33 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Alessandro Giordani (Università Cattolica di Milano)
  1.  88
    Damiano Costa & Alessandro Giordani (2016). In Defence of Transcendentism. Acta Analytica 31 (2):225-234.
    How do objects persist through time? According to endurantism, objects persist through time and do not have temporal parts. According to the transcendentist version of endurantism, objects exist at times by participating in events that occur at those times. This version of transcendentism offers specific metaphysical and semantical advantages over other versions of endurantism. In this paper, we defend transcendentist endurantism against a series of criticisms that have been recently offered by Kristie Miller.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  54
    Alessandro Giordani (2015). A New Framework for Justification Logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 25 (4):308-323.
    The logic of justification provides an in-depth analysis of the epistemic states of an agent. This paper aims at solving some of the problems to which the common interpretation of the operators of justification logic is subject by providing a framework in which a crucial distinction between potential and explicit justifiers is exploited. The paper is subdivided into three sections. The first section offers an introduction to a basic system LJ of justification logic and to the problems concerning its interpretation. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  19
    Alessandro Giordani (forthcoming). Perspectival Logic of Acceptance and Rejection. Logique and Analyse.
    This paper aims at developing a logical theory of perspectival epistemic attitudes. After presenting a standard framework for modeling acceptance, where the epistemic space of an agent coincides with a unique epistemic cell, more complex systems are introduced, which are characterized by the existence of many connected epistemic cells, and different possible attitudes towards a proposition, both positive and negative, are discussed. In doing that, we also propose some interesting ways in which the systems can be interpreted on well known (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Alessandro Giordani (2015). The Truthmaker Solution to the Gettier Problems. Epistemologia 38:66-78.
    A truthmaker solution to the Gettier problems is based on the idea that knowledge can be defined as justified true belief provided that the source of one’s justification is suitably connected with what makes the believed proposition true. Different developments of this basic intuition have been recently criticized on the basis of a series of arguments aiming at showing that no truthmaker theory can allow us to solve Gettier problems, since the very idea underlying such solution is ineffective. In this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  67
    Alessandro Giordani (2016). Logic of Implicit and Explicit Justifiers. In L. Felline, A. Ledda, F. Paoli & E. Rossanese (eds.), New Directions in Logic and the Philosophy of Science. College Publications 119-131.
    The aim of this paper is to provide an intuitive semantics for systems of justification logic which allows us to cope with the distinction between implicit and explicit justifiers. The paper is subdivided into three sections. In the first one, the distinction between implicit and explicit justifiers is presented and connected with a proof-theoretic distinction between two ways of interpreting sequences of sentences; that is, as sequences of axioms in a certain set and as sequences proofs constructed from that set (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  81
    Alessandro Giordani (2015). On a New Tentative Solution to Fitch’s Paradox. Erkenntnis 81 (3):597-611.
    In a recent paper, Alexander argues that relaxing the requirement that sound knowers know their own soundness might provide a solution to Fitch’s paradox and introduces a suitable axiomatic system where the paradox is avoided. In this paper an analysis of this solution is proposed according to which the effective move for solving the paradox depends on the axiomatic treatment of the ontic modality rather than the limitations imposed on the epistemic one. It is then shown that, once the ontic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  71
    Alessandro Giordani (2016). An Internal Limit of the Structural Analysis of Causation. Axiomathes:1-22.
    Structural models of systems of causal connections have become a common tool in the analysis of the concept of causation. In the present paper I offer a general argument to show that one of the most powerful definitions of the concept of actual cause, provided within the structural models framework, is not sufficient to grant a full account of our intuitive judgements about actual causation, so that we are still waiting for a comprehensive definition. This is done not simply by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Alessandro Giordani & Damiano Costa (2013). From Times to Worlds and Back Again: A Transcendentist Theory of Persistence. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):210-220.
    Until recently, an almost perfect parallelism seemed to hold between theories of identity through time and across possible worlds,as every account in the temporal case(endurantism,perdurantism, exdurantism) was mirrored by a twin account in the modal case (trans-world identity, identity-via-parts, identity-via-counterparts). Nevertheless, in the recent literature, this parallelism has been broken because of the implementation in the debate of the relation of location. In particular, endurantism has been subject to a more in-depth analysis, and different versions of it, corresponding to different (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Alessandro Giordani (2013). A Logic of Justification and Truthmaking. Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (2):323-342.
    In the present paper we propose a system of propositional logic for reasoning about justification, truthmaking, and the connection between justifiers and truthmakers. The logic of justification and truthmaking is developed according to the fundamental ideas introduced by Artemov. Justifiers and truthmakers are treated in a similar way, exploiting the intuition that justifiers provide epistemic grounds for propositions to be considered true, while truthmakers provide ontological grounds for propositions to be true. This system of logic is then applied both for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  6
    Alessandro Giordani & Ilaria Canavotto (2016). Basic Action Deontic Logic. In O. Roy, T. Allard & W. Malte (eds.), Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. College Publications 80-92.
    The aim of this paper is to introduce a system of dynamic deontic logic in which the main problems related to the de finition of deontic concepts, especially those emerging from a standard analysis of permission in terms of possibility of doing an action without incurring in a violation of the law, are solved. The basic idea is to introduce two crucial distinctions allowing us to differentiate (i) what is ideal with respect to a given code, which fixes the types (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Alessandro Giordani (2013). A New Semantics for Systems of Logic of Essence. Studia Logica 102 (3):411-440.
    The purpose of the present paper is to provide a way of understanding systems of logic of essence by introducing a new semantic framework for them. Three central results are achieved: first, the now standard Fitting semantics for the propositional logic of evidence is adapted in order to provide a new, simplified semantics for the propositional logic of essence; secondly, we show how it is possible to construe the concept of necessary truth explicitly by using the concept of essential truth; (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2014). Modeling Measurement: Error and Uncertainty. In Marcel Boumans, Giora Hon & Arthur Petersen (eds.), Error and Uncertainty in Scientific Practice. Pickering & Chatto 79-96.
    In the last few decades the role played by models and modeling activities has become a central topic in the scientific enterprise. In particular, it has been highlighted both that the development of models constitutes a crucial step for understanding the world and that the developed models operate as mediators between theories and the world. Such perspective is exploited here to cope with the issue as to whether error-based and uncertainty-based modeling of measurement are incompatible, and thus alternative with one (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Aldo Frigerio, Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2013). On Representing Information: A Characterization of the Analog/Digital Distinction. Dialectica 67 (4):455-483.
    The common account of the analog vs digital distinction is based on features of physical systems, being related to the usage of continuous vs discrete supports respectively. It is proposed here to alternatively characterize the concepts of analog and digital as related to coding systems, of which a formal definition is given, by suggesting that the distinction refers to the strategy adopted to define the coding function: extensional in digital systems, isomorphic intensional in analog systems. This thesis is supported by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  98
    Aldo Frigerio, Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2010). Outline of a General Model of Measurement. Synthese 175 (2):123-149.
    Measurement is a process aimed at acquiring and codifying information about properties of empirical entities. In this paper we provide an interpretation of such a process comparing it with what is nowadays considered the standard measurement theory, i.e., representational theory of measurement. It is maintained here that this theory has its own merits but it is incomplete and too abstract, its main weakness being the scant attention reserved to the empirical side of measurement, i.e., to measurement systems and to the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  62
    Alessandro Giordani (2015). A Suitable Semantics for Implicit and Explicit Belief. Logique Et Analyse 58 (231).
    In the present paper a new semantic framework for modelling the distinction between implicit and explicit belief is proposed and contrasted with the currently standard framework based on the idea that explicit belief can be construed as implicit belief accompanied by awareness. It is argued that within this new framework it is possible to get both a more intuitive interpretation of the aforementioned distinction and a straightforward solution to two critical problems to which the standard view is subjected. A system (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  2
    Alessandro Giordani (forthcoming). An Internal Limit of the Structural Analysis of Causation. Axiomathes:1-22.
    Structural models of systems of causal connections have become a common tool in the analysis of the concept of causation. In the present paper I offer a general argument to show that one of the most powerful definitions of the concept of actual cause, provided within the structural models framework, is not sufficient to grant a full account of our intuitive judgements about actual causation, so that we are still waiting for a comprehensive definition. This is done not simply by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  49
    Alessandro Giordani (2013). On the Factivity of Implicit Intersubjective Knowledge. Synthese (8):1-15.
    The concept of knowledge can be modelled in epistemic modal logic and, if modelled by using a standard modal operator, it is subject to the problem of logical omniscience. The classical solution to this problem is to distinguish between implicit and explicit knowledge and to construe the knowledge operator as capturing the concept of implicit knowledge. In addition, since a proposition is said to be implicitly known just in case it is derivable from the set of propositions that are explicitly (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Alessandro Giordani & Paolo Gomarasca (2012). Trust as the End of Practical Reason. Justification Procedures. In Botturi Francesco (ed.), Understanding Human Experience. Peter Lang
    This paper is about the epistemology of practical reason and, in particular, the function of trust as an end to be pursued rationally in praxis. Our purpose is threefold: first, to present an outline of the structure of practical reason; secondly, to compare practical reason and scientific reason in order to determine the main differences between these two basic manifestations of human reason; finally, to argue in favour of a non-utilitarian model of practical reason in the light of some results (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  50
    Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2012). Measurement, Models, and Uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 61 (8):2144 - 2152.
    Against the tradition, which has considered measurement able to produce pure data on physical systems, the unavoidable role played by the modeling activity in measurement is increasingly acknowledged, particularly with respect to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty. This paper characterizes measurement as a knowledge-based process and proposes a framework to understand the function of models in measurement and to systematically analyze their influence in the production of measurement results and their interpretation. To this aim, a general model of measurement is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  36
    Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari, Quantity and Quantity Value. Proc. TC1-TC7-TC13 14th IMEKO Joint Symposium.
    The concept system around ‘quantity’ and ‘quantity value’ is fundamental for measurement science, but some very basic issues are still open on such concepts and their relations. This paper proposes a duality between quantities and quantity values, a proposal that simplifies their characterization and makes it consistent.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  31
    Alessandro Giordani (2006). Aristotelian and Naturalistic Ontology. In A. Corradini, S. Galvan & E. J. Lowe (eds.), Analytic Philosophy Without Naturalism. Routledge
    The present paper analyses the correctness of an argument aiming to show that Aristotelian ontology justifies a better interpretation of the world than naturalistic ontology. The problems connected with this argument can be reduced to three: (1) the assumption of a scientific appoach to the world does not imply the exclusion of subjectivity or intentionality; (2) the assumption of an ontology of substances does not imlpy the exclusion of ontological models deriving from the scientific approach to the world; (3) the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  20
    Luca Mari & Alessandro Giordani (2012). Quantity and Quantity Value. Metrologia 49 (6):756-764.
    The concept system around 'quantity' and 'quantity value' is fundamental for measurement science, but some very basic issues are still open on such concepts and their relation. This paper argues that quantity values are in fact individual quantities, and that a complementarity exists between measurands and quantity values. This proposal is grounded on the analysis of three basic 'equality' relations: (i) between quantities, (ii) between quantity values and (iii) between quantities and quantity values. A consistent characterization of such concepts is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  25
    Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2012). Property Evaluation Types. Measurement 45 (3):437-452.
    An appropriate characterization of property types is an important topic for measurement science. On the basis of a set-theoretic model of evaluation and measurement processes, the paper introduces the operative concept of property evaluation type, and discusses how property types are related to, and in fact can be derived from, property evaluation types, by finally analyzing the consequences of these distinctions for the concepts of ‘property’ used in the International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Luca Mari & Alessandro Giordani (2015). On the Input of a Measurement Process. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 588:1-6.
    It is assumed sometimes that the input of a measurement, and therefore the entity with which a measuring system interacts, is a quantity value, possibly the (true) measurand value, and from this hypothesis the model of ideal measurement as an identity process is formulated. In this paper we show that this position is based on an inappropriate superposition of quantities and quantity values, and therefore should be discarded.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  15
    Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2010). Towards a Concept of Property Evaluation Type. Journal of Physics CS 238 (1):1-6.
    An appropriate characterization of property types is an important topic for measurement science. This paper proposes to derive them from evaluation types, and analyzes the consequences of this position for the VIM3.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Alessandro Giordani (2009). Synthetic a priori judgments. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 17:297 - 313.
  27. Alessandro Giordani (1997). A Note Concerning the Ontological Basis of Praxis in Aristotle. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 89 (4):625-636.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Alessandro Giordani (2011). Articulating the World in States of Affairs. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 103 (4):587-603.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Alessandro Giordani & Ilaria Canavotto (forthcoming). DEON Proceedings 2016.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Alessandro Giordani (2010). Ontology and theory of systems. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 102 (2):229-240.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Alessandro Giordani & Luca Mari (2012). Philosophical problems of control. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 104 (4):661-686.
    The present paper presents a philosofical analysis of the concept of control based on a specific characterization of the structure of control systems. The paper is subdivided into four section: in the first and the second sections the control dynamics is described and interpreted, while the last two sections briefly copy with the relationships between control, teleonomy, teleology and freedom.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Alessandro Giordani (ed.) (1995). Tempo E Struttura Dell'essere Il Concetto di Tempo in Aristotele E I Suoi Fondamenti Ontologici. Vita E Pensiero.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Alessandro Giordani (2000). The Logic of Evidence. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 92 (3-4):582-626.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography