Search results for 'Angelika Hug' (try it on Scholar)

188 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Anton Kuehberger, Christoph Kogler, Angelika Hug & Evelyne Moesl (2006). The Role of the Position Effect in Theory and Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (5):610-625.
  2.  12
    Gerd Gigerenzer & Klaus Hug (1992). Domain-Specific Reasoning: Social Contracts, Cheating, and Perspective Change. Cognition 43 (2):127-171.
    What counts as human rationality: reasoning processes that embody content-independent formal theories, such as propositional logic, or reasoning processes that are well designed for solving important adaptive problems? Most theories of human reasoning have been based on content-independent formal rationality, whereas adaptive reasoning, ecological or evolutionary, has been little explored. We elaborate and test an evolutionary approach, Cosmides' social contract theory, using the Wason selection task. In the first part, we disentangle the theoretical concept of a “social contract” from that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   130 citations  
  3.  10
    E. Gefenas, V. Dranseika, A. Cekanauskaite, K. Hug, S. Mezinska, E. Peicius, V. Silis, A. Soosaar & M. Strosberg (2010). Non-Equivalent Stringency of Ethical Review in the Baltic States: A Sign of a Systematic Problem in Europe? Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (7):435-439.
    We analyse the system of ethical review of human research in the Baltic States by introducing the principle of equivalent stringency of ethical review, that is, research projects imposing equal risks and inconveniences on research participants should be subjected to equally stringent review procedures. We examine several examples of non-equivalence or asymmetry in the system of ethical review of human research: (1) the asymmetry between rather strict regulations of clinical drug trials and relatively weaker regulations of other types of clinical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4.  1
    Vilius Dranseika, Eugenijus Gefenas, Asta Cekanauskaite, Kristina Hug, Signe Mezinska, Eimantas Peicius, Vents Silis, Andres Soosaar & Martin Strosberg (2011). Twenty Years of Human Research Ethics Committees in the Baltic States. Developing World Bioethics 11 (1):48-54.
    Two decades have passed since the first attempts were made to establish systematic ethical review of human research in the Baltic States. Legally and institutionally much has changed. In this paper we provide an historical and structural overview of ethical review of human research and identify some problems related to the role of ethical review in establishing quality research environment in these countries. Problems connected to (a) public availability of information, (b) management of conflicts of interest, (c) REC composition and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  2
    Kristina Hug & Göran Hermerén (2011). Which Patient Groups Should Be Asked to Participate in First-in-Human Trials of Stem-Cell-Based Therapies? Journal of Clinical Ethics 23 (3):256-271.
    The aims of this article are to consider whether there are medical and societal differences among diseases regarding which patient groups should be asked to participate in first-in-human trials of stem-cell-based therapies; any differences in the light of values generally endorsed by different types of ethical theories, since the question in the title of this article is value laden, and its answer depends on which values one wants to promote and protect, and how they are ranked in importance; whether the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  4
    T. Hug (2015). Towards a Delightful Critique of Pure Reason. Constructivist Foundations 10 (3):414-416.
    Open peer commentary on the article “Amusement, Delight, and Whimsy: Humor Has Its Reasons that Reason Cannot Ignore” by Edith K. Ackermann. Upshot: Ackermann’s target article strikes a chord by thinking together oblique and rational aspects of knowing in constructivism. Her target article points out uses of humor and various ways of making sense of our experience that have been underestimated in constructivist discourse. While I can agree on the main lines of her argument, I want to argue for further (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  19
    Anton Kühberger, Christoph Kogler, H. U. G. Angelika & Evelyne Mösl (2006). The Role of the Position Effect in Theory and Simulation. Mind and Language 21 (5):610–625.
    We contribute to the empirical debate on whether we understand and predict mental states by using simulation (simulation theory) or by relying on a folk psychological theory (theory theory). To decide between these two fundamental positions, it has been argued that failure to predict other people's choices would be challenging evidence against the simulation view. We test the specific claim that people prefer the rightmost position in choosing among equally valued objects, and whether or not this position bias can be (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  5
    Abram Amsel, C. Thomas Surridge & James J. Hug (1969). Number of Food Pellets and the Partial Reinforcement Extinction Effect After Extended Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):578.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Abram Amsel, James J. Hug & C. Thomas Surridge (1968). Number of Food Pellets, Goal Approaches, and the Partial Reinforcement Effect After Minimal Acquisition. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (4):530.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  17
    Pacific L. Hug (1958). The Place and Function of the Catholic Philosopher in the WorId Today. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:34-53.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  2
    T. Hug (2009). Constructivism and Media Socialization. Concepts and Perspectives in German-Speaking Countries. Constructivist Foundations 4 (2):73-81.
    Purpose: The article deals with constructivism and media in two respects: on a general level with some aspects of the role of media in constructivism, and in particular with the role of constructivism in media socialization studies. Context : Media have been taken up as a topic in some parts of constructivist discourses. While some of the authors treat media as a subject of inquiry like other fields to which they are related -- economics, society, or psychotherapy -- others recognize (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    T. Hug (2014). Reflecting on Constructing Constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):316-317.
    Open peer commentary on the article “Constructing Constructivism” by Hugh Gash. Upshot: Hugh Gash’s paper on constructing constructivism is inspiring, insightful, and important in many respects. However, and for that reason, I want to reflect on some critical aspects in terms of metaphorical uses of expressions and ongoing processes of medialization and digitization. Lastly, I am going to point out critical potentials of constructivist thinking as related to education.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  3
    John J. Porter & James J. Hug (1965). Effects of Number and Percentage of Rewarded Trials on the Acquisition and Extinction of Lever Pressing Using a Discrete-Trial Procedure. Journal of Experimental Psychology 70 (6):575.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    T. Hug (2008). Education Towards Truth. Reflecting on a Sentence of Josef Mitterer. Constructivist Foundations 3 (3):249-253.
    Purpose: So far, the work of Josef Mitterer has not been widely recognized in philosophy of education, even though it offers many points of contact not only for epistemological and methodological questions but also for empirical and educational issues. Among these points of contact there is an outstanding sentence (see motto), which can be taken as a starting point for conceptual considerations in philosophy of education. The article takes this sentence as a hub for some corresponding investigations. Method: The article (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    T. Hug (2010). Radical Constructivism Mainstreaming: A Desirable Endeavor? Critical Considerations Using Examples From Educational Studies and Learning Theory. Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):58-65.
    Context: It is beyond doubt that RC has received a great deal of attention in educational studies and learning theory. But overall, the current situation seems to be rather ambivalent in view of the blurring of the various strands in constructivist discourses and the different ways of distinguishing and foregrounding constructivist positions. Correspondingly, there is a wide range of claims, from the claim that (radical) constructivism represents a mainstream endeavor to attributions of its being outdated, self-refuting or irrelevant. Purpose: The (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  1
    T. Hug (2007). Viability and Crusty Snow. Constructivist Foundations 2 (2-3):114-117.
    Excerpt: There is the difficulty in allowing for personal items when focussing on academic interests and in allowing for rational aspects when focussing on personal items for someone who has had the chance to get to know Ernst personally. At least for me the search for apposite words in English is not easy in view of the successful interplay between his philosophical ideas, his handling of everyday problems of life and his ability to cope with difficult situations. But let's give (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  1
    Pacific L. Hug (1958). The Role of the Christian Philosopher. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:34-53.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  1
    James J. Hug & John J. Porter (1968). Interaction of Habit (H) and Drive (D) in Classical Eyelid Conditioning: H and D as Functions of Ucs Intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):150.
  19. Paul Bertelson, Ruth M. J. Byrne, Stanislas Dehaene, Ruma Falk, Gerd Gigerenzer, Klaus Hug, Phillip N. Johnson-Laird, Susan Jones, Peter W. Jusczyk & Barbara Landau (1992). Ex 0. Cognition 43:2.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. James J. Hug & Abram Amsel (1969). Frustration Theory and Partial Reinforcement Effects: The Acquisition-Extinction Paradox. Psychological Review 76 (4):419-421.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Theo Hug (2008). Medienphilosophie und Bildungsphilosophie – Ein Plädoyer für Schnittstellenerkundungen. In Alois Pichler & Herbert Hrachovec (eds.), Philosophy of the Information Society: Proceedings of the 30th International Ludwig Wittgenstein-Symposium in Kirchberg, 2007. De Gruyter 43-74.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Maienborn Claudia & Wöllstein Angelika (2005). Event Arguments: Foundations and Applications. Mouton de Gruyter.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  29
    Sandrine Berges (2011). Why Women Hug Their Chains: Wollstonecraft and Adaptive Preferences. Utilitas (1):72-87.
    In a recent article, Amartya Sen writes that one important influence on his theory of adaptive preferences is Wollstonecraft's account of how some women, though clearly oppressed, are apparently satisfied with their lot. Wollstonecraft's arguments have received little attention so far from contemporary political philosophers, and one might be tempted to dismiss Sen's acknowledgment as a form of gallantry. That would be wrong. Wollstonecraft does have a lot of interest to say on the topic of why her contemporaries appeared to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Peter Klotz (2009). II. Kontexte Und Literale Praktiken. Textsorten Als Elemente Kultureller Praktiken : Zur Funktion Und Zur Geschichte des Poesiealbumeintrags Als Kernelement Einer Kulturellen Praktik / Angelika Linke. Kontexte Und Kompetenzen - Am Beispiel Schriftlichen Argumentierens / Helmuth Feilke. Kontexttransposition : Studentisches Schreiben Zwischen Journalismus Und Wissenschaft / Torsten Steinhoff. Textrhetorik Und Kontextualisierung / Georg Weidacher. Das Verhältnis Text - Kontext Am Beispiel von Beschreiben : Sprachliche, Soziopragmatische Und Kulturelle Aspekte. [REVIEW] In Peter Klotz, Paul R. Portmann-Tselikas & Georg Ernst Weidacher (eds.), Kontexte Und Texte: Soziokulturelle Konstellationen Literalen Handelns. Narr Francke Attempo Verlag
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  10
    Johannes Twardella (2012). Neuwirth, Angelika: Der Koran als Text der Spätantike. Ein europäischer Zugang. Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 64 (1):75-78.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  7
    Daniel G. Calder (1986). Angelika Lutz, ed., Die Version G der Angelsächsischen Chronik: Rekonstruktion und Edition. (Münchener Universitäts-Schriften, Texte und Untersuchungen zur Englische Philologie, 11.) Munich: Wilhelm Fink, 1981. Paper. Pp. cciv, 250; 4 blackand-white facsimile plates. DM 78. [REVIEW] Speculum 61 (1):242-243.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  4
    Gebon Fournelle (1958). Commentary on Pacific L. Hug. Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 32:53-54.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    Jay Baruch (2010). Hug or Ugh? Hastings Center Report 40 (2):7-8.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  8
    Jane F. Gardner (1992). Roman Marriage and the Roman Family Susan Treggiari: Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges Frow the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Pp. Xv + 578. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991. £65.00. Beryl Rawson (Ed.): Marriage, Divorce and Children in Ancient Rome. Pp. Xiv + 252; 9 Plates, 10 Figs., 3 Tables. Oxford: Clarendon Press/Humanities Research Centre, Canberra, 1991. £35.00. Angelika Mette-Dittmann: Die Ehegesetze des Augustus: Eine Untersuchung Im Rahmen der Gesellschaftspolitik des Princeps. (Historia Einzelschriften, 67.) Pp. 220. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner, 1991. Paper, DM 68. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):386-389.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  1
    Barbara H. Partee (1995). Emmon Bach. Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer And. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer 2--1.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Jay Baruch (forthcoming). In Practice: Hug or Ugh? Hastings Center Report.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. A. Black (2001). Angelika Krebs Ethics of Nature and Josef Keulartz Struggle for Nature. Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):209-209.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Ed Claparède (1925). Von Hug-Hellmuth, H. - a study of the mental life of the child. [REVIEW] Scientia 19 (37):283.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Blurred Conditionals (1981). Angelika Kratzer. In W. Klein & W. Levelt (eds.), Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics. Reidel 201.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Joris Geldhof (2012). Review: Angelika Nollert, Matthias Volkenandt, Rut-Maria Gollan & Eckhard Frick (Hg.), Kirchenbauten in der Gegenwart. Architektur zwischen Sakralität und sozialer Wirklichkeit (Regensburg: Friedrich Pustet, 2011). [REVIEW] Bijdragen: Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie En Theologie 73:345-346.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Leta S. Hollingworth (1920). On Hug-Hellmuth's A Study of the Mental Life of the Child. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 17 (2):52.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Renate Reschke & Volker Gerhardt (2008). Elke Angelika Wachendorff, Friedrich Nietzsche. Denker der Interkulturalität. In Renate Reschke & Volker Gerhardt (eds.), Friedrich Nietzsche – Geschichte, Affekte, Medien. Akademie Verlag Gmbh
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Thomas Schramme (forthcoming). Rezension zu: Angelika Krebs: Arbeit und Liebe. Studia Philosophica.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Jean Seidengart (2009). Giordano Bruno.De l'infinito, universo et mondi / Über das Unendliche, das Universum und die Welten. Translated, with an introduction and commentary, by Angelika Bönker‐Vallon. cxliii + 427 pp., bibl., indexes. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2007. €114. [REVIEW] Isis 100 (2):392-392.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. C. Shackle (2008). Ghazal as World Literature I: Transformations of a Literary Genre * by Thomas Bauer and Angelika Neuwirth. Journal of Islamic Studies 19 (3):451-453.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Konstanz von Gisbert Fanselow (1981). Zu Angelika Kratzers Konditionalsatztheorie. Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 15:66.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Gerhild Scholz Williams (1987). Interpretive Strategies: Hug Schapler and the Politics of Royal Power. Semiotica 63 (1-2):221-228.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Nate Charlow (2015). Triviality For Restrictor Conditionals. Noûs 49 (3).
    I present two Triviality results for Kratzer's standard “restrictor” analysis of indicative conditionals. I both refine and undermine the common claim that problems of Triviality do not arise for Kratzer conditionals since they are not strictly conditionals at all.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  92
    Irene Heim & Angelika Kratzer (1998). Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell.
    Written by two of the leading figures in the field, this is a lucid and systematic introduction to semantics as applied to transformational grammars of the ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   128 citations  
  45. Maria Huber, Thorsten Burger, Angelika Illg, Silke Kunze, Alexandros Giourgas, Ludwig Braun, Stefanie Kröger, Andreas Nickisch, Gerhard Rasp, Andreas Becker & Annerose Keilmann (2015). Mental Health Problems in Adolescents with Cochlear Implants: Peer Problems Persist After Controlling for Additional Handicaps. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46. Nate Charlow (forthcoming). Decision Theory: Yes! Truth Conditions: No! In Nate Charlow Matthew Chrisman (ed.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press
    This essay makes the case for, in the phrase of Angelika Kratzer, packing the fruits of the study of rational decision-making into our semantics for deontic modals—specifically, for parametrizing the truth-condition of a deontic modal to things like decision problems and decision theories. Then it knocks it down. While the fundamental relation of the semantic theory must relate deontic modals to things like decision problems and theories, this semantic relation cannot be intelligibly understood as representing the conditions under which (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Angelika Kratzer (1977). What 'Must' and 'Can' Must and Can Mean. Linguistics and Philosophy 1 (3):337--355.
    In this paper I offer an account of the meaning of must and can within the framework of possible worlds semantics. The paper consists of two parts: the first argues for a relative concept of modality underlying modal words like must and can in natural language. I give preliminary definitions of the meaning of these words which are formulated in terms of logical consequence and compatibility, respectively. The second part discusses one kind of insufficiency in the meaning definitions given in (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   87 citations  
  48. Angelika Kratzer, Situations in Natural Language Semantics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Situation semantics was developed as an alternative to possible worlds semantics. In situation semantics, linguistic expressions are evaluated with respect to partial, rather than complete, worlds. There is no consensus about what situations are, just as there is no consensus about what possible worlds or events are. According to some, situations are structured entities consisting of relations and individuals standing in those relations. According to others, situations are particulars. In spite of unresolved foundational issues, the partiality provided by situation semantics (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  49.  75
    Angelika Kratzer (1989). An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12 (5):607 - 653.
  50. Peter B. M. Vranas (2008). New Foundations for Imperative Logic I: Logical Connectives, Consistency, and Quantifiers. Noûs 42 (4):529-572.
    Imperatives cannot be true or false, so they are shunned by logicians. And yet imperatives can be combined by logical connectives: "kiss me and hug me" is the conjunction of "kiss me" with "hug me". This example may suggest that declarative and imperative logic are isomorphic: just as the conjunction of two declaratives is true exactly if both conjuncts are true, the conjunction of two imperatives is satisfied exactly if both conjuncts are satisfied—what more is there to say? Much more, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
1 — 50 / 188