Search results for 'Anita Huber' (try it on Scholar)

877 found
Order:
  1.  11
    Anita Huber (1995). Friederike Hassauer: Homo. Academica. Geschlechterkontrakte, Institution Und Die Verteilung des Wissens. Die Philosophin 6 (12):111-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Anita Huber (1995). Umgang mit der Tradition. Die Philosophin 6 (12):111-113.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  65
    Franz Huber (2008). Milne's Argument for the Log‐Ratio Measure. Philosophy of Science 75 (4):413-420.
    This article shows that a slight variation of the argument in Milne 1996 yields the log‐likelihood ratio l rather than the log‐ratio measure r as “the one true measure of confirmation. ” *Received December 2006; revised December 2007. †To contact the author, please write to: Formal Epistemology Research Group, Zukunftskolleg and Department of Philosophy, University of Konstanz, P.O. Box X906, 78457 Konstanz, Germany; e‐mail: franz.huber@uni‐konstanz.de.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  4.  4
    Franz Huber (forthcoming). Why Follow the Royal Rule? Synthese:1-26.
    This note is a sequel to Huber. It is shown that obeying a normative principle relating counterfactual conditionals and conditional beliefs, viz. the royal rule, is a necessary and sufficient means to attaining a cognitive end that relates true beliefs in purely factual, non-modal propositions and true beliefs in purely modal propositions. Along the way I will sketch my idealism about alethic or metaphysical modality.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  49
    Franz Huber (2007). The Logic of Theory Assessment. Journal of Philosophical Logic 36 (5):511-538.
    This paper starts by indicating the analysis of Hempel's conditions of adequacy for any relation of confirmation (Hempel, 1945) as presented in Huber (submitted). There I argue contra Carnap (1962, Section 87) that Hempel felt the need for two concepts of confirmation: one aiming at plausible theories and another aiming at informative theories. However, he also realized that these two concepts are conflicting, and he gave up the concept of confirmation aiming at informative theories. The main part of the (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  6.  12
    Stefan Huber, Korbinian Moeller, Hans-Christoph Nuerk & Klaus Willmes (2013). A Computational Modeling Approach on Three‐Digit Number Processing. Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (2):317-334.
    Recent findings indicate that the constituting digits of multi-digit numbers are processed, decomposed into units, tens, and so on, rather than integrated into one entity. This is suggested by interfering effects of unit digit processing on two-digit number comparison. In the present study, we extended the computational model for two-digit number magnitude comparison of Moeller, Huber, Nuerk, and Willmes (2011a) to the case of three-digit number comparison (e.g., 371_826). In a second step, we evaluated how hundred-decade and hundred-unit compatibility (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  4
    Lara Huber & Lara Kutschenko (2009). Medicine in a Neurocentric World: About the Explanatory Power of Neuroscientific Models in Medical Research and Practice. [REVIEW] Medicine Studies 1 (4):307-313.
    Medicine in a Neurocentric World: About the Explanatory Power of Neuroscientific Models in Medical Research and Practice Content Type Journal Article Category Editorial Notes Pages 307-313 DOI 10.1007/s12376-009-0036-2 Authors Lara Huber, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Institute for History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine Am Pulverturm 13 55131 Mainz Germany Lara K. Kutschenko, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz Institute for History, Philosophy and Ethics of Medicine Am Pulverturm 13 55131 Mainz (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Peter Brössel, Anna-Maria A. Eder & Franz Huber (2013). Evidential Support and Instrumental Rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 87 (2):279-300.
  9.  63
    Janet M. Dukerich, Mary J. Waller, Elizabeth George & George P. Huber (2000). Moral Intensity and Managerial Problem Solving. Journal of Business Ethics 24 (1):29 - 38.
    There is an increasing interest in how managers describe and respond to what they regard as moral versus nonmoral problems in organizations. In this study, forty managers described a moral problem and a nonmoral problem that they had encountered in their organization, each of which had been resolved. Analyses indicated that: (1) the two types of problems could be significantly differentiated using four of Jones' (1991) components of moral intensity; (2) the labels managers used to describe problems varied systematically between (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   25 citations  
  10.  6
    Franz Huber, How to Learn Concepts, Consequences, and Conditionals.
    In this brief note I show how to model conceptual change, logical learning, and revision of one's beliefs in response to conditional information such as indicative conditionals that do not express propositions.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  74
    Franz Huber (2013). Structural Equations and Beyond. Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):709-732.
    Recent accounts of actual causation are stated in terms of extended causal models. These extended causal models contain two elements representing two seemingly distinct modalities. The first element are structural equations which represent the or mechanisms of the model, just as ordinary causal models do. The second element are ranking functions which represent normality or typicality. The aim of this paper is to show that these two modalities can be unified. I do so by formulating two constraints under which extended (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  64
    Franz Huber & Christoph Schmidt-Petri (eds.) (2009). Degrees of Belief. Springer.
    Various theories try to give accounts of how measures of this confidence do or ought to behave, both as far as the internal mental consistency of the agent as ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13.  55
    Franz Huber (2014). New Foundations for Counterfactuals. Synthese 191 (10):2167-2193.
    Philosophers typically rely on intuitions when providing a semantics for counterfactual conditionals. However, intuitions regarding counterfactual conditionals are notoriously shaky. The aim of this paper is to provide a principled account of the semantics of counterfactual conditionals. This principled account is provided by what I dub the Royal Rule, a deterministic analogue of the Principal Principle relating chance and credence. The Royal Rule says that an ideal doxastic agent’s initial grade of disbelief in a proposition \(A\) , given that the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  54
    Franz Huber (2008). Assessing Theories, Bayes Style. Synthese 161 (1):89 - 118.
    The problem addressed in this paper is “the main epistemic problem concerning science”, viz. “the explication of how we compare and evaluate theories [...] in the light of the available evidence” (van Fraassen, BC, 1983, Theory comparison and relevant Evidence. In J. Earman (Ed.), Testing scientific theories (pp. 27–42). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press). Sections 1– 3 contain the general plausibility-informativeness theory of theory assessment. In a nutshell, the message is (1) that there are two values a theory should exhibit: (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  15.  53
    Peter Brössel & Franz Huber (2014). Bayesian Confirmation: A Means with No End. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (4):axu004.
    Any theory of confirmation must answer the following question: what is the purpose of its conception of confirmation for scientific inquiry? In this article, we argue that no Bayesian conception of confirmation can be used for its primary intended purpose, which we take to be making a claim about how worthy of belief various hypotheses are. Then we consider a different use to which Bayesian confirmation might be put, namely, determining the epistemic value of experimental outcomes, and thus to decide (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. Thomas Kroedel & Franz Huber (2013). Counterfactual Dependence and Arrow. Noûs 47 (3):453-466.
    We argue that a semantics for counterfactual conditionals in terms of comparative overall similarity faces a formal limitation due to Arrow’s impossibility theorem from social choice theory. According to Lewis’s account, the truth-conditions for counterfactual conditionals are given in terms of the comparative overall similarity between possible worlds, which is in turn determined by various aspects of similarity between possible worlds. We argue that a function from aspects of similarity to overall similarity should satisfy certain plausible constraints while Arrow’s impossibility (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  17.  57
    Franz Huber (2015). What Should I Believe About What Would Have Been the Case? Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (1):81-110.
    The question I am addressing in this paper is the following: how is it possible to empirically test, or confirm, counterfactuals? After motivating this question in Section 1, I will look at two approaches to counterfactuals, and at how counterfactuals can be empirically tested, or confirmed, if at all, on these accounts in Section 2. I will then digress into the philosophy of probability in Section 3. The reason for this digression is that I want to use the way observable (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  73
    Antonio Di Domenico, Andreas Gabriel, Beatrix C. Hiesmayr, Florian Hipp, Marcus Huber, Gerd Krizek, Karoline Mühlbacher, Sasa Radic, Christoph Spengler & Lukas Theussl (2012). Heisenberg's Uncertainty Relation and Bell Inequalities in High Energy Physics. Foundations of Physics 42 (6):778-802.
    An effective formalism is developed to handle decaying two-state systems. Herewith, observables of such systems can be described by a single operator in the Heisenberg picture. This allows for using the usual framework in quantum information theory and, hence, to enlighten the quantum features of such systems compared to non-decaying systems. We apply it to systems in high energy physics, i.e. to oscillating meson–antimeson systems. In particular, we discuss the entropic Heisenberg uncertainty relation for observables measured at different times at (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  78
    Franz Huber (2005). What Is the Point of Confirmation? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):1146-1159.
    Philosophically, one of the most important questions in the enterprise termed confirmation theory is this: Why should one stick to well confirmed theories rather than to any other theories? This paper discusses the answers to this question one gets from absolute and incremental Bayesian confirmation theory. According to absolute confirmation, one should accept ''absolutely well confirmed'' theories, because absolute confirmation takes one to true theories. An examination of two popular measures of incremental confirmation suggests the view that one should stick (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  20.  69
    Franz Huber (2006). Ranking Functions and Rankings on Languages. Artificial Intelligence 170:462-471.
    The Spohnian paradigm of ranking functions is in many respects like an order-of-magnitude reverse of subjective probability theory. Unlike probabilities, however, ranking functions are only indirectly—via a pointwise ranking function on the underlying set of possibilities W —defined on a field of propositions A over W. This research note shows under which conditions ranking functions on a field of propositions A over W and rankings on a language L are induced by pointwise ranking functions on W and the set of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  21.  6
    Samuel J. Huber & Matthew K. Wynia (2004). When Pestilence Prevails Physician Responsibilities in Epidemics. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (1):5 – 11.
    The threat of bioterrorism, the emergence of the SARS epidemic, and a recent focus on professionalism among physicians, present a timely opportunity for a review of, and renewed commitment to, physician obligations to care for patients during epidemics. The professional obligation to care for contagious patients is part of a larger "duty to treat," which historically became accepted when 1) a risk of nosocomial infection was perceived, 2) an organized professional body existed to promote the duty, and 3) the public (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  22.  56
    Franz Huber (2007). The Consistency Argument for Ranking Functions. Studia Logica 86 (2):299-329.
    The paper provides an argument for the thesis that an agent’s degrees of disbelief should obey the ranking calculus. This Consistency Argument is based on the Consistency Theorem. The latter says that an agent’s belief set is and will always be consistent and deductively closed iff her degrees of entrenchment satisfy the ranking axioms and are updated according to the ranktheoretic update rules.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  23.  68
    Franz Huber (2013). Belief Revision I: The AGM Theory. Philosophy Compass 8 (7):604-612.
    Belief revision theory studies how an ideal doxastic agent should revise her beliefs when she receives new information. In part I I will first present the AGM theory of belief revision (Alchourrón & Gärdenfors & Makinson 1985). Then I will focus on the problem of iterated belief revisions.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  7
    Kevin A. Smith, David E. Huber & Edward Vul (2013). Multiply-Constrained Semantic Search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition 128 (1):64-75.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  3
    Frank Domahs, Korbinian Moeller, Stefan Huber, Klaus Willmes & Hans-Christoph Nuerk (2010). Embodied Numerosity: Implicit Hand-Based Representations Influence Symbolic Number Processing Across Cultures. Cognition 116 (2):251-266.
  26.  57
    Franz Huber (2013). Belief Revision II: Ranking Theory. Philosophy Compass 8 (7):613-621.
    Belief revision theory studies how an ideal doxastic agent should revise her beliefs when she receives new information. In part I, I have first presented the AGM theory of belief revision. Then I have focused on the problem of iterated belief revisions. In part II, I will first present ranking theory (Spohn 1988). Then I will show how it solves the problem of iterated belief revisions. I will conclude by sketching two areas of future research.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  66
    Franz Huber (2008). Hempel's Logic of Confirmation. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):181 - 189.
    This paper presents a new analysis of C.G. Hempel’s conditions of adequacy for any relation of confirmation [Hempel C. G. (1945). Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays in the philosophy of science. New York: The Free Press, pp. 3–51.], differing from the one Carnap gave in §87 of his [1962. Logical foundations of probability (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.]. Hempel, it is argued, felt the need for two concepts of confirmation: one aiming at true hypotheses and another (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  28.  7
    S. Fischer, C. A. Huber, L. Imhof, R. Mahrer Imhof, M. Furter, S. J. Ziegler & G. Bosshard (2008). Suicide Assisted by Two Swiss Right-to-Die Organisations. Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):810-814.
    Background: In Switzerland, non-medical right-to-die organisations such as Exit Deutsche Schweiz and Dignitas offer suicide assistance to members suffering from incurable diseases. Objectives: First, to determine whether differences exist between the members who received assistance in suicide from Exit Deutsche Schweiz and Dignitas. Second, to investigate whether the practices of Exit Deutsche Schweiz have changed since the 1990s. Methods: This study analysed all cases of assisted suicide facilitated by Exit Deutsche Schweiz (E) and Dignitas (D) between 2001 and 2004 and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  29. Franz Huber (2009). Belief and Degrees of Belief. In F. Huber & C. Schmidt-Petri (eds.), Degrees of Belief. Springer
    Degrees of belief are familiar to all of us. Our confidence in the truth of some propositions is higher than our confidence in the truth of other propositions. We are pretty confident that our computers will boot when we push their power button, but we are much more confident that the sun will rise tomorrow. Degrees of belief formally represent the strength with which we believe the truth of various propositions. The higher an agent’s degree of belief for a particular (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  71
    Franz Huber (2008). Inductive Logic. In J. Lachs R. Talisse (ed.), Encyclopedia of American Philosophy. Routledge
    Logic is the study of the quality of arguments. An argument consists of a set of premises and a conclusion. The quality of an argument depends on at least two factors: the truth of the premises, and the strength with which the premises confirm the conclusion. The truth of the premises is a contingent factor that depends on the state of the world. The strength with which the premises confirm the conclusion is supposed to be independent of the state of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. David E. Huber & Randall C. O'Reilly (2003). Persistence and Accommodation in Short‐Term Priming and Other Perceptual Paradigms: Temporal Segregation Through Synaptic Depression. Cognitive Science 27 (3):403-430.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  32.  42
    Christian G. Huber & Johannes Huber (2009). Epistemological Considerations on Neuroimaging – a Crucial Prerequisite for Neuroethics. Bioethics 23 (6):340-348.
    Purpose: Whereas ethical considerations on imaging techniques and interpretations of neuroimaging results flourish, there is not much work on their preconditions. In this paper, therefore, we discuss epistemological considerations on neuroimaging and their implications for neuroethics. Results: Neuroimaging uses indirect methods to generate data about surrogate parameters for mental processes, and there are many determinants influencing the results, including current hypotheses and the state of knowledge. This leads to an interdependence between hypotheses and data. Additionally, different levels of description are (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  7
    Franz Huber, For True Conditionalizers Weisberg's Paradox is a False Alarm.
    Weisberg introduces a phenomenon he terms perceptual undermining. He argues that it poses a problem for Jeffrey conditionalization, and Bayesian epistemology in general. This is Weisberg’s paradox. Weisberg argues that perceptual undermining also poses a problem for ranking theory and for Dempster-Shafer theory. In this note I argue that perceptual undermining does not pose a problem for any of these theories: for true conditionalizers Weisberg’s paradox is a false alarm.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Franz Huber, What is the Permissibility Solution a Solution Of? -- A Question for Kroedel.
    Kroedel has proposed a new solution, the permissibility solution, to the lottery paradox. The lottery paradox results from the Lockean thesis according to which one ought to believe a proposition just in case one’s degree of belief in it is sufficiently high. The permissibility solution replaces the Lockean thesis by the permissibility thesis according to which one is permitted to believe a proposition if one’s degree of belief in it is sufficiently high. This note shows that the epistemology of belief (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  42
    Franz Huber, Formal Representations of Belief. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Epistemology is the study of knowledge and justified belief. Belief is thus central to epistemology. It comes in a qualitative form, as when Sophia believes that Vienna is the capital of Austria, and a quantitative form, as when Sophia's degree of belief that Vienna is the capital of Austria is at least twice her degree of belief that tomorrow it will be sunny in Vienna. Formal epistemology, as opposed to mainstream epistemology (Hendricks 2006), is epistemology done in a formal way, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  20
    Emily Carson & Renate Huber (eds.) (2006). Intuition and the Axiomatic Method. Springer.
    By way of these investigations, we hope to understand better the rationale behind Kant's theory of intuition, as well as to grasp many facets of the relations ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37.  17
    Margaret Williamson Huber (2011). Analogical Classification in the Wizarding World. Semiotics:350-363.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  3
    Martin Fieder, Susanne Huber & Fred L. Bookstein (2011). Socioeconomic Status, Marital Status and Childlessness in Men and Women: An Analysis of Census Data From Six Countries. Journal of Biosocial Science 43 (5):619-635.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  74
    Franz Huber (2005). Subjective Probabilities as Basis for Scientific Reasoning? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):101-116.
    Bayesianism is the position that scientific reasoning is probabilistic and that probabilities are adequately interpreted as an agent's actual subjective degrees of belief, measured by her betting behaviour. Confirmation is one important aspect of scientific reasoning. The thesis of this paper is the following: if scientific reasoning is at all probabilistic, the subjective interpretation has to be given up in order to get right confirmation—and thus scientific reasoning in general. The Bayesian approach to scientific reasoning Bayesian confirmation theory The example (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  3
    Nicolas Chevalier, Kristina L. Huber, Sandra A. Wiebe & Kimberly Andrews Espy (2013). Qualitative Change in Executive Control During Childhood and Adulthood. Cognition 128 (1):1-12.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  20
    Christian G. Huber (2009). Interdependence of Theoretical Concepts and Neuroimaging Data. Poiesis and Praxis 6 (3-4):203-217.
    Traditionally, discussion about neuroimaging focuses on methodological improvement and neurobiological findings. In current psychiatric neuroimaging, the research focus broadens and includes concepts such as the self, personality, well-being, and psychiatric disease. This calls for the inclusion of disciplines like psychology and philosophy in a dialogue with neuroscience. Furthermore, it raises the question of how theories from these areas relate to neuroimaging findings: are results generated by objective data independent of theories? Is there an epistemological priority for the theories used for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42.  36
    Franz Huber (2008). The Plausibility-Informativeness Theory. In Vincent Hendricks (ed.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan
    The problem adressed in this paper is “the main epistemic problem concerning science”, viz. “the explication of how we compare and evaluate theories [...] in the light of the available evidence” (van Fraassen 1983, 27).
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  5
    Y. Yamazaki, U. Aust, L. Huber, M. Hausmann & O. Güntürkün (2007). Lateralized Cognition: Asymmetrical and Complementary Strategies of Pigeons During Discrimination of the “Human Concept”. Cognition 104 (2):315-344.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  30
    F. Huber (2011). Lewis Causation is a Special Case of Spohn Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (1):207-210.
    This paper shows that causation in the sense of Lewis is a special case of causation in the sense of Spohn.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  16
    Franz Huber & Jonathan Weisberg, Introducing Ergo.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  55
    Franz Huber (2005). The Logic of Confirmation. In O. Neumaier, C. Sedmak & M. Zichy (eds.), Philosophische Perspektiven. Beiträge zum VII. Internationalen Kongress der ÖGP. Ontos
    The paper presents a new analysis of Hempel’s conditions of adequacy, differing from the one in Carnap. Hempel, so it is argued, felt the need for two concepts of confirmation: one aiming at true theories, and another aiming at informative theories. However, so the analysis continues, he also realized that these two concepts were conflicting, and so he gave up the concept of confirmation aiming at informative theories. It is then shown that one can have the cake and eat it: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  4
    Franz Huber (2004). Assessing Theories. The Problem of a Quantitative Theory of Confirmation. Dissertation, University of Erfurt
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48. Franz Huber (2009). Ranking Functions. In A. Pazos Sierra, J. R. Rabunal Dopico & J. Dorado de la Calle (eds.), Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence. Hershey
    Ranking functions have been introduced under the name of ordinal conditional functions in Spohn (1988; 1990). They are representations of epistemic states and their dynamics. The most comprehensive and up to date presentation is Spohn (manuscript).
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  24
    Franz Huber (2012). Wolfgang Spohn: The Laws of Belief. Philosophy of Science 79 (4):584-588.
  50.  31
    Franz Huber (2012). Essay Review: The Laws of Belief. Philosophy of Science 79 (4):584-588.
1 — 50 / 877