Search results for 'Alvin Pantinga' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. John S. Wilkins & Paul E. Griffiths (forthcoming). Evolutionary Debunking Arguments in Three Domains: Fact, Value, and Religion. In James Maclaurin Greg Dawes (ed.), A New Science of Religion. Routledge
    Ever since Darwin people have worried about the sceptical implications of evolution. If our minds are products of evolution like those of other animals, why suppose that the beliefs they produce are true, rather than merely useful? We consider this problem for beliefs in three different domains: religion, morality, and commonsense and scientific claims about matters of empirical fact. We identify replies to evolutionary scepticism that work in some domains but not in others. One reply is that evolution can be (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. I. Alvin (1979). Go Ldm An. What is Justified Belief? In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel 10--9.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  1
    Kernan, B. Alvin & Ed (1998). Review Essay: What's Happened to the Humanities? Philosophy and Literature 22 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  36
    Daniel Hill & Greg Welty (2009). Deane-Peter Baker, Ed. Alvin Plantinga. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 29:82-85.
    This is a book review of Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga (New York: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  32
    Tyler Andrew Wunder (2013). Alvin Plantinga on Paul Draper's Evolutionary Atheology: Implications of Theism's Noncontingency. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (1):67-75.
    In his recently published Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, & Naturalism 2011 Alvin Plantinga criticises Paul Draper’s evolutionary argument against theism as part of a larger project to show that evolution poses no threat to Christian belief. Plantinga focuses upon Draper’s probabilistic claim that the facts of evolution are much more probable on naturalism than on theism, and with regard to that claim makes two specific points. First, Draper’s probabilistic claim contradicts theism’s necessary falsehood; unless Draper wishes (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  52
    Kelly James Clark & Michael C. Rea (eds.) (2012). Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga. OUP Usa.
    In May 2010, philosophers, family and friends gathered at the University of Notre Dame to celebrate the career and retirement of Alvin Plantinga, widely recognized as one of the world's leading figures in metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of religion. Plantinga has earned particular respect within the community of Christian philosophers for the pivotal role that he played in the recent renewal and development of philosophy of religion and philosophical theology. Each of the essays in this volume engages with (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Greg Janzen (2012). Critical Notice of Alvin Plantinga's Where the Conflict Really Lies. Grazer Philosophische Studien 86:291-295.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  20
    Alvin Plantinga (1998). The Analytic Theist: An Alvin Plantinga Reader. Eerdmans.
    This collection of essays and excerpts gives a comprehensive overview of Alvin Plantinga 's seminal work as a Christian philosopher of religion.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9.  58
    Gerhard Schurz, Markus Werning & Alvin I. Goldman (eds.) (2009). Reliable Knowledge and Social Epistemology: Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Goldman and Replies by Goldman. Rodopi.
    The volume contains the written versions of all papers given at the workshop, divided into five chapters and followed by Alvin Goldman¿s replies in the sixth ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  82
    James Tomberlin & Peter van Inwagen (eds.) (1985). Alvin Plantinga (Profiles, Vol. 5). D. Reidel Publishing Company.
    PROFILES AN INTERNATIONAL SERIES ON CONTEMPORARY PHILOSOPHERS AND LOGICIANS EDITORS RADU ... University of Warsaw J. VUILLEMIN, College de France VOLUME 5 ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11. Enrique R. Moros (1997). El Argumento Ontológico Modal de Alvin Plantinga.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Michael C. Rea (2006). Alvin Plantinga. In D. Borchert (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. MacMillan Reference 579-581.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  4
    Georg Plasger (2015). Does Calvin Teach a Sensus Divinitatis? Reflections on Alvin Plantinga’s Interpretation of Calvin. In Dieter Schönecker (ed.), Plantinga's 'Warranted Christian Belief': Critical Essays with a Reply by Alvin Plantinga. De Gruyter 169-190.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  37
    Harvey Siegel (2005). Truth, Thinking, Testimony and Trust: Alvin Goldman on Epistemology and Education. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):345–366.
    In his recent work in social epistemology, Alvin Goldman argues that truth is the fundamental epistemic end of education, and that critical thinking is of merely instrumental value with respect to that fundamental end. He also argues that there is a central place for testimony and trust in the classroom, and an educational danger in over-emphasizing the fostering of students’ critical thinking. In this paper I take issue with these claims, and argue that (1) critical thinking is a fundamental (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  15.  61
    Bradford McCall (2014). Alvin Plantinga: Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Minds and Machines 24 (3):371-372.
    A prominent analytic philosopher, Alvin Plantinga, here writes on one of our biggest debates—the compatibility of science and religion. I will begin this review by summarizing the contents of the book. I will then comment specifically on certain entailments of the title and give some general constructive criticisms of the text. Finally, I will remark about its potential readership. Notably, this book originated as Gifford Lectures, entitled “Science and Religion: Conflict or Concord?” at the University of St. Andrews in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  78
    Oliver R. Scholz (2009). Experts: What They Are and How We Recognize Them—a Discussion of Alvin Goldman's Views. Grazer Philosophische Studien 79 (1):187-205.
    What are experts? Are there only experts in a subjective sense or are there also experts in an objective sense? And how, if at all, may non-experts recognize experts in an objective sense? In this paper, I approach these important questions by discussing Alvin I. Goldman's thoughts about how to define objective epistemic authority and about how non-experts are able to identify experts. I argue that a multiple epistemic desiderata approach is superior to Goldman's purely veritistic approach.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  63
    David W. Tien (2004). Warranted Neo-Confucian Belief: Religious Pluralism and the Affections in the Epistemologies of Wang Yangming (1472–1529) and Alvin Plantinga. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 55 (1):31-55.
    In this article, I argue that Wang Yangming'sNeo-Confucian religious beliefs can bewarranted, and that the rationality of hisreligious beliefs constitutes a significantdefeater for the rationality of Christianbelief on Alvin Plantinga's theory of warrant. I also question whether the notion of warrantas proper function can adequately account fortheories of religious knowledge in which theaffections play an integral role. Idemonstrate how a consideration of Wang'sepistemology reveals a difficulty forPlantinga's defense of the rationality ofChristian belief and highlights a limitation ofPlantinga's current conception (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18. Richard M. Gale (2007). Evil and Alvin Plantinga. In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Thomas M. Crisp, Matthew Davidson & David Vander Laan (eds.) (2006). Knowledge and Reality: Essays in Honor of Alvin Plantinga. Springer.
    This volume comprises essays presented to Alvin Plantinga on the occasion of his 70th birthday.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  72
    Derek S. Jeffreys (1997). How Reformed is Reformed Epistemology? Alvin Plantinga and Calvin's ‘Sensus Divinitatis’. Religious Studies 33 (4):419-431.
    In his recent two volumes on epistemology, Alvin Plantinga surveys contemporary theories of knowledge thoroughly, and carefully defends an externalist epistemology. He promises that in a third volume, Warranted Christian Belief, he will present John Calvin's sensus divinitatis as an epistemic module akin to sense perception, a priori knowledge, induction, testimony and other epistemic modules. Plantinga defines the sensus divinitatis as a ‘many sided disposition to accept belief in God in a variety of circumstances’. Like other epistemic modules, it (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  7
    Gerrit Glas (2000). Heeft het theïsme eigen gronden? Alvin plantinga over de'Proper basicality'Van Religieus Geloof. Philosophia Reformata 65 (2):170-182.
    The title of this article is ambiguous in the sense that it may direct the attention to either theism as a system of beliefs of persons who are referring to particular facts that serve as external grounds for the foundation of theist beliefs or to theism as a system of beliefs of persons who are convinced of theism’s truth on grounds that are intrinsic to their belief . Traces of both conceptions of theism can be found in Alvin Plantinga’s (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  57
    Richard M. Gale (2001). Alvin Plantinga's Warranted Christian Belief. Philo 4 (2):138-147.
    In Warranted Christian Belief, Alvin Plantinga makes use of his earlier two books, Warrant: the Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function, to show how it is possible for someone to have a warranted belief that God exists and that all of the great things of the Christian Gospel are true even if the believer is unable to give any argument to support these beliefs. Three objections are lodged against Plantinga’s position. First, the alleged sensus divinitatis and the internal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Alvin Plantinga & Michael Tooley (2009). Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley: Knowledge of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2):105-107.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  28
    T. J. Mawson (2009). Knowledge of God * by Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley. Analysis 69 (3):591-592.
    Knowledge of God takes the form of a debate between Alvin Plantinga and Michael Tooley. Plantinga opens the batting with a seventy-page laying out of his case ‘that theism has a significant epistemic virtue: if it is true, it is warranted; this is a virtue naturalism emphatically lacks’ . Indeed, Plantinga argues that ‘if naturalism were true, there would be no such thing as knowledge’ . It will be recalled [e.g. Plantinga and Plantinga ] that Plantinga's position is that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  25
    Tyler Wunder (2002). Warranted Christian Belief by Alvin Plantinga. Philo 5 (1):103-118.
    Alvin Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Belief (2000) is the capstone to the latest stage in his views on the intellectual credibility of theism in general, and Christian theism in particular. While Plantinga’s stature in the community of Christian philosophers alone makes gaining familiarity with this text a good idea for contemporary analytic philosophers of religion, its vigorous, innovative defense of specifically Christian theism and daring suggestions for renovating the landscape of analytic philosophy of religion merit serious consideration. I aim to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  24
    Tyler Wunder (2007). Critical Study of James K. Beilby, Epistemology as Theology: An Evaluation of Alvin Plantinga's Religious Epistemology. Philo 10 (2):168-186.
    James Beilby’s Epistemology as Theology is the first monograph to address Alvin Plantinga’s completed Warrant Trilogy. The book provides a thorough introduction to Plantinga’s current religious epistemology, but readers hoping for a critical treatment of Plantinga will be largely disappointed: while Beilby does level criticisms against Plantinga, he often underestimates their significance. One of Beilby’s main goals is to sketch out how a version of Reformed epistemology, even if not exactly Plantinga’s version, can withstand its critics. I provide a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Matthew Davidson (2003). Introduction to Alvin Plantinga, Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality. In Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality.
    For the past 30 years, Alvin Plantinga's work in the metaphysics of modality has been both insightful and innovative; it is high time that his papers in this area be collected together in a single volume. This book contains 11 pieces of Plantinga's work in modal metaphysics, arranged in chronological order so one can trace the development of his thought on matters modal. In what follows I will lay out the principal concepts and arguments in these papers.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  33
    Susan Stuart (2009). Alvin I. Goldman, Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (2):279-282.
    Alvin I. Goldman, Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading Content Type Journal Article Pages 279-282 DOI 10.1007/s11023-009-9142-x Authors Susan Stuart, University of Glasgow Humanities Advanced Technology and Information Institute 11 University Gardens Glasgow G12 8QQ Scotland, UK Journal Minds and Machines Online ISSN 1572-8641 Print ISSN 0924-6495 Journal Volume Volume 19 Journal Issue Volume 19, Number 2.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  10
    Paul A. Roth (1996). Dubious Liaisons: A Review of Alvin Goldman's Liaisons: Philosophy Meets the Cognitive and Social Sciences. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 9 (2):261 – 279.
    Alvin Goldman's recent collection (Goldman, 1992) includes many of the important and seminal contributions made by him over the last three decades to epistemology, philosophy of mind, and analytic metaphysics. Goldman is an acknowledged leader in efforts to put material from cognitive and social science to good philosophical use. This is the “liaison” which Goldman takes his own work to exemplify and advance. Yet the essays contained in Liaisons chart an important evolution in Goldman's own views about the relation (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  30
    Kevin Diller (2008). Are Sin and Evil Necessary for a Really Good World?: Questions for Alvin Plantinga's Felix Culpa Theodicy. Faith and Philosophy 25 (1):87-101.
    Arguably, the most philosophically nuanced defense of a Felix Culpa theodicy, born out of serious theological reflection, is to be found in Alvin Plantinga’srecent article entitled “Superlapsarianism, or ‘O Felix Culpa.’” In this paper I look at Plantinga’s argument for the necessity of evil as a means to God’s fargreater ends and raise four objections to it. The arguments I give are aimed at the theological adequacy of explaining the emergence of evil as a functionalgood. I conclude that Plantinga’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  1
    Guilherme V. R. De Carvalho (2009). A “basicalidade” da crença em Deus segundo Alvin Plantinga: uma apresentação. Horizonte 4 (8):97-113.
    O artigo apresenta a defesa da racionalidade da crença em Deus desenvolvida pelo filósofo reformado Alvin Plantinga, a partir de sua redefinição como “crença apropriadamente básica”. Após uma breve introdução, que situa a epistemologia religiosa de Plantinga no contexto das transformações recentes no campo da filosofia analítica da religião, expõe-se a crítica de Plantinga ao fundacionalismo clássico, cujo colapso teria reaberto a viabilidade epistemológica da crença em Deus. Segue-se a defesa plantingiana da crença em Deus como crença apropriadamente básica, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Deane-Peter Baker (ed.) (2007). Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.
    Few thinkers have had as much impact on contemporary philosophy as has Alvin Plantinga. The work of this quintessential analytic philosopher has in many respects set the tone for the debate in the fields of modal metaphysics and epistemology and he is arguably the most important philosopher of religion of our time. In this volume, a distinguished team of today’s leading philosophers address the central aspects of Plantinga’s philosophy - his views on natural theology; his responses to the problem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Deane-Peter Baker (ed.) (2009). Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press.
    Few thinkers have had as much impact on contemporary philosophy as has Alvin Plantinga. The work of this quintessential analytic philosopher has in many respects set the tone for the debate in the fields of modal metaphysics and epistemology and he is arguably the most important philosopher of religion of our time. In this volume, a distinguished team of today's leading philosophers address the central aspects of Plantinga's philosophy - his views on natural theology; his responses to the problem (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Deane-Peter Baker (2007). Introduction: Alvin Plantinga, God's Philosopher. In Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Francisco Conesa & Alvin Plantinga (1996). Dios y El Mal la Defensa Del Teísmo Frente Al Problema Del Mal Según Alvin Plantinga.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. John Divers (2007). The Modal Metaphysics of Alvin Plantinga. In Deane-Peter Baker (ed.), Alvin Plantinga. Cambridge University Press
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  64
    Kelly James Clark & Michael C. Rea (eds.) (2012). Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga. Oxford University Press Usa.
    In May 2010, philosophers, family and friends gathered at the University of Notre Dame to celebrate the career and retirement of Alvin Plantinga, widely recognized as one of the world's leading figures in metaphysics, epistemology, and the philosophy of religion. Plantinga has earned particular respect within the community of Christian philosophers for the pivotal role that he played in the recent renewal and development of philosophy of religion and philosophical theology. Each of the essays in this volume engages with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Alvin Plantinga (1999). 21 On Being Evidentially Challenged 'Alvin Plantinga'. In Eleonore Stump & Michael J. Murray (eds.), Philosophy of Religion: The Big Questions. Blackwell Publishers 6--176.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Alvin Plantinga & James F. Sennett (1998). The Analytic Theist a Collection of Alvin Plantinga's Work in Philosophy of Religion. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Alvin Thalheimer (1920). Thalheimer, Alvin, The Meaning of the Terms: „Existence" and „Reality“. Kant-Studien 25 (1).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Thomas D. Senor (2002). A Critical Review of Alvin Plantinga's Warranted Christian Belief. International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):389-396.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. D. Efird (2013). Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga. Analysis 73 (2):398-400.
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Tyler Dalton Mcnabb (2015). Warranted Religion: Answering Objections to Alvin Plantinga's Epistemology – CORRIGENDUM. Religious Studies 51 (4):496.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44. John Grumley (1989). Reviews : Alvin W. Gouldner, Against Fragmentation: The Origins of Marxism and the Sociology of the Intellectuals (New York, Oxford University Press, 1985). Thesis Eleven 22 (1):130-133.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  13
    Frank Jackson, Jesse J. Prinz, Ernest Sosa & Kim Sterelny (2009). Viii Notes on Contributors Alvin Goldman is Board of Governors Professor of Philosophy and Cognitive Science at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey. His Principal Research Areas Are Episte-Mology, Philosophy of Mind, and Cognitive Science. His Most Recent Book is Simulating Minds (2006). [REVIEW] In Michael Bishop & Dominic Murphy (eds.), Stich and His Critics. Blackwell
  46. Bradley Monton & Logan Paul Gage (2012). Alvin Plantinga: Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (1):53-57.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. William L. Rowe (2009). Alvin Plantinga on the Ontological Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 65 (2):87 - 92.
    By taking ‘existence in reality’ to be a great-making property and ‘God’ to be the greatest possible being, Plantinga skillfully presents Anselm’s ontological argument. However, since he proves God’s existence by virtue of a premise, “God (a maximally great being) is a possible being”, that is true only if God actually exists; his argument begs the question of the existence of God.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  19
    Roberto Di Ceglie (2015). Alvin Plantinga and Thomas Aquinas on Theism and Christianity. Philosophy and Theology 27 (1):235-252.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  67
    Jim Slagle (2013). Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism by Alvin Plantinga. [REVIEW] Zygon 48 (1):234-236.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    Jeroen de Ridder & Mathanja Berger (2013). Shipwrecked or Holding Water? In Defense of Alvin Plantinga’s Warranted Christian Believer. Philo 16 (1):42-61.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000