4 found
  1.  7
    Adil Ahmad Haque (2014). Law and Morality at War. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):79-97.
    Through a critical engagement with Jeremy Waldron’s work, as well as the work of other writers, I offer an account of the relative scope of the morality of war, the laws of war, and war crimes. I propose an instrumentalist account of the laws of war, according to which the laws of war should help soldiers conform to the morality of war. The instrumentalist account supports Waldron’s conclusion that the laws of war justifiably prohibit attacks on civilians even if it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2.  22
    Adil Ahmad Haque (2013). The Revolution and the Criminal Law. Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (2):231-253.
    Egyptians had many reasons to overthrow the government of Hosni Mubarak, and to challenge the legitimacy of the interim military government. Strikingly, among the leading reasons for the uprising and for continued protest are reasons grounded in criminal justice. Reflection on this dimension of the Egyptian uprising invites a broader examination of the relationship between criminal justice and political legitimacy. While criminal justice is neither necessary nor sufficient for political legitimacy, criminal injustice substantially undermines political legitimacy and can provide independent (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  3.  13
    Adil Ahmad Haque (2013). Retributivism: The Right and the Good. [REVIEW] Law and Philosophy 32 (1):59-82.
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  4. Adil Ahmad Haque (2017). Law and Morality at War. Oxford University Press Uk.
    The laws are not silent in war, but what should they say? What is the moral function of the law of armed conflict? Should the law protect civilians who do not fight but help those who do? Should the law protect soldiers who perform non-combat functions or who may be safely captured? How certain should a soldier be that an individual is a combatant rather than a civilian before using lethal force? What risks should soldiers take on themselves to avoid (...)
    No categories
    Export citation  
    My bibliography