9 found
Order:
  1. Angela R. Dorrough, Andreas Glöckner, Dshamilja M. Hellmann & Irena Ebert (2015). The Development of Ingroup Favoritism in Repeated Social Dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  18
    Cilia Witteman & Andreas Glöckner (2011). Beyond Dual-Process Models: A Categorisation of Processes Underlying Intuitive Judgement and Decision Making. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):1-25.
    Intuitive-automatic processes are crucial for making judgements and decisions. The fascinating complexity of these processes has attracted many decision researchers, prompting them to start investigating intuition empirically and to develop numerous models. Dual-process models assume a clear distinction between intuitive and deliberate processes but provide no further differentiation within both categories. We go beyond these models and argue that intuition is not a homogeneous concept, but a label used for different cognitive mechanisms. We suggest that these mechanisms have to be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  3.  48
    Andreas Glöckner & Cilia Witteman (2010). Beyond Dual-Process Models: A Categorisation of Processes Underlying Intuitive Judgement and Decision Making. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (1):1 – 25.
    Intuitive-automatic processes are crucial for making judgements and decisions. The fascinating complexity of these processes has attracted many decision researchers, prompting them to start investigating intuition empirically and to develop numerous models. Dual-process models assume a clear distinction between intuitive and deliberate processes but provide no further differentiation within both categories. We go beyond these models and argue that intuition is not a homogeneous concept, but a label used for different cognitive mechanisms. We suggest that these mechanisms have to be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  4.  50
    Andreas Glöckner & Thorsten Pachur (2012). Cognitive Models of Risky Choice: Parameter Stability and Predictive Accuracy of Prospect Theory. Cognition 123 (1):21-32.
  5.  8
    Marc Jekel, Andreas Glöckner, Susann Fiedler & Arndt Bröder (2012). The Rationality of Different Kinds of Intuitive Decision Processes. Synthese 189 (S1):147-160.
    Whereas classic work in judgment and decision making has focused on the deviation of intuition from rationality, more recent research has focused on the performance of intuition in real-world environments. Borrowing from both approaches, we investigate to which extent competing models of intuitive probabilistic decision making overlap with choices according to the axioms of probability theory and how accurate those models can be expected to perform in real-world environments. Specifically, we assessed to which extent heuristics, models implementing weighted additive information (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6. Susann Fiedler & Andreas Glöckner (2012). The Dynamics of Decision Making in Risky Choice: An Eye-Tracking Analysis. Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Andreas Glöckner, Susann Fiedler, Guy Hochman, Shahar Ayal & Benjamin E. Hilbig (2012). Processing Differences Between Descriptions and Experience: A Comparative Analysis Using Eye-Tracking and Physiological Measures. Frontiers in Psychology 3.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  1
    Andreas Glöckner, Benjamin E. Hilbig & Marc Jekel (2014). What is Adaptive About Adaptive Decision Making? A Parallel Constraint Satisfaction Account. Cognition 133 (3):641-666.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Andreas Glöckner, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Felix Henninger & Susann Fiedler (2016). The Reversed Description-Experience Gap: Disentangling Sources of Presentation Format Effects in Risky Choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145 (4):486-508.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography