9 found
Sort by:
  1. Frances Brazier, Anja Oskamp, Corien Prins, Maurice Schellekens & Niek Wijngaards (2004). Anonymity and Software Agents: An Interdisciplinary Challenge. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):137-157.
    Software agents that play a role in E-commerce and E-government applications involving the Internet often contain information about the identity of their human user such as credit cards and bank accounts. This paper discusses whether this is necessary: whether human users and software agents are allowed to be anonymous under the relevant legal regimes and whether an adequate interaction and balance between law and anonymity can be realised from both the perspective of Computer Systems and the perspective of Law.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Frances Brazier, Anja Oskamp, Corien Prins, Maurice Schellekens & Niek Wijngaards (2004). Law-Abiding and Integrity on the Internet: A Case for Agents. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):5-37.
    Software agents extend the current, information-based Internet to include autonomous mobile processing. In most countries such processes, i.e., software agents are, however, without an explicit legal status. Many of the legal implications of their actions (e.g., gathering information, negotiating terms, performing transactions) are not well understood. One important characteristic of mobile software agents is that they roam the Internet: they often run on agent platforms of others. There often is no pre-existing relation between the owner of a running agents process (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Anja Oskamp & Emily Weitzenböck (2004). Foreword. Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (1-2):1-3.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Dennis M. Kennedy, Marc Lauritsen & Anja Oskamp (2002). Foreword. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):225-225.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Anja Oskamp & Marc Lauritsen (2002). AI in Law Practice? So Far, Not Much. Artificial Intelligence and Law 10 (4):227-236.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Anja Oskamp (1999). Richard Susskind, The Future of Law, Facing Challenges of Information Technology. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (4):387-391.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Anja Oskamp & Maaike W. Tragter (1997). Automated Legal Decision Systems in Practice: The Mirror of Reality. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 5 (4):291-322.
    Automated decision systems are often used to enforce legislation.As such, they have considerable regulating effects. These systemsregulate the behaviour of users and addressees mainly throughstandardization. This research classifies these systems intocategories according to which the regulating effects can bedescribed more clearly. Furthermore, this categorization resultsin a better understanding how problems encountered with atpresent can be avoided in the future. Many problems result fromthe way the development process has been organized. It turns outthe development process can be divided according to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Anja Oskamp, Maaike Tragter & Cees Groendijk (1995). AI and Law: What About the Future? [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 (3):209-215.
    The introduction of results of AI and Law research in actual legal practice advances disturbingly slow. One of the problems is that most research can be classified as either theoretical or pragmatic, while combinations of these two are scarce. This interferes with the need for feedback as well as with the need of getting support, both financially and from actual legal practice. The conclusion of this paper is that an emphasis on research that generates operational and sophisticated systems is necessary (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anja Oskamp (1992). Model for Knowledge and Legal Expert Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 1 (4):245-274.
    This paper presents a four layer model for working with legal knowledge in expert systems. It distinguishes five sources of knowledge. Four contain basic legal knowledge found in published and unpublished sources. The fifth consists of legal metaknowledge. In the model the four basic legal knowledge sources are placed at the lowest level. The metaknowledge is placed at levels above the other four knowledge sources. The assumption is that the knowledge is represented only once. The use of metaknowledge at various (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation