22 found
Sort by:
  1. Ana Smith Iltis (forthcoming). 1 Human Subjects Research. Research Ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ana Smith Iltis & Mark J. Cherry (2008). First Do No Harm: Critical Analyses of the Roads to Health Care Reform. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (5):403-415.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Susan Dodds, Colin Thomson, Robert M. Veatch, Arthur Caplan, Autumn Fiester, H. Tristram Engelhardt, Ana Smith Iltis, Fabrice Jotterand, Wenmay Rei & Jiunn-Rong Yeh (2006). National Reference Center for Bioethics Literature Selected Citations From the ETHXWeb Database on Bioethics Centers October 17, 2007. Bioethics 20 (6):326-338.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ana Smith Iltis (2006). Conducting and Terminating Randomized Controlled Trials. In , Research Ethics. Routledge.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ana Smith Iltis (2006). Human Subjects Research : Ethics and Compliance. In , Research Ethics. Routledge.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ana Smith Iltis (ed.) (2006). Research Ethics. Routledge.
    Medicine in the twenty-first century is increasingly reliant on research to guarantee the safety and efficacy of medical interventions. As a result, the need to understand the ethical issues that research generates is becoming essential. This volume introduces the principal areas of concern in research on human subjects, offering a framework for understanding research ethics, and the relationship between ethics and compliance. Research Ethics brings together leading scholars in bioethics and the topics covered include the unique concerns that arise in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Bioethics Consultation in the Private Sector. HEC Forum 17 (2):87-93.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Timing Invitations to Participate in Clinical Research: Preliminary Versus Informed Consent. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (1):89 – 106.
    This article addresses the impact of the potential conflict between the roles of physicians who are both clinicians and researchers on the recruitment of persons into research trials. It has been proposedthat a physician breaches inter-role confidentiality when he or she uses information gathered in his or her clinical role to inform patients about trials for which they may be eligible and that clinician-researchers should adopt a model of preliminary consent to be approached about research prior to commencing a clinical (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Third-Party Payers and the Costs of Biomedical Research. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (2):135-160.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ana Smith Iltis (2005). Values Based Decision Making: Organizational Mission and Integrity. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 17 (1):6-17.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ana Smith Iltis & Lisa M. Rasmussen (2005). Patient Ethics and Responsibilities. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (2):131 – 137.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Barbara J. Evans, Sven Ove Hansson, Steve Heilig, Ana Smith Iltis, Kenneth V. Iserson, Anita F. Khayat, Greg Loeben, Jerry Menikoff & Rebecca D. Pentz (2004). Nancy Berlinger, Ph. D., M. Div., is Deputy Director and Associate for Religious Studies at The Hastings Center, Garrison, New York. Michael A. DeVita, MD, is Associate Professor of Critical Care Medicine and Internal Medicine and Chair of the UPMC Ethics Committee, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13:313-314.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ana Smith Iltis (2004). Placebo Controlled Trials: Restrictions, Not Prohibitions. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (04):380-393.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ana Smith Iltis (2004). Bioethics: The Intersection of Private and Public Decisions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (4):381 – 388.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Lisa Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2003). Call for Papers. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (1):127.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Lisa Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2003). The Ethics of Being a Patient. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 28 (3):391.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Ana Smith Iltis (2002). A New Moral Agent: The Patient Advocate. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):699 – 701.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ana Smith Iltis (2002). Biomedical Research Ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (5):515 – 522.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Lisa M. Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2002). Introduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):617 – 619.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Lisa Rasmussen & Ana Smith Iltis (2002). The Ethics of Being a Patient. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 27 (6):711.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ana Smith Iltis (2001). Organizational Ethics and Institutional Integrity. HEC Forum 13 (4):317-328.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ana Smith Iltis (2000). Bioethics as Methodological Case Resolution: Specification, Specified Principlism and Casuistry. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):271 – 284.
    Bioethical decision-making depends on presuppositions about the function and goal of bioethics. The authors in this issue of The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy share the assumption that bioethics is about resolving cases, not about moral theory, and that the best method of bioethical decision-making is that which produces useful answers. Because we have no universally agreed upon background moral theory which can serve as the basis for bioethical decision-making, they try to move bioethics away from theory. For them, a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation