Search results for 'Andrew E. Reisner' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Andrew Reisner (Uppsala Universitet)
  1. Andrew E. Reisner (2014). A Short Refutation of Strict Normative Evidentialism. Inquiry (5):1-9.
    This paper shows that strict evidentialism about normative reasons for belief is inconsistent with taking truth to be the source of normative reasons for belief. It does so by showing that there are circumstances in which one can know what truth requires one to believe, yet still lack evidence for the contents of that belief.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2. Andrew Reisner (2009). The Possibility of Pragmatic Reasons for Belief and the Wrong Kind of Reasons Problem. Philosophical Studies 145 (2):257 - 272.
    In this paper I argue against the stronger of the two views concerning the right and wrong kind of reasons for belief, i.e. the view that the only genuine normative reasons for belief are evidential. The project in this paper is primarily negative, but with an ultimately positive aim. That aim is to leave room for the possibility that there are genuine pragmatic reasons for belief. Work is required to make room for this view, because evidentialism of a strict variety (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  3. Andrew Reisner, Anchoring Diachronic Rationality.
    [Please note, this paper has been for the most part superseded by 'Unifying the Requirements of Rationality'] In the last decade, it has become commonplace among people who work on reasons (although not uncontroversially so) to distinguish between normativity and rationality. Work by John Broome, Niko Kolodny, Derek Parfit, and Nicholas Shackel has helped to establish the view that rationality is conceptually distinct from reasons. The distinction allows us to make sense of the questions recently addressed by Broome, Kolodny, (...), and Shackel: is rationality normative, and if so, in what way? Kolodny’s ‘Why be Rational?’ answered the first of these questions by claiming that there is no reason to be rational. In order to argue for this conclusion, Kolodny argues for a process account of rationality. Kolodny’s view is that rational requirements govern mental processes. His view is set in direct contrast to Broome’s, who holds that rational requirements are primarily, and perhaps exclusively, concerned with relations among mental states at a time. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. E. Andrew (1990). The Foxy Prophet-Machiavelli Versus Machiavelli on Ferdinand-the-Catholic. History of Political Thought 11 (3):409-422.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  46
    Andrew Reisner (forthcoming). Two Thesis About the Distinctness of Practical and Theoretical Normativity. In C. McHugh, J. Way & D. Whiting (eds.), Normativity: Practical and Theoretical. Oxford University Press
    In tradition linked to Aristotle and Kant, many contemporary philosophers treat practical and theoretical normativity as two genuinely distinct domains of normativity. In this paper I consider the question of what it is for normative domains to be distinct. I suggest that there are two different ways that the distinctness thesis might be understood and consider the different implications of the two different distinctness theses.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Andrew Reisner (forthcoming). Pragmatic Reasons for Belief. In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press
    This is a discussion of the state of discussion on pragmatic reasons for belief.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Andrew Reisner (2015). Fittingness, Value and Trans-World Attitudes. Philosophical Quarterly (260):1-22.
    Philosophers interested in the fitting attitude analysis of final value have devoted a great deal of attention to the wrong kind of reasons problem. This paper offers an example of the reverse difficulty, the wrong kind of value problem. This problem creates deeper challenges for the fitting attitude analysis and provides independent grounds for rejecting it, or at least for doubting seriously its correctness.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Andrew Reisner (2013). Is the Enkratic Principle a Requirement of Rationality? Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 20 (4):436-462.
    In this paper I argue that the enkratic principle in its classic formulation may not be a requirement of rationality. The investigation of whether it is leads to some important methodological insights into the study of rationality. I also consider the possibility that we should consider rational requirements as a subset of a broader category of agential requirements.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9.  81
    Andrew Reisner (forthcoming). Peer Disagreement, Rational Requirements, and Evidence of Evidence as Evidence Against. In Martin Grajner & Pedro Schmechtig (eds.), Epistemic Reasons, Epistemic Norms, Epistemic Goals. De Gruyter
    This chapter addresses an ambiguity in some of the literature on rational peer disagreement about the use of the term 'rational'. In the literature 'rational' is used to describe a variety of normative statuses related to reasons, justification, and reasoning. This chapter focuses most closely on the upshot of peer disagreement for what is rationally required of parties to a peer disagreement. This follows recent work in theoretical reason which treats rationality as a system of requirements among an agent's mental (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Andrew Reisner (2015). Normative Conflicts and the Structure of Normativity. In Iwao Hirose & Andrew Reisner (eds.), Weighing and Reasoning: Themes from the Work of John Broome. OUP
    This paper considers the relation between the sources of normativity, reasons, and normative conflicts. It argues that common views about how normative reasons relate to their sources have important consequences for how we can understand putative normative conflicts.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  88
    Andrew Reisner & Joseph Van Weelden (2015). Moral Reasons for Moral Beliefs: A Puzzle for Moral Testimony Pessimism. Logos and Episteme (4):429-448.
    According to moral testimony pessimists, the testimony of moral experts does not provide non-experts with normative reasons for belief. Moral testimony optimists hold that it does. We first aim to show that moral testimony optimism is, to the extent such things may be shown, the more natural view about moral testimony. Speaking roughly, the supposed discontinuity between the norms of moral beliefs and the norms of non-moral beliefs, on careful reflection, lacks the intuitive advantage that it is sometimes supposed to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Andrew Reisner (2013). Book Review: The Domain of Reasons. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 122 (4):661-664.
    A review of John Skorupski's The Domain of Reasons.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.) (2011). Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press.
    Philosophers have long been concerned about what we know and how we know it. Increasingly, however, a related question has gained prominence in philosophical discussion: what should we believe and why? This volume brings together twelve new essays that address different aspects of this question. The essays examine foundational questions about reasons for belief, and use new research on reasons for belief to address traditional epistemological concerns such as knowledge, justification and perceptually acquired beliefs. This book will be of interest (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  14. Andrew Reisner (2008). Weighing Pragmatic and Evidential Reasons for Belief. Philosophical Studies 138 (1):17 - 27.
    In this paper I argue that we can give a plausible account of how to compare pragmatic and evidential normative reasons for belief. The account I offer is given in the form of a ‘defeasing function’. This function allows for a sophisticated comparison of the two types of reasons without assigning complex features to the logical structures of either type of reason.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  15. Andrew Reisner (2013). Leaps of Knowledge. In Timothy Chan (ed.), The Aim of Belief. OUP 167-183.
    This paper argues that both a limited doxastic voluntarism and anti-evidentialism are consistent with the views that the aim of belief is truth or knowledge and that this aim plays an important role in norm-setting for beliefs. More cautiously, it argues that limited doxastic voluntarism is (or would be) a useful capacity for agents concerned with truth tracking to possess, and that having it would confer some straightforward benefits of both an epistemic and non-epistemic variety to an agent concerned with (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. Andrew Reisner (2007). Evidentialism and the Numbers Game. Theoria 73 (4):304-316.
    In this paper I introduce an objection to normative evidentialism about reasons for belief. The objection arises from difficulties that evidentialism has with explaining our reasons for belief in unstable belief contexts with a single fixed point. I consider what other kinds of reasons for belief are relevant in such cases.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17. Andrew Reisner (2010). Metaethics for Everyone. Problema 4:39-64.
    As Dworkin puts it: moral scepticism is a moral view. This is in contrast to the more popular idea that the real challenge for moral realism is external scepticism, scepticism which arises because of non-moral considerations about the metaphysics of morality. I, too, do not concur with Dworkin’s strongest conclusions about the viability of external scepticism. But, I think his criticism of error scepticism offers a much needed corrective to more traditional metaethical projects. My aim in this paper is to (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Andrew Reisner (2009). Abandoning the Buck Passing Analysis of Final Value. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12 (4):379 - 395.
    In this paper it is argued that the buck-passing analysis (BPA) of final value is not a plausible analysis of value and should be abandoned. While considering the influential wrong kind of reason problem and other more recent technical objections, this paper contends that there are broader reasons for giving up on buck-passing. It is argued that the BPA, even if it can respond to the various technical objections, is not an attractive analysis of final value. It is not attractive (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Andrew Reisner (2009). Unifying the Requirements of Rationality. Philosophical Explorations 12 (3):243-260.
    This paper looks at the question of what form the requirements of practical rationality take. One common view is that the requirements of rationality are wide-scope, and another is that they are narrow-scope. I argue that the resolution to the question of wide-scope versus narrow-scope depends to a significant degree on what one expects a theory of rationality to do. In examining these expectations, I consider whether there might be a way to unify requirements of both forms into a single (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  20. Andrew Reisner (2011). Is There Reason to Be Theoretically Rational? In Andrew Reisner & Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen (eds.), Reasons for Belief. Cambridge University Press
    An important advance in normativity research over the last decade is an increased understanding of the distinction, and difference, between normativity and rationality. Normativity concerns or picks out a broad set of concepts that have in common that they are, put loosely, guiding. For example, consider two commonly used normative concepts: that of a normative reason and that of ought. To have a normative reason to perform some action is for there to be something that counts in favour of performing (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  79
    Andrew Reisner (2015). John Broome. In Robert Audi (ed.), Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy. Cambridge University Press
    A short encyclopaedia entry on John Broome.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  2
    Eliot Michaelson & Andrew Reisner (forthcoming). Fish. In Anne Barnhill, Mark Budolfson & Tyler Doggett (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Food Ethics. Oxford University Press
    In this chapter we discuss some of the central ethical issues specific to eating and harvesting fish. We survey recent research on fish intelligence and cognition and discuss possible considerations that are distinctive to questions about the ethics of eating fish as opposed to terrestrial and avian mammals. We conclude that those features that are distinctive to the harvesting and consumption of fish, including means of capture and the central role that fishing plays in many communities, do not suggest that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  59
    Andrew Reisner (2013). Prima Facie and Pro Tanto Oughts. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Blackwells
    There are many uses in English of the word “ought” (see Ought). This essay concerns the normative uses and the concepts or properties denoted thereby. In particular, it concerns two nonfinal oughts commonly used in the philosophical literature: prima facie oughts and pro tanto oughts.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Andrew Reisner (2008). Does Friendship Give Us Non-Derivative Partial Reasons. Les ateliers de l'éthique/The Ethics Forum 3 (1):70-78.
    One way to approach the question of whether there are non-derivative partial reasons of any kind is to give an account of what partial reasons are, and then to consider whether there are such reasons. If there are, then it is at least possible that there are partial reasons of friendship. It is this approach that will be taken here, and it produces several interesting results. The first is a point about the structure of partial reasons. It is at least (...)
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  4
    Ann E. Reisner & Robert G. Hays (1989). Media Ethics and Agriculture: Advertiser Demands Challenge Farm Press's Ethical Practices. Agriculture and Human Values 6 (4):40-46.
    The agricultural communicator is a key link in transmitting information to farmers. If agricultural communicators' ethics are compromised, the resulting biases in news production could have serious detrimental effects on the quality of information conveyed to farmers. But, to date, agricultural communicators' perceptions of ethical problems they encounter at work has not been examined. This study looks at the dimensions of ethical concerns for topics area (agricultural) journalists as defined by practitioners. To determine these dimensions, we sent open ended questionnaires (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  7
    Ann E. Reisner (2014). Martha Rosenberg: Born with a Junk Food Deficiency: How Flacks, Quacks, and Hacks Pimp the Public Health. Agriculture and Human Values 31 (1):165-166.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Emily Bell, Gail Andrew, Nina Di Pietro, Albert E. Chudley, James N. Reynolds & Eric Racine (2016). It’s a Shame! Stigma Against Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: Examining the Ethical Implications for Public Health Practices and Policies. Public Health Ethics 9 (1):65-77.
    Stigma can influence the prevention and identification of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder, a leading cause of developmental delay in North America. Understanding the effects of public health practices and policies on stigma is imperative. We reviewed social science and biomedical literatures to understand the nature of stigma in FASD and its relevance from an ethics standpoint in matters of health practices and policies. We propose a descriptive model of stigma in FASD and note current knowledge gaps; discuss the ethical implications (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  1
    V. I. Lenin, P. I. Stuchka, M. A. Reisner, E. B. Pashukanis, J. V. Stalin & A. Y. Vyshinsky (1954). Soviet Legal Philosophy. Journal of Philosophy 51 (10):300-307.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. D. Aacte40 Boud, E. Aera46 Boyd, R. J. Alexander, D. Boydell, G. Allport, M. Brennan, M. Andrew, J. E. Brophy, A. Anning & S. Brown (1993). Bolin, FS 80 DES 154 Borko, H. 14, 16 Dawson, CJ 109. In James Calderhead & Peter Gates (eds.), Conceptualizing Reflection in Teacher Development. London ;Falmer Press
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. C. H. Y. Fu, E. Amaro, M. Brammer, F. Ahmad, C. Andrew, S. C. R. Williams, N. Vythelingum & P. K. McGuire (2000). Alien Voices: An Event-Related fMRI Study of Overt Verbal Self-Monitoring. Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):S51 - S51.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Iwao Hirose & Andrew Reisner (eds.) (2015). Weighing and Reasoning: Themes From the Philosophy of John Broome. Oxford University Press Uk.
    John Broome has made major contributions to, and radical innovations in, contemporary moral philosophy. His research combines the formal method of economics with the philosophical analysis. Broome's works stretch over formal axiology, decision theory, philosophy of economics, population axiology, the value of life, the ethics of climate change, the nature of rationality, and practical and theoretical reasoning. Weighing and Reasoning brings together fifteen original essays from leading philosophers who have been influenced by the work and thought of John Broome.They explore (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Cedano Garcia My, P. A. Akwara, N. J. Madise, A. Hinde, G. Andrew, V. Patel, J. Ramakrishna, B. E. Antia, B. A. Omotara & A. I. Rabasa (2003). Sexual Rights and Reproductive Rights: Challenges for Contemporary Feminism. Journal of Biosocial Science 35 (3):56-66.
  33.  14
    Patricia Smith (2004). Book Review: Rape and Equal Protection: A Review of Stephen J. Schulhofer's Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law (Harvard University Press, 1998) and Andrew E. Taslitz's Rape and the Culture of the Courtroom. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (2):152-157.
  34.  1
    Michael S. Jones, Review: A Survey of the Old Testament (by Andrew E. Hill and John H. Walton). [REVIEW]
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Jennifer Illig (2013). Andrew E. Larsen, The School of Heretics: Academic Condemnation at the University of Oxford, 1277–1409. (Education and Society in the Middle Ages and Renaissance 40.) Leiden: Brill, 2011. Pp. Xii, 323. $166. ISBN: 9789004206618. [REVIEW] Speculum 88 (3):821-823.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Steven Shapin (1988). The Figural and the Literal: Problems of Language in the History of Science and Philosophy, 1630-1800 by Andrew E. Benjamin; Geoffrey N. Cantor; John R. R. Christie. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 79:127-128.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Patricia Smith (2004). Book Review: Rape and Equal Protection: A Review of Stephen J. Schulhofer's Unwanted Sex: The Culture of Intimidation and the Failure of Law and Andrew E. Taslitz's Rape and the Culture of the Courtroom. [REVIEW] Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 19 (2):152-157.
  38.  45
    S. Robertson (2013). Reasons for Belief, by Andrew Reisner and Asbjorn Steglich-Petersen (Eds). Mind 122 (485):315-319.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  14
    Conservative Utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham & J. S. Mill (2000). MOZAFFAR QlZILBASH 223 Reviews RM Hare, Sorting Out Ethics DALE E. MILLER 241 Andrew Mason (Ed.), Ideals on Equality. Utilitas 12 (2).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    Francesco Orsi (2016). Iwao Hirose and Andrew Reisner : Weighing and Reasoning. Themes From the Philosophy of John Broome. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):805-807.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  2
    Wendell Evangelista Soares Lopes (2015). Andrew Feenberg e a bidimensionalidade da tecnologia. Revista de Filosofia Aurora 27 (621):111.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  7
    W. J. Goodrich (1911). Varia Socratica Varia Socratica. First Series, by A. E. Taylor (St. Andrew's University Publications, No. IX.). 1 Vol. Pp. Iv. + 269. Oxford: James Parker and Co. 1911. 7s. 6d. Net. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 25 (08):251-253.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Wendell V. Harris (1995). Patrick Henry, Edwin Stein, Gabriele Poole, Richard Rumana, Gerald Prince, Tom Conley, Richard D. Lord, G. Mallary Masters, William E. Cain, Karsten Harries, Robert D. Cottrell, David Halliburton, Colette Gaudin, Virginia A. La Charité, Jeff Mitchell, John Goodliffe, Kerry S. Walters, Thomas Reinert, Dana R. Smith, Michael L. Hall, Christopher McClintick, Julie Van Camp, Warren Ginsberg, Steven Rendall, Donald Pizer, Jean A. Perkins, Roberta Davidson, Christopher Perricone, Peter J. Rabinowitz, Andrew J. McKenna, C. S. Schreiner, Anthony Roda, and Juniper Ellis. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Literature 19 (1):136.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  9
    Harold P. Cooke (1913). Primus Annus Primus Annus. By W. L. Paine and C. L. Mainwaring (Whitgift School, Croydon). With an Introduction by S. O. Andrew. Pp. 138. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912. 2s. Decem Fabulae. By W. L. Paine, C. L. Mainwaring, and Miss E. Ryle. With a Preface by W. H. D. Rouse. Pp. 94. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912. 1s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (01):32-33.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Robert Amiet, Repertorium Liturgicum, Typo-Offset Musumeci, Facultatis Theologicae & B. Sectio (1974). Paul Archambault, Seven French Chroni-Clers: Witnesses to History. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1974. Pp. Xiv, 156. $9.75. Andrew Blane, Ed., Thomas E. Bird, Assoc. [REVIEW] Mediaeval Studies 1:488.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Marialuisa Baldi (1989). Andrew Michael Ramsay, Ciclicita e progresso nell'Antica Teologia alle soglie dell Illuminismo. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 44 (3):443.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Daniel Métraux (1997). Review Of: D. W. Bracket, Holy Terror: Armageddon in Tokyo; David E. Kaplan and Andrew Marshall, The Cult at the End of the World: The Incredible Story of Aum; The Japan Times, Terror in the Heart of Tokyo: The Aum Shinrikyo Doomsday Cult; Ian Reader, A Poisonous Cocktail: Aum Shinrikyō’s Path to Violence. [REVIEW] Japanese Journal of Religious Studies 24 (1-2):207-210.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Jelson R. De Oliveira (2015). A técnica como poder e o poder da técnica: entre Hans Jonas e Andrew Feenberg. Revista de Filosofia Aurora 27 (621):143.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Taísa Helena Pascale Palhares (1997). A filosofia de Walter Benjamin–destruição e experiência, de Andrew Benjamin e Peter Osborne. Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã 3.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Francesco Paparella, Marco Balzano, Venezia Marsilio, Virgilio Melchiorre, Francesco Marrone, Stefano Levati & Marco Meriggi (2008). Iohannis Scotti seu Erugenae, Homilia super 'In principio erat Verbum'et Commenta-rius in Evangelium Iohannis, editiones novas curavit Édouard A. Jeauneau, adiu-vante Andrew J. Hicks, Brepols, Turnhout 2008, pp. CXVI-178, sip Antonio Vallisneri, Istoria della generazione, a cura di Maria Teresa Monti, saggi in-troduttivi di François Duchesneau e Maria Teresa Monti, Olschki, Firenze 2009, 2. [REVIEW] Elenchos 29 (15):00.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000