20 found
Sort by:
  1. Amber D. Carpenter (2014). Ethics of Substance. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 88 (1):145-167.
    Aristotle bequeathed to us a powerful metaphysical picture, of substances in which properties inhere. The picture has turned out to be highly problematic in many ways; but it is nevertheless a picture not easy to dislodge. Less obvious are the normative tones implicit in the picture and the way these permeate our system of values, especially when thinking of ourselves and our ambitions, hopes and fears. These have proved, if anything, even harder to dislodge than the metaphysical picture which supports (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Amber D. Carpenter, Eating One's Own : Exploring Conceptual Space for Moral Restraint.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Amber D. Carpenter, Faith Without God in Nagarjuna.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Amber D. Carpenter, Indian Buddhist Philosophy : Metaphysics as Ethics.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Amber D. Carpenter, Judging Strives to Be Knowing.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Amber D. Carpenter, Metaphysical Suffering, Metaphysics as Therapy.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Amber D. Carpenter, Persons Keeping Their Karma Together.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Amber D. Carpenter (2011). Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Platos Timaeus. Phronesis 55 (4):281-303.
    In the Timaeus , plants are granted soul, and specifically the sort of soul capable of perception and desire. Also in the Timaeus , perception requires the involvement of to phronimon . It seems it must follow that plants are intelligent. I argue that we can neither avoid granting plants sensation in just this sense, nor can we suppose that ` to phronimon ' is something devoid of intelligence. Indeed, plants must be related to intelligence, if they are to be (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Amber D. Carpenter (2011). Nicomachean Ethics 7 (C.) Natali (Ed.) Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, Book VII. Pp. Viii + 296. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Cased, £55, US$90. ISBN: 978-0-19-955844-5. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 61 (02):410-413.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Amber D. Carpenter (2011). Pleasure as Genesis in Plato's Philebus. Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):73-94.
    Socrates’ claim that pleasure is a γένεσις unifies the Philebus’ conception of pleasure. Close examination of the passage reveals an emphasis on metaphysical-normative dependency in γένεσις. Seeds for such an emphasis were sown in the dialogue’s earlier discussion of μεικτά, thus linking the γένεσις claim to Philebus’ description of pleasure as ἄπειρον. False pleasures illustrate the radical dependency of pleasure on outside determinants. I end tying together the Philebus’ three descriptions of pleasure: restoration, indefinite, and γένεσις.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Amber D. Carpenter (2010). Brill Online Books and Journals. Phronesis 55 (4).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Amber D. Carpenter, Embodying Intelligence (?): Plants in Plato's Timaeus.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Amber D. Carpenter (2010). Embodied Intelligent (?) Souls: Plants in Plato's Timaeus. Phronesis 55 (4):281-303.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Amber D. Carpenter, What is Peculiar in Aristotle's and Plato's Psychologies? What is Common to Them Both?
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Amber D. Carpenter, Nevertheless: The Philosophical Significance of the Questions Posed at Philebus 15b.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Amber Carpenter & Jonardon Ganeri (2009). Can You Seek the Answer to This Question?(Meno in India). Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4):571-594.
    Plato articulates a deep perplexity about inquiry in ?Meno's Paradox??the claim that one can inquire neither into what one knows, nor into what one does not know. Although some commentators have wrestled with the paradox itself, many suppose that the paradox of inquiry is special to Plato, arising from peculiarities of the Socratic elenchus or of Platonic epistemology. But there is nothing peculiarly Platonic in this puzzle. For it arises, too, in classical Indian philosophical discussions, where it is formulated with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Amber D. Carpenter, Embodying Intelligence : Animals and Us in Plato's Timaeus.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Amber D. Carpenter, On Plato's Lack of Consciousness.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Amber Danielle Carpenter (2006). Hedonistic Persons. The Good Man Argument in Plato's Philebus. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (1):5 – 26.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Amber D. Carpenter, Questioning Krishna's Kantianism.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation