Search results for 'Andrew Siegel' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Tal Bergman Levy, Shlomi Azar, Ronen Huberfeld, Andrew M. Siegel & Rael D. Strous (2013). Attitudes Towards Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: A Comparison Between Psychiatrists and Other Physicians. Bioethics 27 (7):402-408.score: 240.0
    Euthanasia and physician assisted-suicide are terms used to describe the process in which a doctor of a sick or disabled individual engages in an activity which directly or indirectly leads to their death. This behavior is engaged by the healthcare provider based on their humanistic desire to end suffering and pain. The psychiatrist's involvement may be requested in several distinct situations including evaluation of patient capacity when an appeal for euthanasia is requested on grounds of terminal somatic illness or when (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ruth R. Faden, Liza Dawson, Alison S. Bateman‐House, Dawn Mueller Agnew, Hilary Bok, Dan W. Brock, Aravinda Chakravarti, Xiao‐Jiang Gao, Mark Greene, John A. Hansen, Patricia A. King, Stephen J. O'Brien, David H. Sachs, Kathryn E. Schill, Andrew Siegel, Davor Solter, Sonia M. Suter, Catherine M. Verfaillie, Leroy B. Walters & John D. Gearhart (2003). Public Stem Cell Banks: Considerations of Justice in Stem Cell Research and Therapy. Hastings Center Report 33 (6):13-27.score: 240.0
    If stem cell-based therapies are developed, we will likely confront a difficult problem of justice: for biological reasons alone, the new therapies might benefit only a limited range of patients. In fact, they might benefit primarily white Americans, thereby exacerbating long-standing differences in health and health care.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Andrew W. Siegel (2003). The Moral Insignificance of Crossing Species Boundaries. American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):33-34.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Leili Fatehi, Susan M. Wolf, Jeffrey McCullough, Ralph Hall, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P. Kahn, Cortney Jones, Stephen A. Campbell, Rebecca S. Dresser, Arthur G. Erdman, Christy L. Haynes, Robert A. Hoerr, Linda F. Hogle, Moira A. Keane, George Khushf, Nancy M. P. King, Efrosini Kokkoli, Gary Marchant, Andrew D. Maynard, Martin Philbert, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, Ronald A. Siegel & Samuel Wickline (2012). Recommendations for Nanomedicine Human Subjects Research Oversight: An Evolutionary Approach for an Emerging Field. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (4):716-750.score: 240.0
    The nanomedicine field is fast evolving toward complex, “active,” and interactive formulations. Like many emerging technologies, nanomedicine raises questions of how human subjects research (HSR) should be conducted and the adequacy of current oversight, as well as how to integrate concerns over occupational, bystander, and environmental exposures. The history of oversight for HSR investigating emerging technologies is a patchwork quilt without systematic justification of when ordinary oversight for HSR is enough versus when added oversight is warranted. Nanomedicine HSR provides an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Andrew W. Siegel (forthcoming). Some Doubts About in Vitro Eugenics as a Human Enhancement Technology. Journal of Medical Ethics:2013-101511.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Liza Dawson, Alison S. Bateman-House, Dawn Mueller Agnew, Hilary Bok, Dan W. Brock, Aravinda Chakravarti, Mark Greene, Patricia King, Stephen J. O'Brien, David H. Sachs, Kathryn E. Schill, Andrew Siegel & Davor Solter (2003). Safety Issues In Cell-Based Intervention Trials. Fertility and Sterility 80 (5):1077-1085.score: 240.0
    We report on the deliberations of an interdisciplinary group of experts in science, law, and philosophy who convened to discuss novel ethical and policy challenges in stem cell research. In this report we discuss the ethical and policy implications of safety concerns in the transition from basic laboratory research to clinical applications of cell-based therapies derived from stem cells. Although many features of this transition from lab to clinic are common to other therapies, three aspects of stem cell biology pose (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Andrew M. Siegel, Anna S. Barnwell & Dominic A. Sisti (2014). Assessing Decision-Making Capacity: A Primer for the Development of Hospital Practice Guidelines. HEC Forum 26 (2):159-168.score: 240.0
    Decision making capacity (DMC) is a fundamental concept grounding the principle of respect for autonomy and the practice of obtaining informed consent. DMC must be determined and documented every time a patient undergoes a hospital procedure and for routine care when there is reason to believe decision making ability is compromised. In this paper we explore a path toward ethically informed development and implementation of a hospital policy related to DMC assessment. We begin with a review of the context of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Eli Siegel (1957). Free Poem on "the Siegel Theory of Opposites" in Relation to Aesthetics. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 16 (1):148-150.score: 180.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Harvey Siegel (1993). Siegel, From Page One. Inquiry 11 (4):17-22.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. P. Yule, Corpus der Minoischen, Mykenischen Siegel, F. Matz, N. Platon & I. Pini (1988). 2. iii. Iraklion, Archaologisches Museum. Die Siegel der Neupalastzeit. Journal of Hellenic Studies 108:257.score: 180.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Sidney Siegel & Julia Mcmichael Andrews (1962). Magnitude of Reinforcement and Choice Behavior in Children. Journal of Experimental Psychology 63 (4):337.score: 80.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Susanna Siegel (2002). The Role of Perception in Demonstrative Reference. Philosophers' Imprint 2 (1):1-21.score: 60.0
    Siegel defends "Limited Intentionism", a theory of what secures the semantic reference of uses of bare demonstratives ("this", "that" and their plurals). According to Limited Intentionism, demonstrative reference is fixed by perceptually anchored intentions on the part of the speaker.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Susanna Siegel (2010). The Contents of Visual Experience. Oxford.score: 60.0
    In this book, Susanna Siegel develops a framework for understanding the contents of visual experience, and argues that these contents involve all sorts of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Susanna Siegel, Dialogue About Philosophy in Spanish.score: 60.0
    This is a compilations of short talks presented at a workshop held at Harvard in April 14 on the life of analytic philosophy today in Spanish. Authors include Susanna Siegel, Diana Acosta and Patricia Marechal, Diana Perez, Laura Pérez, and Josefa Toribio.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Harvey Siegel (1997). Rationality Redeemed?: Further Dialogues on an Educational Ideal. Routedge.score: 60.0
    In Educating Reason, Harvey Siegel presented the case regarding rationality and critical thinking as fundamental education ideals. In Rationality Redeemed? , a collection of essays written since that time, he develops this view, responds to major criticisms raised against it, and engages those critics in dialogue. In developing his ideas and responding to critics, Siegel addresses main currents in contemporary thought, including feminism, postmodernism and multiculturalism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Harvey Siegel & John Biro (1997). Epistemic Normativity, Argumentation, and Fallacies. Argumentation 11 (3):277-292.score: 60.0
    In Biro and Siegel (1992) we argued that a theory of argumentation mustfully engage the normativity of judgments about arguments, and we developedsuch a theory. In this paper we further develop and defend our theory.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Harvey Siegel (1996). Instrumental Rationality and Naturalized Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 63 (3):124.score: 60.0
    In two recent papers, I criticized Ronald N. Giere's and Larry Laudan's arguments for 'naturalizing' the philosophy of science (Siegel 1989, 1990). Both Giere and Laudan replied to my criticisms (Giere 1989, Laudan 1990b). The key issue arising in both interchanges is these naturalists' embrace of instrumental conceptions of rationality, and their concomitant rejection of non-instrumental conceptions of that key normative notion. In this reply I argue that their accounts of science's rationality as exclusively instrumental fail, and consequently that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Dudley Andrew (1984). Concepts in Film Theory. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Concepts in Film Theory is a continuation of Dudley Andrew's classic, The Major Film Theories. In writing now about contemporary theory, Andrew focuses on the key concepts in film study -- perception, representation, signification, narrative structure, adaptation, evaluation, identification, figuration, and interpretation. Beginning with an introductory chapter on the current state of film theory, Andrew goes on to build an overall view of film, presenting his own ideas on each concept, and giving a sense of the interdependence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Harvey Siegel (1988). Rationality and Anemia (Response to Baigrie). Philosophy of Science 55 (3):442-447.score: 60.0
    In his (1988), Brian Baigrie criticizes my earlier discussion of the rationality of science (Siegel 1985). In this response, I argue that (1) Baigrie misses the point of my tripartite distinction between different questions one can ask about science's rationality, (2) Baigrie's argument that the history of the development of methodological principles is crucial to philosophical discussion of the rationality of science is flawed, and (3) Baigrie's charge that my view is "anemic" rests on a failure to appreciate the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Tim Luke, Paul Piccone, Fred Siegel & Michael Taves (1987). Roundtable on Intellectuals and the Academy. Telos 1987 (71):5-35.score: 60.0
    Taves: Let us begin with the claim that universities are deadly to serious intellectual work. The university ethos fosters mediocrity, boredom and gutlessness. It has become a haven for conformist intellectuals who value patronage and status over intellectual quality and challenge. “Radical” academics are no exception; they too have bought into hyperspecialization, empiricism, professionalization, abstract theory, and have become marginal, predictable and politically irrelevant. If such is the case, what are the implications? Siegel: There is certainly a sense of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Tamar Gendler, Susanna Siegel & Steven M. Cahn (eds.) (2008). The Elements of Philosophy: Readings From Past and Present. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    The Elements of Philosophy: Readings from Past and Present is a comprehensive collection of historical and contemporary readings across the major fields of philosophy. With depth and quality, this introductory anthology offers a selection of readings that is both extensive and expansive; the readings span twenty-five centuries. They are organized topically into five parts: Religion and Belief, Moral and Political Philosophy, Metaphysics and Epistemology, Philosophy of Mind and Language, and Life and Death. The product of the collaboration of three highly (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Alex Byrne, David Hilbert & Susanna Siegel (2007). Do We See More Than We Can Access? Behavioral and Brain Sciences (5-6):501-502.score: 30.0
    Short commentary on a paper by Ned Block.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. David Saunders & Ian Hunter (2003). Bringing the State to England: Andrew Tooke's Translation of Samuel Pufendorf's 'De Officio Hominis Et Civis'. History of Political Thought 24 (2):218-234.score: 24.0
    Andrew Tooke's 1691 English translation of Samuel Pufendorf's De officio hominis et civis, published as The Whole Duty of Man According to the Law of Nature, brought Pufendorf's manual fo statist natural law into English politics at a moment of temporary equilibrium in the unfinished contest between Crown and Parliament for the rights and powers of sovereignty. Drawing on the authors' re-edition of The Whole Duty of Man, this article describes and analyses a telling instance of how--by translation--the core (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Andrew Collier, Margaret Scotford Archer & William Outhwaite (eds.) (2004). Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier. Routledge.score: 21.0
    Andrew Collier is the boldest defender of objectivity - in science, knowledge, thought, action, politics, morality and religion. In this tribute and acknowledgement of the influence his work has had on a wide readership, his colleagues show that they have been stimulated by his thinking and offer challenging responses. This wide-ranging book covers key areas with which defenders of objectivity often have to engage. Sections are devoted to the following: 'objectivity of value', 'objectivity and everyday knowledge', 'objectivity in political (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, David Ingram, Sally Wyatt, Yoko Arisaka & Andrew Feenberg (2011). Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg's Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity. Philosophy and Technology 24 (2):203-226.score: 21.0
    Book Symposium on Andrew Feenberg’s Between Reason and Experience: Essays in Technology and Modernity Content Type Journal Article Pages 203-226 DOI 10.1007/s13347-011-0017-8 Authors Inmaculada de Melo-Martín, Division of Medical Ethics, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, USA David B. Ingram, Loyola University Chicago, 6525 North Sheridan Road, Chicago, IL 60626, USA Sally Wyatt, e-Humanities Group, Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) & Maastricht University, Cruquiusweg 31, 1019 AT Amsterdam, The Netherlands Yoko Arisaka, Forschungsinstitut für Philosophie (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Thomas Jeannot (2010). Reclaiming Marx's 'Capital': A Refutation of the Myth of Inconsistency, Andrew Kliman, Lanham: Lexington Books, 2007. Historical Materialism 18 (4):189-206.score: 21.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Andrew Botterell (2005). Review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 114:125-128.score: 21.0
    A review of Andrew Melnyk, A Physicalist Manifesto: Thoroughly Modern Materialism (Cambridge University Press, 2003).
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David J. Chalmers (2013). The Contents of Consciousness: Reply to Hellie, Peacocke and Siegel. Analysis 73 (2):345-368.score: 18.0
    This is a reply to commentaries on my book, The Character of Consciousness, by Benj Hellie, Christopher Peacocke, and Susanna Siegel. The reply to Hellie focuses on issues about acquaintance and transparency. The reply to Peacocke focuses on externalism about spatial experience. The reply to Siegel focuses on whether there can be Frege cases in perceptual experience.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. William O. Stephens (2011). If Friendship Hurts, an Epicurean Deserts : A Reply to Andrew Mitchell. In Adrianne Leigh McEvoy (ed.), Sex, Love, and Friendship: Studies of the Society for the Philosophy of Sex and Love: 1993-2003. Rodopi. 7.score: 18.0
    In “Friendship Amongst the Self-Sufficient: Epicurus” (this Journal, Vol. 2, No. 2, June 2001), Andrew Mitchell explores the Epicurean view of the relationship between self-sufficiency and friendship by contrasting it with the views of Aristotle and the Stoics. Epicurus, Aristotle, and the Stoics do indeed have interestingly different views on friendship that are well worth comparing. Yet Mitchell’s characterization of Aristotelian friendship is misleading, his account of Stoic friendship is inaccurate, and his interpretation of Epicurean friendship is curiously imaginative (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Charles Travis, Siegel's Contents.score: 18.0
    This is a draft of what became a contribution to a virtual symposium on Susanna Siegel's "The Content of Visual Experience". It takes issue with her claims, and arguments, that perceptual experience has representational content.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gideon Calder & Andrew Collier (2009). Values and Ontology: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 8 (1):63-90.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Douglas Kellner, Review-Article on Andrew Feenberg, Questioning Technology. New York and London, Routledge, 1999.score: 18.0
    Andrew Feenberg's Questioning Technology (1999) is his third book in a series of studies which undertake to provide critical theoretical and democratic political perspectives to engage technology in the contemporary era. In Critical Theory of Technology (1991), Feenberg draws on neo-Marxian and other critical theories of technology, especially the Frankfurt School, to criticize determinist and essentialist theories. In this ground-breaking work (which will go into its second edition in 2001), he discusses both how the labor process, science, and technology (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Andrew Collier & Gideon Calder (2008). Philosophy and Politics: An Interview with Andrew Collier, Part. Journal of Critical Realism 7 (2):276-296.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Wayne C. Myrvold (1996). Bayesianism and Diverse Evidence: A Reply to Andrew Wayne. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):661-665.score: 18.0
    Andrew Wayne (1995) discusses some recent attempts to account, within a Bayesian framework, for the "common methodological adage" that "diverse evidence better confirms a hypothesis than does the same amount of similar evidence" (112). One of the approaches considered by Wayne is that suggested by Howson and Urbach (1989/1993) and dubbed the "correlation approach" by Wayne. This approach is, indeed, incomplete, in that it neglects the role of the hypothesis under consideration in determining what diversity in a body of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Gerald Doppelt (1980). Ii. A Reply to Siegel on Kuhnian Relativism. Inquiry 23 (1):117 – 123.score: 18.0
    Siegel argues that the Kuhnian relativism presented in ?Kuhn's Epistemological Relativism? fails because it neglects the possibility of rational choice in science between rival paradigms? own incommensurable standards on the basis of ?paradigm?neutral external standards?. In reply, it is argued (1) that Siegel has given no reason to believe that there are such external standards in science, (2) that the mere ?possibility? of such standards in scientific debate is not sufficient to vitiate Kuhn's relativism, (3) that the actual (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Cynthia Willett (2010). Response to Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello on Irony in the Age of Empire. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 24 (1):96-99.score: 18.0
    What a pleasure to have such subtle thinkers and scholars as Bill Martin and Andrew Cutrofello reflect on the relation of irony and comedy to politics and philosophy through their commentary on my new book. To set the tone, Martin begins with a koan, or a parody of one, “What if a tree told a joke in the woods and there was no one there to hear it?” He means, I believe, to sound a warning on the limits of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Nicolas de Warren (2007). Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy. Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.score: 18.0
    This essay explores Heidegger’s “The Origin of the Work of Art” and Andrew Goldsworthy’s artworks. Both Heidegger and Goldsworthy can be seen as refashioning our ontological bearings towards nature through the work of art. After introducing a set of distinctions (e.g., world/earth) in the context of Heidegger’s conception of the artwork as the event of truth, I argue that Heidegger’s releasing of the work of art from metaphysical notions of “the thing” illuminates the ambiguous status of Goldsworthy’s artworks as (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Brian S. Baigrie (1988). Siegel on the Rationality of Science. Philosophy of Science 55 (3):435-441.score: 18.0
    Harvey Siegel's (1985) attempts to revive the traditional epistemological formulation of the rationality of science. Contending that "a general commitment to evidence" is constitutive of method and rationality in science, Siegel advances its compatibility with specific, historically attuned formulations of principles of evidential support as a virtue of his aprioristic candidate for science's rationality. In point of fact, this account is compatible with virtually any formulation of evidential support, which runs afoul of Siegel's claim that scientific beliefs (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Mikel Burley (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012). Philosophical Papers 42 (1):127 - 131.score: 18.0
    (2013). Andrew Gleeson, A Frightening Love: Recasting the Problem of Evil (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012) Philosophical Papers: Vol. 42, No. 1, pp. 127-131. doi: 10.1080/05568641.2013.774726.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Alfred Nordmann (1990). Goodbye and Farewell: Siegel Vs. Feyerabend. Inquiry 33 (3):317 – 331.score: 18.0
    In his review (Inquiry 32 [1989], pp. 343?69) of Paul Feyerabend's Farewell to Reason, Harvey Siegel makes a fairly simple point: Feyerabend provides a bad argument for a good cause. In particular, Siegel maintains that the argument suffers, first, from self?inflicted depreciation: having been rendered impotent by Feyerabend's views of objectivity and rationality, what claim to persuasion can his argument possibly hold? And second, the argument is said to be incoherent: instead of respecting and leaving alone diverse cultures (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: II. Review of Metaphysics 11 (4):673 - 688.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Andrew J. Reck (1958). The Philosophy of Andrew Ushenko: I. Review of Metaphysics 11 (3):471 - 485.score: 18.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Carlos Sonnenschein (2008). Book Review of "The Estrogen Elixir: A History of Hormone Replacement Therapy in America" by Elizabeth Siegel Watkins. [REVIEW] Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 3 (1):1-.score: 18.0
    The Estrogen Elixir: A History of Hormone Replacement Therapy in America by Elizabeth Siegel Watkins is a thoroughly documented cautionary tale of the information and advice offered to women in the perimenopausal period of their life, and the consequences of exposure to sexual hormones on their health and wellbeing.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. J. Andrew DeWoody, John W. Bickham, Charles H. Michler, Krista M. Nichols, Olin E. Rhodes & Keith E. Woeste (2011). Conservation Genetics for Natural ResourcesMolecular Approaches in Natural Resource Conservation and Management.J. Andrew DeWoody , John W. Bickham , Charles H. Michler , Krista M. Nichols , Olin E. Rhodes Jr. , and Keith E. Woeste , Eds . Cambridge University Press , 2010 . 392 Pp., Illus. $55.00 (ISBN 9780521731348 Paper). [REVIEW] BioScience 61 (4):330-331.score: 18.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Andrew Dodsworth (2000). Andrew's Literary Death Quiz. Philosophy Now 27:47-47.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gregory Flaxman (2001). The Laws of Cinematic Hospitality: A Response to Andrew Murphie. Film-Philosophy 5 (2).score: 18.0
    Andrew Murphie 'Is Philosophy Ever Enough?' _Film-Philosophy_, Deleuze Special Issue vol. 5 no. 38, November 2001.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. J. Lindenmann (2001). Siegel, Schaudinn, Fleck and the Etiology of Syphilis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (3):435-455.score: 18.0
    In 1905 two different etiologic agents for syphilis were proposed in Berlin, one, the Cytorrhyctes luis, by John Siegel, the other, Spirochaete pallida, by Fritz Schaudinn. Both scientists were pupils of Franz Eilhard Schulze, and were outsiders to the Berlin medical establishment. Both belonged to the same thought collective, used the same thought style, and started from the same supposition that the etiologic agent of syphilis must be a protist. Both used the same morphological approach, the same microscopes and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Adam Stewart (2010). John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn. Newman Studies Journal 7 (2):6-17.score: 18.0
    This essay examines the contrasting conceptualizations of reason in the thought of John Henry Newman and Andrew Martin Fairbairn in their articles published in The Contemporary Review in 1885. This essay articulates both Fairbairn’s charge of philosophical scepticism against Newman as well as Newman’s defense of his position and concomitantly details Fairbairn’s and Newman’s competing notions of the efficacy of reason to provide reliable knowledge of God. The positions of Fairbairn and Newman remain two of the most important perspectives (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Doohwan Ahn (2011). From Greece to Babylon:The Political Thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay (1686–1743). History of European Ideas 37 (4):421-437.score: 18.0
    This paper explores the political thought of Andrew Michael Ramsay with particular reference to his highly acclaimed book called A New Cyropaedia, or the Travels of Cyrus (1727). Dedicated to Prince Charles Edward Stuart, the Young Pretender, to whom he was tutor, this work has been hitherto viewed as a Jacobite imitation of the Telemachus, Son of Ulysses(1699) of his eminent teacher archbishop Fénelon of Cambrai. By tracing the dual legacy of the first Persian Emperor Cyrus in Western thought, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Francis X. Diebold & Glenn D. Rudebusch (2013). Yield Curve Modeling and Forecasting: The Dynamic Nelson-Siegel Approach. Princeton University Press.score: 18.0
    In this book, Francis Diebold and Glenn Rudebusch propose two extensions of the classic yield curve model of Nelson and Siegel that are both theoretically rigorous and empirically successful.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999