Search results for 'Andrew D. Spear' (try it on Scholar)

13 found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew D. Spear, Husserl on Intentionality and Intentional Content.score: 290.0
    Edmund Husserl (1859—1938) was an influential thinker of the first half of the twentieth century. His philosophy was heavily influenced by the works of Franz Brentano and Bernard Bolzano, and was also influenced in various ways by interaction with contemporaries such as Alexius Meinong, Kasimir Twardowski, and Gottlob Frege. In his own right, Husserl is considered the founder of twentieth century Phenomenology with influence extending to thinkers such as Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and to contemporary continental philosophy generally. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew D. Spear (2009). Tommaso Piazza, A Priori Knowledge: Toward a Phenomenological Explanation. Philosophy in Review 29 (2):127.score: 290.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Norman D. Lock & Margaret Spear (1997). Student Teachers in Primary Schools: The Views of Mentors and Headteachers. Educational Studies 23 (2):253-261.score: 140.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gaile Renegar, Christopher J. Webster, Steffen Stuerzebecher, Lea Harty, I. D. E. E., Beth Balkite, Taryn A. Rogalski-salter, Nadine Cohen, Brian B. Spear, Diane M. Barnes & Celia Brazell (2006). Returning Genetic Research Results to Individuals: Points-to-Consider. Bioethics 20 (1):24–36.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peter Hare & Andrew Spear (2007). Dale Maurice Riepe, 1918-2006. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 80 (5):171 - 172.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew Storfer, Jonathan M. Eastman & Stephen F. Spear (2009). Modern Molecular Methods for Amphibian Conservation. Bioscience 59 (7):559-571.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. Baird Callicott & William Grove-Fanning (2009). Should Endangered Species Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Listed Species. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):317-352.score: 12.0
    The Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) is America's strongest environmental law. Its citizen-suit provisionany personawards implicit intrinsic value, de facto standing, and operational legal rights (sensu Christopher D. Stone) to listed species. Accordingly, some cases had gone forward in the federal courts in the name of various listed species between 1979 (Palila v. Hawaii Dept. of Land & Natural Resources) and 2004 (Cetacean Community v. Bush), when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that animals could not sue in (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Martin Cohen (2005). Wittgenstein's Beetle and Other Classic Thought Experiments. Blackwell Pub..score: 12.0
    A is for Alice and astronomers arguing about acceleration -- B is for Bernard's body-exchange machine -- C is for the Catholic cannibal -- D is for Maxwell's demon -- E is for evolution (and an embarrassing problem with it) -- F is for the forms lost forever to the prisoners of the cave -- G is for Galileo's gravitational balls -- H is for Hume's shades -- I is for the identity of indiscernibles -- J is for Henri Poincaré (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Penelope D. Johnson (2007). Valerie G. Spear, Leadership in Medieval English Nunneries. (Studies in the History of Medieval Religion, 24.) Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell and Brewer, 2005. Pp. Xix, 244; 5 Black-and-White Plates, 2 Black-and-White Figures, and Tables. $90. [REVIEW] Speculum 82 (2):486-487.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. William D. Spears (1960). Learning Theory and Objective Psychology in Education. Educational Theory 10 (2):107-119.score: 4.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. M. Cary & A. D. Nock (1927). Magic Spears. Classical Quarterly 21 (3-4):122-.score: 4.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. William D. Spears & Mary Ellen Deese (1973). Self-Concept as Cause. Educational Theory 23 (2):144-152.score: 4.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Teresa McCormack, Christoph Hoerl & Stephen Andrew Butterfill (eds.) (2011). Tool Use and Causal Cognition. OUP Oxford.score: 2.0
    What cognitive abilities underpin the use of tools, and how are tools and their properties represented or understood by tool-users? Does the study of tool use provide us with a unique or distinctive source of information about the causal cognition of tool-users? -/- Tool use is a topic of major interest to all those interested in animal cognition, because it implies that the animal has knowledge of the relationship between objects and their effects. There are countless examples of animals developing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation