34 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Adrian M. S. Piper [19]Adrian Piper [15]
See also:
  1. Adrian Piper, Ten Commandments of Philosophical Writing.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Adrian Piper, On Wearing Three Hats.
    These remarks were originally delivered at a symposium at Brandeis University on multi-talented women in March 1996.1 The organizers and audience of the symposium posed certain questions of the participants, and we did our best to answer them. I mention this at the outset because the questions were in some ways like the polite query, »How are you?« and the following remarks like a certain kind of answer to that query. Under some circumstances »How are you?« can elicit a sudden (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Adrian Piper, Rationality and the Structure of the Self.
    Thank you for your kind and encouraging message. Separately and consecutively it is, if absolutely necessary. Please feel free to ignore the kicking and screaming noises. I am just so very certain that this strategy is going to lose that very large potential art audience (even if there's no longer a CUP Art catalogue, there's sure to remain its mailing list, and I had many years ago designed a promotional flyer for RSS that it could distribute).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Adrian M. S. Piper, Cambridge University Press Reader B.
    I would put RSS2 into a group of books/papers that began more or less with Thomas Nagel’s The Possibility of Altruism. Nagel’s idea was to appeal to Kant to find a rational grounding for such important moral duties as altruism. The idea in this tradition (and RSS2 follows this) is to appeal to Kant’s work to solve the contemporary problem of finding the right way to explain and justify ethical behavior; it is only secondarily intended to be exegesis of Kant’s (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Adrian M. S. Piper, Volume II: A Kantian Conception.
    I require of a critique of pure practical reason that when it is completed, we must be able to show its unity with the speculative in a common principle, because in the end there can be only one and the same reason, which must be differentiated solely in its application. [G, Ak.391].
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Adrian Piper, Kant's Intelligible Standpoint on Action.
    This essay attempts to render intelligible (you will pardon the pun) Kant's peculiar claims about the intelligible at A 539/B 567 – A 541/B 569 in the first Critique, in which he asserts that (1) ... [t]his acting subject would now, in conformity with his intelligible character, stand under no temporal conditions, because time is only a condition of appearances, but not of things in themselves. In him no action would begin or cease. Consequently it would not be subjected to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Adrian Piper, On Becoming a Warrior.
    For most of my adult life I have worked two full-time jobs, because choosing between them is not an option for me. In my day job I am a philosophy professor, and I moonlight as an artist. The two fields are very different. Academic philosophers teach, do research, serve on committees, and give talks. Artists who teach do all this, and also produce, document, market, exhibit, and sell their work. But the two jobs are alike in that the more success (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Adrian Piper, The Rationality of Military Service (1981).
    The aim of this discussion is twofold.* First, I shall scrutinize certain prevailing rationales for enlisting for military service and show that these justifications are inadequate to meet the military’s recruiting needs. Larger numbers of enlistees who are fully equipped, both in technical skills and morale, for combat readiness are in great demand, but the arguments used to recruit potential enlistees are self-defeating. I shall show how and why they attract volunteers who are rendered singularly unfit to meet these demands (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Adrian Piper, Was Amerikaner Von den Deutschen Lernen Können.
    Seit kurzem wird des öfteren in Deutschland die Ansicht geäußert, Deutschland solle nun seine fremdenfeindliche Vergangenheit im Zweiten Weltkrieg endlich hinter sich lassen und von nun ab als >>normalisiertes<< Land der Zukunft gegenübertreten. Diese Meinung entsteht aus der Voraussetzung, daß Deutschland durch seine Geschichte von Xenophobie und Genozid im Zweiten Weltkrieg als abnormal, als ungewöhnlich gekennzeichnet ist. Aber das ist nicht wahr. Deutschlands blutige Geschichte ist mit derjenigen der Vereinigten Staaten, Großbritanniens, der Niederlande, Rußlands, Chinas, Japans, der Türkei, Vietnams, Kambodschas, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Adrian Piper, Was Amerikaner Von den Deutschen Lernen Können (2003).
    Seit kurzem wird des öfteren in Deutschland die Ansicht geäußert, Deutschland solle nun seine fremdenfeindliche Vergangenheit im Zweiten Weltkrieg endlich hinter sich lassen und von nun ab als >>normalisiertes<< Land der Zukunft gegenübertreten. Diese Meinung entsteht aus der Voraussetzung, daß Deutschland durch seine Geschichte von Xenophobie und Genozid im Zweiten Weltkrieg als abnormal, als ungewöhnlich gekennzeichnet ist. Aber das ist nicht wahr. Deutschlands blutige Geschichte ist mit derjenigen der Vereinigten Staaten, Großbritanniens, der Niederlande, Rußlands, Chinas, Japans, der Türkei, Vietnams, Kambodschas, (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Adrian M. S. Piper, Kant on the Objectivity of the Moral Law (1994).
    In 1951 John Rawls expressed these convictions about the fundamental issues in metaethics: [T]he objectivity or the subjectivity of moral knowledge turns, not on the question whether ideal value entities exist or whether moral judgments are caused by emotions or whether there is a variety of moral codes the world over, but simply on the question: does there exist a reasonable method for validating and invalidating given or proposed moral rules and those decisions made on the basis of them? For (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Adrian M. S. Piper (2012). Kant's Two Solutions to the Free Rider Problem. Kant Yearbook 4 (1).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Adrian Piper (2009). Intuition and Concrete Particularity in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
    By transcendental aesthetic, Kant means “the science of all principles of a priori sensibility” (A 21/B 35). 1 These, he argues, are the laws that properly direct our judgments of taste (B 35 – 36 fn.), i.e. our aesthetic judgments as we ordinarily understand that notion in the context of contemporary art. Thus the first part of the Critique of Pure Reason, entitled the Transcendental Aesthetic, enumerates the necessary presuppositions of, among other things, our ability to make empirical judgments about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Adrian M. S. Piper (2009). Intuition and Concrete Particularity in Kant's Transcendental Aesthetic. In Francis Halsall, Julia Jansen & Tony O'Connor (eds.), Rediscovering Aesthetics: Transdisciplinary Voices From Art History, Philosophy, and Art Practice. Stanford University Press.
    By transcendental aesthetic, Kant means “the science of all principles of a priori sensibility” (A 21/B 35). 1 These, he argues, are the laws that properly direct our judgments of taste (B 35 – 36 fn.), i.e. our aesthetic judgments as we ordinarily understand that notion in the context of contemporary art. Thus the first part of the Critique of Pure Reason, entitled the Transcendental Aesthetic, enumerates the necessary presuppositions of, among other things, our ability to make empirical judgments (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Adrian M. S. Piper (2008). Rationality and the Structure of the Self, Volume I: The Humean Conception. APRA Foundation Berlin.
    The Humean conception of the self consists in the belief-desire model of motivation and the utility-maximizing model of rationality. This conception has dominated Western thought in philosophy and the social sciences ever since Hobbes’ initial formulation in Leviathan and Hume’s elaboration in the Treatise of Human Nature. Bentham, Freud, Ramsey, Skinner, Allais, von Neumann and Morgenstern and others have added further refinements that have brought it to a high degree of formal sophistication. Late twentieth century moral philosophers such as Rawls, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Sue Weinberg, Joshua Cohen, Adrian M. S. Piper, Linda Nicholson & Alison Jaggar (2001). Marcia Lind, 1951-2000. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 75 (2):118 - 121.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Adrian Piper (2000). Two Kinds of Discrimination. In Bernard Boxill (ed.), Race and Racism. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Adrian M. S. Piper (1996). Making Sense of Value. Ethics 106 (3):525-537.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Adrian M. S. Piper (1993). Xenophobia and Kantian Rationalism. Philosophical Forum 24 (1-3):188-232.
  20. John D. Sommer, Ed Casey, Mary C. Rawlinson, Eva Kittay, Michael A. Simon, Patrick Grim, Clyde Lee Miller, Rita Nolan, Marshall Spector, Don Ihde, Peter Williams, Anthony Weston, Donn Welton, Dick Howard, David A. Dilworth, Tom Foster Digby 3d, Anthony Appiah, David Auerbach, Annette Baier, Seyla Benhabib, Akeel Bilgrami, Richard Boyd, Robert Brandon, Joshua Cohen, Arnold Davidson, Owen Flanagan, Nancy Fraser, Marcia Lind, Alexander Nehamas, Linda Nicholson, Adrian Piper, Lynne Tirrell, Lawrence Blum, Lawrence Foster, Roma Farion, Mitchel Silver, Jenifer Radden, Jack Bayne, Robert K. Shope, Jane Roland Martin, Arthur B. Millman, Beebe Nelson, Robert Rosenfeld, Janet Farrell-Smith, David E. Flesche, Daniel E. Anderson, J. R. Brown, F. Cunningham, D. Goldstick, I. Hacking, C. Normore, A. Ripstein, W. Sumner, Alison M. Jaggar, Harry Deutsch, Irving Stein, John Hund, George Englebretsen, Fred Strohm, D. L. Ouren, P. Bilimoria, F. B. D. & Nora Nevin (1993). Letters to the Editor. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 66 (5):97 - 112.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Adrian Piper (1992). Passing for White, Passing for Black. Transitions.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Adrian M. S. Piper (1991). Impartiality, Compassion, and Modal Imagination. Ethics 101 (4):726-757.
  23. Adrian M. S. Piper (1991). “Seeing Things”. Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (S1):29-60.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Adrian Piper (1988). Pseudorationality. In Brian P. McLaughlin & Amelie O. Rorty (eds.), Perspectives on Self-Deception. University of California Press. 173--197.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Adrian M. S. Piper (1988). Hume on Rational Final Ends. Philosophy Research Archives 14:193-228.
    Historically, the view, prevalent in contemporary economics and decision theory as well as philosophy, that rational action consists simply in satisfying one’s desires, whatever they may be, as efficiently as possible, is to be found first in Book II of Hume’s Treatise of Human Nature. This view has counterintuitive and self-refuting implications, in that it recognizes as rational behavior that may reveal a clear degree of irresponsibility or psychological instability. Accordingly, many Hume scholars have tried to show recently that this (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Adrian M. S. Piper (1987). Moral Theory and Moral Alienation. Journal of Philosophy 84 (2):102-118.
    Contemporary Debates in Moral Theory features pairs of newly commissioned essays by some of the leading theorists working in the field today. Brings together fresh debates on the most controversial issues in moral theory Questions include: Are moral requirements derived from reason? How demanding is morality? Are virtues the proper starting point for moral theorizing? Lively debate format sharply defines the issues, and paves the way for further discussion. Will serve as an accessible introduction to the major topics in contemporary (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Adrian M. S. Piper (1987). Personal Continuity and Instrumental Rationality in Rawls' Theory of Justice. Social Theory and Practice 13 (1):49-76.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Adrian M. S. Piper (1986). Instrumentalism, Objectivity, and Moral Justification. American Philosophical Quarterly 23 (4):373 - 381.
    "instrumentalism" claims that a moral theory is objectively justified if the actions it prescribes are the most efficient means to any agent's final ends. Insofar as instrumentalism objectively justifies a moral theory, It fails to morally justify it. Insofar as it morally justifies the theory, Either it fails to objectively justify it, Or else the humean model of instrumental rationality is doing no justificatory work. In either case, Instrumentalism cannot justify a moral theory that enjoins us to modify or sacrifice (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Adrian Piper (1985). Two Conceptions of the Self. Philosophical Studies 48 (2):173 - 197.
    The Humean conception of the self prevalent in the contemporary literature in moral and political philosophy, philosophy of mind, and action theory has yielded a persuasive model of human action that has contributed considerably to our understanding of moral motivation, rational action, and many other issues. But it has also generated certain problems. I should like to take issue with this conception, first by describing it in some detail and charting its connection with two such interrelated problems in moral psychology. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Adrian M. S. Piper (1985). Critical Hegemony and Aesthetic Acculturation. Noûs 19 (1):29-40.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Adrian M. S. Piper (1982). A Distinction Without a Difference. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1):403-435.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Adrian Piper (1980). Property and the Limits of the Self. Political Theory 8 (1):39 - 64.
    THE MAIN OBJECTIVES of the following discussions are, first, to show the logical inconsistency of Hegel’s theory of the necessity of private property and, second, to show its exegetical inconsistency with the most plausible and consistent interpretations of Hegel’s theory of the self and its relation to the state in Ethical Life. I begin with the latter objective, by distinguishing three basic conceptions of the self that can be gleaned from various passages in the Philosophy of Right. I suggest viable (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Adrian M. S. Piper (1980). Property and the Limits of the Self. Political Theory 8 (1):39-64.
    THE MAIN OBJECTIVES of the following discussions are, first, to show the logical inconsistency of Hegel’s theory of the necessity of private property and, second, to show its exegetical inconsistency with the most plausible and consistent interpretations of Hegel’s theory of the self and its relation to the state in Ethical Life. I begin with the latter objective, by distinguishing three basic conceptions of the self that can be gleaned from various passages in the Philosophy of Right. I suggest viable (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Adrian M. S. Piper (1978). Utility, Publicity, and Manipulation. Ethics 88 (3):189-206.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation