16 found
Order:
  1.  18
    Andreas Follesdal & Victor M. Muñiz Fraticelli (2015). The Principle of Subsidiarity as a Constitutional Principle in the EU and Canada. Les Ateliers de l'Éthique / the Ethics Forum 10 (2):89-106.
    Andreas Follesdal,Victor Muñiz Fraticelli | : A Principle of Subsidiarity regulates the allocation and/or use of authority within a political order where authority is dispersed between a centre and various sub-units. Section 1 sketches the role of such principle of subsidiarity in the EU, and some of its significance in Canada. Section 2 presents some conceptions of subsidiarity that indicate the range of alternatives. Section 3 considers some areas where such conceptions might add value to constitutional and political deliberations in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  20
    Andreas Follesdal & Thomas Pogge (eds.) (2005). Real World Justice. Grounds, Principles, Human Rights, and Social Institutions. Springer.
    It helps ordinary citizens evaluate their options and their responsibility for global institutional factors, and it challenges social scientists to address the causes of poverty and hunger that act across borders.The present volume ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  3.  13
    Andreas Follesdal (1998). Survey Article: Subsidiarity. Journal of Political Philosophy 6 (2):190-218.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  4.  4
    Andreas Follesdal (2006). Subsidiarity, Democracy, and Human Rights in the Constitutional Treaty of Europe. Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (1):61-80.
  5.  19
    Andreas Follesdal (2009). The Legitimacy of International Human Rights Review: The Case of the European Court of Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):595-607.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  5
    Andreas Follesdal (2011). Can There Be a Just Zionism? Does Anyone Care? On Chaim Ganz, A Just Zionism. Ethical Perspectives 18 (4):625-632.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  6
    Andreas Follesdal (2000). Global Ethics and Respect for Culture. Social Philosophy Today 15:3-23.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  6
    Andreas Follesdal (2008). Equality of Education and Citizenship: Challenges of European Integration. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27 (5):335-354.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  20
    Andreas Follesdal (2002). Constructing a European Civic Society – Vaccination for Trust in a Fair, Multi-Level Europe. Studies in East European Thought 54 (4):303-324.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  17
    Eva Erman & Andreas Follesdal (2012). Multiple Citizenship: Normative Ideals and Institutional Challenges. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (3):279-302.
    Institutional suggestions for how to rethink democracy in response to changing state responsibilities and capabilities have been numerous and often mutually incompatible. This suggests that conceptual unclarity still reigns concerning how the normative ideal of democracy as collective self-determination, i.e. ?rule by the people?, might best be brought to bear in a transnational and global context. The aim in this paper is twofold. First, it analyses some consequences of the tendency to smudge the distinction between democratic theory and moral theories (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    Andreas Follesdal (2015). Machiavelli at 500: From Cynic to Vigilant Supporter of International Law. Ratio Juris 28 (2):242-251.
    Machiavelli's 500-year-old treatise The Prince outlined the central features of the realist tradition in international relations. His premises led him to question the likelihood of efficacious and stable international law and international courts, a skepticism that has present-day proponents. Machiavelli's reluctance was due to a combination of features of human nature and a focus on anarchic features of the relations among states. This article challenges these assumptions and implications: Other interpretations of human nature are closer to Machiavelli's text, and current (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  7
    Andreas Follesdal (2007). Why Deliberative Democracy? Contemporary Political Theory 6 (1):125-127.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  9
    Andreas Follesdal (2005). Exit, Choice, and Loyalty: Religious Liberty Versus Gender Equality. Journal of Social Philosophy 36 (4):407–420.
  14.  8
    Andreas Follesdal (2009). Introduction: How to Bring Normative Requirements to Bear on Institutions Beyond the State. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):461-465.
  15. Andreas Follesdal (2006). The Legitimacy Deficits of the European Union. Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (4):441-468.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Andreas Follesdal (1991). The Significance of State Borders for International Distributive Justice. Dissertation, Harvard University
    How should the global set of social institutions distribute income and wealth among members of different states? I present a Theory of Global Justice which supports the Bounded Significance of State Borders: The states system must satisfy the Determinate Human Needs of all, and the distribution within each state must satisfy Rawls' Difference Principle. However, justice does not require a Global Difference Principle: income and wealth need not be distributed so as to maximize the income and wealth of the globally (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography