30 found
Sort by:
  1. Aleksander Peczenik (2004). Can Philosophy Help Legal Doctrine? Ratio Juris 17 (1):106-117.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Aleksander Peczenik (2004). Pt. 1. Justice. In , Proceedings of the 21st Ivr World Congress, Lund, Sweden, 12-17 August, 2003. Franz Steiner Verlag.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Aleksander Peczenik (ed.) (2004). Proceedings of the 21st Ivr World Congress, Lund, Sweden, 12-17 August, 2003. Franz Steiner Verlag.
    Aleksander Peczenik, Lund Introduction to the Proceedings of the 21st IVR World Congress General Information This volume opens the Proceedings of the 21st ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Aleksander Peczenik (2001). A Theory of Legal Doctrine. Ratio Juris 14 (1):75-105.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jaap Hage & Aleksander Peczenik (2000). Law, Morals and Defeasibility. Ratio Juris 13 (3):305-325.
  6. Aleksander Peczenik (2000). Introduction. Ratio Juris 13 (3):231-235.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Aleksander Peczenik (2000). Scientia Iuris - an Unsolved Philosophical Problem. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):273-302.
    Legal dogmatics in Continental European law (scientia iuris, Rechtswissenschaft) consists of professional legal writings whose task is to systematize and interpret valid law. Legal dogmatics pursues knowledge of the existing law, yet in many cases it leads to a change of the law. Among general theories of legal dogmatics, one may mention the theories of negligence, intent, adequate causation and ownership. The theories produce principles and they also produce defeasible rules. By means of production of general and defeasible theories, legal (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Aleksander Peczenik & Jaap Hage (2000). Legal Knowledge About What? Ratio Juris 13 (3):326-345.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Aleksander Peczenik (1998). A Coherence Theory of Juristic Knowledge. In Aulis Aarnio (ed.), On Coherence Theory of Law. Distribution, Akademibokhandeln I Lund. 7--16.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Aulis Aarnio & Aleksander Peczenik (1996). On Values. Universal or Relative? Ratio Juris 9 (4):321-330.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Aleksander Peczenik (1996). Jumps and Logic in the Law. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):297-329.
    The main stream of legal theory tends to incorporate unwritten principles into the law. Weighing of principles plays a great role in legal argumentation, inter alia in statutory interpretation. A weighing and balancing of principles and other prima facie reasons is a jump. The inference is not conclusive.To deal with defeasibility and weighing, a jurist needs both the belief-revision logic and the nonmonotonic logic. The systems of nonmonotonic logic included in the present volume provide logical tools enabling one to speak (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Aulis Aarnio & Aleksander Peczenik (1995). Suum Cuique Tribuere. Some Reflections on Law, Freedom and Justice. Ratio Juris 8 (2):142-179.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Aleksander Peczenik (1995). Argumentation in Ethics, Legal Dogmatics and Legal Practice. Argumentation 9 (5):747-756.
    The author adopts a coherentist approach to legal argumentation.Ceteris paribus, the degree of coherence of argumentation depends on answers to such questions as: How many statements belonging to the justification are supported by reasons, that is, not arbitrary?, How profound is the justification, that is, how long are the chains of reasons it contains?, How closely interconnected are the reasons, for example in such a way that the same conclusion follows from various independent reasons?, How relevant are the reasons in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Aleksander Peczenik & Mikael M. Karlsson (eds.) (1995). Law, Justice and the State: Essays on Justice and Rights: Proceedings of the 16th World Congress of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (Ivr), Reykjavík, 26 May-2 June, 1993. [REVIEW] F. Steiner Verlag.
  15. Aleksander Peczenik & Sebastián Urbina (1995). Why Officials: On Legal Positivism Old and New. Rechtstheorie 26 (2):139-162.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Aleksander Peczenik (1994). Law, Morality, Coherence and Truth. Ratio Juris 7 (2):146-176.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Aleksander Peczenik (1993). Why Shall Legal Reasoning Be Coherent? In K. B. Agrawal & R. K. Raizada (eds.), Sociological Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy: Random Thoughts On. University Book House.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Aleksander Peczenik (1992). Weighing Values. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 5 (2):137-152.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Aleksander Peczenik (1991). Legal Rules and Moral Principles. Rechtstheorie 11.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert Alexy & Aleksander Peczenik (1990). The Concept of Coherence and Its Significance for Discursive Rationality. Ratio Juris 3 (s1):130-147.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Aleksander Peczenik (1988). Legal Reasoning as a Special Case of Moral Reasoning. Ratio Juris 1 (2):123-136.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Aleksander Peczenik (1985). Moral and Ontological Justification of Legal Reasoning. Law and Philosophy 4 (2):289 - 309.
  23. Aleksander Peczenik & Jerzy Wróblewski (1985). Fuzziness and Transformation: Towards Explaining Legal Reasoning. Theoria 51 (1):24-44.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Aleksander Peczenik (1984). RS Summers, Instrumentalism and Legal Theory Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 4 (2):87-89.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Aleksander Peczenik (1983). The Basis of Legal Justification. [A. Peczenik].
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Aleksander Peczenik (1979). Non-Equivalent Transformations and the Law. In Aleksander Peczenik & Jyrki Uusitalo (eds.), Reasoning on Legal Reasoning. Society of Finnish Lawyers. 47--64.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Aleksander Peczenik & Jyrki Uusitalo (eds.) (1979). Reasoning on Legal Reasoning. Society of Finnish Lawyers.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Aleksander Peczenik (1970). Essays in Legal Theory. Dbk.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Aleksander Peczenik (1968). Juristic Definition of Law. Ethics 78 (4):255-268.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Aleksander Peczenik (1968). Norms and Reality. Theoria 34 (2):117-133.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation