Search results for 'Andrew Dodsworth' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew Dodsworth (2000). Andrew's Literary Death Quiz. Philosophy Now 27:47-47.score: 540.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew Dodsworth (2002). Literary Quiz. Philosophy Now 37:23-23.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Dudley Andrew (1984). Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Concepts in Film Theory is a continuation of Dudley Andrew's classic, The Major Film Theories. In writing now about contemporary theory, Andrew focuses on the key concepts in film study -- perception, representation, signification, narrative structure, adaptation, evaluation, identification, figuration, and interpretation. Beginning with an introductory chapter on the current state of film theory, Andrew goes on to build an overall view of film, presenting his own ideas on each concept, and giving a sense of the interdependence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Wayne K. Andrew (1980). Human Freedom and the Science of Psychology. Journal of Mind and Behavior 1:271-290.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. David Saunders & Ian Hunter (2003). Bringing the State to England: Andrew Tooke's Translation of Samuel Pufendorf's 'De Officio Hominis Et Civis'. History of Political Thought 24 (2):218-234.score: 24.0
    Andrew Tooke's 1691 English translation of Samuel Pufendorf's De officio hominis et civis, published as The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature, brought Pufendorf's manual fo statist natural law into English politics at a moment of temporary equilibrium in the unfinished contest between Crown and Parliament for the rights and powers of sovereignty. Drawing on the authors' re-edition of The Whole Duty of Man, this article describes and analyses a telling instance of how--by translation--the core (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.score: 21.0
    Andrew Collier is the boldest defender of objectivity - in science, knowledge, thought, action, politics, morality and religion. In this tribute and acknowledgement of the influence his work has had on a wide readership, his colleagues show that they have been stimulated by his thinking and offer challenging responses. This wide-ranging book covers key areas with which defenders of objectivity often have to engage. Sections are devoted to the following: 'objectivity of value', 'objectivity and everyday knowledge', 'objectivity in political (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, David Ingram, Sally Wyatt, Yoko Arisaka & Andrew Feenberg (2011). Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg's Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):203-226.score: 21.0
    Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg’s Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity Content Type Journal Article Pages 203-226 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0017-8 Authors Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA David B. Ingram, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA Sally Wyatt, e-Humanities Group, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) & Maastricht University, Cruquiusweg 31, 1019 AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Yoko Arisaka, Forschungsinstitut für Philosophie (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Thomas Jeannot (2010). Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital': A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007. Historical Materialism 18 (4):189-206.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Andrew Botterell (2005). Review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 114:125-128.score: 21.0
    A review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. William O. Stephens (2011). If Friendship Hurts, an Epicurean Deserts : A Reply to Andrew Mitchell. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi. 7.score: 18.0
    In “Friendship Amongst the Self-Sufficient: Epicurus” (this Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 2001), Andrew Mitchell explores the Epicurean view of the relationship between self-sufficiency and friendship by contrasting it with the views of Aristotle and the Stoics. Epicurus, Aristotle, and the Stoics do indeed have interestingly different views on friendship that are well worth comparing. Yet Mitchell’s characterization of Aristotelian friendship is misleading, his account of Stoic friendship is inaccurate, and his interpretation of Epicurean friendship is curiously imaginative (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Douglas Kellner, Review-Article on Andrew Feenberg, Questioning Technology. New York and London, Routledge, 1999.score: 18.0
    Andrew Feenberg's Questioning Technology (1999) is his third book in a series of studies which undertake to provide critical theoretical and democratic political perspectives to engage technology in the contemporary era. In Critical Theory of Technology (1991), Feenberg draws on neo-Marxian and other critical theories of technology, especially the Frankfurt School, to criticize determinist and essentialist theories. In this ground-breaking work (which will go into its second edition in 2001), he discusses both how the labor process, science, and technology (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gideon Calder & Andrew Collier (2009). Values and Ontology: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 8 (1):63-90.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andrew Collier & Gideon Calder (2008). Philosophy and Politics: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 7 (2):276-296.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Wayne C. Myrvold (1996). Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):661-665.score: 18.0
    Andrew Wayne (1995) discusses some recent attempts to account, within a Bayesian framework, for the "common methodological adage" that "diverse evidence better confirms a hypothesis than does the same amount of similar evidence" (112). One of the approaches considered by Wayne is that suggested by Howson and Urbach (1989/1993) and dubbed the "correlation approach" by Wayne. This approach is, indeed, incomplete, in that it neglects the role of the hypothesis under consideration in determining what diversity in a body of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Cynthia Willett (2010). Response to Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello on Irony in the Age of Empire. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (1):96-99.score: 18.0
    What a pleasure to have such subtle thinkers and scholars as Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello reflect on the relation of irony and comedy to politics and philosophy through their commentary on my new book. To set the tone, Martin begins with a koan, or a parody of one, “What if a tree told a joke in the woods and there was no one there to hear it?” He means, I believe, to sound a warning on the limits of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Nicolas de Warren (2007). Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.score: 18.0
    This essay explores Heidegger’s “The Origin of the Work of Art” and Andrew Goldsworthy’s artworks. Both Heidegger and Goldsworthy can be seen as refashioning our ontological bearings towards nature through the work of art. After introducing a set of distinctions (e.g., world/earth) in the context of Heidegger’s conception of the artwork as the event of truth, I argue that Heidegger’s releasing of the work of art from metaphysical notions of “the thing” illuminates the ambiguous status of Goldsworthy’s artworks as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Mikel Burley (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). Philosophical Papers 42 (1):127 - 131.score: 18.0
    (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) Philosophical Papers: Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 127-131. doi: 10.1080/05568641.2013.774726.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: II. Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):673 - 688.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: I. Review of Metaphysics 11 (3):471 - 485.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gregory Flaxman (2001). The Laws of Cinematic Hospitality: A Response to Andrew Murphie. Film-Philosophy 5 (2).score: 18.0
    Andrew Murphie 'Is Philosophy Ever Enough?' _Film-Philosophy_, Deleuze Special Issue vol. 5 no. 38, November 2001.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Adrián Kvokačka (2008). Andrew Slade: Lyotard, Beckett, Duras, and the Postmodern Sublime. Estetika 45 (2):243-249.score: 18.0
    A review of Andrew Slade‘s Lyotard, Beckett, Duras, and the Postmodern Sublime (New York, Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, Oxford, Wien: Peter Lang Publishing Inc., 2007, 136 pp. ISBN 0820478628).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Adam Stewart (2010). John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.score: 18.0
    This essay examines the contrasting conceptualizations of reason in the thought of John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn in their articles published in The Contemporary Review in 1885. This essay articulates both Fairbairn’s charge of philosophical scepticism against Newman as well as Newman’s defense of his position and concomitantly details Fairbairn’s and Newman’s competing notions of the efficacy of reason to provide reliable knowledge of God. The positions of Fairbairn and Newman remain two of the most important perspectives (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Doohwan Ahn (2011). From Greece to Babylon:The Political Thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743). History of European Ideas 37 (4):421-437.score: 18.0
    This paper explores the political thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay with particular reference to his highly acclaimed book called A New Cyropaedia, or the Travels of Cyrus (1727). Dedicated to Prince Charles Edward Stuart, the Young Pretender, to whom he was tutor, this work has been hitherto viewed as a Jacobite imitation of the Telemachus, Son of Ulysses(1699) of his eminent teacher archbishop Fénelon of Cambrai. By tracing the dual legacy of the first Persian Emperor Cyrus in Western thought, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. J. Andrew DeWoody, John W. Bickham, Charles H. Michler, Krista M. Nichols, Olin E. Rhodes & Keith E. Woeste (2011). Conservation Genetics for Natural ResourcesMolecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management.J. Andrew DeWoody , John W. Bickham , Charles H. Michler , Krista M. Nichols , Olin E. Rhodes Jr. , and Keith E. Woeste , Eds . Cambridge University Press , 2010 . 392 Pp., Illus. $55.00 (ISBN 9780521731348 Paper). [REVIEW] Bioscience 61 (4):330-331.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John Andrew Fisher (1996). The Myth of Anthropomorphism John Andrew Fisher. In Colin Allen & D. Jamison (eds.), Readings in Animal Cognition. Mit Press.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. William Hasker (2010). Which God? What Power? A Response to Andrew H. Gleeson. Sophia 49 (3):433-445.score: 18.0
    Andrew H. Gleeson has written an essay commenting on an exchange between Dewi Z. Phillips and me, arguing that I was mistaken to dismiss Phillips’ criticism of the standard definition of omnipotence as unsuccessful. Furthermore, he charges Swinburne, me, and analytic theists in general, with an excessive anthropomorphism that obliterates the distinction between Creator and creature. In response, I contend that all of Gleeson’s criticisms are unsound.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John Apczynski (2008). Andrew Grosso on Polanyi as a Resource for Christian Theology. Tradition and Discovery 35 (1):46-48.score: 18.0
    These reflections on Andrew Grosso’s recent book Personal Being highlight his philosophical construction of a concept of personhood based on themes from the writings Of Michael Polanyi and his use of this conception to express creatively elements of the traditional Christian doctrines on the trinity. Additional clarifications are sought regarding his formulations on the divine personhood of Jesus, the adequacy of his formulations on the intra-trinitarian relations, and the insightfulness of the absolute personhood of the divine. This study is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Andrew Dobson, Luc Semal, Mathilde Szuba & Olivier Petit (2014). Andrew Dobson: Trajectories of Green Political Theory Interview by Luc Semal, Mathilde Szuba and Olivier Petit. Natures Sciences Sociétés 22 (2):132-141.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David Hitchcock (2014). Andrew Aberdein and Ian J. Dove (Eds): The Argument of Mathematics (Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, Vol. 30). Argumentation 28 (2):245-258.score: 18.0
    Post-war argumentation theorists have tended to regard argumentation as one thing and mathematical proof as another. Perelman (1958, 1969), for example, defined the word ‘argumentation’ stipulatively as a contrast term to ‘demonstration’: whereas mathematical reasoning as theorized by modern formal logic, he writes, is a matter of deducing theorems from axioms in accordance with stipulated rules of transformation, argumentation aims at gaining the adherence of minds (Perelman 1969, pp. 1–2). Toulmin (1958) contrasted his “jurisprudential model” of argument, according to which (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Andrew Mansfield (2012). Aristocratic Reform and the Extirpation of Parliament in Early Georgian Britain: Andrew Michael Ramsay and French Ideas of Monarchy. History of European Ideas 40 (2):1-19.score: 18.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Peter Murphy (2011). Painting's Double: Andrew Benjamin's Disclosing Spaces. Thesis Eleven 104 (1):108-113.score: 18.0
    Andrew Benjamin’s book Disclosing Spaces (2004) presents a theory of painting. The theory is developed via a meticulous analysis of a series of individual artworks. The pivot of Benjamin’s theory of painting is the idea of relationality. The theory is critically reviewed with reference to the works of Edward Hopper, Gerhard Richter and Jacques-Louis David.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Andrew V. Abela (2001). Catholic Social Teaching and the Purpose of the Firm1 Andrew I/. Abela. Journal of Business Ethics 31:2.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Roy Bhaskar (2004). A Personal and Intellectual Tribute to Andrew Collier. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge. 1.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Justin Cruickshank (2004). Practical Knowledge and Realism: Linking Andrew Collier on Lay Knowledge to Karl Popper on the Philosophy of Science.'. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Matt Matravers (forthcoming). Symposium on Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-3.score: 18.0
    Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch’s Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation (Simester and von Hirsch 2011) is an important contribution to the philosophical debate over the nature and ethical limits of criminalisation. As they note in their reply in this symposium, one of the novel aspects of their account is that they do not advance one “unified, grand theory”. Rather, they analyse each ground of criminal prohibition—wrongfulness, harm-based, offense, and paternalistic prohibitions aimed at preventing self-harm—so (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrew J. Mckenna & Mark Youngerman (1994). Andrew J. McKenna., Violence and Difference: Girard, Derrida, and Deconstruction. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):149-150.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Enrique Peruzzotti, Martín Plot & Andrew Arato (eds.) (2012). Critical Theory and Democracy: Essays in Honour of Andrew Arato. Routledge.score: 18.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Andrew Vandenberg (2007). Chapter Seven Postmodern Conservatism and Reactionary Recognition Andrew Vandenberg, Matthew Sharpe and Geoff Boucher. In Julie Connolly, Michael Leach & Lucas Walsh (eds.), Recognition in Politics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cambridge Scholars. 116.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Walter L. Adamson (1983). Andrew Feenberg, Lukács, Marx and the Sources of Critical Theory (Review). [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2).score: 15.0
  40. Herbert Hochberg (2003). Review of Andrew Newman, The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (1).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. James T. Cushing (1985). Book Review:Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics Andrew Pickering. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (4):640-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jerry Fodor (2001). Evolution and the Human Mind: Modularity, Language and Meta-Cognition Peter Carruthers and Andrew Chamberlin. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (3):623-628.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Douglas Patterson (2004). Correspondence and Metaphysics: Andrew Newman's the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Inquiry 47 (5):490 – 504.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Yonathan Reshef Avner de-Shalit (2009). Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and its Place in Egalitarian Thought – Andrew Mason. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):756-760.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. D. Gene Witmer (2004). Review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (6).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Fred Adams (2007). Review of Andrew Brook, Kathleen Akins (Eds.), Cognition and the Brain: The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (2).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Ivan Moscati (2010). The Foundations of Positive and Normative Economics: A Handbook , Ed. Andrew Caplin and Andrew Schotter. Oxford University Press, 2008, XXII + 382 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 26 (1):101-108.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Roman Frigg (2005). Review of Meinard Kuhlmann, Holger Lyre, and Andrew Wayne (Eds.):" Ontological Aspects of Quantum Field Theory". [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 72:511-514.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. David Efird (2008). God and the Ethics of Belief: New Essays in Philosophy of Religion - Edited by Andrew Dole and Andrew Chignell. Philosophical Books 49 (1):93-94.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ernan McMullin (2005). Review of Andrew Janiak (Ed.), Isaac Newton: Philosophical Writings. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (6).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999