1. Alon Segev (2008). Leaving the “Real Hume” in Peace and Reading the Dialogues From a Moral Perspective. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology 8 (2).
    This paper offers a new reading of Hume’s much discussed Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion (1779/2000) which shows that, in contrast to what commentators tend to ascribe to Hume, the crux of the text is not epistemological-ontological – that is, not the arguments in favour of and against God’s existence – but moral. It is shown that, although most of the epistemologicalontological pro-and-contra arguments are quite weak, Hume’s interlocutors nevertheless cling to their theses from beginning to end, with the reason for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Alon Segev (2008). The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
    The aim of this paper is to examine Heidegger’s critique of Hegel and to determine whether it is justified. Heidegger claims that Hegel tries to reduce everything to a single absolute entity, to the absolute knowing subject. The result is the identification of being and nothing, as Hegel formulates it at the beginning of his Logic. Hegel identifies being with nothing because being has no references, no predicates, no properties. Heidegger agrees with Hegel that being and nothing are the same, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Alon Segev (2008). The Absolute and the Failure to Think of the Ontological Difference Heidegger's Critique of Hegel. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:453-472.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation