7 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Andrew J. Nicholson (State University of New York, Stony Brook)
  1. Jeffrey M. Perl, Tim Beasley-Murray, Ardis Butterfield, Gerard Wiegers, Andrew J. Nicholson, Johan Elverskog, Daniel J. Sharfstein & Dariusz Gafijczuk (forthcoming). Fuzzy Studies: A Symposium on the Consequence of Blur. Common Knowledge 19 (3):411-423.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew J. Nicholson (2014). Lord Siva's Song: The Isvara Gita. State University of New York Press.
    While the Bhagavad Gītā is an acknowledged treasure of world spiritual literature, few people know a parallel text, the Īśvara Gītā. This lesser-known work is also dedicated to a god, but in this case it is Śiva, rather than Kṛṣṇa, who is depicted as the omniscient creator of the world. Andrew J. Nicholson’s Lord Śiva’s Song makes this text available in English in an accessible new translation. A work of both poetry and philosophy, the Īśvara Gītā builds on the insights (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew J. Nicholson (2013). Is Yoga Hindu? On the Fuzziness of Religious Boundaries. Common Knowledge 19 (3):490-505.
    This contribution to the Common Knowledge symposium “Fuzzy Studies” explores the boundaries between religions by exploring the ambiguous place of yoga in various religious traditions, both modern and premodern. Recently, certain Hindus and Christians have tried to argue that yoga is an essentially Hindu practice, making their case by appealing to the Yoga Sutras, a text by the Sanskrit author Patanjali. However, on closer examination, the Yoga Sutras seem to exist in a fuzzy, indeterminate space that is not quite “Hindu” (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew J. Nicholson (2010). Unifying Hinduism: Philosophy and Identity in Indian Intellectual History. Columbia University Press.
    Some postcolonial theorists argue that the idea of a single system of belief known as "Hinduism" is a creation of nineteenth-century British imperialists. Andrew J. Nicholson introduces another perspective: although a unified Hindu identity is not as ancient as some Hindus claim, it has its roots in innovations within South Asian philosophy from the fourteenth to seventeenth centuries. During this time, thinkers treated the philosophies of Vedanta, Samkhya, and Yoga, along with the worshippers of Visnu, Siva, and Sakti, as belonging (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Andrew J. Nicholson (2007). Samādhi: The Numinous and Cessative in Indo-Tibetan Yoga (Review). Philosophy East and West 58 (1):157-159.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew J. Nicholson (2007). Reconciling Dualism and Non-Dualism: Three Arguments in Vijñānabhikṣu's Bhedābheda Vedānta. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 35 (4):371-403.
    The late 16th century Indian philosopher Vijñānabhikṣu is most well known today for his commentaries on Sāṃkhya and Yoga texts. However, the majority of his extant corpus belongs to the tradition of Bhedābheda (Difference and Non-Difference) Vedānta. This article elucidates three Vedāntic arguments from Vijñānabhikṣu’s voluminous commentary on the Brahma Sūtra, entitled Vijñānāmṛtabhāṣya (Commentary on the Nectar of Knowledge). The first section of the article explores the meaning of bhedābheda, showing that in Vijñānabhikṣu’s understanding, “difference and non-difference” does not entail (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Andrew J. Nicholson, Bhedābheda Vedānta. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation