19 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: A.M. Viens (University of Southampton, Ruhr-University Bochum)
  1. A. M. Viens, M. J. Smith, C. M. Bensimon & D. S. Silva (2014). Justifying the Initiation and Continued Provision of Public Health Interventions in Humanitarian Settings. Public Health Ethics 7 (3):314-317.
    Médecins Sans Frontières is not morally required to continue providing the same therapeutic and preventative interventions for lead poisoning in Nigeria in the face of conditions that negatively impact on the achievement of their objectives. Nevertheless, Médecins Sans Frontières may have reasons to revise their objectives and adopt different interventions or methods.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. A. M. Viens (2013). Disadvantage, Social Justice and Paternalism. Public Health Ethics 6 (1):28-34.
    While Powers and Faden do not consider possible anti-paternalism objections to their view, there are two variants of this objection that a social justice perspective is susceptible to. It is worth exploring which responses to such objections may be less promising than others. It is argued that for most public health measures targeting the disadvantaged, theorists and practitioners taking a social justice perspective should bite the paternalist bullet. Insofar as the government has the ability to reduce mortality and morbidity within (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. A. M. Viens & Michael Selgelid (eds.) (2012). Emergency Ethics. Ashgate.
    Emergencies are extreme events which threaten to cause massive disruption to society and negatively affect the physical and psychological well-being of its members. They raise important practical and theoretical questions about how we should treat each other in times of "crisis". The articles selected for this volume focus on the nature and significance of emergencies; ethical issues in emergency public policy and law; war, terrorism and supreme emergencies; and public health and humanitarian emergencies. Together they demonstrate the normative implications of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. A. M. Viens (2010). Mark C. Murphy, Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 27 (3):206-208.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. A. M. Viens, Cécile M. Bensimon & Ross E. G. Upshur (2009). Your Liberty or Your Life: Reciprocity in the Use of Restrictive Measures in Contexts of Contagion. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 6 (2):207-217.
    In this paper, we explore the role of reciprocity in the employment of restrictive measures in contexts of contagion. Reciprocity should be understood as a substantive value that governs the use, level and extent of restrictive measures. We also argue that independent of the role reciprocity plays in the legitimisation the use of restrictive measures, reciprocity can also motivate support and compliance with legitimate restrictive measures. The importance of reciprocity has implications for how restrictive measures should be undertaken when preparing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Peter A. Singer & A. M. Viens (eds.) (2008). The Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
    Medicine and health care generate many bioethical problems and dilemmas that are of great academic, professional and public interest. This comprehensive resource is designed as a succinct yet authoritative text and reference for clinicians, bioethicists, and advanced students seeking a better understanding of ethics problems in the clinical setting. Each chapter illustrates an ethical problem that might be encountered in everyday practice; defines the concepts at issue; examines their implications from the perspectives of ethics, law and policy; and then provides (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. A. M. Viens (2008). Joshua Gert, Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), Pp. XIII + 244. [REVIEW] Utilitas 20 (2):246-248.
  8. A. M. Viens (2008). Public Health, Ethical Behavior and Reciprocity. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (5):1 – 3.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. A. M. Viens (2008). Towards a Reasons-Based Pragmatic Ethical Framework. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):41 – 43.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jeffrey R. Bibbee & A. M. Viens (2007). The Inseparability of Religion and Politics in the Neoconservative Critique of Biotechnology. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (10):18 – 20.
  11. A. M. Viens (2007). Addiction, Responsibility and Moral Psychology. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (1):17 – 19.
    The author comments on several articles on addiction. Recent developments in neuroscience suggest that addicted individuals have substantial impairments in the cognitive control of voluntary behavior. The author differs on the observations that addicts either act on desires that are not conducive to rational action. The author also states that addiction seems to be a prime manifestation of akrasia, in which one fails to be motivated to act in accordance with what one judges ought to be done. Accession Number: 24077920; (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. A. M. Viens (2007). Criminal Law in the Regulation of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (2):73-5.
  13. A. M. Viens (2007). Mark C. Murphy, Natural Law in Jurisprudence and Politics. Philosophy in Review 27 (3):206.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. A. M. Viens (2007). The Use of Functional Neuroimaging Technology in the Assessment of Loss and Damages in Tort Law. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (9):63-65.
  15. A. M. Viens (2004). Value Judgment, Harm, and Religious Liberty. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):241-247.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. A. M. Viens (2004). Prudential Motives and Reciprocal Altruism. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (4):44 – 46.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. A. M. Viens & Julian Savulescu (2004). Introduction to The Olivieri Symposium. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):1-7.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. A. M. Viens (2001). Operation of Justice in a Public Healthcare System. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):1c-2c.
  19. A. M. Viens (2001). Socio-Economic Status and Inducement to Participate. American Journal of Bioethics 1 (2):1f-2f.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation