Search results for 'Angelika Hug' (try it on Scholar)

207 found
Sort by:
  1. Anton Kuehberger, Christoph Kogler, Angelika Hug & Evelyne Moesl (2006). The Role of the Position Effect in Theory and Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (5):610-625.score: 120.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Anton Kühberger, Christoph Kogler, H. U. G. Angelika & Evelyne Mösl (2006). The Role of the Position Effect in Theory and Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (5):610–625.score: 30.0
    We contribute to the empirical debate on whether we understand and predict mental states by using simulation (simulation theory) or by relying on a folk psychological theory (theory theory). To decide between these two fundamental positions, it has been argued that failure to predict other people's choices would be challenging evidence against the simulation view. We test the specific claim that people prefer the rightmost position in choosing among equally valued objects, and whether or not this position bias can be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. E. Gefenas, V. Dranseika, A. Cekanauskaite, K. Hug, S. Mezinska, E. Peicius, V. Silis, A. Soosaar & M. Strosberg (2010). Non-Equivalent Stringency of Ethical Review in the Baltic States: A Sign of a Systematic Problem in Europe? Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):435-439.score: 30.0
    We analyse the system of ethical review of human research in the Baltic States by introducing the principle of equivalent stringency of ethical review, that is, research projects imposing equal risks and inconveniences on research participants should be subjected to equally stringent review procedures. We examine several examples of non-equivalence or asymmetry in the system of ethical review of human research: (1) the asymmetry between rather strict regulations of clinical drug trials and relatively weaker regulations of other types of clinical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. T. Hug (2010). Radical Constructivism Mainstreaming: A Desirable Endeavor? Critical Considerations Using Examples From Educational Studies and Learning Theory. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):58-65.score: 30.0
    Context: It is beyond doubt that RC has received a great deal of attention in educational studies and learning theory. But overall, the current situation seems to be rather ambivalent in view of the blurring of the various strands in constructivist discourses and the different ways of distinguishing and foregrounding constructivist positions. Correspondingly, there is a wide range of claims, from the claim that (radical) constructivism represents a mainstream endeavor to attributions of its being outdated, self-refuting or irrelevant. Purpose: The (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Pacific L. Hug (1958). The Place and Function of the Catholic Philosopher in the WorId Today. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:34-53.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Abram Amsel, James J. Hug & C. Thomas Surridge (1968). Number of Food Pellets, Goal Approaches, and the Partial Reinforcement Effect After Minimal Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):530.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Abram Amsel, C. Thomas Surridge & James J. Hug (1969). Number of Food Pellets and the Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect After Extended Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):578.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Dierolf Angelika (2011). The Influence of Endogenous Cortisol on a Task Switching Task: An ERP-Study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 5.score: 30.0
  9. Paul Bertelson, Ruth M. J. Byrne, Stanislas Dehaene, Ruma Falk, Gerd Gigerenzer, Klaus Hug, Phillip N. Johnson-Laird, Susan Jones, Peter W. Jusczyk & Barbara Landau (1992). Ex 0. Cognition 43:2.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas, Asta Cekanauskaite, Kristina Hug, Signe Mezinska, Eimantas Peicius, Vents Silis, Andres Soosaar & Martin Strosberg (2011). Twenty Years of Human Research Ethics Committees in the Baltic States. Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):48-54.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gerd Gigerenzer & Klaus Hug (1992). Domain-Specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating, and Perspective Change. Cognition 43 (2):127-171.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Caulfield Hayley, Anderson Angelika & Enticott Peter (2013). Is the Role of Facial Mimicry in Emotion Recognition Influenced by Differing Levels of Autistic Traits? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 30.0
  13. T. Hug (2008). Education Towards Truth. Reflecting on a Sentence of Josef Mitterer. Constructivist Foundations 3 (3):249-253.score: 30.0
    Purpose: So far, the work of Josef Mitterer has not been widely recognized in philosophy of education, even though it offers many points of contact not only for epistemological and methodological questions but also for empirical and educational issues. Among these points of contact there is an outstanding sentence (see motto), which can be taken as a starting point for conceptual considerations in philosophy of education. The article takes this sentence as a hub for some corresponding investigations. Method: The article (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James J. Hug & John J. Porter (1968). Interaction of Habit (H) and Drive (D) in Classical Eyelid Conditioning: H and D as Functions of Ucs Intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):150.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Pacific L. Hug (1958). The Role of the Christian Philosopher. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:34-53.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. T. Hug (2007). Viability and Crusty Snow. Constructivist Foundations 2 (2-3):114-117.score: 30.0
    Excerpt: There is the difficulty in allowing for personal items when focussing on academic interests and in allowing for rational aspects when focussing on personal items for someone who has had the chance to get to know Ernst personally. At least for me the search for apposite words in English is not easy in view of the successful interplay between his philosophical ideas, his handling of everyday problems of life and his ability to cope with difficult situations. But let's give (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Kristina Hug & Göran Hermerén (2011). Which Patient Groups Should Be Asked to Participate in First-in-Human Trials of Stem-Cell-Based Therapies? Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):256-271.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John J. Porter & James J. Hug (1965). Effects of Number and Percentage of Rewarded Trials on the Acquisition and Extinction of Lever Pressing Using a Discrete-Trial Procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (6):575.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jane F. Gardner (1992). Roman Marriage and the Roman Family Susan Treggiari: Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges Frow the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Pp. Xv + 578. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. £65.00. Beryl Rawson (Ed.): Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome. Pp. Xiv + 252; 9 Plates, 10 Figs., 3 Tables. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Humanities Research Centre, Canberra, 1991. £35.00. Angelika Mette-Dittmann: Die Ehegesetze des Augustus: Eine Untersuchung Im Rahmen der Gesellschaftspolitik des Princeps. (Historia Einzelschriften, 67.) Pp. 220. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1991. Paper, DM 68. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):386-389.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jay Baruch (2010). Hug or Ugh? Hastings Center Report 40 (2):7-8.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Johannes Twardella (2012). Neuwirth, Angelika: Der Koran als Text der Spätantike. Ein europäischer Zugang. Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 64 (1):75-78.score: 9.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jay Baruch (forthcoming). In Practice: Hug or Ugh? Hastings Center Report.score: 9.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Sandrine Berges (2011). Why Women Hug Their Chains: Wollstonecraft and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas (1):72-87.score: 9.0
    In a recent article, Amartya Sen writes that one important influence on his theory of adaptive preferences is Wollstonecraft's account of how some women, though clearly oppressed, are apparently satisfied with their lot. Wollstonecraft's arguments have received little attention so far from contemporary political philosophers, and one might be tempted to dismiss Sen's acknowledgment as a form of gallantry. That would be wrong. Wollstonecraft does have a lot of interest to say on the topic of why her contemporaries appeared to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. A. Black (2001). Angelika Krebs Ethics of Nature and Josef Keulartz Struggle for Nature. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):209-209.score: 9.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Daniel G. Calder (1986). Angelika Lutz, ed., Die Version G der Angelsächsischen Chronik: Rekonstruktion und Edition. (Münchener Universitäts-Schriften, Texte und Untersuchungen zur Englische Philologie, 11.) Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1981. Paper. Pp. cciv, 250; 4 blackand-white facsimile plates. DM 78. [REVIEW] Speculum 61 (1):242-243.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Blurred Conditionals (1981). Angelika Kratzer. In W. Klein & W. Levelt (eds.), Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics. Reidel. 201.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Gebon Fournelle (1958). Commentary on Pacific L. Hug. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:53-54.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Joris Geldhof (2012). Review: Angelika Nollert, Matthias Volkenandt, Rut-Maria Gollan & Eckhard Frick (Hg.), Kirchenbauten in der Gegenwart. Architektur zwischen Sakralität und sozialer Wirklichkeit (Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 2011). [REVIEW] Bijdragen: Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 73:345-346.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Peter Klotz (2009). II. Kontexte Und Literale Praktiken. Textsorten Als Elemente Kultureller Praktiken : Zur Funktion Und Zur Geschichte des Poesiealbumeintrags Als Kernelement Einer Kulturellen Praktik / Angelika Linke. Kontexte Und Kompetenzen - Am Beispiel Schriftlichen Argumentierens / Helmuth Feilke. Kontexttransposition : Studentisches Schreiben Zwischen Journalismus Und Wissenschaft / Torsten Steinhoff. Textrhetorik Und Kontextualisierung / Georg Weidacher. Das Verhältnis Text - Kontext Am Beispiel von Beschreiben : Sprachliche, Soziopragmatische Und Kulturelle Aspekte. [REVIEW] In Peter Klotz, Paul R. Portmann-Tselikas & Georg Ernst Weidacher (eds.), Kontexte Und Texte: Soziokulturelle Konstellationen Literalen Handelns. Narr Francke Attempo Verlag.score: 9.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Barbara H. Partee (1995). Emmon Bach. Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer And. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer. 2--1.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Thomas Schramme (forthcoming). Rezension zu: Angelika Krebs: Arbeit und Liebe. Studia Philosophica.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Konstanz von Gisbert Fanselow (1981). Zu Angelika Kratzers Konditionalsatztheorie. Conceptus 15:66.score: 9.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Gerhild Scholz Williams (1987). Interpretive Strategies: Hug Schapler and the Politics of Royal Power. Semiotica 63 (1-2):221-228.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Angelika Kratzer (1977). What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.score: 3.0
    In this paper I offer an account of the meaning of must and can within the framework of possible worlds semantics. The paper consists of two parts: the first argues for a relative concept of modality underlying modal words like must and can in natural language. I give preliminary definitions of the meaning of these words which are formulated in terms of logical consequence and compatibility, respectively. The second part discusses one kind of insufficiency in the meaning definitions given in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Angelika Kratzer, Situations in Natural Language Semantics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 3.0
    Situation semantics was developed as an alternative to possible worlds semantics. In situation semantics, linguistic expressions are evaluated with respect to partial, rather than complete, worlds. There is no consensus about what situations are, just as there is no consensus about what possible worlds or events are. According to some, situations are structured entities consisting of relations and individuals standing in those relations. According to others, situations are particulars. In spite of unresolved foundational issues, the partiality provided by situation semantics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Angelika Kratzer (1981). Partition and Revision: The Semantics of Counterfactuals. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 10 (2):201 - 216.score: 3.0
    The last section made it clear that an analysis which at first seems to fail is viable after all. It is viable if we let it depend on a partition function to be provided by the context of conversation. This analysis leaves certain traits of the partition function open. I have tried to show that this should be so. Specifying these traits as Pollock does leads to wrong predictions. And leaving them open endows counterfactuals with just the right amount of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Angelika Kratzer, Beyond Ouch and Oops. How Descriptive and Expressive Meaning Interact.score: 3.0
    They are expressives, too. There is a phonology. There is a syntax. There is a compositional semantics. There are interesting interactions to investigate. German, Greek, and Papago are known examples of discourse particle languages. Intonation has been said to have similar uses in other languages.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Angelika Kratzer (1979). Conditional Necessity and Possibility. In. In Rainer Bäuerle, Urs Egli & Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Semantics From Different Points of View. Springer-Verlag. 117--147.score: 3.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Angelika Kratzer (1989). An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):607 - 653.score: 3.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Angelika Kratzer (2002). Facts: Particulars or Information Units? [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):655-670.score: 3.0
    What are facts, situations, or events? When Situation Semantics was born in the eighties, I objected because I could not swallow the idea that situations might be chunks of information. For me, they had to be particulars like sticks or bricks. I could not imagine otherwise. The first manuscript of “An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought” that I submitted to Linguistics and Philosophy had a footnote where I distanced myself from all those who took possible situations to be units (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Peter B. M. Vranas (2008). New Foundations for Imperative Logic I: Logical Connectives, Consistency, and Quantifiers. Noûs 42 (4):529-572.score: 3.0
    Imperatives cannot be true or false, so they are shunned by logicians. And yet imperatives can be combined by logical connectives: "kiss me and hug me" is the conjunction of "kiss me" with "hug me". This example may suggest that declarative and imperative logic are isomorphic: just as the conjunction of two declaratives is true exactly if both conjuncts are true, the conjunction of two imperatives is satisfied exactly if both conjuncts are satisfied—what more is there to say? Much more, (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Dilip Ninan (2005). Two Puzzles About Deontic Necessity. In J. Gajewski, V. Hacquard, B. Nickel & S. Yalcin (eds.), New Work on Modality, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.score: 3.0
    The deontic modal must has two surprising properties: an assertion of must p does not permit a denial of p, and must does not take past tense complements. I first consider an explanation of these phenomena that stays within Angelika Kratzer’s semantic framework for modals, and then offer some reasons for rejecting that explanation. I then propose an alternative account, according to which simple must sentences have the force of an imperative.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Angelika Kratzer, A Note on Choice Functions in Context.score: 3.0
    Kratzer 1998 proposes that certain indefinite determiners (at least in some of their uses) might be variables for (Skolemized) choice functions that receive a value from the utterance context. What does it mean for a choice function variable to receive a value from the context of utterance? How can a context provide such a function? To sharpen intuitions, here is an example describing a custom from my home town Mindelheim. After every funeral, all the mourners gathered around the still open (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Eric Swanson (2008). Modality in Language. Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1193-1207.score: 3.0
    This article discusses some of the ways in which natural language can express modal information – information which is, to a first approximation, about what could be or must be the case, as opposed to being about what actually is the case. It motivates, explains, and raises problems for Angelika Kratzer's influential theory of modal auxiliaries, and introduces a new approach to one important debate about the relationships between modality, evidentiality, context change, and imperative force.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Thomas Ede Zimmermann (1993). On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs. Natural Language Semantics 2 (1):149-179.score: 3.0
    This paper is about the semantic analysis of referentially opaque verbs like seek and owe that give rise to nonspecific readings. It is argued that Montague's categorization (based on earlier work by Quine) of opaque verbs as properties of quantifiers runs into two serious difficulties: the first problem is that it does not work with opaque verbs like resemble that resist any lexical decomposition of the seek ap try to find kind; the second one is that it wrongly predicts de (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Angelika Krebs (1999). Ethics of Nature: A Map. W. De Gruyter.score: 3.0
    Krebs (philosophy, U. of Frankfurt, Germany) provides a systematic study of whether nature has intrinsic value or is only valuable for human beings, with an ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Irene Heim & Angelika Kratzer (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell.score: 3.0
    Written by two of the leading figures in the field, this is a lucid and systematic introduction to semantics as applied to transformational grammars of the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Angelika Kratzer (2005). Constraining Premise Sets for Counterfactuals. Journal of Semantics 22 (2):153-158.score: 3.0
    This note is a reply to ‘On the Lumping Semantics of Counterfactuals’ by Makoto Kanazawa, Stefan Kaufmann and Stanley Peters. It shows first that the first triviality result obtained by Kanazawa, Kaufmann, and Peters is already ruled out by the constraints on admissible premise sets listed in Kratzer (1989). Second, and more importantly, it points out that the results obtained by Kanazawa, Kaufmann, and Peters are obsolete in view of the revised analysis of counterfactuals in Kratzer (1990, 2002).
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Angelika Kratzer, Interpreting Focus: Presupposed or Expressive Meanings? A Comment on Geurts and Van der Sandt.score: 3.0
    The BPR assumes that we already know how sentences are partitioned into focused and backgrounded material, and this is quite legitimate, given the literature on the topic (see e.g. Krifka (1991), von Stechow (1991)). If the BPR was true, no more would have to be said about the meaning of focus. The behavior of whatever inferences are generated by backgrounding could be taken care of by theories dealing with the projection of presuppositions of the familiar kind, the presuppositions of definite (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Angelika Kratzer, Building Statives.score: 3.0
    The adjectival passive construction that is traditionally called ‘Zustandspassiv’ (‘state passive’) in German seems to have the same syntactic and semantic properties as its English cousin, except that it is easier to identify. German state or adjectival passives select the auxiliary sein (‘be’), and are therefore clearly distinguished from verbal or ‘Vorgangs’- passives (‘process passives’), which use the auxiliary werden (‘get’, ‘become’). In spite of their appearance, German state passives do not form a homogenious class, however. There are two important (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 207