Search results for 'Alexander Boer' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  19
    Alexander Boer, Tom van Engers, Rob Peters & Radboud Winkels (2007). Separating Law From Geography in GIS-Based Egovernment Services. Artificial Intelligence and Law 15 (1):49-76.
    The Leibniz Center for Law is involved in the project Digitale Uitwisseling Ruimtelijke Plannen [DURP (http://www.vrom.nl/durp); digital exchange of spatial plans] which develops a XML-based digital exchange format for spatial regulations. Involvement in the DURP project offers new possibilities to study a legal area that hasn’t yet been studied to the extent it deserves in the field of Computer Science & Law. We studied and criticised the work of the DURP project and the Dutch Ministry of internal affairs on metadata (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  1
    Alexander Boer & Tom van Engers (2013). Agile: A Problem-Based Model of Regulatory Policy Making. Artificial Intelligence and Law 21 (4):399-423.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. F. Matthias Alexander (1974/1986). The Resurrection of the Body: The Essential Writings of F. Matthias Alexander. Distributed in the U.S. By Random House.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. David Gorman & F. Matthias Alexander (2000). Réflexions Sur Nos Réflexions Sur Nous-Mêmes Conférence En Mémoire de F.M. Alexander Par Devant la Society of Teachers of the Alexander Technique, 27th Octobre, 1984. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. David Gorman & F. Matthias Alexander (2000). Thinking About Thinking About Ourselves the F.M. Alexander Memorial Lecture, Delivered Before the Society of Teachers of the Alexander Technique, on October 27th 1984. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  45
    Edouard Machery, Jean-Louis Dessalles, Fiona Cowie & Jason Alexander (2010). Symposium on J.-L. Dessalles's Why We Talk (OUP, 2007): Precis by J.-L. Dessalles, Commentaries by E. Machery, F. Cowie, and J. Alexander, Replies by J.-L. Dessalles. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 25 (5):851-901.
    This symposium discusses J.-L. Dessalles's account of the evolution of language, which was presented in Why we Talk (OUP 2007).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    David E. Alexander (2010). Problems for Moral/Natural Supervenience: DAVID E. ALEXANDER. Religious Studies 47 (1):73-84.
    ???Everyone agrees that the moral features of things supervene on their natural features??? , 22). Everyone is wrong, or so I will argue. In the first section, I explain the version of moral supervenience that Smith and others argue everyone should accept. In the second section, I argue that the mere conceptual possibility of a divine command theory of morality is sufficient to refute the version of moral supervenience under consideration. Lastly, I consider and respond to two objections, showing, among (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  13
    Thomas M. Alexander (2008). The Life and Work of Hartley Burr Alexander. The Pluralist 3 (1):1 - 10.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  15
    Thomas M. Alexander (2008). Hartley Burr Alexander: Humanistic Personalism and Pluralism. The Pluralist 3 (1):89 - 127.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    Larry Alexander (2000). Larry Alexander. Legal Theory 6 (4):391-404.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Patrick Proctor Alexander (1866/1975). Mill and Carlyle: An Examination of Mr. John Stuart Mill's Doctrine of Causation in Relation to Moral Freedom with an Occasional Discourse on Sauerteig by Smelfungus [I.E. P. P. Alexander]. [REVIEW] Norwood Editions.
  12. Thomas Alexander (1977). Vital Symbolism:Harley Burr Alexander's Basis For A Naturalistic Logic. Southwest Philosophical Studies.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  38
    Roberto Franzini Tibaldeo (2015). LA CONOSCIBILITÀ DEL MONDO SECONDO ALEXANDER VON HUMBOLDT: L’ESPERIENZA DEL PAESAGGIO. Rivista Geografica Italiana 122:1-14.
    The cognizability of the world according to Alexander von Humboldt: the experience of landscape. According to Alexander von Humboldt, geography ought to aim to go beyond the modern attitude of seeing knowledge as being the result of a spatial and temporal abstraction from the real world. Von Humboldt wishes to create a new theory of knowledge, one that instead of just simplifying, schematizing, and categorizing reality is able to highlight its multiple meanings, its diversity of perspectives, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Susanne Bobzien (2014). Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle's Theory of the Stoic Indemonstrables. In M. Lee (ed.), Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic. OUP 199-227.
    ABSTRACT: Alexander of Aphrodisias’ commentaries on Aristotle’s Organon are valuable sources for both Stoic and early Peripatetic logic, and have often been used as such – in particular for early Peripatetic hypothetical syllogistic and Stoic propositional logic. By contrast, this paper explores the role Alexander himself played in the development and transmission of those theories. There are three areas in particular where he seems to have made a difference: First, he drew a connection between certain passages (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  30
    Miira Tuominen (2010). Receptive Reason: Alexander of Aphrodisias on Material Intellect. Phronesis 55 (2):170-190.
    According to Alexander of Aphrodisias, our potential intellect is a purely receptive capacity. Alexander also claims that, in order for us to actualise our intellectual potentiality, the intellect needs to abstract what is intelligible from enmattered perceptible objects. Now a problem emerges: How is it possible for a purely receptive capacity to perform such an abstraction? It will be argued that even though Alexander's reaction to this question causes some tension in his theory, the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  13
    Mark A. Johnstone (2015). Aristotle and Alexander on Perceptual Error. Phronesis: A Journal for Ancient Philosophy 60 (3):310-338.
    Aristotle sometimes claims that the perception of special perceptibles by their proper sense is unerring. This claim is striking, since it might seem that we quite often misperceive things like colours, sounds and smells. Aristotle also claims that the perception of common perceptibles is more prone to error than the perception of special perceptibles. This is puzzling in its own right, and also places constraints on the interpretation of. I argue that reading Alexander of Aphrodisias on perceptual error (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Karen A. Rader (2006). Alexander Hollaender's Postwar Vision for Biology: Oak Ridge and Beyond. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 39 (4):685 - 706.
    Experimental radiobiology represented a long-standing priority for the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), but organizational issues initially impeded the laboratory progress of this government-funded work: who would direct such interdisciplinary investigations and how? And should the AEC support basic research or only mission-oriented projects? Alexander Hollaender's vision for biology in the post-war world guided AEC initiatives at Oak Ridge, where he created and presided over the Division of Biology for nearly two decades (1947-1966). Hollaender's scheme, at once entrepreneurial and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  15
    Jonathan Barnes & Susanne Bobzien (1991). Alexander of Aphrodisias' on Aristotle's Prior Analytics 1.1-7. Duckworth.
    ABSTRACT: English translation of the 2nd/3rd century Peripatetic Philosopher's Alexander of Aphrodisias commentary on Aristotle's non-modal syllogistic, i.e. on one of the most influential logical texts of all times. -/- Volume includes introduction on Alexander of Aphrodisias and the early commentators, translation with notes and comments, appendices with a new translation of Aristotle's text, a summary of Aristotle's non-modal syllogistic and textual notes.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  13
    Anke de Boer, Sip Jan Pijl, Wendy Post & Alexander Minnaert (2011). Which Variables Relate to the Attitudes of Teachers, Parents and Peers Towards Students with Special Educational Needs in Regular Education? Educational Studies 38 (4):433-448.
    While there is an increased interest in describing attitudes of teachers, parents and peers towards students with special educational needs in regular education, there is a lack of knowledge about various variables relating to the attitudes of these three groups. The aims of this study are: (1) to examine which variables relate to the attitudes of teachers (N?=?44), parents (N?=?508) and peers (N?=?1113) towards students with Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Autistic Spectrum Syndrome or a cognitive disability in regular primary education and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  35
    David Sloan Wilson (1999). A Critique of R.D. Alexander's Views on Group Selection. Biology and Philosophy 14 (3):431-449.
    Group selection is increasingly being viewed as an important force in human evolution. This paper examines the views of R.D. Alexander, one of the most influential thinkers about human behavior from an evolutionary perspective, on the subject of group selection. Alexander's general conception of evolution is based on the gene-centered approach of G.C. Williams, but he has also emphasized a potential role for group selection in the evolution of individual genomes and in human evolution. Alexander's views are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  12
    Maria Regina Brioschi (2013). A Niche for Subjectivity: Emergence and Process According to S. Alexander and A. N. Whitehead. Nóema 4 (2).
    Why an emergentist account of subjectivity? On the one hand, emergentism provides a new paradigm to rethink subjectivity beyond any dualism. At the same time, the issue of subjectivity puts a strain on emergentism itself, and pushes it beyond its limits. To show it, in the present paper I address a fundamental question: How can we describe subjectivity from an emergentist perspective? To answer, I will tackle Samuel Alexander’s and Alfred North Whitehead’s emergentist accounts of subjectivity. (...) locates subjectivity into a consistent emergentist framework, but his model of subjectivity remains grounded in the classical interpretation of subjectivity as mind. Whitehead gives a more innovative model of subjectivity, which implies a radical revision of its temporality and connection to the world, but this leads him beyond emergentism as a whole. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  9
    Brian Harding (2008). The Use of Alexander the Great in Augustine's City of God. Augustinian Studies 39 (1):113-128.
    This paper discusses the various rhetorical and argumentative uses to which Augustine puts Alexander the Great in his City of God. I argue that Alexander is a particularly useful figure for Augustine insofar as he is both non-Roman and a figure greatly admired by the Romans. Because of this unique position, Augustine is able to use Alexander to examine and discredit certain ideals and character traits present to the Romans without alienating his audience. I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. J. A. Towey (2000). Alexander of Aphrodisias On Aristotle On Sense Perception. Duckworth.
    The first English translation of the commentary of Alexander of Aphrodisias on Aristotle's De Sensu.With notes.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  12
    Andrew Rosato (2013). The Interpretation of Anselm's Teaching on Christ's Satisfaction for Sin in the Franciscan Tradition From Alexander of Hales to Duns Scotus. Franciscan Studies 71 (1):411-444.
    Anselm’s Cur Deus homo [CDH hereafter] covers a number of topics related to the doctrine of redemption, but its main contribution to that doctrine is its account of how Christ’s death makes satisfaction for human sin. Anselm’s concept of satisfaction is correlated with his understanding of sin. According to Anselm, sin incurs a debt that one pays by making satisfaction. Anselm’s satisfaction theory of the Atonement came to dominate soteriology in the scholastic period. Despite numerous quotations from and references to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  20
    Simon van Rysewyk, Eben Alexander: ‘Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey Into the Afterlife’ (2012) – is Consciousness Cortical?
  26.  6
    Laurent Clauzade (2007). De la science de l'esprit à l'étude du caractère : Alexander Bain et la psychologie des différences individuelles. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 2 (2):281-301.
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  18
    J. V. Bateman (1940). Professor Alexander's Proofs of the Spatio-Temporal Nature of Mind. Philosophical Review 49 (May):309-324.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  2
    G. T. Griffith, V. Ehrenberg & R. F. von Velsen (1939). Alexander and the Greeks. Journal of Hellenic Studies 59:156.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  16
    R. I. Markus (1950). Alexander's Philosophy: The Emergence of Qualities. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 11 (September):58-74.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  5
    Oleg Romanov, Alexander Polyhistor. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    H. G. Alexander Aphrodisiensis (2008). Alexander, De Anima Libri Mantissa. In Alexander Aphrodisiensis, "de Anima Libri Mantissa": A New Edition of the Greek Text with Introduction and Commentary. De Gruyter 35-142.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  1
    Milton R. Konvitz (1948). On the Nature of Value: The Philosophy of Samuel Alexander. Journal of Philosophy 45 (23):632-632.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    R. W. Sharples & T. -S. Lee (1986). Die griechische Tradition der aristote-lischen Syllogistik in der Spatantike: eine Untersuchung uber die Kommentare zu den Analytica priora von Alexander Aphrodisiensis, Ammonius und Philoponus. Journal of Hellenic Studies 106:231.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  13
    Alexander (2001). Alexander of Aphrodisias on the Cosmos. Brill Academic Pub.
    This volume contains the Arabic translations of a lost treatise by Alexander of Aphrodisias (c. AD 200) "On the Principles of the Universe" with English translation, introduction and commentary. It also includes an Arabic and Syriac glossary. The introduction and commentary deal in detail with the manuscripts, the translators and the exegetical tendencies of the text, as well as with its reception in Arabic philosophy. The main theme of the work is the motion of the heavenly bodies and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Martin Grabmann (1929). Mittelalterliche Lateinische Übersetzungen von Schriften der Aristoteles-Kommentatoren Johannes Philoponos, Alexander von Aphrodisias Und Themistios. Verlag der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Gweltaz Guyomarc'H. (2013). Review of V. Caston (Trans.) Alexander of Aphrodisias: On the Soul. Part I. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 63 (02):400-402.
  37. Milton R. Konvitz (1946). On the Nature of Value: The Philosophy of Samuel Alexander. By Bertram Morris. [REVIEW] Ethics 57:143.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  10
    Alexander of Lycopolis (1974). An Alexandrian Platonist Against Dualism: Alexander of Lycopolis' Treatise "Critique of the Doctrines of Manichaeus". Brill.
    Introduction 1. Alexander in Modern Scholarship; The Present Translation The anti-Manichaean treatise of Alexander of Lycopolis has for a long time been ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Herbert Spiegelberg (1963). Alexander Pfänders Phänomenologie. M. Nijhoff.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  86
    A. R. J. Fisher (2015). Samuel Alexander's Theory of Categories. The Monist 98 (3):246-67.
    Samuel Alexander was one of the first realists of the twentieth century to defend a theory of categories. He thought that the categories are genuinely real and grounded in the intrinsic nature of Space-Time. I present his reduction of the categories in terms of Space-Time, articulate his account of categorial structure and completeness, and offer an interpretation of what he thought the nature of the categories really were. I then argue that his theory of categories has some advantages (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. David L. Hildebrand (2014). The Human Eros: Eco-Ontology and the Aesthetics of Existence by Thomas M. Alexander. [REVIEW] Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 50 (2):308-313.
    The Human Eros is an outstanding accomplishment, a work of genuine wisdom. It combines meticulous scholarship with an enviable mastery of cultural and philosophical history to address pressing concerns of human beings, nature, and philosophy itself. While comprised of essays spanning over two decades, the book presents a powerfully coherent philosophical vision which Alexander names, alternately, “eco-ontology,” “humanistic naturalism,” and “ecological humanism.” Whatever the name, the approach is humane and intellectually compelling, offering insight and direction to pragmatism, aesthetics, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  37
    S. A. J. Stuart (2013). The Union of Two Nervous Systems: Neurophenomenology, Enkinaesthesia, and the Alexander Technique. Constructivist Foundations 8 (3):314-323.
    Context: Neurophenomenology is a relatively new field, with scope for novel and informative approaches to empirical questions about what structural parallels there are between neural activity and phenomenal experience. Problem: The overall aim is to present a method for examining possible correlations of neurodynamic and phenodynamic structures within the structurally-coupled work of Alexander Technique practitioners with their pupils. Method: This paper includes the development of an enkinaesthetic explanatory framework, an overview of the salient aspects of the (...) Technique, and the presentation of an elicitation interview technique as part of a neurophenomenological method. It will propose a way of testing the hypothesis that if, in the effective practice of Alexander Technique, there is a union between the nervous systems of teacher and pupil, it should be visible neurologically and affective phenomenologically, and thus it should be possible to investigate both its neural and phenomenal signatures. Results: The proposed means of testing the hypothesis is to use the elicitation interview technique alongside neural monitoring during the teaching of the Alexander Technique in four paired sets of subjects. Constructivist content: At the heart of this paper is the claim that all activity is co-activity. I make no assumption of an ontological primacy of mental or physical, or explanatory primacy of any methodology. Implications: This has important ramifications for somatic education and therapies, for establishing frameworks of co-engagement and care in health-care situations, and for understanding empathy. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  10
    Garry Potter (2000). For Bourdieu, Against Alexander: Reality and Reduction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 30 (2):229–246.
    Jeffrey Alexander argues that despite Bourdieu’s considerable achievements ultimately his work is reductionist and determinist. He further argues that though Bourdieu is a middle range theorist he is implicitly realist in his meta-theoretical assumptions. This article accepts these conclusions but argues that Bourdieu’s meta-theoretical realism is a virtue rather than a vice and that the manner in which he is a reductionist and determinist necessitate a re-thinking of what is meant by these notions. Alexander uses Bourdieu’s (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  44. Carl Gillett (2006). Samuel Alexander's Emergentism. Synthese 153 (2):261-296.
    Samuel Alexander was one of the foremost philosophical figures of his day and has been argued by John Passmore to be one of ‘fathers’ of Australian philosophy as well as a novel kind of physicalist. Yet Alexander is now relatively neglected, his role in the genesis of Australian philosophy if far from widely accepted and the standard interpretation takes him to be an anti-physicalist. In this paper, I carefully examine these issues and show that (...) has been badly, although understandably, misjudged by most of his contemporary critics and interpreters. Most importantly, I show that Alexander offers an ingenious, and highly original, version of physicalism at the heart of which is a strikingly different view of the nature of the microphysical properties and associated view of emergent properties. My final conclusion will be that Passmore is correct in his claims both that Alexander is significant as one of the grandfather’s of Australian philosophy and that he provides a novel physicalist position. I will also suggest that Alexander’s emergentism is important for addressing the so-called ‘problem of mental causation’ presently dogging contemporary non-reductive physicalists. (shrink)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45.  33
    Emily Thomas (2013). Space, Time, and Samuel Alexander. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (3):549-569.
    Super-substantivalism is the thesis that space is identical to matter; it is currently under discussion ? see Sklar (1977, 221?4), Earman (1989, 115?6) and Schaffer (2009) ? in contemporary philosophy of physics and metaphysics. Given this current interest, it is worth investigating the thesis in the history of philosophy. This paper examines the super-substantivalism of Samuel Alexander, an early twentieth century metaphysician primarily associated with (the movement now known as) British Emergentism. Alexander argues that spacetime is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. Robert Pippin (2014). Self-Interpreting Selves: Comments on Alexander Nehamas's Nietzsche: Life as Literature. Journal of Nietzsche Studies 45 (2):118-133.
    When Alexander Nehamas’s pathbreaking, elegantly conceived and executed book, Nietzsche: Life as Literature,1 first appeared in 1985, the reception of Nietzsche in the Anglo-American philosophical community was still in its initial, hesitant stages, even after the relative success of Walter Kaufmann’s much earlier, 1950 book, Nietzsche: Philosopher, Psychologist, Anti-Christ,2 and its postwar “decontamination” of Nietzsche after his appropriation by the Nazis.3 Arthur Danto’s 1964 book, Nietzsche as Philosopher,4 was also an important if somewhat isolated event, and there finally (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  28
    Michael S. Moore (2012). Moore's Truths About Causation and Responsibility: A Reply to Alexander and Ferzan. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):445-462.
    In this response to the review of Moore, Causation and Responsibility, by Larry Alexander and Kimberly Ferzan, previously published in this journal, two issues are discussed. The first is whether causation, counterfactual dependence, moral blame, and culpability, are all scalar properties or relations, that is, matters of more-or-less rather than either-or. The second issue discussed is whether deontological moral obligation is best described as a prohibition against using another as a means, or rather, as a prohibition on an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Alexander Bird (2008). Review of Alexander Bird, Nature's Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).
    This is a rewarding book. In terms of area, it has one foot firmly planted in metaphysics and the other just as firmly set in the philosophy of science. Nature's Metaphysics is distinctive for its thorough and detailed defense of fundamental, natural properties as essentially dispositional and for its description of how these dispositional properties are thus suited to sustain the laws of nature as (metaphysically) necessary truths.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Ulf Schmidt (2004). Justice at Nuremberg: Leo Alexander and the Nazi Doctors' Trial. Palgrave Macmillan.
    Justice at Nuremberg traces the history of the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial held in 1946-47, as seen through the eyes of the Austrian bliogemigrbliogé psychiatrist Leo Alexander. His investigations helped the United States to prosecute twenty German doctors and three administrators for war crimes and crimes against humanity. The legacy of Nuremberg was profound. In the Nuremberg code--a landmark in the history of modern medical ethics--the judges laid down, for the first time, international guidelines for permissible experiments on humans. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  2
    Milan Subotic (2008). The Birth of Russian Intelligentsia From the Spirit of Enlightenment: Alexander Radishchev. Filozofija I Društvo 19 (3):293-311.
    This text is the first part of a larger study about Alexander Radishchev, one of the leading representatives of Enlightenment in Russia's XVIII Century. Analyzing Voltaire's and Diderot's relationship with Catherine II, the Empress of Russia, in the Introduction of this article, the author formulates the reasons for thematization of Russian reception of Enlightenment. Since Radishchev is considered as 'the father of Russian intelligentsia', different approaches to the meaning of the concept of 'Russian intelligentsia' are considered in the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000