88 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Andrew Lugg [88]Andrew Maxwell Lugg [1]Andrew M. Lugg [1]
  1.  1
    Andrew Lugg (1984). The Limits of Scientific Reasoning. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   60 citations  
  2.  32
    Andrew Lugg (2012). W.V. Quine on Analyticity: “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” in Context. Dialogue 51 (2):231-246.
    Research Articles Andrew Lugg, Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue canadienne de philosophie, FirstView Article.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  25
    Andrew Lugg (1990). Pierre Duhem's Conception of Natural Classification. Synthese 83 (3):409 - 420.
    Duhem's discussion of physical theories as natural classifications is neither antithetical nor incidental to the main thrust of his philosophy of science. Contrary to what is often supposed, Duhem does not argue that theories are better thought of as economically organizing empirical laws than as providing information concerning the nature of the world. What he is primarily concerned with is the character and justification of the scientific method, not the logical status of theoretical entities. The crucial point to notice is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  4.  82
    David L. Hull, Andrew Lugg, Robert E. Butts & I. C. Jarvie (1979). Review Symposium : Laurens Laudan. Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1977. Pp. X + 257.Laudan's Progress and its Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):457-465.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  18
    Andrew Lugg (2000). Wittgenstein's Investigations 1-133: A Guide and Interpretation. Routledge.
    One of the greatest works of twentieth-century philosophy, Ludwig Wittgenstein'sPhilosophical Investigationsis also one of the most controversial.Wittgenstein's ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  16
    Andrew Lugg (1985). The Process of Discovery. Philosophy of Science 52 (2):207-220.
    The main argument of this paper is that philosophical difficulties regarding scientific discovery arise mainly because philosophers base their arguments on a flawed picture of scientific research. Careful examination of N. R. Hanson's treatment of Kepler's discovery not only puts the rationality of this discovery beyond question, it also reveals what its rationality consists in. We can retrieve the point stressed by Hanson concerning the rational character of discoveries such as Kepler's even as we reject the type of "logical" analysis (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  7.  38
    Andrew Lugg (2013). Wittgenstein's True Thoughts. Nordic Wittgenstein Review 2 (1):33-56.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Nordic Wittgenstein Review Jahrgang: 2 Heft: 1 Seiten: 33-56.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Andrew Lugg (2010). Roger M. White, Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: A Reader's Guide Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 28 (3):232-234.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  33
    Andrew Lugg (2013). A Sort of Prologue: Philosophical Investigations §§1–7. Philosophical Investigations 36 (1):20-36.
    §§1–7 of the Investigations should be taken at face value and not read against the grain. Wittgenstein is best understood as saying what he means and meaning what he says, and it is a mistake to suppose the examples of the shopkeeper and builders in §§1–2 cannot be read straightforwardly. The seven sections function as a prologue alerting the reader to the type of problem he intends to tackle and the type of approach he intends to pursue.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  53
    Andrew Lugg (1978). Disagreement in Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 9 (2):276-292.
    Summary The argument of this paper is (1) that, contrary to what is often thought, there are cases of disagreement among scientists concerning the relative acceptability of theories which do not turn on nonrational or extra-scientific considerations, (2) that agreement cannot be secured without adversely affecting the scientific enterprise as we know it, and (3) that disagreement can be accommodated within a theory of scientific rationality and progress based on the idea that the relative acceptability of scientific theories is a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  7
    Howard Duncan & Andrew Lugg (1988). Images of Science. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):795-804.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  16
    Andrew Lugg (2014). Wittgenstein on Showing What Cannot Be Said. Philosophical Investigations 37 (3):246-257.
    The distinction between saying and showing in Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus is not self-refuting, unbelievable or nonsensical. It makes good sense given Wittgenstein's equation of saying with communicable information and showing with necessarily true thought. The key to understanding his thinking is his claim in the Preface that unassailable and definitive truths are expressed in the book, and the subsidiary assumption that asserting empty truths is nonsensical. His conception of pictures, propositions, logic, mathematics, mathematical physics, mysticism, the inexpressible and solipsism as showing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  17
    Andrew Lugg (2013). Mauro Luiz Engelmann , Wittgenstein's Philosophical Development: Phenomenology, Grammar, Method, and the Anthropological View . Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 33 (6):452-454.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  20
    Andrew Lugg (1979). Review Symposium : Laudan and the Problem-Solving Approach to Scientific Progress and Rationality. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):466-474.
  15. Andrew Lugg (2005). Russell as a Precursor of Quine. The Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly 128.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  26
    Andrew Lugg (1986). An Alternative to the Traditional Model? Laudan on Disagreement and Consensus in Science. Philosophy of Science 53 (3):419-424.
  17.  15
    Andrew Lugg (1983). Forms of Explanation. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (4):633-646.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  12
    Andrew Lugg (2014). Wittgenstein on Transparent White. Wittgenstein-Studien 5 (1).
    Name der Zeitschrift: Wittgenstein-Studien Jahrgang: 5 Heft: 1 Seiten: 205-226.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  4
    Andrew Lugg (2010). Overinterpreting Wittgenstein. Wittgenstein-Studien 1 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  37
    Andrew Lugg (1995). Pseudoscience as Structurally Flawed Practice: A Reply to A.A. Derksen. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 26 (2):323 - 326.
    I respond to two criticisms levelled by A. A. Derksen in a recent issue of this journal against characterizing pseudoscience as structurally flawed practice: I argue that he surreptitiously invokes this conception, his official view that we should concentrate on pseudoscientists' pretensions rather than their practices notwithstanding; and I critically examine his contention that judgements of scientificity (and pseudoscientificity) cannot properly be made independently of a consideration of whether the relevant theories and practices are empirically well-confirmed.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  25
    Andrew Lugg (1976). Book Review:The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics Michael Audi. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 43 (3):449-.
  22.  9
    Andrew Lugg (1991). Consensus and Common Ground. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 53 (3):474 - 488.
    Philosophers concerned with the character of scientific disputes tend to divide into two camps. On the one side there are those who hold that scientists can always settle their differences by appealing to shared assumptions; on the other side there are those who maintain that in many cases scientists must resort to (nonrational ) persuasion to establish their views. The trouble is that for all their strong points both approaches labour under enormous difficulties. Scientific disagreement is often much deeper than (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  17
    Andrew Lugg (1980). Theory Choice and Resistance to Change. Philosophy of Science 47 (2):227-243.
    The object of this paper is twofold: to show that resistance to scientific change on the part of scientists need signal neither irrationality nor the presence of extra-scientific influences; and to show how such resistance can be accommodated within a theory of rational choice. After considerations have been outlined suggesting that scientists cannot rationally resist new scientific theories unless theory choice is subjectivistic (section I), evidence is adduced favoring the contrary view (section II). In section III, a non-subjectivistic, non-relativistic conception (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  11
    Andrew Lugg (1991). Farewell to Reason. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):109-120.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Andrew Lugg (2005). Antony Flew, God and Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (5):355-356.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  3
    Andrew Lugg (2014). When and Why Was Remarks on Colour Written – and Why is It Important to Know? In Stefan Riegelnik & Frederik A. Gierlinger (eds.), Wittgenstein on Colour. De Gruyter 1-20.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  5
    Andrew Lugg (1987). Bunkum, Flim‐Flam and Quackery: Pseudoscience as a Philosophical Problem. Dialectica 41 (3):221-230.
    SummaryIn the first half of the paper, it is argued that while the prospects for a criterion for demarcating scientific theories from pseudoscientific ones are exceedingly dim, it is a mistake to fall back to the position that these differ only with regard to how well they are confirmed. One may admit that different pseudoscientific theories are flawed in different ways yet still insist that their flaws are structural rather than empirical in character. In the second half of the paper, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  3
    Andrew Lugg (1978). Overdetermined Problems in Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 9 (1):1-18.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  15
    Andrew Lugg (2010). “But What About This?”. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:221-240.
    Philosophical Investigations §§19–20 have received little critical attention and their importance has mostly gone unappreciated. In this paper these sections are examined a few sentences at a time in the order they were written with an eye to determining what Wittgenstein does and does not say and how he has been and can be misinterpreted. In addition it is suggested that the material deserves careful consideration because it sheds light on Wittgenstein’s way of tackling philosophical problems, illuminates his pronouncements about (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Andrew Lugg (1986). Deep Disagreement and Informal Logic: No Cause for Alarm. Informal Logic 8 (1).
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  13
    Andrew Lugg & J. F. McDonald (1993). Scientism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):291-298.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  13
    Andrew Lugg (2004). Wittgenstein and Politics. International Studies in Philosophy 36 (1):61-79.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  4
    Andrew Lugg & Steve Fuller (1984). Review. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 21 (3):433 - 438.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  2
    Andrew Lugg (2011). Nuno Venturinha, Ed. , Wittgenstein After His Nachlass . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 31 (2):156-159.
  35.  2
    Andrew Lugg (2010). “But What About This?”: Philosophical Investigations §§19–20. Journal of Philosophical Research 35:221-240.
    Philosophical Investigations §§19–20 have received little critical attention and their importance has mostly gone unappreciated. In this paper these sections are examined a few sentences at a time in the order they were written with an eye to determining what Wittgenstein does and does not say and how he has been and can be misinterpreted. In addition it is suggested that the material deserves careful consideration because it sheds light on Wittgenstein’s way of tackling philosophical problems, illuminates his pronouncements about (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  7
    Andrew Lugg (1979). Critical Notice of T.W. Adorno Et aI., The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (4):739-756.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  18
    Andrew Lugg (2003). Wittgenstein's Tractatus: True Thoughts and Nonsensical Propositions. Philosophical Investigations 26 (4):332–347.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Andrew Lugg (1989). "Challengeability in Modern Science" by J. O. Wisdom. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (3):379.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  13
    Andrew Lugg (1985). Was Wittgenstein a Conservative Thinker? Southern Journal of Philosophy 23 (4):465-474.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  4
    Andrew Lugg (1975). Putnam on Reductionism. Cognition 3 (3):289-293.
  41.  10
    Andrew Lugg (2007). Wittgenstein: A Guide for the Perplexed - by Mark Addis. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 48 (3):268-269.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  10
    Andrew Lugg (1988). Book Review:Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity G. P. Baker, P. M. S. Hacker. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 55 (3):486-.
  43.  3
    Andrew Lugg & Donald McDonell (1984). Serge Robert, Les révolutions du savoir. Longueuil, Le Préambule, 1979, 307 p.Serge Robert, Les révolutions du savoir. Longueuil, Le Préambule, 1979, 307 p. [REVIEW] Philosophiques 11 (1):203-205.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Andrew Lugg (1982). Raymond L. Wilder, Mathematics as a Cultural System Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 2 (1):37-39.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    Andrew Lugg (1987). Book Review:The Limits of Scientific Reasoning David Faust. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 54 (1):137-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Andrew Lugg (1991). Wesley C. Salmon, Four Decades of Scientific Explanation Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 11 (1):68-69.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Andrew Lugg (2004). Roger Gibson, Ed., The Cambridge Companion to Quine Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 24 (5):325-328.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    Andrew Lugg (1977). Feyerabend's Rationalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (4):755 - 775.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  8
    Andrew Lugg (1987). 'The Priority of Paradigms' Revisited. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 18 (1-2):175-182.
    In diesem Beitrag liefere ich eine Interpretation und Verteidigung der These Thomas Kuhns von der Priorität von Paradigmen. Ich behaupte, daß Kuhns Argument für diese These wichtiger, als gewöhnlich angenommen wird, ist, und zwar sowohl für die Klärung seiner Ideen als auch für die Wissenschaftstheorie im allgemeinen. Anerkennt man seine Kritik an der üblichen Auffassung, daß Regeln den Paradigmen vorausgehen, so erscheint vieles von dem, was er über andere Gegenstände sagt, in einem neuen Licht, und viele Schwierigkeiten, die Philosophen bei (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    Harry F. Gollob & Andrew M. Lugg (1973). Effects of Instruction and Stimulus Presentation on the Occurrence of Averaging Responses in Impression Formation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):217.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 88