17 found
Order:
  1.  8
    Dimiter Ginev & Asarja Polikarov (1988). The Scientification of Methodology of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 19 (1):18-27.
    Unter dem Begriff der "Verwissenschaftlichung der Methodologie der Wissenschaft" verstehen wir den Einfluß wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnis auf die eine oder andere Art und Weise auf die Methodologie der Wissenschaft, insbesondere den Gebrauch von wissenschaftlichen Ideen und Methoden für die Formulierung und Lösung von methodologischen Problemen der Wissenschaft und Problemen der Methodologie selbst. Es werden vier Haupttendenzen im Prozeß der Verwissenschaftlichung der Methodologie vorgestellt: der Übergang vom "statement view" zum mathematischen Holismus; die Verwissenschaftlichung auf system-theoretischer Basis; der Einzug soziologischer Methoden in die (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  8
    A. Polikarov (1995). Concerning the Integration of Sciences: Kinds and Stages. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (2):297 - 312.
    The detailed analysis allows to discern seven kinds of integration, namely: I₁ consisting in the synthesis of scientific disciplines from their elements, including disciplinary unification I₁; I₂ inclusion of a science in (reduction to) another, more general; I₃ - links between different sciences, especially establishing of common elements; I₄ - interdisciplines bridging various sciences; I₅ - combination of two (or more) disciplines into a new (complex) science; I₆ - a general approach to several domains or multidisciplinary unification; I₇ - transdisciplinary (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  10
    A. Polikarov (1993). Is There an Incommensurability Between Superseding Theories? Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):127 - 146.
    According to the Incommensurability Thesis (IT) superseding scientific theories (paradigms) are incommensurable. Unlike many authors we do not discuss whether there is a relationship of this kind. We take for granted that this may be the case, and see the problem in the endeavour to establish the domain of validity of the IT. The notion incommensurability (Ic) is derivative from the concepts of scientific paradigm (P) and scientific revolution (R). There are several concepts of P, as well as various conceptions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  2
    Azaria Polikarov (1974). Determinism in Physics. Russian Studies in Philosophy 13 (1):67-85.
    When does a particular radioactive atom decay? Where will a particular electron be and with what velocity will it move ?
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  2
    A. Polikarov (1993). Is There an Incommensurability Between Superseding Theories? On the Validity of the Incommensurability Thesis. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 24 (1):127 - 146.
    According to the Incommensurability Thesis (IT) superseding scientific theories (paradigms) are incommensurable. Unlike many authors we do not discuss whether there is a relationship of this kind. We take for granted that this may be the case, and see the problem in the endeavour to establish the domain of validity of the IT. The notion incommensurability (Ic) is derivative from the concepts of scientific paradigm (P) and scientific revolution (R). There are several concepts of P, as well as various conceptions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  7
    A. Polikarov (1998). A Draft for Unifying Controversies in Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 29 (2):225-244.
    The basic (negative and positive) methodological maxims of three currents of philosophy of science (logical empiricism, falsificationism, and postpositivism) are formulated. Many of these maxims (stratagems) are controversial, e.g., the stance about the nonsense of metaphysics, and that of its indispensability. The restricted validity of these maxims allows for their unification. Within the framework of most of them there may be a relationship of (synchronic, or diachronic) subordination of the contradicting desiderata. In this vein ten stratagems are formulated.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Asaria Polikarov (1989). Über den Charakter von Einstein philosophischen Realismus. Philosophia Naturalis 26 (1):135-158.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Azaria Prizenti Polikarov, Dimitur Ginev & R. S. Cohen (1997). Issues and Images in the Philosophy of Science Scientific and Philosophical Essays for Azarya Polikarov.
  9. Azari͡a Prizenti Polikarov (1983). Methodological Problems of Science: The Iteration Cycle: Science--Methodology of Science. Pub. House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Azaria Polikarov (1989). On the Nature of Einstein's Realism'. Epistemologia 12 (2):277-304.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. A. Polikarov (1980). On the Relation of the Philosophy and the Special Sciences. Filosoficky Casopis 28 (2):177-189.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Azarya Polikarov (1993). On Various Kinds of Scientific Revolution in Physics. Epistemologia 16 (2):213-234.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. A. Polikarov (1968). Philosophie und physik in den Ost-europäischen ländern Von. In Raymond Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy. Firenze, la Nuova Italia 2--232.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Azari͡a Prizenti Polikarov (1973). Science and Philosophy. Sofia,House of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. A. Polikarov (1974). The Divergent-Convergent Method—a Heuristic Approach to Problem-Solving. In R. S. Cohen & Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences. Boston,Reidel 211--233.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Azarya Polikarov (1974). The Divergent-Convergent Method. In R. S. Cohen & Marx W. Wartofsky (eds.), Methodological and Historical Essays in the Natural and Social Sciences. Boston,Reidel 4--213.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. A. Polikarov (1968). Zum kausalitatsproblem Von. In Raymond Klibansky (ed.), Contemporary Philosophy. Firenze, la Nuova Italia 2--298.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography