Search results for 'Aaron Barth' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Aaron Barth (University of Western Ontario)
  1.  51
    Aaron Barth (2012). A Refutation of Frege's Context Principle? Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):26-35.
    This paper explores the limitations of current empirical approaches to the philosophy of language in light of a recent criticism of Frege's context principle. According to this criticism, the context principle is in conflict with certain features of natural language use and this is held to undermine its application in Foundations of Arithmetic. I argue that this view is mistaken because the features with which the context principle is alleged to be in conflict are irrelevant to the principle's methodological significance (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  22
    Aaron Barth (2013). Anti- Naturalism: The Role of Non-Empirical Methods in Philosophy. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (3):196-206.
    Some naturalistic conceptions of philosophical methodologies interpret the doctrine that philosophy is continuous with science to mean that philosophical investigations must implement empirical methods and must not depart from the experimental results that the scientific application of those methods reveal. In this paper, I argue that while our answers to philosophical questions are certainly constrained by empirical considerations, this does not imply that the methods by which these questions are correctly settled are wholly captured by empirical methods. Many historical cases (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  3
    James L. Barth (1985). Egyptian Social Studies Teachers' Responses To The Barth/Shermis Social Studies Preference Scale. Journal of Social Studies Research 9 (2):15-25.
  4. Hans Barth (1946). Natur Und Geist Fritz Medicus Zum Siebzigsten Geburtstag, 23. April. 1946 / [Hrsg. Von Hans Barth Und Walter Rüegg]. Mit Portraitskizze von Cuno Amiet. [REVIEW] E. Rentsch.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Heinrich Barth & Gerhard Huber (1960). Philosophie Und Christliche Existenz Festschrift Für Heinrich Barth Zum 70. Geburtstag Am 3. Februar 1960. Helbing & Lichtenhahn.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Karl Barth & Martin Rumscheidt (1986). The Way of Theology in Karl Barth Essays and Comments. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Heinrich Barth, Günther Hauff, Hans Rudolf Schweizer & Armin Wildermuth (1990). In Erscheinung Treten Heinrich Barths Philosophie des Ästhetischen.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  2
    Friederike Barth (2011). Die Wirklichkeit des Guten: Dietrich Bonhoeffers "Ethik" Und Ihr Philosophischer Hintergrund. Mohr Siebeck.
    Besonderes Augenmerk richtet Friederike Barth dabei auf den philosophischen Hintergrund dieses Werks, da die in derEthikentworfene ethische Theologie Bonhoeffers auf einem zumeist unausgewiesenen, differenzierten Rezeptions- und ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    Christian Barth (2011). Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism. Routledge.
    Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20 th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. (...) offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Christian Barth (2015). Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism. Routledge.
    Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20 th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. (...) offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Christian Barth (2014). Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism. Routledge.
    Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20 th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. (...) offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Christian Barth (2010). Objectivity and the Language-Dependence of Thought: A Transcendental Defence of Universal Lingualism. Routledge.
    Does thought depend on language? Primarily as a consequence of the cognitive turn in empirical disciplines like psychology and ethology, many current empirical researchers and empirically minded philosophers tend to answer this question in the negative. This book rejects this mainstream view and develops a philosophical argument in favor of a universal dependence of language on thought. In doing so, it comprises insights of two primary representatives of 20 th century and contemporary philosophy, namely Donald Davidson and Robert Brandom. (...) offers an introduction to the debate concerning the language-dependence of thought and lays the methodological foundation for the subsequent argument in favor of a universal dependence of thought on language, presenting an account and defense of the transcendental method in reference to the writings of Peter F. Strawson. He then offers a transcendental argument in favor of a universal language-dependence of thought, beginning with a reevaluation of a basic idea for an argument originally presented by Donald Davidson. Later, two main objections to the conclusion of this transcendental argument are addressed and rejected using Robert Brandom’s inferentialist and normativist account of thought and language. In the course of doing so, the recent debate on Brandom’s work is addressed extensively, and main objections to Brandom’s work are presented and answered. (shrink)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  3
    Karl Barth (2004). Church Dogmatics. Edinburgh: T and T Clark.
    I. THE TASK OF DOGMATICS As a theological discipline dogmatics is the scientific self- examination of the Christian Church with respect to the content of ...
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   34 citations  
  14.  15
    Elizabeth Spelke & Hilary Barth (2003). The Construction of Large Number Representations in Adults. Cognition 86 (3):201-221.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   45 citations  
  15. E. M. Barth (1982). From Axiom to Dialogue: A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. W. De Gruyter.
  16.  19
    Hilary Barth, Kristen La Mont, Jennifer Lipton, Stanislas Dehaene, Nancy Kanwisher & Elizabeth Spelke (2006). Non-Symbolic Arithmetic in Adults and Young Children. Cognition 98 (3):199-222.
  17. R. I. Aaron (1936). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 45 (178):283-287.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. R. J. Aaron (1932). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 41 (163):283-287.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. R. I. Aaron (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):283-287.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. A. E. Taylor, T. E. Jessop, A. K. Stout, E. J. Thomas, R. I. Aaron, F. C. S. Schiller & John Laird (1931). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 40 (159):386-403.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  89
    J. Barth (2004). Interlude 4 Telling and Listening to Stories. Diogenes 51 (3):133-134.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  16
    Petra Stoerig & E. Barth (2001). Low-Level Phenomenal Vision Despite Unilateral Destruction of Primary Visual Cortex. Consciousness and Cognition 10 (4):574-587.
    GY, an extensively studied human hemianope, is aware of salient visual events in his cortically blind field but does not call this ''vision.'' To learn whether he has low-level conscious visual sensations or whether instead he has gained conscious knowledge about, or access to, visual information that does not produce a conscious phenomenal sensation, we attempted to image process a stimulus s presented to the impaired field so that when the transformed stimulus T(s) was presented to the normal hemifield it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  23. R. I. Aaron & John Wisdom (1945). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 54 (215):280-282.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. R. I. Aaron (1953). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 62 (246):283-287.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  31
    R. I. Aaron (1942). Intuitive Knowledge. Mind 51 (204):297-318.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  78
    E. M. Barth (1976). Phenomenology, Grammar, or Theory of Argumentation?: A Plea for Meta-Philosophical Change, Applied to the Problems of Nominalization and of Negation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 4 (2):163-182.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  15
    E. M. Barth & J. L. Martens (eds.) (1982). Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation: Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978. Benjamins.
    The contributions in the first part Re-modelling logic of this volume take account of formal logic in the theory of rational argumentation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  28.  17
    John Laird, W. J. H. Sprott, R. I. Aaron, F. C. S. Schiller & M. Black (1936). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 45 (178):252-267.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  40
    R. I. Aaron (1939). Two Senses of the Word Universal. Mind 48 (190):168-185.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  68
    R. I. Aaron (1931). Locke and Berkeley's Commonplace Book. Mind 40 (160):439-459.
  31.  66
    Richard I. Aaron (1965). Wittgenstein's Theory of Universals. Mind 74 (294):249-251.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  12
    Hilary Barth (2008). Do Mental Magnitudes Form Part of the Foundation for Natural Number Concepts? Don't Count Them Out Yet. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (6):644-645.
    The current consensus among most researchers is that natural number is not built solely upon a foundation of mental magnitudes. On their way to the conclusion that magnitudes do not form any part of that foundation, Rips et al. pass rather quickly by theories suggesting that mental magnitudes might play some role. These theories deserve a closer look.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  44
    Sloman Aaron (1971). Tarski, Frege and the Liar Paradox. Philosophy 46 (176):133-.
    A.1. Some philosophers, including Tarski and Russell, have concluded from a study of various versions of the Liar Paradox ‘that there must be a hierarchy of languages, and that the words “true” and “false”, as applied to statements in any given language, are themselves words belonging to a language of higher order’. In his famous essay on truth Tarski claimed that ‘colloquial’ language is inconsistent as a result of its property of ‘universality’: that is, whatever can be said at all (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  25
    Daniel J. Povinelli & Jochen Barth (2005). Reinterpreting Behavior: A Human Specialization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):712-713.
    Tomasello et al. argue that the “small difference that made a big difference” in the evolution of the human mind was the disposition to share intentions. Chimpanzees are said to understand certain mental states (like intentions), but not share them. We argue that an alternative model is better supported by the data: the capacity to represent mental states (and other unobservable phenomena) is a human specialization that co-evolved with natural language.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Karl Barth (1960/1985). Anselm, Fides Quaerens Intellectum: Anselm's Proof of the Existence of God in the Context of His Theological Scheme. Pickwick Press.
  36. Karl Barth (1960). Anselm: Fides Quaerens Intellectum. Richmond, Va.,John Knox Press.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  37.  9
    Anthony Quinton, Peter Alexander, L. Minio-Paluello & Richard I. Aaron (1959). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 68 (269):105-118.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  23
    R. I. Aaron (1952). Dispensing with Mind. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:225-242.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  26
    E. M. Barth (1977). The Logical Paradigm in Dialectical Philosophy and Science. Erkenntnis 11 (1):291 - 322.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  7
    E. M. Barth (1985). A New Field: Empirical Logic Bioprograms, Logemes and Logics as Institutions. Synthese 63 (3):375 - 388.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  35
    R. I. Aaron (1945). A Possible Early Draft of Hobbes' de Corpore. Mind 54 (216):342-356.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  19
    Richard Ithamar Aaron (1952). The Theory of Universals. Oxford [Eng.]Clarendon Press.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  43.  7
    A. K. Stout, F. C. S. Schiller, R. B. Brathwaite, James Drever, R. I. Aaron, H. R. Mackintosh, E. S. Waterhouse, O. de Selincourt, A. C. Ewing, T. E. & M. D. (1930). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 39 (156):502-530.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  24
    Susan C. Johnson, Carol S. Dweck, Frances S. Chen, Hilarie L. Stern, Su-Jeong Ok & Maria Barth (2010). At the Intersection of Social and Cognitive Development: Internal Working Models of Attachment in Infancy. Cognitive Science 34 (5):807-825.
    Three visual habituation studies using abstract animations tested the claim that infants’ attachment behavior in the Strange Situation procedure corresponds to their expectations about caregiver–infant interactions. Three unique patterns of expectations were revealed. Securely attached infants expected infants to seek comfort from caregivers and expected caregivers to provide comfort. Insecure-resistant infants not only expected infants to seek comfort from caregivers but also expected caregivers to withhold comfort. Insecure-avoidant infants expected infants to avoid seeking comfort from caregivers and expected caregivers to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  4
    R. I. Aaron (1950). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 59 (234):283-287.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    R. I. Aaron (1931). Critical Notices. Mind 40 (157):86-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  6
    R. I. Aaron (1933). Critical Notices. Mind 42 (167):86-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  18
    Julia J. Aaron (2004). Book Review: Elizabeth Porter. Recent Contributions to Feminist Ethics: A Review of Feminist Perspectives on Ethics Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education, 1999); James Sterba. Three Challenges to Ethics; and Janna Thompson. Discourse and Knowledge. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (2):201-208.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  11
    W. D. Lamont, H. R. Mackintosh, H. Barker, R. I. Aaron, H. B. Acton, M. H., Ralph Tyler Flewelling & J. W. Scott (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):98-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  5
    R. I. Aaron (1930). Critical Notices. Mind 39 (156):86-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000