21 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Andrew Spear (Grand Valley State University)
  1.  10
    Andrew D. Spear, Werner Ceusters & Barry Smith (2016). Functions in Basic Formal Ontology. Applied Ontology 11 (2):103-128.
    The notion of function is indispensable to our understanding of distinctions such as that between being broken and being in working order (for artifacts) and between being diseased and being healthy (for organisms). A clear account of the ontology of functions and functioning is thus an important desideratum for any top-level ontology intended for application to domains such as engineering or medicine. The benefit of using top-level ontologies in applied ontology can only be realized when each of the categories identified (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  2
    Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  7
    Andrew D. Spear (2016). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (1):n/a-n/a.
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  1
    Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  1
    Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  43
    Andrew D. Spear, Husserl on Intentionality and Intentional Content. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Edmund Husserl (1859—1938) was an influential thinker of the first half of the twentieth century. His philosophy was heavily influenced by the works of Franz Brentano and Bernard Bolzano, and was also influenced in various ways by interaction with contemporaries such as Alexius Meinong, Kasimir Twardowski, and Gottlob Frege. In his own right, Husserl is considered the founder of twentieth century Phenomenology with influence extending to thinkers such as Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and to contemporary continental philosophy generally. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  56
    Robert Arp, Barry Smith & Andrew D. Spear (2015). Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. MIT Press.
    In the era of “big data,” science is increasingly information driven, and the potential for computers to store, manage, and integrate massive amounts of data has given rise to such new disciplinary fields as biomedical informatics. Applied ontology offers a strategy for the organization of scientific information in computer-tractable form, drawing on concepts not only from computer and information science but also from linguistics, logic, and philosophy. This book provides an introduction to the field of applied ontology that is of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Andrew D. Spear (2015). Conditions of Cognitive Sanity and the Internalist Credo. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    BonJour has proposed background conditions on internalist justification, which Kornblith argues are inconsistent with a core internalist ‘credo’ – that subjects internally alike are justificationally alike – signaling the ‘death’ of internalism. The funeral arrangements are premature, though more systematic consideration of background conditions is needed. The majority of BonJour's conditions are not background conditions as their failure makes an epistemically relevant internal difference. This neutralizes Kornblith's criticisms and reveals how the proposed conditions are not departures from internalism. BonJour's background (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Andrew D. Spear (2009). Tommaso Piazza, A Priori Knowledge: Toward a Phenomenological Explanation. Philosophy in Review 29 (2):127.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography