Search results for 'Aaron Frankel' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Aaron Frankel (2006). Memo in Memoriam: A Visit with Santayana. Philosophical Forum 37 (2):227–230.score: 240.0
  2. Mark S. Frankel (1989). Professional Codes: Why, How, and with What Impact? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2-3):109 - 115.score: 30.0
    A tension between the professions' pursuit of autonomy and the public's demand for accountability has led to the development of codes of ethics as both a foundation and guide for professional conduct in the face of morally ambiguous situations. The profession as an institution serves as a normative reference group for individual practitioners and through a code of ethics clarifies, for both its members and outsiders, the norms that ought to govern professional behavior. Three types of codes can be identified (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Melissa Frankel (2009). Something-We-Know-Not-What, Something-We-Know-Not-Why: Berkeley, Meaning and Minds. Philosophia 37 (3):381-402.score: 30.0
    It is sometimes suggested that Berkeley adheres to an empirical criterion of meaning, on which a term is meaningful just in case it signifies an idea (i.e., an immediate object of perceptual experience). This criterion is thought to underlie his rejection of the term ‘matter’ as meaningless. As is well known, Berkeley thinks that it is impossible to perceive matter. If one cannot perceive matter, then, per Berkeley, one can have no idea of it; if one can have no idea (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Charles Frankel (1971). Equality of Opportunity. Ethics 81 (3):191-211.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Richard I. Aaron (1965). Wittgenstein's Theory of Universals. Mind 74 (294):249-251.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ellen Frankel, Fred Dycus Miller & Jeffrey Paul (eds.) (2000). Natural Law and Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 30.0
    These essays address some of the most intriguing questions raised by natural law theory and its implications for law, morality, and public policy. some of the essays explore the implications that natural law theory has for jurisprudence, asking what natural law suggests about the use of legal devices such as constitutions and precedents. Other essays examine the connections between natural law and various political concepts, such as citizens' rights and the obligation of citizens to obey their government.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Mark S. Frankel (forthcoming). Private Interests Count Too Commentary on “Science, Democracy, and the Right to Research”. Science and Engineering Ethics.score: 30.0
    Along with concerns about the deleterious effects of politically driven government intervention on science are the intrusion of private sector interests into the conduct of research and the reporting of its results. Scientists are generally unprepared for the challenges posed by private interests seeking to advance their economic, political, or ideological agendas. They must educate and prepare themselves for assaults on scientific freedom, not because it is a legal right, but rather because social progress depends on it.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Melissa Frankel (2012). Berkeley and God in the Quad. Philosophy Compass 7 (6):388-396.score: 30.0
  9. Sloman Aaron (1971). Tarski, Frege and the Liar Paradox. Philosophy 46 (176):133-.score: 30.0
  10. Melissa Frankel (2009). Berkeley, Meaning and Minds: Remarks on Glezakos' Comments. Philosophia 37 (3):409-413.score: 30.0
    This is a response to Stavroula Glezakos’ commentary on my paper, in which I address three main points: (1) whether Berkeley is entitled to argue via inference to the best explanation, (2) whether Berkeley’s likeness principle might be too strict, and (3) whether the texts support my reading.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. R. I. Aaron (1945). A Possible Early Draft of Hobbes' de Corpore. Mind 54 (216):342-356.score: 30.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Benjamin Frankel (ed.) (1996). Realism: Restatements and Renewal. F. Cass.score: 30.0
    The original essays collected in this book offer a comprehensive evaluation of realism as a theory of international relations. Realism has been the subject of critical scrutiny for some time and this examination aims to identify and define its strengths and shortcomings. In the realist family there has been a flourishing of variants and interpretations, a fact that many critics of realism tend to obscure or dismiss. In the past decade and a half we have seen the emergence of neo-realism, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Howard Rachlin & Marvin Frankel (1997). The Uses of Self-Deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (1):124-125.score: 30.0
    The essence of a mental event such as self-deception lies in its function – its place in the life of an animal. But the function of self-deception corresponds to that of interpersonal deception. Therefore self-deception, contrary to Mele's thesis, is essentially isomorphic with interpersonal deception.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. R. I. Aaron (1931). Locke and Berkeley's Commonplace Book. Mind 40 (160):439-459.score: 30.0
  15. Kam-Yuen Cheng, Thomas Ming & L. A. I. Aaron (2011). Can Familism Be Justified? Bioethics 26 (8):431-439.score: 30.0
    This paper argues against the continued practice of Confucian familism, even in its moderate form, in East Asian hospitals. According to moderate familism, a physician acting in concert with the patient's family may withhold diagnostic information from the patient, and may give it to the patient's family members without her prior approval. There are two main approaches to defend moderate familism: one argues that it can uphold patient's autonomy and protect her best interests; the other appeals to cultural relativism by (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Steven Frankel (2002). Spinoza's Dual Teachings of Scripture: His Solution to the Quarrel Between Reason and Revelation. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (3):273-296.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard M. Frankel, Timothy E. Quill & Susan H. McDaniel (eds.) (2003). The Biopsychosocial Approach: Past, Present, and Future. University of Rochester Press.score: 30.0
    According to the biopsychosocial model, developed by the late Dr. George Engel, how physicians approach patients and the problems they present is very much ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Lois Elaine Frankel (1986). Justifying Descartes' Causal Principle. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (3):323-341.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Henry Frankel (1978). Book Review:The Essential Tension Thomas S. Kuhn. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 45 (4):649-.score: 30.0
  20. Lois Frankel (1986). From a Metaphysical Point of View: Leibniz and the Principle of Sufficient Reason. Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):321-334.score: 30.0
    The relation between leibniz's logical and his metaphysical views is the subject of much modern scholarship. Some commentators have argued that his metaphysics is based on his logic; others have taken the opposite position. However, Both sides pose the question in terms of 'priority'. On the contrary, I argue that it is likely that leibniz means the psr to play "both" a logical and a metaphysical role. The ambiguity of leibniz's psr indicates that he equates the metaphysical notion of causation (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Mark S. Frankel & Stephanie J. Bird (2003). The Role of Scientific Societies in Promoting Research Integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):139-140.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. R. I. Aaron (1952). Dispensing with Mind. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 52:225-242.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Richard I. Aaron (1958). John Locke and The Way of Ideas. By John W. Yolton. (Oxford: Clarendon Press; London: Cumberlege. 1956. Pp. Xii + 235. Price 30s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 33 (125):175-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Austin Duncan-Jones, G. B. Keene, G. C. J. Midgley, Karl Britton, G. E. L. Owen, H. D. Lewis, Edna Daitz, J. L. Ackrill, Martha Kneale, Frederick C. Copleston, J. O. Urmson, J. P. Corbett & R. I. Aaron (1953). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 62 (246):259-288.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. J. N. Findlay, Iris Murdoch, A. C. A. Rainer, G. J. Warnock, John Holloway, G. C. Stead, R. I. Aaron, P. T. Geach, A. H. Armstrong, R. H. Thouless, R. J. Spilsbury & W. B. Gallie (1950). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 59 (234):262-284.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Lois Frankel (1989). Damaris Cudworth Masham: A Seventeenth Century Feminist Philosopher. Hypatia 4 (1):80 - 90.score: 30.0
    The daughter of Ralph Cudworth, and friend of John Locke, Damaris Masham was also a philosopher in her own right. She published two, philosophical books, A Discourse Concerning the Love of God and Occasional Thoughts In Reference to a Virtuous and Christian Life. Her primary purpose was to refute John Norris' Malebranchian doctrine that we ought to love only God because only God can give us pleasure, and his criticism of Locke. In addition, she argues for greater educational opportunities for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Julia J. Aaron (2004). Book Review: Elizabeth Porter. Recent Contributions to Feminist Ethics: A Review of Feminist Perspectives on Ethics Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson Education, 1999); James Sterba. Three Challenges to Ethics; and Janna Thompson. Discourse and Knowledge. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (2):201-208.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. R. I. Aaron (1945). Critical Notices. Mind 54 (213):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Henry Frankel (1980). Problem-Solving, Research Traditions, and the Development of Scientific Fields. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:29 - 40.score: 30.0
    The general thesis that science is essentially a problem-solving activity is extended to the development of new fields. Their development represents a research strategy for generating and solving new unsolved problems and solving existing ones in related fields. The pattern of growth of new fields is guided by the central problems within the field and applicable problems in other fields. Proponents of existing research traditions welcome work in new fields, if they believe it will increase the problem-solving effectiveness of their (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Henry Frankel (1979). The Career of Continental Drift Theory: An Application of Imre Lakatos' Analysis of Scientific Growth to the Rise of Drift Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 10 (1):21-66.score: 30.0
  31. Steven Frankel (2002). The Piety of a Heretic: Spinoza's Interpretation of Judaism. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 11 (2):117-134.score: 30.0
  32. John Laird, W. J. H. Sprott, R. I. Aaron, F. C. S. Schiller & M. Black (1936). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 45 (178):252-267.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. R. I. Aaron (1933). John Locke (1632-1704). The Adamson Lecture for 1932. By Norman Kemp Smith, D.Litt., LL.D., F.B.A. (Manchester Univ. Press. 1933. Pp. 32. Price 2s. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 8 (31):370-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. R. I. Aaron (1932). Locke's Theory of Universals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 33:173 - 202.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Richard Ithamar Aaron (1952). The Theory of Universals. Oxford [Eng.]Clarendon Press.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Margot Iverson, Mark S. Frankel & Sanyin Siang (2003). Scientific Societies and Research Integrity: What Are They Doing and How Well Are They Doing It? Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2):141-158.score: 30.0
    Scientific societies can play an important role in promoting ethical research practices among their members, and over the past two decades several studies have addressed how societies perform this role. This survey continues this research by examining current efforts by scientific societies to promote research integrity among their members. The data indicate that although many of the societies are working to promote research integrity through ethics codes and activities, they lack rigorous assessment methods to determine the effectiveness of their efforts.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. W. D. Lamont, H. R. Mackintosh, H. Barker, R. I. Aaron, H. B. Acton, M. H., Ralph Tyler Flewelling & J. W. Scott (1935). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 44 (173):98-114.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. R. I. Aaron (1937). John Locke and English Literature of the Eighteenth Century. By Kenneth Maclean. (Newhaven: Yale University Press; London: Oxford University Press, Humphrey Milford, 1936. 11S. 6d. Pp. Viii X 176. Price 2 Dollars 50; 11s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 12 (47):355-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Anthony Quinton, Peter Alexander, L. Minio-Paluello & Richard I. Aaron (1959). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 68 (269):105-118.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Susan Corrine Aaron (2002). A Technologically Mediated Phenomenon Affecting Human Dynamics. World Futures 58 (1):81 – 99.score: 30.0
    This paper will suggest a mapping for human dynamics to see where emerging digital technology currently and could further affect the dynamics of the human, technological and natural, and the cultural forms that define them. Emerging technology will be seen to reveal and surpass the limitations of human measures built on human abilities and perception. and the social structures that are derived from them. The formation of this conceptual mapping is based on the premise that digital technology has the ability (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. R. I. Aaron (1941). Hume's Theory of Universals. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 42:117 - 140.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. R. I. Aaron (1942). Intuitive Knowledge. Mind 51 (204):297-318.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. David Aaron (1996). Imagery of the Divine and the Human: On the Mythology of Genesis Rabba 8 §1. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 5 (1):1-62.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. I. Aaron (1936). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 45 (178):283-287.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Mark S. Frankel (2009). Commentary: Public Outreach by the FDA: Evaluating Oversight of Human Drugs and Medical Devices. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (4):625-628.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Charles Frankel (1972). Political Disobedience and the Denial of Political Authority. Social Theory and Practice 2 (1):85-98.score: 30.0
  47. Margherita Frankel (1983). Vico and Rousseau Through Derrida. New Vico Studies 1:51-61.score: 30.0
  48. A. E. Taylor, T. E. Jessop, A. K. Stout, E. J. Thomas, R. I. Aaron, F. C. S. Schiller & John Laird (1931). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 40 (159):386-403.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. R. I. Aaron (1932). A Catalogue of Berkeley's Library. Mind 41 (164):465-475.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. R. I. Aaron (1931). Critical Notices. Mind 40 (157):86-92.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000