16 found
Sort by:
  1. A. H. Coxon (2009). The Fragments of Parmenides: A Critical Text with Introduction and Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Parmenides Publishing.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Eberhard Beckers & A. H. Coxon (2000). Dol, Marcel/Martje Fentener van Vlissingen/Soemini Kasanmoentalib. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31:189-191.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. A. H. Coxon (1999). The Philosophy of Forms: An Analytical and Historical Commentary on Plato's Parmenides: With a New English Translation. Van Gorcum.
    I FORMS IN THE PRE-SOCRATIC PHYSICISTS Plato's dialogue Parmenides carried in the classification of Thrasyllus the editorial subtitle nepi i6«ov, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. A. H. Coxon (1988). The Fragments of Parmenides. Phronesis 33 (1):119-119.
  5. A. H. Coxon (1968). The Manuscript Tradition of Simplicius' Commentary on Aristotle's Physics I-Iv. Classical Quarterly 18 (01):70-.
    The following discussion' of the manuscript tradition of Simplicius' commentary on Aristotle's Physics i-iv originated in an examination of the tradition of the fragments of Parmenides. It is therefore illustrated not only from Simplicius but particularly from the texts of Parmenides quoted by him. This will not be misleading, since, though many of these texts are quoted by Simplicius more than once, there is little or no sign in any manuscript of interpolation from one passage to another and it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. A. H. Coxon (1968). The Text of Parmenides Fr. I. 3. Classical Quarterly 18 (01):69-.
    In all texts of the fragments of Parmenides printed in the last fifty years he begins his poem by speaking of ‘the way which’ ‘carries through all towns the man who knows’ . The more percipient critics have realized that is difficult or impossible to defend, for it makes no good sense and is incompatible with 1. 27, according to which the way is . In fact , which is alleged to be the reading of the best manuscript of Sextus' (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. A. H. Coxon (1962). Lucretius as Expositor Gerhard Müller: Die Darstellung der Kinetik bei Lukrez. Pp. 130 Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1959. Paper, DM. 15.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (01):54-55.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. A. H. Coxon & R. D. Murray (1961). The Motif of Io in Aeschylus' Suppliants. Journal of Hellenic Studies 81:161.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. A. H. Coxon (1958). Persica. Classical Quarterly 8 (1-2):45-.
    In writing the following notes on some passages in Aeschylus' Persae I have consulted mainly the editions of Schiitz, Blomfield, Hermann, Paley, Vitelli–Wecklein, Sidgwick, Prickard, Wilamowitz, Mazon, and Italie , and the Index of Italie. The text quoted is that of Murray.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. A. H. Coxon (1956). Specimens of Greek Dramatic Poets F. L. Lucas: Greek Drama for Everyman. Pp. Xxv+454. London: Dent, 1954. Cloth, 21s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 6 (02):116-117.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. A. H. Coxon (1955). Euripides. The Classical Review 5 (01):43-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. A. H. Coxon (1955). Euripides L. H. G. Greenwood: Aspects of Euripidean Tragedy. Pp. Vii+144. Cambridge: University Press, 1953. Cloth, 18s. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (01):43-44.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. A. H. Coxon (1947). The Μλος Πò Σκηνς in Sophocles' Trachiniae (Ll. 1004–1043). The Classical Review 61 (3-4):69-72.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. A. H. Coxon (1946). Review of W. J. Verdenius: Parmenides: Some Comments on His Poem. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (02):68-69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. A. H. Coxon (1934). Joseph Souilhé: L'énigme d'Emptédocle. Pp. 23. (Archives de Philosophic, Vol. IX, Cahier III.) Paris: Beauchesne, 1934. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 48 (04):146-147.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. A. H. Coxon (1934). The Philosophy of Parmenides. Classical Quarterly 28 (3-4):134-.
    In the Classical Quarterly for April, 1933, Professor Cornford maintains that the ‘Two Ways’ of Parmenides are not meant as alternatives: ‘The Way of Truth and the Way of Seeming are no more parallel and alternative systems of cosmology, each complete in itself, than are Plato's accounts of the intellectual and sensible worlds.’ I wish here to try to support his general view, which seems to me to be indisputably correct, while differing from Professor Cornford in some important details.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation