53 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Ana S. Iltis [30]Ana Smith Iltis [23]
  1.  4
    Ana S. Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen (forthcoming). The “Ethics” Expertise in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy:jhw013.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  24
    Michele K. Langowski & Ana S. Iltis (2011). Global Health Needs and the Short-Term Medical Volunteer: Ethical Considerations. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 23 (2):71-78.
    Global Health Needs and the Short-Term Medical Volunteer: Ethical Considerations Content Type Journal Article Pages 71-78 DOI 10.1007/s10730-011-9158-5 Authors Michele K. Langowski, Albert Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Salus Center, Saint Louis University, 3545 Lafayette, 5th Floor, St. Louis, MO 63104-1314, USA Ana S. Iltis, Department of Philosophy and Center for Bioethics, Health and Society, Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7332, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, USA Journal HEC Forum Online ISSN 1572-8498 Print ISSN 0956-2737 Journal Volume Volume 23 Journal Issue (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  3. Ana S. Iltis (2015). Risk-Taking: Individual and Family Interests. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 40 (4):437-450.
    Decisions regarding clinical procedures or research participation typically require the informed consent of individuals. When individuals are unable to give consent, the informed permission of a legally authorized representative or surrogate is required. Although many proposed procedures are aimed primarily at benefiting the individual, some are not. I argue that, particularly when individuals are asked to assume risks primarily or exclusively for the benefit of others, family members ought to be engaged in the informed consent process. Examples of procedures in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  15
    Ana S. Iltis (forthcoming). Costs to Subjects for Research Participation and the Informed Consent Process: Regulatory and Ethical Considerations. IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  24
    Ana Smith Iltis (2000). Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):271 – 284.
    Bioethical decision-making depends on presuppositions about the function and goal of bioethics. The authors in this issue of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy share the assumption that bioethics is about resolving cases, not about moral theory, and that the best method of bioethical decision-making is that which produces useful answers. Because we have no universally agreed upon background moral theory which can serve as the basis for bioethical decision-making, they try to move bioethics away from theory. For them, a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  6.  10
    Ana S. Iltis (2009). Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 37 (1):6-11.
  7.  41
    Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Values Based Decision Making: Organizational Mission and Integrity. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 17 (1):6-17.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  20
    Ana S. Iltis (2006). Look Who's Talking: The Interdisciplinarity of Bioethics and the Implications for Bioethics Education. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 31 (6):629 – 641.
    There are competing accounts of the birth of bioethics. Despite the differences among them, these accounts share the claim that bioethics was not born in a single disciplinary home or in a single social space, but in numerous, including hospitals, doctors' offices, research laboratories, courtrooms, medical schools, churches and synagogues, and philosophy classrooms. This essay considers the interdisciplinarity of bioethics and the contribution of new disciplines to bioethics. It also explores the implications of interdisciplinarity for bioethics education. As bioethics develops, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  12
    Ana S. Iltis (2011). Who Is A Patient and Why Does It Matter? American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):62-64.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  8
    Ana S. Iltis (2015). Organ Donation, Brain Death and the Family: Valid Informed Consent. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 43 (2):369-382.
    I argue that valid informed consent is ethically required for organ donation from individuals declared dead using neurological criteria. Current policies in the U.S. do not require this and, not surprisingly, current practices inhibit the possibility of informed consent. Relevant information is withheld, opportunities to ensure understanding and appreciation are extremely limited, and the ability to make and communicate a free and voluntary decision is hindered by incomplete disclosure and other practices. Current practices should be revised to facilitate valid informed (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  9
    Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Timing Invitations to Participate in Clinical Research: Preliminary Versus Informed Consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):89 – 106.
    This article addresses the impact of the potential conflict between the roles of physicians who are both clinicians and researchers on the recruitment of persons into research trials. It has been proposedthat a physician breaches inter-role confidentiality when he or she uses information gathered in his or her clinical role to inform patients about trials for which they may be eligible and that clinician-researchers should adopt a model of preliminary consent to be approached about research prior to commencing a clinical (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  49
    Ana Smith Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen (2005). Patient Ethics and Responsibilities. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):131 – 137.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  1
    Ana S. Iltis & Mark Sheehan (forthcoming). Expertise, Ethics Expertise, and Clinical Ethics Consultation: Achieving Terminological Clarity. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy:jhw014.
    The language of ethics expertise has become particularly important in bioethics in light of efforts to establish the value of the clinical ethics consultation, to specify who is qualified to function as a clinical ethics consultant, and to characterize how one should evaluate whether or not a person is so qualified. Supporters and skeptics about the possibility of ethics expertise use the language of ethics expertise in ways that reflect competing views about what ethics expertise entails. We argue for clarity (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  31
    Ana Smith Iltis (ed.) (2006). Research Ethics. Routledge.
    Medicine in the twenty-first century is increasingly reliant on research to guarantee the safety and efficacy of medical interventions. As a result, the need to understand the ethical issues that research generates is becoming essential. This volume introduces the principal areas of concern in research on human subjects, offering a framework for understanding research ethics, and the relationship between ethics and compliance. Research Ethics brings together leading scholars in bioethics and the topics covered include the unique concerns that arise in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  55
    Lisa M. Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2002). Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):617 – 619.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  56
    Ana Smith Iltis (2004). Bioethics: The Intersection of Private and Public Decisions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):381 – 388.
  17.  56
    Ana Smith Iltis (2002). A New Moral Agent: The Patient Advocate. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):699 – 701.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  17
    Ana Smith Iltis (2001). Organizational Ethics and Institutional Integrity. HEC Forum 13 (4):317-328.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  4
    Ana Smith Iltis (2004). Placebo Controlled Trials: Restrictions, Not Prohibitions. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (4):380-393.
    The last two decades have witnessed intense debate over the ethical legitimacy of placebo controlled trials. Most of the arguments for and against the use of PCTs turn on one of the following issues: the compatibility of the obligations of clinicians and researchers with PCTs, the scientific merit of PCTs, and the influence of patients' and subjects' perceptions, ability to consent, expectations, and rights on the permissibility of PCTs. I introduce each of these categories and assess the principal arguments in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Ana Smith Iltis (2006). Human Subjects Research : Ethics and Compliance. In Research Ethics. Routledge
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  34
    Ana Smith Iltis (2002). Biomedical Research Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):515 – 522.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  28
    Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Bioethics Consultation in the Private Sector. HEC Forum 17 (2):87-93.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  8
    Nancy M. P. King & Ana S. Iltis (2012). INTRODUCTION: Research Ethics: Reexamining Key Concerns. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 40 (4):865-866.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  1
    Kirstin R. W. Matthews & Ana S. Iltis (2015). Unproven Stem Cell–Based Interventions and Achieving a Compromise Policy Among the Multiple Stakeholders. BMC Medical Ethics 16 (1):1-11.
    BackgroundIn 2004, patient advocate groups were major players in helping pass and implement significant public policy and funding initiatives in stem cells and regenerative medicine. In the following years, advocates were also actively engaged in Washington DC, encouraging policy makers to broaden embryonic stem cell research funding, which was ultimately passed after President Barack Obama came into office. Many advocates did this because they were told stem cell research would lead to cures. After waiting more than 10 years, many of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  16
    Ana S. Iltis (2006). Research, Development, and the Availability of Health Care Products: The Market, Regulation, and Legal Liability. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 40 (2-3):195-208.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Daniel McCall & Ana S. Iltis (2014). Health Care Voluntourism: Addressing Ethical Concerns of Undergraduate Student Participation in Global Health Volunteer Work. HEC Forum 26 (4):285-297.
    The popularity and availability of global health experiences has increased, with organizations helping groups plan service trips and companies specializing in “voluntourism,” health care professionals volunteering their services through different organizations, and medical students participating in global health electives. Much has been written about global health experiences in resource poor settings, but the literature focuses primarily on the work of health care professionals and medical students. This paper focuses on undergraduate student involvement in short term medical volunteer work in resource (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  9
    Ana S. Iltis (2011). Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 39 (3):488-501.
    This essay examines conceptual difficulties with one of the ways in which justice has been understood and applied the ethical and regulatory review of human research. Justice requires the fair distribution of the benefits and burdens of research. Class membership is seen as justifying inclusion in higher hazard-no benefit research from which members of potentially vulnerable classes, such as children, typically would be excluded. I argue that class membership does not do the justificatory work it is thought to do and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  8
    Lisa Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2002). The Ethics of Being a Patient. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):711.
  29.  2
    Barbara J. Evans, Sven Ove Hansson, Steve Heilig, Ana Smith Iltis, Kenneth V. Iserson, Anita F. Khayat, Greg Loeben, Jerry Menikoff & Rebecca D. Pentz (2004). Nancy Berlinger, Ph. D., M. Div., is Deputy Director and Associate for Religious Studies at The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York. Michael A. DeVita, MD, is Associate Professor of Critical Care Medicine and Internal Medicine and Chair of the UPMC Ethics Committee, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13:313-314.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  2
    Ana S. Iltis (2011). Bioethics and the Culture Wars. Christian Bioethics 17 (1):9-24.
    The term ‘culture wars’ has been used to describe deep, apparently intractable, disagreements between groups for many years. In contemporary discourse, it refers to disputes regarding significant moral matters carried out in the public square and for which there appears to be no way to achieve consensus or compromise. One set of battle lines is drawn between those who hold traditional Christian commitments and those who do not. Christian bioethics is nested in a set of moral and metaphysical understandings that (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  4
    Lisa Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2003). The Ethics of Being a Patient. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):391.
  32.  3
    Lisa Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2003). Call for Papers. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):127.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  1
    Laura M. Beskow, Christine Grady, Ana S. Iltis, John Z. Sadler & Benjamin S. Wilfond (2009). Points to Consider: The Research Ethics Consultation Service and the IRB. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 31 (6):1.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Susan G. DuBois (2012). Editors' Note. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 2 (2):v-vi.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Ana Smith Iltis & Mark J. Cherry (2008). First Do No Harm: Critical Analyses of the Roads to Health Care Reform. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (5):403-415.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  1
    Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Third-Party Payers and the Costs of Biomedical Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (2):135-160.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    Ana S. Iltis, Hisako Matsuo & Shannon R. DeVader (2008). Currents in Contemporary Ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):413-418.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  2
    Ana S. Iltis (2008). Reviews in Medical Ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):419-424.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Susan Dodds, Colin Thomson, Robert M. Veatch, Arthur Caplan, Autumn Fiester, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Ana Smith Iltis, Fabrice Jotterand, Wenmay Rei & Jiunn-Rong Yeh (2006). National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature Selected Citations From the ETHXWeb Database on Bioethics Centers October 17, 2007. Bioethics 20 (6):326-338.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. James M. DuBois & Ana S. Iltis (2011). Editors' Note. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 1 (3):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. James M. DuBois & Ana S. Iltis (2011). Editors’ Note. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 1 (2):v-v.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. James M. DuBois, Ana S. Iltis & Susan G. DuBois (2015). Editors’ Note. Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics 5 (1A):v-vi.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Ana Smith Iltis (2006). Conducting and Terminating Randomized Controlled Trials. In Research Ethics. Routledge
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Ana S. Iltis, Hisako Matsuo & Shannon R. DeVader (2008). Currents in Contemporary Ethics. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):413-418.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Ana S. Iltis (2008). Harm Reduction Research : Ethics and Compliance. In Ronald Michael Green, Aine Donovan & Steven A. Jauss (eds.), Global Bioethics: Issues of Conscience for the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Ana Smith Iltis (forthcoming). 1 Human Subjects Research. Research Ethics.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Ana S. Iltis (2009). Introduction: Vulnerability in Biomedical Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (1):6-11.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Ana S. Iltis (2011). Justice, Fairness, and Membership in a Class: Conceptual Confusions and Moral Puzzles in the Regulation of Human Subjects Research. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):488-501.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Ana S. Iltis, Sandra H. Johnson & Barbara A. Hinze (eds.) (2007). Legal Perspectives in Bioethics. Routledge.
    Issues in bioethics often turn, at least in part, on the law and regulatory requirements. Consisting of chapters that address particular bioethics topics from the law’s perspective, this fascinating book includes: an introduction to the American legal system papers identifying the principal ways in which the law influences discussions and decisions concerning each of the topics highlighted supplemental papers on certain areas that address the influence and status of the law in countries other than the United States. Covering traditional topics (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Ana S. Iltis, Sandra H. Johnson & Barbara A. Hinze (eds.) (2010). Legal Perspectives in Bioethics. Routledge.
    Issues in bioethics often turn, at least in part, on the law and regulatory requirements. Consisting of chapters that address particular bioethics topics from the law’s perspective, this fascinating book includes: an introduction to the American legal system papers identifying the principal ways in which the law influences discussions and decisions concerning each of the topics highlighted supplemental papers on certain areas that address the influence and status of the law in countries other than the United States. Covering traditional topics (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 53