8 found
Sort by:
  1. Aaron J. Cotnoir (forthcoming). Composition as Identity: Framing the Debate. In Aaron Cotnoir & Donald Baxter (eds.), Composition as Identity. Oxford University Press.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Aaron J. Cotnoir (2013). 7. Composition as General Identity. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 8:294.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Aaron J. Cotnoir (2013). Pluralism and Paradox. In Nikolaj J. L. L. Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (eds.), Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates. Oxford University Press. 339.
  4. Aaron J. Cotnoir (2013). Validity for Strong Pluralists. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):563-579.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Aaron J. Cotnoir & Andrew Bacon (2012). Non-Wellfounded Mereology. Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):187-204.
    This paper is a systematic exploration of non-wellfounded mereology. Motivations and applications suggested in the literature are considered. Some are exotic like Borges’ Aleph, and the Trinity; other examples are less so, like time traveling bricks, and even Geach’s Tibbles the Cat. The authors point out that the transitivity of non-wellfounded parthood is inconsistent with extensionality. A non-wellfounded mereology is developed with careful consideration paid to rival notions of supplementation and fusion. Two equivalent axiomatizations are given, and are compared to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Aaron J. Cotnoir (2010). Anti-Symmetry and Non-Extensional Mereology. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (239):396-405.
    I examine the link between extensionality principles of classical mereology and the anti-symmetry of parthood. Varzi's most recent defence of extensionality depends crucially on assuming anti-symmetry. I examine the notions of proper parthood, weak supplementation and non-well-foundedness. By rejecting anti-symmetry, the anti-extensionalist has a unified, independently grounded response to Varzi's arguments. I give a formal construction of a non-extensional mereology in which anti-symmetry fails. If the notion of 'mereological equivalence' is made explicit, this non-anti-symmetric mereology recaptures all of the structure (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Aaron J. Cotnoir (2009). Generic Truth and Mixed Conjunctions: Some Alternatives. Analysis 69 (3):473-479.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Colin Caret & Aaron J. Cotnoir (2008). True, False, Paranormal and 'Designated'?: A Reply to Jenkins. Analysis 68 (299):238–244.
    Jenkins (2007) charges that the language advanced in Beall (2007) is either expressively impoverished, or inconsistent. We argue that Jenkins’ objections are based on unreasonably strong constraints on formal theories of truth. Our primary concern is not to defend the ‘paranormal’ framework advanced in Beall, but to respond to a common – and implausible – ‘revenge’-style charge directed at a certain class of formal theories of truth and paradox.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation