Search results for 'Andrew M. Pitts' (try it on Scholar)

39 found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew M. Pitts & Paul Taylor (1989). A Note on Russell's Paradox in Locally Cartesian Closed Categories. Studia Logica 48 (3):377 - 387.score: 290.0
    Working in the fragment of Martin-Löfs extensional type theory [12] which has products (but not sums) of dependent types, we consider two additional assumptions: firstly, that there are (strong) equality types; and secondly, that there is a type which is universal in the sense that terms of that type name all types, up to isomorphism. For such a type theory, we give a version of Russell's paradox showing that each type possesses a closed term and (hence) that all terms of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew M. Pitts (1992). On an Interpretation of Second Order Quantification in First Order Intuitionistic Propositional Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):33-52.score: 290.0
    We prove the following surprising property of Heyting's intuitionistic propositional calculus, IpC. Consider the collection of formulas, φ, built up from propositional variables (p,q,r,...) and falsity $(\perp)$ using conjunction $(\wedge)$ , disjunction (∨) and implication (→). Write $\vdash\phi$ to indicate that such a formula is intuitionistically valid. We show that for each variable p and formula φ there exists a formula Apφ (effectively computable from φ), containing only variables not equal to p which occur in φ, and such that for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. J. Brian Pitts (2008). Why the Big Bang Singularity Does Not Help the Kal M Cosmological Argument for Theism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 59 (4):675-708.score: 120.0
    The cosmic singularity provides negligible evidence for creation in the finite past, and hence theism. A physical theory might have no metric or multiple metrics, so a ‘beginning’ must involve a first moment, not just finite age. Whether one dismisses singularities or takes them seriously, physics licenses no first moment. The analogy between the Big Bang and stellar gravitational collapse indicates that a Creator is required in the first case only if a Destroyer is needed in the second. The need (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. M. R. Klinger, P. Burton & G. Pitts (2000). Mechanisms of Unconscious Priming: Response Competition, Not Spreading Activation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (2):441-455.score: 120.0
  5. Silvio Ghilardi & Marek Zawadowski (1995). A Sheaf Representation and Duality for Finitely Presented Heyting Algebras. Journal of Symbolic Logic 60 (3):911-939.score: 14.0
    A. M. Pitts in [Pi] proved that HA op fp is a bi-Heyting category satisfying the Lawrence condition. We show that the embedding $\Phi: HA^\mathrm{op}_\mathrm{fp} \longrightarrow Sh(\mathbf{P_0,J_0})$ into the topos of sheaves, (P 0 is the category of finite rooted posets and open maps, J 0 the canonical topology on P 0 ) given by $H \longmapsto HA(H,\mathscr{D}(-)): \mathbf{P_0} \longrightarrow \text{Set}$ preserves the structure mentioned above, finite coproducts, and subobject classifier, it is also conservative. This whole structure on HA (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. W. M. R. (1890). Schuckburgh's Herodotus Herodotos VI. With Introduction, Notes and Maps. By E. S. Shuckbukgh, M.A. (Pitt Press Series.) Cambridge: 1889. 4s. 6d. Herodotos IX. 1–89 Ditto. 1887. 3s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 4 (1-2):21-22.score: 13.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. H. M. Stephenson (1888). Titi Livi Ab Urbe Condita Libri. Editionem Primam Curavit G. Weissenborn. Editio Altera Quam Curavit Mauritius Müller. Pars. IV. Fase. I. Lib. XXXI.—XXXV. Lipsiae, in Aedibus B. G. Teubneri.Titi Livi Ab Urbe Condita Liber V. Für den Schulgebrauch Erklärt von Franz Luterbacher. Leipzig. B. G. Teubner. 1 Mk. 20.Livy. Book XXI. Edited for the Syndics of the University Press, by M. S. Dimsdale, M.A., Fellow of King's College, Cambridge. Pitt Press Series. 3s. Sd. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 2 (07):213-214.score: 13.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. W. M. Lindsay (1894). Two School-Editions of Plautus 1. T. Macci Plauti Stichus, Edited with Introduction and Notes by C. A. M. Fennell, Litt. D. University Press, Cambridge, 1893 (Pitt Press Series). (Pp. Xix. 55.) 2. T. Macci Plauti Epidicus, From the Text of G. Goetz, with an Introduction and Notes by J. H. Gray, M.A. University Press, Cambridge, 1893 (Pitt Press Series). (Pp. Xxxiii. 93.). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (04):158-160.score: 13.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. B. Perrin (1891). Peskett's Caesar B.C.I. Gai Iuli Commentariorum de Bello Civili, Liber Primus, with Introduction, Notes, and Maps, by A. G. Peskett, M.A. XX. + 172 Pp. Cambridge, Pitt Press Series, 1890. 3s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (07):324-325.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John C. Rolfe (1893). Stephenson's Sixth Book of Livy Livy, Book VI. With Introduction and Notes, by H. M. Stephenson, M.A. Pitt Press Series. 2s. Gd. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 7 (06):272-273.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. W. E. P. Cotter (1898). Headlam's Edition of the Medea Euripidis Medea, Edited with Introduction and Notes by C. E. S. Headlam, M.A. Pp. I.-Xxv. 1–124. Pitt Press Series. 2s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (07):367-368.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. H. W. Hatley (1898). Hadley's Edition of the Alcestis The Alcestis of Euripides. Edited with Introduction and Notes by W. S. Hadlet, M.A., Fellow and Assistant Tutor of Pembroke College, Cambridge. Cambridge: University Press. 1896. [Pitt Press Series.] 2s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (02):118-119.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. Arbuthnot Nairn (1902). Lawson's Homer Iliad IX. And X The Iliad of Homer: Books IX and X. Edited with Introduction and Notes, by J. C. Lawson, M.A., Fellow of Pembroke College, Cambridge. Pp. Xxx, 97. Cambridge, Pitt Press. 2s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 16 (06):329-.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Arthur Platt (1891). The Iliad of Homer, Book Xxiii. With Introduction, Notes, and Appendices, by G. M. Edwards, M. A., Fellow and Tutor of Sidney Sussex College, Cambridge. Pitt Press, 1891. 2s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 5 (10):476-477.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. E. S. Shuckburgh (1889). Some Books on Xenophon (1) Xenophon Cyropaedeia. Books III.—V. With Notes by the Rev. H. A. Holden M.A. LL.D. (Pitt Press Series). Text, Pp. 128. Notes, Pp. 182. Indices, Pp. 44. 5s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 3 (09):403-406.score: 12.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. St George Stock (1901). Peskett's Book III. Of Caesar's Civil War Caesar's Civil War, Book III. Edited with Introduction, Notes, and Maps, by A. G. Peskett, M. A., President and Tutor of Magdalene College, Cambridge, Pp. Xxiv, 184. Pitt Press, 1900. Price 2s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 15 (02):123-126.score: 12.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Richard M. Burian & Joseph C. Pitt (1992). Editorial Introduction. Synthese 92 (1):3-7.score: 4.7
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Richard M. Burian & Joseph C. Pitt (1986). Introduction. Synthese 67 (1):1-2.score: 4.7
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John M. Artz (2001). Thinking About Technology: Foundations of the Philosophy of Technology, Joseph C. Pitt. Ethics and Information Technology 2 (4):249-250.score: 4.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. M. M. Van De Pitte (1984). Schlick's Critique of Phenomenological Propositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (2):195 - 225.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. M. M. Van De Pitte (1984). Schlick's Critique of Phenomenological Propositions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (2):195-225.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Joseph C. Pitt (2005). Review of Carla Rita Palmerino (Ed.), J.M.M.H. Thijssen (Ed.), The Reception of the Galilean Science of Motion in Seventeenth-Century Europe. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. M. M. van de Pitte (1976). Husserl: The Idealist Malgré Lui. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):70-78.score: 4.0
    The aim of the paper is to show and document the husserlian concern to validate a position of ontological realism, and the inappropriateness of his method to this task. It is precisley the scientific charachter of his philosophy that drew Husserl to idealism and solipsism, despite his original intentions and motivations.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. M. M. Van de Pitte (1984). Hermeneutics and the ‘Crisis’ of Literature. British Journal of Aesthetics 24 (2):99-112.score: 4.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. M. M. van De Pitte (1972). The Idea of Dialogal Phenomenology. By Stephen Strasser. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press. 1969. Pp. Xiii, 136. $5.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 11 (03):452-455.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. M. M. Pitte (1988). Phenomenology: Vigorous or Moribund? Husserl Studies 5 (1):3-39.score: 4.0
  27. M. M. Van de Pitte (1975). Husserl Literature 1965—1971. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 57 (1).score: 4.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. M. M. Van de Pitte (1977). Is There a Phenomenological Method? Metaphilosophy 8 (1):21–35.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. M. M. Van De Pitte (1984). Comments on a Claim That Some Phenomenological Statements May Be a Posteriori. Metaphilosophy 15 (3-4):248-255.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. M. van De Pitte (1972). On Bracketing the Epoché. Dialogue 11 (04):535-545.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. M. M. van De Pitte (1986). Seeing and Reading Graeme Nicholson Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1984. Pp. 275. $25.00. Dialogue 25 (04):782-.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. M. Van de Pitte (1998). “The Female is Somewhat Duller”: The Construction of the Sexes in Ornithological Literature. Environmental Ethics 20 (1):23-39.score: 4.0
    I review ornithological literature in order to demonstrate that conventions of description and illustration, as well as some aspects of biological theory relating to birds, put a strong focus on male birds. I criticize the sexist aspects of ornithology from the standpoint of recent feminist philosophy of science, establishing connections between the ways in which we view animals and the ways in which we viewourselves and arguing that it is costly to humans, specifically women, to suggest that females of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. M. M. Van De Pitte (1976). Husserl: The Idealist Malgre Lui. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):70 - 78.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. M. A. Bayfield (1901). Odyssey, Book Xi. By J. A. Nairn. Pitt Press Series. 2s. The Classical Review 15 (04):229-.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. M. M. Van De Pitte (1977). Is There a Phenomenological Method? Metaphilosophy 8 (1):21-35.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. M. M. van De Pitte (1979). Critical Notice of Peter Jones, Philosophy and the Novel. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):163-178.score: 4.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David Pitt, Indexical Thought.score: 2.0
    Call a thought whose expression involves the utterance of an indexical an indexical thought . Thus, my thoughts that I’m annoyed, that now is not the right time, that this is not acceptable, are all indexical thoughts. Such thoughts present a prima facie problem for the thesis that thought contents are phenomenally individuated – i.e., that each distinct thought type has a proprietarily cognitive phenomenology such that its having that phenomenology makes it the thought that it is – given the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Richard M. Burian (2001). The Dilemma of Case Studies Resolved: The Virtues of Using Case Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 9 (4):383-404.score: 2.0
    : Philosophers of science turned to historical case studies in part in response to Thomas Kuhn's insistence that such studies can transform the philosophy of science. In this issue Joseph Pitt argues that the power of case studies to instruct us about scientific methodology and epistemology depends on prior philosophical commitments, without which case studies are not philosophically useful. Here I reply to Pitt, demonstrating that case studies, properly deployed, illustrate styles of scientific work and modes of argumentation that are (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation