9 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Amy Perfors [7]Amy F. Perfors [1]Amy Francesca Perfors [1]
  1.  6
    Thomas L. Griffiths, Nick Chater, Charles Kemp, Amy Perfors & Joshua B. Tenenbaum (2010). Probabilistic Models of Cognition: Exploring Representations and Inductive Biases. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):357-364.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   35 citations  
  2.  5
    Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Terry Regier (2011). The Learnability of Abstract Syntactic Principles. Cognition 118 (3):306-338.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  3.  47
    Amy Perfors, Joshua B. Tenenbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths & Fei Xu (2011). A Tutorial Introduction to Bayesian Models of Cognitive Development. Cognition 120 (3):302-321.
  4.  8
    Stephani Foraker, Terry Regier, Naveen Khetarpal, Amy Perfors & Joshua Tenenbaum (2009). Indirect Evidence and the Poverty of the Stimulus: The Case of Anaphoric One. Cognitive Science 33 (2):287-300.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  10
    Fei Xu, Kathryn Dewar & Amy Perfors (2009). Induction, Overhypotheses, and the Shape Bias: Some Arguments and Evidence for Rational Constructivism. In Bruce M. Hood & Laurie Santos (eds.), The Origins of Object Knowledge. Oxford University Press 263--284.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  4
    Amy Perfors & Daniel J. Navarro (2014). Language Evolution Can Be Shaped by the Structure of the World. Cognitive Science 38 (4):775-793.
    Human languages vary in many ways but also show striking cross-linguistic universals. Why do these universals exist? Recent theoretical results demonstrate that Bayesian learners transmitting language to each other through iterated learning will converge on a distribution of languages that depends only on their prior biases about language and the quantity of data transmitted at each point; the structure of the world being communicated about plays no role (Griffiths & Kalish, , ). We revisit these findings and show that when (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  32
    Amy Perfors (2012). Bayesian Models of Cognition: What's Built in After All? Philosophy Compass 7 (2):127-138.
    This article explores some of the philosophical implications of the Bayesian modeling paradigm. In particular, it focuses on the ramifications of the fact that Bayesian models pre‐specify an inbuilt hypothesis space. To what extent does this pre‐specification correspond to simply ‘‘building the solution in''? I argue that any learner must have a built‐in hypothesis space in precisely the same sense that Bayesian models have one. This has implications for the nature of learning, Fodor's puzzle of concept acquisition, and the role (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    Luke Maurits, Amy F. Perfors & Daniel J. Navarro (2009). Joint Acquisition of Word Order and Word Reference. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 36.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  1
    Daniel Joseph Navarro & Amy Francesca Perfors (2011). Enlightenment Grows From Fundamentals. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):207-208.
    Jones & Love (J&L) contend that the Bayesian approach should integrate process constraints with abstract computational analysis. We agree, but argue that the fundamentalist/enlightened dichotomy is a false one: Enlightened research is deeply intertwined with the basic, fundamental work upon which it is based.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography