50 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Andrew Mason [43]Andrew S. Mason [6]Andrew D. Mason [1]
  1. Andrew Mason (2013). The Nous Doctrine in Plato's Thought. Apeiron 46 (3):201-228.
    Journal Name: Apeiron Issue: Ahead of print.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew Mason (2012). A Reply to Sleat. Political Theory 40 (5):657-662.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew Mason (2012). Citizens, Resident Aliens, and the Good of Equal Membership. In Eva Erman & Ludvig Beckman (eds.), Territories of Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan. 1.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew Mason (2012). Danielle S. Allen. Why Plato Wrote. Malden, MA/Oxford/Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. 2010. 232 Pp. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 6 (1):168-172.
    This article is currently available as a free download on ingentaconnect.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Andrew Mason (2012). Legitimacy and Disagreement: A Reply to Sleat. Political Theory 40 (5):657 - 662.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Andrew Mason (2012). Living Together as Equals: The Demands of Citizenship. Oup Oxford.
    There is considerable debate about the demands citizenship places upon us in our everyday lives. Living Together as Equals distinguishes two different ways of thinking about citizenship both of which shed some light on the demands that it makes upon us.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Andrew Mason (2012). What Is the Point of Justice? Utilitas 24 (04):525-547.
    Conflicting answers to the question of what principles of justice are for may generate very different ways of theorizing about justice. Indeed divergent answers to it are at the heart of G. A. Cohen's disagreement with John Rawls. Cohen thinks that the roots of this disagreement lie in the constructivist method that Rawls employs, which mistakenly treats the principles that emerge from a procedure that involves factual assumptions as ultimate principles of justice. But I argue that even if Rawls were (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Chris Armstrong & Andrew Mason (2011). Introduction: Democratic Citizenship and its Futures. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (5):553-560.
  9. Andrew Mason (2011). Holger Thesleff. Platonic Patterns. Las Vegas/Zurich/Athens: Parmenides Publishing. 2009. 626 Pp. [REVIEW] International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 4 (2):181-184.
  10. Andrew Mason (2011). Putting Story‐Reading to Bed: A Reply to Segall. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (1):81-88.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Andrew Mason (2010). Rawlsian Theory and the Circumstances of Politics. Political Theory 38 (5):658 - 683.
    Can Rawlsian theory provide us with an adequate response to the practical question of how we should proceed in the face of widespread and intractable disagreement over matters of justice? Recent criticism of ideal theorizing might make us wonder whether this question highlights another way in which ideal theory can be too far removed from our non-ideal circumstances to provide any practical guidance. Further reflection on it does not show that ideal theory is redundant, but it does indicate that there (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Andrew S. Mason (2010). Plato. Acumen Pub. Ltd..
    Introduction -- Plato's development and Plato's Socrates -- Plato's metaphysics : the "theory of forms" -- Knowledge -- The soul -- Ethics -- God and nature -- Aesthetics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andrew Mason (2009). Justice, Holism and Principles. Res Publica 15 (2):179-194.
    Some moral theorists defend a holistic account of practical reasons and deny that the possibility of moral thought depends upon the existence of moral principles. This article explores the implications of this position for theorising about justice, which has often aspired to provide us with an ordered list of principles to govern our institutions and practices.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Andrew Mason (2009). Review of Francis A. Grabowski III, Plato, Metaphysics and the Forms. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (3).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Andrew Mason (2007). Public Justifiability, Deliberation, and Civic Virtue. Social Theory and Practice 33 (4):679-700.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Andrew Mason (2007). Review of Lindsay Judson, Vassilis Karasmanis (Eds.), Remembering Socrates: Philosophical Essays. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. T. Scaltsas & Andrew S. Mason (eds.) (2007/2010). The Philosophy of Epictetus. Oxford University Press.
    Written by some of the leading experts in the field, the essays in this volume will be a fascinating resource for students and scholars of ancient philosophy, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Andrew Mason (2006). Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and its Place in Egalitarian Thought. OUP Oxford.
    "Equality of opportunity for all" is a fine piece of political rhetoric but the ideal that lies behind it is slippery to say the least. Some see it as an alternative to a more robust form of egalitarianism, whilst others think that when it is properly understood it provides us with a real radical vision of what it is to level the playing field. This book combines a meritocratic conception of equality of opportunity that governs access to advantaged social positions, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Andrew Mason, 5 Questions.
    Mason on the question: "What are the most important unsolved questions in political philosophy and/or related disciplines and what are the prospects for progress?" Political philosophy rarely, if ever, solves problems once and for all. Old problems usually persist despite attempts to resolve them, and even when they are successfully resolved, new ones arise from the ashes of the old. In my view, however, it would be a mistake to conclude from this that political philosophy makes no progress. We should (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Andrew S. Mason (2006). Belief in God. Hume Studies 32 (2):357-361.
  21. Andrew S. Mason (2006). Belief in God: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion (Review). Hume Studies 32 (2):357-361.
  22. Andrew S. Mason (2006). Plato on Necessity and Chaos. Philosophical Studies 127 (2):283 - 298.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Andrew S. Mason (2006). Why Does Plato Believe in a Timeless Eternity? In Fritz-Gregor Herrmann & Stefan Büttner (eds.), New Essays on Plato: Language and Thought in Fourth-Century Greek Philosophy. David Brown Book Co., Distributor. 177.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Andrew Mason (2004). Equality of Opportunity and Differences in Social Circumstances. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (216):368 - 388.
    It is often supposed that the point of equality of opportunity is to create a level playing-field. This is understood in different ways, however. A common proposal is what I call the neutralization view: that people's social circumstances should not differentially affect their life chances in any serious way. I raise problems with this view, before developing an alternative conception of equal opportunity which allows some variations in social circumstances to create differences in life prospects. The meritocratic conception which I (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Andrew Mason, Meritocracy, Desert and the Moral Force of Intuitions.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Andrew Mason (2002). Cultural Goods and the Limits of the Market. Contemporary Political Theory 1 (3):389.
  27. Andrew Mason (2001). Glen Newey, Virtue, Reason and Toleration: The Place of Toleration in Ethical and Political Philosophy, Edinburgh, Edinburgh University Press, 1999, Pp. Ix + 208. Utilitas 13 (01):132-.
  28. Andrew Mason (2001). Egalitarianism and the Levelling Down Objection. Analysis 61 (3):246–254.
    In an important piece of work Derek Parfit distinguishes two different forms of egalitarianism, ‘Deontic’ and ‘Telic’ (Parfit 1995; see also Parfit 1997). He contrasts these with what he calls the Priority View, which is not strictly a form of egalitarianism at all, since it is not essentially concerned with how well off people are relative to each other. His main aim is to generate an adequate taxonomy of the positions available, but in the process he draws attention to some (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Andrew Mason (2001). Equality of Opportunity, Old and New. Ethics 111 (4):760-781.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Andrew Mason (2000). XI: Equality, Personal Responsibility, and Gender Socialisation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (3):227–246.
    A number of egalitarians have reached the conclusion that inequalities are just provided that they are the outcome of holding people appropriately responsible for their choices, and that only inequalities which can be traced back to the circumstances in which people happen to find themselves are objectionable. But this form of egalitarianism needs to be supplemented with an account of when it is appropriate to hold people responsible for their choices that is properly sensitive to the profound effects of socialisation. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Margaret Gilbert, Andrew Mason, Elizabeth S. Anderson, J. David Velleman, Matthew H. Kramer, Michele M. Moody‐Adams & Martha C. Nussbaum (1999). 10. Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr., On Race and Philosophy Lucius T. Outlaw, Jr., On Race and Philosophy (Pp. 454-456). Ethics 109 (2).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Andrew Mason (1999). Political Community, Liberal‐Nationalism, and the Ethics of Assimilation. Ethics 109 (2):261-286.
  33. Andrew Mason (1998). Imposing Liberal Principles. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (3):98-116.
  34. Andrew Mason (1998). Politics. MacIntyre on Modernity and How It has Marginalized the Virtues. In Roger Crisp (ed.), How Should One Live?: Essays on the Virtues. Clarendon Press.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Andrew Mason (1998). Plato on the Self Moving Soul. Philosophical Inquiry 20 (1-2):18-28.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andrew Mason (1997). Foreword: Ideals of Equality. Ratio 10 (3):197–201.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Andrew Mason (1997). Special Obligations to Compatriots. Ethics 107 (3):427-447.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Andrew Mason (1996). Justice, Contestability, and Conceptions of the Good. Utilitas 8 (03):295-305.
    Brian Barry's Justice as Impartiality is a highly enjoyable and rewarding book. It throws new light on some familiar theories of justice, and shows how the idea that principles of justice are those principles which no one could reasonably reject can yield prescriptions for constitutional design. But I shall argue that Barry's defence of his theory is less robust than he thinks, and more generally that there is reason to suppose that principles of justice are as contestable as conceptions of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Andrew Mason, MacIntyre on Modernity and How It has Marginalized the Virtues.
    Political philosophers have again become concerned with the role of the virtues in justifying social, political, and economic arrangements, and have explored the issue of which institutions can provide space for the virtues to flourish. In After Virtue, MacIntyre launched an attack on liberalism, arguing that the institutions it defends undermine the virtues. This paper examines MacIntyre's account and the responses it has provoked. It argues that MacIntyre makes an important criticism of liberalism that liberals have not yet fully answered, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Andrew Mason (1995). R. P. George, Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1993, Pp. Xvi + 241. [REVIEW] Utilitas 7 (01):175-.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Andrew Mason (1994). Immortality in the Timaeus. Phronesis 39 (1):90-97.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Andrew Mason (1993). Explaining Political Disagreement. Cambridge University Press.
    This book examines a number of different accounts developed by philosophers and political theorists to explain why political disagreement is so extensive and persistent. The author argues that moral and political questions can have correct answers, but that not every reasonable person will necessarily be satisfied with these answers. He develops a framework that gives a role to the individual's reasons for his or her beliefs, but also to psychological and sociological factors, to explain the intractability of political disputes.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Andrew Mason (1993). Liberalism and the Value of Community. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23 (2):215 - 239.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Andrew Mason (1991). Community and Autonomy: Logically Incompatible Values? Analysis 51 (3):160 - 166.
  45. Andrew Mason (1990). Nozick on Self-Esteem. Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):91-98.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Andrew Mason (1990). Gilligan's Conception of Moral Maturity. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (2):167–179.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Andrew Mason (1990). On Explaining Political Disagreement: The Notion of an Essentially Contested Concept. Inquiry 33 (1):81 – 98.
    Although the notion of an essentially contested concept may shed light on the logic of disputes over the proper application of some key political terms, it nevertheless plays no genuine role in explaining the intractability of these disputes. The notion of an essentially contested concept is defended against some influential criticisms, showing how it is possible for one conception of an essentially contested concept to be justifiably regarded as superior to other competing conceptions. Two possible answers are distinguished to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Andrew Mason, Politics and the State.
    Political theorists disagree about whether 'politics' and 'the political' should bedefined narrowly or broadly. Defenders of broad conceptions argue that narrow definitions exclude phenomena that ought to be included and lead us to misunderstand the relationship between different forces in society. Defenders of narrow conceptions argue that broad definitions collapse the distinction between the social and the political, and deprive politics of any distinctive identity. I shall argue that neither of these arguments is successful and that disputes over whether we (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Andrew D. Mason (1990). Autonomy, Liberalism and State Neutrality. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (161):433-452.
  50. Andrew Mason (1988). Liberty, Community and Justice. Philosophical Books 29 (4):247-248.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation