5 found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew McGee (2014). Acting to Let Someone Die. Bioethics 29 (1).
    This paper examines the recent prominent view in medical ethics that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment is an act of killing. I trace this view to the rejection of the traditional claim that withdrawing LST is an omission rather than an act. Although that traditional claim is not as problematic as this recent prominent view suggests, my main claim is that even if we accepted that withdrawing LST should be classified as an act rather than as an omission, it could still be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew McGee (2014). The Potentiality of the Embryo and the Somatic Cell. Metaphilosophy 45 (4-5):689-706.
    Recent arguments on the ethics of stem cell research have taken a novel approach to the question of the moral status of the embryo. One influential argument focuses on a property that the embryo is said to possess—namely, the property of being an entity with a rational nature or, less controversially, an entity that has the potential to acquire a rational nature—and claims that this property is also possessed by a somatic cell. Since nobody seriously thinks that we have a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew Mcgee (2013). Intention, Foresight, and Ending Life. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (01):77-85.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Andrew McGee (2011). Me and My Body: The Relevance of the Distinction for the Difference Between Withdrawing Life Support and Euthanasia. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (4):671-677.
    In this paper, I discuss David Shaw's claim that the body of a terminally ill person can be conceived as a kind of life support, akin to an artificial ventilator. I claim that this position rests upon an untenable dualism between the mind and the body. Given that dualism continues to be attractive to some thinkers, I attempt to diagnose the reasons why it continues to be attractive, as well as to demonstrate its incoherence, drawing on some recent work in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Andrew McGee (2011). Omissions, Causation, and Responsibility. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (4):351-361.
    In this paper I discuss a recent exchange of articles between Hugh McLachlan and John Coggon on the relationship between omissions, causation, and moral responsibility. My aim is to contribute to their debate by isolating a presupposition I believe they both share and by questioning that presupposition. The presupposition is that, at any given moment, there are countless things that I am omitting to do. This leads both McLachlan and Coggon to give a distorted account of the relationship between causation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation