21 found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew Jones (2014). Criticisms of the Nutrient-Dependent Pheromone-Controlled Evolutionary Model. Socioaffective Neuroscience and Psychology 4.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew Zimmerman Jones (2011). Hacker Ethics. The Philosophers' Magazine 54 (54):96-99.
    The hacker culture is neither good nor evil, but instead focuses on getting results. It is self-reliant and rooted in an anti-authoritarian embrace of individuality. No citizen is beholden to any single person, only to the quality of work being done.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Thomas W. Hertel, Alla A. Golub, Andrew D. Jones, Michael O'Hare, Richard J. Plevin & Daniel M. Kammen (2010). Effects of US Maize Ethanol on Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Estimating Market-Mediated Responses. BioScience 60 (3):223-231.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew Jones (2010). Globalization: Key Thinkers. Polity.
    Introduction: thinking about globalization -- Systemic thinking: Immanuel Wallerstein -- Conceptual thinking: Anthony Giddens -- Sociological thinking: Manuel Castells -- Transformational thinking: David Held and Anthony McGrew -- Sceptical thinking: Paul Hirst and Grahame Thompson -- Spatial thinking: Peter Dicken and Saskia Sassen -- Positive thinking: Thomas Friedman and Martin Wolf -- Reformist thinking: Joseph Stiglitz -- Radical thinking: Naomi Klein, George Monbiot and Subcommandante Marcos -- Revolutinary thinking: Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri -- Cultural thinking: Arjun Appadurai -- Conclusion: (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Thomas W. Hertel, Alla Golub, Andrew D. Jones, Michael O'Hare, Richard J. Plevin & Daniel M. Kammen (2009). Supporting Online Materials For: Global Land Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impacts of Maize Ethanol: The Role of Market-Mediated Responses. BioScience 60:223-231.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew Jones (2008). Art and Archaeology (R.) Osborne and (J.) Tanner Eds. Art's Agency and Art History (New Interventions in Art History). Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007. £50, 9781405135375 (Hbk); £24.99, 9781405135382 (Pbk). [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 128:263-.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Andrew J. I. Jones & Xavier Parent (2008). Normative-Informational Positions: A Modal-Logical Approach. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 16 (1):7-23.
    This paper is a preliminary investigation into the application of the formal-logical theory of normative positions to the characterisation of normative-informational positions, pertaining to rules that are meant to regulate the supply of information. First, we present the proposed framework. Next, we identify the kinds of nuances and distinctions that can be articulated in such a logical framework. Finally, we show how such nuances can arise in specific regulations. Reference is made to Data Protection Law and Contract Law, among others. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Joseph M. Craine, Jessamy Battersby, Andrew J. Elmore & Andrew W. Jones (2007). Building EDENs: The Rise of Environmentally Distributed Ecological Networks. BioScience 57 (1):45-54.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Andrew Zimmerman Jones (2007). Exploring the Dark Side of the Rainbow. In George A. Reisch (ed.), Pink Floyd and Philosophy: Careful with That Axiom, Eugene! Open Court.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Andrew K. Jones & David B. Sattelle (2004). Functional Genomics of the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Gene Family of the Nematode, Caenorhabditis Elegans. Bioessays 26 (1):39-49.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Jones (2002). Archaeological Theory and Scientific Practice. Cambridge University Press.
    Is archaeology an art or a science? This question has been hotly debated over the last few decades with the rise of archaeological science. At the same time, archaeologists have seen a change in the intellectual character of their discipline, as many writers have adopted approaches influenced by social theory. The discipline now encompasses both archaeological scientists and archaeological theorists, and discussion regarding the status of archaeology remains polarised. Andrew Jones argues that we need to analyse the practice of archaeology. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. José Carmo & Andrew J. I. Jones (1996). Deontic Database Constraints, Violation and Recovery. Studia Logica 57 (1):139 - 165.
    The paper discusses the potential value of a deontic approach to database specification. More specifically, some different types of integrity constraints are considered and a distinction is drawn between necessary (hard) and deontic (soft) constraints.Databases are compared with other normative systems. A deontic logic for database specification is proposed and the problems of how to react to, and of how to correct, or repair, a situation which arises through norm violation are discussed in the context of this logic. The limitations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andrew J. I. Jones & Marek Sergot (1996). From the Editors. Studia Logica 57 (1):3-4.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Andrew J. I. Jones & Marek Sergot (1992). Deontic Logic in the Representation of Law: Towards a Methodology. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (1):45-64.
    There seems to be no clear consensus in the existing literature about the role of deontic logic in legal knowledge representation — in large part, we argue, because of an apparent misunderstanding of what deontic logic is, and a misplaced preoccupation with the surface formulation of legislative texts. Our aim in this paper is to indicate, first, which aspects of legal reasoning are addressed by deontic logic, and then to sketch out the beginnings of a methodology for its use in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Andrew J. I. Jones (1991). On the Logic of Deontic Conditionals. Ratio Juris 4 (3):355-366.
  16. Andrew J. I. Jones (1990). Deontic Logic and Legal Knowledge Representation. Ratio Juris 3 (2):237-244.
  17. Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1989). A Rejoinder to Hansson. Synthese 80 (3):429 - 432.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1986). Ought' and 'Must. Synthese 66 (1):89 - 93.
  19. Ghita Holmström-Hintikka, Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (eds.) (1985). Action, Logic, and Social Theory: Dedicated to Ingmar Pörn on the Occasion of His 50th Birthday. Distributed by Akateeminen Kirjakauppa.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Andrew J. I. Jones & Ingmar Pörn (1985). Ideality, Sub-Ideality and Deontic Logic. Synthese 65 (2):275 - 290.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation