10 found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew J. I. Jones & Xavier Parent (2008). Normative-Informational Positions: A Modal-Logical Approach. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):7-23.
    This paper is a preliminary investigation into the application of the formal-logical theory of normative positions to the characterisation of normative-informational positions, pertaining to rules that are meant to regulate the supply of information. First, we present the proposed framework. Next, we identify the kinds of nuances and distinctions that can be articulated in such a logical framework. Finally, we show how such nuances can arise in specific regulations. Reference is made to Data Protection Law and Contract Law, among others. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. José Carmo & Andrew J. I. Jones (1996). Deontic Database Constraints, Violation and Recovery. Studia Logica 57 (1):139 - 165.
    The paper discusses the potential value of a deontic approach to database specification. More specifically, some different types of integrity constraints are considered and a distinction is drawn between necessary (hard) and deontic (soft) constraints.Databases are compared with other normative systems. A deontic logic for database specification is proposed and the problems of how to react to, and of how to correct, or repair, a situation which arises through norm violation are discussed in the context of this logic. The limitations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew J. I. Jones & Marek Sergot (1996). From the Editors. Studia Logica 57 (1):3-4.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew J. I. Jones & Marek Sergot (1992). Deontic Logic in the Representation of Law: Towards a Methodology. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):45-64.
    There seems to be no clear consensus in the existing literature about the role of deontic logic in legal knowledge representation — in large part, we argue, because of an apparent misunderstanding of what deontic logic is, and a misplaced preoccupation with the surface formulation of legislative texts. Our aim in this paper is to indicate, first, which aspects of legal reasoning are addressed by deontic logic, and then to sketch out the beginnings of a methodology for its use in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Andrew J. I. Jones (1991). On the Logic of Deontic Conditionals. Ratio Juris 4 (3):355-366.
  6. Andrew J. I. Jones (1990). Deontic Logic and Legal Knowledge Representation. Ratio Juris 3 (2):237-244.
  7. Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1989). A Rejoinder to Hansson. Synthese 80 (3):429 - 432.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1986). Ought' and 'Must. Synthese 66 (1):89 - 93.
  9. Ghita Holmström-Hintikka, Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (eds.) (1985). Action, Logic, and Social Theory: Dedicated to Ingmar Pörn on the Occasion of His 50th Birthday. Distributed by Akateeminen Kirjakauppa.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1985). Ideality, Sub-Ideality and Deontic Logic. Synthese 65 (2):275 - 290.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation