Search results for 'Aaron Barth' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Aaron Barth (University of Western Ontario)
  1. Aaron Barth (2012). A Refutation of Frege's Context Principle? Thought 1 (1):26-35.score: 240.0
    This paper explores the limitations of current empirical approaches to the philosophy of language in light of a recent criticism of Frege's context principle. According to this criticism, the context principle is in conflict with certain features of natural language use and this is held to undermine its application in Foundations of Arithmetic. I argue that this view is mistaken because the features with which the context principle is alleged to be in conflict are irrelevant to the principle's methodological significance (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Aaron Barth (2013). Anti- Naturalism: The Role of Non-Empirical Methods in Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):196-206.score: 240.0
    Some naturalistic conceptions of philosophical methodologies interpret the doctrine that philosophy is continuous with science to mean that philosophical investigations must implement empirical methods and must not depart from the experimental results that the scientific application of those methods reveal. In this paper, I argue that while our answers to philosophical questions are certainly constrained by empirical considerations, this does not imply that the methods by which these questions are correctly settled are wholly captured by empirical methods. Many historical cases (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. James L. Barth (1985). Egyptian Social Studies Teachers' Responses To The Barth/Shermis Social Studies Preference Scale. Journal of Social Studies Research 9 (2):15-25.score: 180.0
  4. Friederike Barth (2011). Die Wirklichkeit des Guten: Dietrich Bonhoeffers "Ethik" Und Ihr Philosophischer Hintergrund. Mohr Siebeck.score: 60.0
    Besonderes Augenmerk richtet Friederike Barth dabei auf den philosophischen Hintergrund dieses Werks, da die in derEthikentworfene ethische Theologie Bonhoeffers auf einem zumeist unausgewiesenen, differenzierten Rezeptions- und ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Christian Barth (2011). Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism. Routledge.score: 60.0
    Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20 th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. (...) offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Richard I. Aaron (1965). Wittgenstein's Theory of Universals. Mind 74 (294):249-251.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sloman Aaron (1971). Tarski, Frege and the Liar Paradox. Philosophy 46 (176):133-.score: 30.0
  8. R. I. Aaron (1945). A Possible Early Draft of Hobbes' de Corpore. Mind 54 (216):342-356.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. R. I. Aaron (1931). Locke and Berkeley's Commonplace Book. Mind 40 (160):439-459.score: 30.0
  10. Susan C. Johnson, Carol S. Dweck, Frances S. Chen, Hilarie L. Stern, Su-Jeong Ok & Maria Barth (2010). At the Intersection of Social and Cognitive Development: Internal Working Models of Attachment in Infancy. Cognitive Science 34 (5):807-825.score: 30.0
    Three visual habituation studies using abstract animations tested the claim that infants’ attachment behavior in the Strange Situation procedure corresponds to their expectations about caregiver–infant interactions. Three unique patterns of expectations were revealed. Securely attached infants expected infants to seek comfort from caregivers and expected caregivers to provide comfort. Insecure-resistant infants not only expected infants to seek comfort from caregivers but also expected caregivers to withhold comfort. Insecure-avoidant infants expected infants to avoid seeking comfort from caregivers and expected caregivers to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Daniel J. Povinelli & Jochen Barth (2005). Reinterpreting Behavior: A Human Specialization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):712-713.score: 30.0
    Tomasello et al. argue that the “small difference that made a big difference” in the evolution of the human mind was the disposition to share intentions. Chimpanzees are said to understand certain mental states (like intentions), but not share them. We argue that an alternative model is better supported by the data: the capacity to represent mental states (and other unobservable phenomena) is a human specialization that co-evolved with natural language.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Richard I. Aaron (1958). John Locke and The Way of Ideas. By John W. Yolton. (Oxford: Clarendon Press; London: Cumberlege. 1956. Pp. Xii + 235. Price 30s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 33 (125):175-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. R. I. Aaron (1952). Dispensing with Mind. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:225-242.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Austin Duncan-Jones, G. B. Keene, G. C. J. Midgley, Karl Britton, G. E. L. Owen, H. D. Lewis, Edna Daitz, J. L. Ackrill, Martha Kneale, Frederick C. Copleston, J. O. Urmson, J. P. Corbett & R. I. Aaron (1953). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 62 (246):259-288.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. J. N. Findlay, Iris Murdoch, A. C. A. Rainer, G. J. Warnock, John Holloway, G. C. Stead, R. I. Aaron, P. T. Geach, A. H. Armstrong, R. H. Thouless, R. J. Spilsbury & W. B. Gallie (1950). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 59 (234):262-284.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Petra Stoerig & E. Barth (2001). Low-Level Phenomenal Vision Despite Unilateral Destruction of Primary Visual Cortex. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):574-587.score: 30.0
    GY, an extensively studied human hemianope, is aware of salient visual events in his cortically blind field but does not call this ''vision.'' To learn whether he has low-level conscious visual sensations or whether instead he has gained conscious knowledge about, or access to, visual information that does not produce a conscious phenomenal sensation, we attempted to image process a stimulus s presented to the impaired field so that when the transformed stimulus T(s) was presented to the normal hemifield it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard Ithamar Aaron (1952). The Theory of Universals. Oxford [Eng.]Clarendon Press.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Julia J. Aaron (2004). Book Review: Elizabeth Porter. Recent Contributions to Feminist Ethics: A Review of Feminist Perspectives on Ethics Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education, 1999); James Sterba. Three Challenges to Ethics; and Janna Thompson. Discourse and Knowledge. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (2):201-208.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. R. I. Aaron (1945). Critical Notices. Mind 54 (213):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Hilary Barth (2008). Do Mental Magnitudes Form Part of the Foundation for Natural Number Concepts? Don't Count Them Out Yet. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):644-645.score: 30.0
    The current consensus among most researchers is that natural number is not built solely upon a foundation of mental magnitudes. On their way to the conclusion that magnitudes do not form any part of that foundation, Rips et al. pass rather quickly by theories suggesting that mental magnitudes might play some role. These theories deserve a closer look.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. John Laird, W. J. H. Sprott, R. I. Aaron, F. C. S. Schiller & M. Black (1936). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 45 (178):252-267.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. R. I. Aaron (1933). John Locke (1632-1704). The Adamson Lecture for 1932. By Norman Kemp Smith, D.Litt., LL.D., F.B.A. (Manchester Univ. Press. 1933. Pp. 32. Price 2s. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 8 (31):370-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. E. M. Barth & J. L. Martens (eds.) (1982). Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation: Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978. Benjamins.score: 30.0
    The contributions in the first part Re-modelling logic of this volume take account of formal logic in the theory of rational argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. W. D. Lamont, H. R. Mackintosh, H. Barker, R. I. Aaron, H. B. Acton, M. H., Ralph Tyler Flewelling & J. W. Scott (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):98-114.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. R. I. Aaron (1937). John Locke and English Literature of the Eighteenth Century. By Kenneth Maclean. (Newhaven: Yale University Press; London: Oxford University Press, Humphrey Milford, 1936. 11S. 6d. Pp. Viii X 176. Price 2 Dollars 50; 11s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 12 (47):355-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ronald S. Barth (1969). Open Education – Assumptions About Learning. Educational Philosophy and Theory 1 (2):29–39.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Anthony Quinton, Peter Alexander, L. Minio-Paluello & Richard I. Aaron (1959). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 68 (269):105-118.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Susan Corrine Aaron (2002). A Technologically Mediated Phenomenon Affecting Human Dynamics. World Futures 58 (1):81 – 99.score: 30.0
    This paper will suggest a mapping for human dynamics to see where emerging digital technology currently and could further affect the dynamics of the human, technological and natural, and the cultural forms that define them. Emerging technology will be seen to reveal and surpass the limitations of human measures built on human abilities and perception. and the social structures that are derived from them. The formation of this conceptual mapping is based on the premise that digital technology has the ability (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. R. I. Aaron (1942). Intuitive Knowledge. Mind 51 (204):297-318.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. R. I. Aaron (1936). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 45 (178):283-287.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. E. M. Barth (1976). Phenomenology, Grammar, or Theory of Argumentation?: A Plea for Meta-Philosophical Change, Applied to the Problems of Nominalization and of Negation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 4 (2):163-182.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Ulrich Barth (2001). Von der cartesianischen zur hermeneutischen Subjektivität. Werkgeschichtliche Annäherungen an Heideggers Sein und Zeit. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 83 (2):180-198.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. A. E. Taylor, T. E. Jessop, A. K. Stout, E. J. Thomas, R. I. Aaron, F. C. S. Schiller & John Laird (1931). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 40 (159):386-403.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. R. I. Aaron (1932). A Catalogue of Berkeley's Library. Mind 41 (164):465-475.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. R. I. Aaron (1931). Critical Notices. Mind 40 (157):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. R. I. Aaron (1933). Critical Notices. Mind 42 (167):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. R. I. Aaron & W. G. de Burgh (1943). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 52 (207):283-287.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. R. I. Aaron (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):283-287.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. E. M. Barth (1977). The Logical Paradigm in Dialectical Philosophy and Science. Erkenntnis 11 (1):291 - 322.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Richard Aaron & Philip Walters (1965). Locke and the Intuitionist Theory of Number. Philosophy 40 (153):197 - 206.score: 30.0
  41. R. I. Aaron (1930). Critical Notices. Mind 39 (156):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. R. I. Aaron (1932). Dr. Johnston's Edition of the Commonplace Book. Mind 41 (162):277-278.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Richard Ithamar Aaron (1971). Knowing and the Function of Reason. Oxford,Clarendon Press.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. I. Aaron, L. J. Russell, S. V. Keeling, H. J. Paton, W. D. Lamont, T. E. Jessop, V. W. & A. C. Ewing (1930). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 39 (155):376-394.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. R. I. Aaron & John Wisdom (1945). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 54 (215):280-282.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. E. M. Barth (1984). A New Field: Empirical Logic Bioprograms, Logemes and Logics as Institutions. Synthese 58 (2):375 - 388.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. R. I. Aaron (1946). The Nature of Metaphysical Thinking. By Dorothy M. Emmet. (London: Macmillan & Co., Ltd., 1945. Pp. Xii and 238. Price 10s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 21 (78):79-.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. R. I. Aaron (1932). Critical Notices. Mind 41 (161):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. R. I. Aaron (1939). Two Senses of the Word Universal. Mind 48 (190):168-185.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. E. M. Barth (1985). A New Field: Empirical Logic Bioprograms, Logemes and Logics as Institutions. Synthese 63 (3):375 - 388.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000