Search results for 'Andrew Pickin' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Andrew Pickin (Bristol University)
  1.  23
    Dudley Andrew (1984). Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press.
    Concepts in Film Theory is a continuation of Dudley Andrew's classic, The Major Film Theories. In writing now about contemporary theory, Andrew focuses on the key concepts in film study -- perception, representation, signification, narrative structure, adaptation, evaluation, identification, figuration, and interpretation. Beginning with an introductory chapter on the current state of film theory, Andrew goes on to build an overall view of film, presenting his own ideas on each concept, and giving a sense (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Edward G. Andrew (1995). The Genealogy of Values: The Aesthetic Economy of Nietzsche and Proust. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    Until the time of Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill, philosophers generally held economics to be an integral element of moral philosophy. These days, the language of values—moral, aesthetic, and cognitive—dominates philosophic discourse, even though contemporary philosophers rarely hold economics to be integral to moral philosophy. Examining the thought of Friedrich Nietzsche and the art of Marcel Proust, Edward Andrew provides the first sustained critical analysis of values discourse, an analysis that deconstructs its content and its form.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  6
    David Saunders & Ian Hunter (2003). Bringing the State to England: Andrew Tooke's Translation of Samuel Pufendorf's 'De Officio Hominis Et Civis'. History of Political Thought 24 (2):218-234.
    Andrew Tooke's 1691 English translation of Samuel Pufendorf's De officio hominis et civis, published as The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature, brought Pufendorf's manual fo statist natural law into English politics at a moment of temporary equilibrium in the unfinished contest between Crown and Parliament for the rights and powers of sovereignty. Drawing on the authors' re-edition of The Whole Duty of Man, this article describes and analyses a telling instance of how--by translation--the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Andrew Lang & Marysa Demoor (1989). Friends Over the Ocean Andrew Lang's American Correspondents 1881-1912. Rijksuniversiteit Te Gent.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  34
    Andrew Botterell (2005). Review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 114:125-128.
    A review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Andrew Ashworth & Martin Wasik (eds.) (1998). Fundamentals of Sentencing Theory: Essays in Honour of Andrew von Hirsch. Oxford University Press Uk.
    The Oxford Monographs On Criminal Law And Justice series aims to cover all aspects of criminal law and procedure including criminal evidence. the scope of the series is wide, encompassing both practical and theoretical works. Series Editor: Professor Andrew Ashworth, Vinerian Professor of English Law, All Souls College, Oxford. This volume is a thematic collection of essays on sentencing theory by leading writers. The essays fall into three groups. Part I considers the underlying justifications for the imposition of punishment (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  12
    Thomas Jeannot (2010). Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital': A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007. Historical Materialism 18 (4):189-206.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  11
    Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, David Ingram, Sally Wyatt, Yoko Arisaka & Andrew Feenberg (2011). Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg's Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):203-226.
    Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg’s Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity Content Type Journal Article Pages 203-226 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0017-8 Authors Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA David B. Ingram, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA Sally Wyatt, e-Humanities Group, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) & Maastricht University, Cruquiusweg 31, 1019 AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Yoko Arisaka, Forschungsinstitut für (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    Andrew Mansfield (2012). Aristocratic Reform and the Extirpation of Parliament in Early Georgian Britain: Andrew Michael Ramsay and French Ideas of Monarchy. History of European Ideas 40 (2):1-19.
    In An Essay upon Civil Government , Andrew Michael Ramsay mounted a sustained attack upon the development throughout English history of popular government. According to Ramsay, popular involvement in sovereignty had led to the decline of society and the revolutions of the seventeenth century. In his own time, Parliament had become a despotic instrument of government, riven with faction and driven by a multiplicity of laws that manifested a widespread corruption in the state. Ramsay's solution to this degeneracy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  41
    Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.
    Andrew Collier is the boldest defender of objectivity - in science, knowledge, thought, action, politics, morality and religion. In this tribute and acknowledgement of the influence his work has had on a wide readership, his colleagues show that they have been stimulated by his thinking and offer challenging responses. This wide-ranging book covers key areas with which defenders of objectivity often have to engage. Sections are devoted to the following: 'objectivity of value', 'objectivity and everyday knowledge', 'objectivity in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. W. H. Evans (1924). Twelve Lectures on the Harmonial Philosophy of Andrew Jackson Davis. Spiritualists' National Union.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. John Andrew Fisher (1996). The Myth of Anthropomorphism John Andrew Fisher. In Colin Allen & D. Jamison (eds.), Readings in Animal Cognition. MIT Press
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  97
    Geoff Gallop (1983). Reviews : Andrew Gamble, Britain in Decline (Macmillan, 1981) and Martin Jacques and Francis Mulhern (Eds), The Forward March of Labour Halted? (Verso, 1981). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 7 (1):185-188.
    Andrew Gamble, Britain in Decline and Martin Jacques and Francis Mulhern , The Forward March of Labour Halted?
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  20
    Wayne C. Myrvold (1996). Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):661-665.
    Andrew Wayne discusses some recent attempts to account, within a Bayesian framework, for the "common methodological adage" that "diverse evidence better confirms a hypothesis than does the same amount of similar evidence". One of the approaches considered by Wayne is that suggested by Howson and Urbach and dubbed the "correlation approach" by Wayne. This approach is, indeed, incomplete, in that it neglects the role of the hypothesis under consideration in determining what diversity in a body of evidence is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  15.  2
    Andrew Eshleman (2010). Religious Fictionalism Defended: Reply to Cordry: Andrew Eshleman. Religious Studies 46 (1):91-96.
    In his paper, ‘A critique of religious fictionalism’, Benjamin Cordry raises a series of objections to a fictionalist form of religious non-realism that I proposed in my earlier paper, ‘Can an atheist believe in God?’. They fall into two main categories: those alleging that an atheist would be unjustified in adopting fictionalism, and those alleging that fictionalism could not be successfully implemented, or practised communally. I argue that these objections can be met.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  5
    William Hasker (2010). Which God? What Power? A Response to Andrew H. Gleeson. Sophia 49 (3):433-445.
    Andrew H. Gleeson has written an essay commenting on an exchange between Dewi Z. Phillips and me, arguing that I was mistaken to dismiss Phillips’ criticism of the standard definition of omnipotence as unsuccessful. Furthermore, he charges Swinburne, me, and analytic theists in general, with an excessive anthropomorphism that obliterates the distinction between Creator and creature. In response, I contend that all of Gleeson’s criticisms are unsound.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  47
    John Apczynski (2008). Andrew Grosso on Polanyi as a Resource for Christian Theology. Tradition and Discovery 35 (1):46-48.
    These reflections on Andrew Grosso’s recent book Personal Being highlight his philosophical construction of a concept of personhood based on themes from the writings Of Michael Polanyi and his use of this conception to express creatively elements of the traditional Christian doctrines on the trinity. Additional clarifications are sought regarding his formulations on the divine personhood of Jesus, the adequacy of his formulations on the intra-trinitarian relations, and the insightfulness of the absolute personhood of the divine. This study (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Andrew Cullison (2010). A Defence of the No-Minimum Response to the Problem of Evil: Andrew Cullison. Religious Studies 47 (1):121-123.
    I defend Peter van Inwagen's no-minimum response to the problem of evil from a recent objection raised by Jeff Jordan.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  8
    Beth Eddy (2015). Science, Democracy, and the American University: From the Civil War to the Cold War by Andrew Jewett. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 36 (2):194-198.
    Intellectual historian <span class='Hi'>Andrew</span> Jewett sets an enormous task for himself: to trace the history and context of science and values relations over the course of some hundred-odd years of U.S. history. He does this to further an argument that science was once explicitly connected to the study of human values, and that the story that explains how science became value neutral is a contingent one. It could have happened differently, he argues, and it should have. Furthermore, because (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Douglas Kellner, Review-Article on Andrew Feenberg, Questioning Technology. New York and London, Routledge, 1999.
    Andrew Feenberg's Questioning Technology (1999) is his third book in a series of studies which undertake to provide critical theoretical and democratic political perspectives to engage technology in the contemporary era. In Critical Theory of Technology (1991), Feenberg draws on neo-Marxian and other critical theories of technology, especially the Frankfurt School, to criticize determinist and essentialist theories. In this ground-breaking work (which will go into its second edition in 2001), he discusses both how the labor process, science, and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  8
    Richard Schaefer (2015). Andrew Dickson White and the History of a Religious Future. Zygon 50 (1):7-27.
    Andrew Dickson White played a pivotal role in constructing the image of a necessary, and even violent, confrontation between religion and science that persists to this day. Though scholars have long acknowledged that his position is more complex, given that White claimed to be saving religion from theology, there has been no attempt to explore what this means in light of his overwhelming attack on existing religions. This essay draws attention to how White's role as a historian was (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  10
    Daniel Putman (2010). Was Andrew Carnegie Generous? Think 9 (26):91-98.
    Millions of Americans, as well as millions in Europe, have used or will use a library established by Andrew Carnegie. In his lifetime Carnegie gave the equivalent of several billion dollars in today's money to establish 1,689 public libraries in the United States, Hawaii and Puerto Rico. Moreover, 660 libraries in Britain and Ireland, 125 in Canada, 17 in New Zealand, 12 in South Africa and scattered others around the world exist because of this man. 1 And this (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  64
    William O. Stephens (2011). If Friendship Hurts, an Epicurean Deserts : A Reply to Andrew Mitchell. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Essays in Philosophy. Rodopi 7.
    In “Friendship Amongst the Self-Sufficient: Epicurus” (this Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 2001), Andrew Mitchell explores the Epicurean view of the relationship between self-sufficiency and friendship by contrasting it with the views of Aristotle and the Stoics. Epicurus, Aristotle, and the Stoics do indeed have interestingly different views on friendship that are well worth comparing. Yet Mitchell’s characterization of Aristotelian friendship is misleading, his account of Stoic friendship is inaccurate, and his interpretation of Epicurean friendship is curiously (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  20
    Peter Murphy (2011). Painting's Double: Andrew Benjamin's Disclosing Spaces. Thesis Eleven 104 (1):108-113.
    Andrew Benjamin’s book Disclosing Spaces (2004) presents a theory of painting. The theory is developed via a meticulous analysis of a series of individual artworks. The pivot of Benjamin’s theory of painting is the idea of relationality. The theory is critically reviewed with reference to the works of Edward Hopper, Gerhard Richter and Jacques-Louis David.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  18
    Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: I. Review of Metaphysics 11 (3):471 - 485.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  11
    Andrew V. Abela (2001). Catholic Social Teaching and the Purpose of the Firm1 Andrew I/. Abela. Journal of Business Ethics 31:2.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  5
    Paola Marrati, Andrew Norris, Jörg Volbers, Cary Wolfe & Thomas Dumm (2012). The Political Theory of Stanley Cavell: The Ordinary Life of Democracy Paola Marrati Skepticism, Finitude and Politics in the Work of Stanley Cavell Andrew Norris Crossing the Bounds of Sense: Cavell and Foucault Jörg Volbers Cavell's 'Forms of Life' and Biopolitics Cary Wolfe Misgiving, or Cavell's Gift Thomas Dumm Responses. Contemporary Political Theory 11 (4):397-429.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  34
    Gideon Calder & Andrew Collier (2009). Values and Ontology: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 8 (1):63-90.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  8
    Matt Matravers (2016). Symposium on Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch, Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation. Criminal Law and Philosophy 10 (2):297-299.
    Andrew Simester and Andreas von Hirsch’s Crimes, Harms, and Wrongs: On the Principles of Criminalisation (Simester and von Hirsch 2011) is an important contribution to the philosophical debate over the nature and ethical limits of criminalisation. As they note in their reply in this symposium, one of the novel aspects of their account is that they do not advance one “unified, grand theory”. Rather, they analyse each ground of criminal prohibition—wrongfulness, harm-based, offense, and paternalistic prohibitions aimed at preventing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    S. J. L. Edwards (2000). Can Unequal Be More Fair? A Response to Andrew Avins. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):179-182.
    In this paper, we respond to Andrew Avins's recent review of methods whose use he advocates in clinical trials, to make them more ethical. He recommends in particular, “unbalanced randomisation”. However, we argue that, before such a recommendation can be made, it is important to establish why unequal randomisation might offer ethical advantages over equal randomisation, other things being equal. It is important to make a pragmatic distinction between trials of treatments that are already routinely available and trials (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  9
    Gregory Flaxman (2001). The Laws of Cinematic Hospitality: A Response to Andrew Murphie. Film-Philosophy 5 (2).
    Andrew Murphie 'Is Philosophy Ever Enough?' _Film-Philosophy_, Deleuze Special Issue vol. 5 no. 38, November 2001.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  8
    Doohwan Ahn (2011). From Greece to Babylon:The Political Thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743). History of European Ideas 37 (4):421-437.
    This paper explores the political thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay with particular reference to his highly acclaimed book called A New Cyropaedia, or the Travels of Cyrus (1727). Dedicated to Prince Charles Edward Stuart, the Young Pretender, to whom he was tutor, this work has been hitherto viewed as a Jacobite imitation of the Telemachus, Son of Ulysses(1699) of his eminent teacher archbishop Fénelon of Cambrai. By tracing the dual legacy of the first Persian Emperor Cyrus in Western (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  21
    Andrew Collier & Gideon Calder (2008). Philosophy and Politics: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 7 (2):276-296.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  15
    Nicolas de Warren (2007). Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.
    This essay explores Heidegger’s “The Origin of the Work of Art” and Andrew Goldsworthy’s artworks. Both Heidegger and Goldsworthy can be seen as refashioning our ontological bearings towards nature through the work of art. After introducing a set of distinctions (e.g., world/earth) in the context of Heidegger’s conception of the artwork as the event of truth, I argue that Heidegger’s releasing of the work of art from metaphysical notions of “the thing” illuminates the ambiguous status of Goldsworthy’s artworks (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  1
    Jairo Dias Carvalho (2015). A contribuição da noção de tecnoestética de Gilbert Simondon para o projeto de transformação da tecnologia de Andrew Feenberg. Doispontos 12 (1).
    resumo: O objetivo do artigo é explicitar o projeto de transformação da tecnologia de Andrew Feenberg a partir do conceito de design e da noção de tecnoestética de Gilbert Simondon. Queremos entender qual seria o papel da tecnoestética na transformação do design da tecnologia. O uso das categorias tecnoestéticas, como prazer no uso dos objetos técnicos e a incorporação deste uso ao sentido do eu, pode fornecer um critério para a intervenção democrática na constituição do design dos objetos (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    Mikel Burley (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). Philosophical Papers 42 (1):127 - 131.
    (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) Philosophical Papers: Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 127-131. doi: 10.1080/05568641.2013.774726.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  2
    D. R. Oldroyd & G. McKenna (1995). A Note on Andrew Ramsay's Unpublished Report on the St David's Area, Recently Discovered. Annals of Science 52 (2):193-196.
    Notice is given of the discovery of two reports and an accompanying manuscript map by Andrew Ramsay, on the geology of the St David's area, Pembrokeshire. This adds to previously published information on early geological work in this important region: Ramsay's report throw some light on his attitude towards Murchison's ideas on Welsh stratigraphy. The map is the earliest known version of the Survey's St David's sheet.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  9
    Adam Stewart (2010). John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.
    This essay examines the contrasting conceptualizations of reason in the thought of John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn in their articles published in The Contemporary Review in 1885. This essay articulates both Fairbairn’s charge of philosophical scepticism against Newman as well as Newman’s defense of his position and concomitantly details Fairbairn’s and Newman’s competing notions of the efficacy of reason to provide reliable knowledge of God. The positions of Fairbairn and Newman remain two of the most important (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  4
    Russell Kelly (2014). Andrew P. Carlin and Roger S. Slack (Eds): Ethnographic Studies: Special Memorial Issue: Egon Bittner: Phenomenology in Action. Human Studies 37 (3):447-450.
    The purpose of this review is to bring to the attention to a wider, specialised audience a special issue of the UK journal, Ethnographic Studies. The special issue, compiled and edited by Andrew Carlin and Roger Slack, is a Festschrift in honour of Egon Bittner (1921–2011). The readership of Human Studies might be aware of Egon Bittner as one of the circle surrounding Harold Garfinkel and Harvey Sacks in the early and preparatory days of ethnomethodology between 1955 and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  10
    Andrew Dodsworth (2000). Andrew's Literary Death Quiz. Philosophy Now 27:47-47.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Andrew J. Mckenna & Mark Youngerman (1994). Andrew J. McKenna., Violence and Difference: Girard, Derrida, and Deconstruction. International Studies in Philosophy 26 (4):149-150.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    Andrew Dobson, Luc Semal, Mathilde Szuba & Olivier Petit (2014). Andrew Dobson: Trajectories of Green Political Theory Interview by Luc Semal, Mathilde Szuba and Olivier Petit. Natures Sciences Sociétés 22 (2):132-141.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  4
    David Hitchcock (2014). Andrew Aberdein and Ian J. Dove (Eds): The Argument of Mathematics (Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, Vol. 30). Argumentation 28 (2):245-258.
    Post-war argumentation theorists have tended to regard argumentation as one thing and mathematical proof as another. Perelman (1958, 1969), for example, defined the word ‘argumentation’ stipulatively as a contrast term to ‘demonstration’: whereas mathematical reasoning as theorized by modern formal logic, he writes, is a matter of deducing theorems from axioms in accordance with stipulated rules of transformation, argumentation aims at gaining the adherence of minds (Perelman 1969, pp. 1–2). Toulmin (1958) contrasted his “jurisprudential model” of argument, according to which (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  13
    Cynthia Willett (2010). Response to Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello on Irony in the Age of Empire. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (1):96-99.
    What a pleasure to have such subtle thinkers and scholars as Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello reflect on the relation of irony and comedy to politics and philosophy through their commentary on my new book. To set the tone, Martin begins with a koan, or a parody of one, “What if a tree told a joke in the woods and there was no one there to hear it?” He means, I believe, to sound a warning on the limits of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: II. Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):673 - 688.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  7
    Paul de Hert & Eugenio Mantovani (2008). Review of The Regulation of Cyberspace by Andrew Murray. [REVIEW] Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (1).
    After canvassing with good grace the make-up of cyberspace Andrew Murray wonders, in his recent book The Regulation of Cyberspace, which role traditional lawmakers are left to play in the new cyber-regulatory environment. Murray describes the static `command and control' regulatory model as disruptive and ineffective, and supports instead a dynamic, complimentary, and symbiotic regulatory model, which he presents under the features of an autopoietic environment and systems dynamics theory.Regulatory models, explains Andrew Murray in his recent book The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Andrew R. Bailey (ed.) (2016). Utilitarianism - Ed. Andrew Bailey. Broadview Press.
    _Utilitarianism_ is a classic work of ethical theory, arguably the most persuasive and comprehensible presentation of this widely influential position. Mill argues that it is pleasure and pain that ought to guide our decision-making&and not the pleasure and pain of any one person or group, but the summative experience of all who are affected by our actions. While he didn’t invent utilitarianism, Mill offered its clearest expression and strongest defense, and expanded the theory to account for the variety in quality (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Roy Bhaskar (2004). A Personal and Intellectual Tribute to Andrew Collier. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge 1.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Edwin Bryant (2016). Lord Śiva's Song: The Īśvara Gītā by Andrew J. Nicholson. Philosophy East and West 66 (2):660-662.
    The Īśvara Gītā, translated by Andrew J. Nicholson in Lord Śiva’s Song: The Īśvara Gītā, is a quintessentially Hindu post-Vedic devotional text. Extolling Lord Śiva as the highest Truth, it sets out to establish its credentials in ways typical of the devotional traditions: it is located in one of the Purāṇas, already considered to be the fifth Veda by the time of the Chandogya Upaniṣad, thereby appropriating the paramount sacrosanctity of the Śruti tradition. It adopts the setting of Sūta’s (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Justin Cruickshank (2004). Practical Knowledge and Realism: Linking Andrew Collier on Lay Knowledge to Karl Popper on the Philosophy of Science.'. In Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.), Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000