1.  4
    Alejandro Chehtman (2015). Occupation Courts, Jus Ad Bellum Considerations, and Non-State Actors: Revisiting the Ethics of Military Occupation. Legal Theory 21 (1):18-46.
    This article provides a normative appraisal of the law of military occupation by looking into occupation courts and their legitimacy. It focuses on two cornerstones of the current regulation of war: the principle of equality of belligerents, that is, the potential relevance of jus ad bellum considerations on the in bello rights of occupants, and the normative force of the traditional distinction between states and non-state armed groups, specially in conflicts not of an international character. Against the currently predominant neoclassical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  2.  66
    Alejandro Chehtman (2010). The Extraterritorial Scope of the Right to Punish. Law and Philosophy 29 (2):127-157.
    This paper provides a philosophical critique of the principles that govern extraterritorial punishment under international law. It advocates an interest-based theory of punishment that accounts for states' right to punish offences committed on their territory or against their sovereignty, security or important governmental functions. Yet, it criticizes the states' well-established right to punish crimes committed extraterritorially on grounds of the nationality of the offender or that of the victim. Indeed, it shows that the arguments on the basis of which these (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  21
    Alejandro Chehtman (2010). The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment. Oxford University Press.
    This book provides the first full account, explanation, and critique of extraterritorial punishment in international law.
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation