Search results for 'Anjan Chravartty' (try it on Scholar)

76 found
Sort by:
  1. Anjan Chravartty (2008). Inessential Aristotle : Powers Without Essences. In Ruth Groff (ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism About Causality in Philosophy and Social Science. Routledge.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. James Ladyman (2009). Review of Anjan Chakravartty, A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (6).score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. S. Choi (2011). Anjan Chakravartty * A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):443-451.score: 15.0
  4. Bradford McCall (2011). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism. By Anjan Chakravartty. Heythrop Journal 52 (2):300-300.score: 15.0
  5. Jacob Busch (2009). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable – Anjan Chakravartty. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (235):368-371.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Toby Handfield (2010). Review of A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, by Anjan Chakravartty. [REVIEW] Mind 118 (472):1118-1121.score: 15.0
  7. John Bacon (1997). Shukla Anjan. A Set of Axioms for the Propositional Calculus with Implication and Converse Non-Implication. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, Vol. 6 No. 2 (1965), Pp. 123–128. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):664-664.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Bacon (1966). Review: Anjan Shukla, A Set of Axioms for the Propositional Calculus with Implication and Converse Non-Implication. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 31 (4):664-664.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Phillip H. Wiebe (2012). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. By Anjan Chakravartty. The European Legacy 17 (6):860-860.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. R. A. Bull (1972). Review: Anjan Shukla, Decision Procedures for Lewis System S1 and Related Modal Systems. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):754-755.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Anjan Chakravartty (2007). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable. Cambridge University Press.score: 6.0
    Scientific realism is the view that our best scientific theories give approximately true descriptions of both observable and unobservable aspects of a mind-independent world. Debates between realists and their critics are at the very heart of the philosophy of science. Anjan Chakravartty traces the contemporary evolution of realism by examining the most promising recent strategies adopted by its proponents in response to the forceful challenges of antirealist sceptics, resulting in a positive proposal for scientific realism today. He examines the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Anjan Chakravartty (2004). Stance Relativism: Empiricism Versus Metaphysics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 35 (1):173-184.score: 3.0
    In The empirical stance, Bas van Fraassen argues for a reconceptualization of empiricism, and a rejection of its traditional rival, speculative metaphysics, as part of a larger and provocative study in epistemology. Central to his account is the notion of voluntarism in epistemology, and a concomitant understanding of the nature of rationality. In this paper I give a critical assessment of these ideas, with the ultimate goal of clarifying the nature of debate between metaphysicians and empiricists, and more specifically, between (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Anjan Chakravartty (2003). The Structuralist Conception of Objects. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):867-878.score: 3.0
    This paper explores the consequences of the two most prominent forms of contemporary structural realism for the notion of objecthood. Epistemic structuralists hold that we can know structural aspects of reality, but nothing about the natures of unobservable relata whose relations define structures. Ontic structuralists hold that we can know structural aspects of reality, and that there is nothing else to know—objects are useful heuristic posits, but are ultimately ontologically dispensable. I argue that structuralism does not succeed in ridding a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anjan Chakravartty (2005). Causal Realism: Events and Processes. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 63 (1):7 - 31.score: 3.0
    Minimally, causal realism (as understood here) is the view that accounts of causation in terms of mere, regular or probabilistic conjunction are unsatisfactory, and that causal phenomena are correctly associated with some form of de re necessity. Classic arguments, however, some of which date back to Sextus Empiricus and have appeared many times since, including famously in Russell, suggest that the very notion of causal realism is incoherent. In this paper I argue that if such objections seem compelling, it is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Anjan Chakravartty (2004). Structuralism as a Form of Scientific Realism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 18 (2 & 3):151 – 171.score: 3.0
    Structural realism has recently re-entered mainstream discussions in the philosophy of science. The central notion of structure, however, is contested by both advocates and critics. This paper briefly reviews currently prominent structuralist accounts en route to proposing a metaphysics of structure that is capable of supporting the epistemic aspirations of realists, and that is immune to the charge most commonly levelled against structuralism. This account provides an alternative to the existing epistemic and ontic forms of the position, incorporating elements of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Anjan Chakravartty (2008). What You Don't Know Can't Hurt You: Realism and the Unconceived. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 137 (1):149 - 158.score: 3.0
    Two of the most potent challenges faced by scientific realism are the underdetermination of theories by data, and the pessimistic induction based on theories previously held to be true, but subsequently acknowledged as false. Recently, Stanford (2006, Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. Oxford: Oxford University Press) has formulated what he calls the problem of unconceived alternatives: a version of the underdetermination thesis combined with a historical argument of the same form as the pessimistic induction. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Anjan Chakravartty (2003). The Dispositional Essentialist View of Properties and Laws. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 11 (4):393 – 413.score: 3.0
    One view of the nature of properties has been crystallized in recent debate by an identity thesis proposed by Shoemaker. The general idea is that there is for behaviour. Well-known criticisms of this approach, however, remain unanswered, and the details of its connections to laws nothing more to being a particular causal property than conferring certain dispositions of nature and the precise ontology of causal properties stand in need of development. This paper examines and defends a dispositional essentialist account of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Anjan Chakravartty (1998). Semirealism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 29 (3):391-408.score: 3.0
    The intuition of the naı¨ve realist, miracle arguments notwithstanding, is countered forcefully by a host of considerations, including the possibility of underdetermination, and criticisms of abductive inferences to explanatory hypotheses. Some have suggested that an induction may be performed, from the perspective of present theories, on their predecessors. Past theories are thought to be false, strictly speaking; it is thus likely that present-day theories are also false, and will be taken as such at an appropriate future time.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Anjan Chakravartty, Truth and Representation in Science: Two Inspirations From Art.score: 3.0
    Realists regarding scientific knowledge – those who think that our best scientific representations truly describe both observable and unobservable aspects of the natural world – have special need of a notion of approximate truth. Since theories and models are rarely considered true simpliciter, the realist requires some means of making sense of the claim that they may be false and yet close to the truth, and increasingly so over time. In this paper, I suggest that traditional approaches to approximate truth (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Anjan Chakravartty (2010). Review of Brian Ellis, The Metaphysics of Scientific Realism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (7).score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anjan Chakravartty (2001). The Semantic or Model-Theoretic View of Theories and Scientific Realism. Synthese 127 (3):325 - 345.score: 3.0
    The semantic view of theoriesis one according to which theoriesare construed as models of their linguisticformulations. The implications of thisview for scientific realism have been little discussed. Contraryto the suggestion of various champions of the semantic view,it is argued that this approach does not makesupport for a plausible scientific realism anyless problematic than it might otherwise be.Though a degree of independence of theory fromlanguage may ensure safety frompitfalls associated with logical empiricism, realism cannot be entertained unless models or (abstractedand/or idealized) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. P. D. Magnus (2010). Inductions, Red Herrings, and the Best Explanation for the Mixed Record of Science. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (4):803-819.score: 3.0
    Kyle Stanford has recently claimed to offer a new challenge to scientific realism. Taking his inspiration from the familiar Pessimistic Induction (PI), Stanford proposes a New Induction (NI). Contra Anjan Chakravartty’s suggestion that the NI is a ‘red herring’, I argue that it reveals something deep and important about science. The Problem of Unconceived Alternatives, which lies at the heart of the NI, yields a richer anti-realism than the PI. It explains why science falls short when it falls short, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Anjan Chakravartty, Ontological Priority: The Conceptual Basis of Non-Eliminative, Ontic Structural Realism.score: 3.0
    The number of positions identified with structural realism in philosophical debates about scientific knowledge has grown significantly in the past decade, particularly with respect to the metaphysical or ‘ontic’ approach (OSR). In recent years, several advocates of OSR have proposed a novel understanding of it in order to side-step a serious challenge faced by its original formulation, eliminative OSR. I examine the conceptual basis of the new, noneliminative view, and conclude that it too faces a serious challenge, resulting in a (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Anjan Chakravartty (2004). Critical Scientific Realism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (1):227-229.score: 3.0
  25. Anjan Chakravartty (2010). Metaphysics Between the Sciences and Philosophies of Science. In P. D. Magnus & Jacob Busch (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Science. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 3.0
    Subsequent to the transition from the era of natural philosophy to what we now regard as the era of the modern sciences, the latter have often been described as independent of the major philosophical preoccupations that previously informed theorizing about the natural world. The extent to which this is a naïve description is a matter of debate, and in particular, views of the place of metaphysics in the interpretation of modern scientific knowledge have varied enormously. Logical positivism spawned a distaste (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Anjan Chakravartty (2003). The Reality of the Unobservable: Observability, Unobservability and Their Impact on the Issue of Scientific Realism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):359-363.score: 3.0
  27. Anjan Chakravartty, Scientific Realism. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 3.0
  28. Anjan Chakravartty (2013). Realism in the Desert and in the Jungle: Reply to French, Ghins, and Psillos. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 78 (1):39 - 58.score: 3.0
    A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable has two primary aims. The first is to extract the most promising refinements of the idea of scientific realism to emerge in recent decades and assemble them into a maximally defensible realist position, semirealism. The second is to demonstrate that, contra antirealist scepticism to the contrary, key concepts typically invoked by realists in expounding their views can be given a coherent and unified explication. These concepts include notions of causation, laws of nature, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Anjan Chakravatty (2010). Informational Versus Functional Theories of Scientific Representation. Synthese 172 (2):197 - 213.score: 3.0
    Recent work in the philosophy of science has generated an apparent conflict between theories attempting to explicate the nature of scientific representation. On one side, there are what one might call 'informational' views, which emphasize objective relations (such as similarity, isomorphism, and homomorphism) between representations (theories, models, simulations, diagrams, etc.) and their target systems. On the other side, there are what one might call 'functional' views, which emphasize cognitive activities performed in connection with these targets, such as interpretation and inference. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Anjan Chakravartty (2011). A Puzzle About Voluntarism About Rational Epistemic Stances. Synthese 178 (1):37 - 48.score: 3.0
    The philosophy of science has produced numerous accounts of how scientific facts are generated, from very specific facilitators of belief, such as neo-Kantian constitutive principles, to global frameworks, such as Kuhnian paradigms. I consider a recent addition to this canon: van Fraassen's notion of an epistemic stance— a collection of attitudes and policies governing the generation of factual beliefs— and his commitment to voluntarism in this context: the idea that contrary stances and sets of beliefs are rationally permissible. I argue (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Anjan Chatterjee (2006). The Promise and Predicament of Cosmetic Neurology. Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (2):110-113.score: 3.0
  32. S. K. Ghosal, Biplab Raychaudhuri, Anjan Kumar Chowdhury & Minakshi Sarker (2003). Relativistic Sagnac Effect and Ehrenfest Paradox. Foundations of Physics 33 (6):981-1001.score: 3.0
    There seems to exist a dilemma in the literature as to the correct relativistic formula for the Sagnac phase-shift. The paper addresses this issue in the light of a novel, kinematically equivalent linear Sagnac-type thought experiment, which provides a vantage point from which the effect of rotation in the usual Sagnac effect can be analyzed. The question is shown to be related to the so-called rotating disc problem known as the Ehrenfest paradox. The relativistic formula for the Sagnac phase-shift seems (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Anjan Chakravatty, Inessential Aristotle: Powers Without Essences.score: 3.0
    A groundswell of recent work in philosophy has sought to revitalize the analysis of causation by appealing to “active principles” such as powers, dispositions, capacities, tendencies, and propensities. These principles are described in a realist and rather Aristotelian fashion, in stark contrast to the deflationary and linguistic accounts of such principles characteristic of Humean thought and empiricist thinking more generally. Natures, essences, powers, and de re necessity are back in the analysis of causation. I do not argue in this paper (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Anjan Chakravartty (2011). Scientific Realism and Ontological Relativity. The Monist 94 (2):157-180.score: 3.0
    Scientific realism has three dimensions: a metaphysical commitment to the existence of a mind-independent world; a semantic commitment to a literal interpretation of scientific claims; and an epistemological commitment to scientific knowledge of both observable and unobservable entities. The semantic dimension is uncontroversial, and the epistemological dimension, though contested, is well articulated in a number of ways. The metaphysical dimension, however, is not even well articulated. In this paper, I elaborate a plausible understanding of mind independence for the realist – (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Anjan Chakravartty, Getting Real with Quanta.score: 3.0
    The interpretation of quantum mechanics has always been a pain in the backside of scientific realism. Throughout its history, various anti-realist doctrines have dominated, associated with such luminaries as Niels Bohr and Werner Heisenberg, and referred to collectively as ‘the Copenhagen interpretation’. The voice of realist dissent was thus marginalized, but never silenced. In recent years, renewed interest has attached to the possibility of a realist interpretation of quantum theory. Christopher Norris’ book is an effort in this tradition.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Anjan Chakravartty (2003). Review of The Reality of the Unobservable. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54.score: 3.0
    There is perhaps no more succinct a way of describing the controversy between scientific realists and antirealists than to say that it turns on the reality of the unobservable. Less concisely, it turns on whether we have reason to think that scientific theories tell us the truth (or something close to it) about some of the underlying, unobservable bits of a mind-independent, external reality, among other things. Claims to knowledge of such a reality have traditionally been a bone of contention (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Anjan Chakravartty (2013). Stephen Mumford and Rani Lill Anjum Getting Causes From Powers. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (4):axt007.score: 3.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Anjan Chakravartty, Critical Notices.score: 3.0
    In the wake of proclamations of the death of scientific realism, the past few years have witnessed several book-length resurrections. Like the undead, realism i s proving hard to finish off once and for all. In the preface to his book, Ilkka Niiniluoto suggests that the realism debate will never generate a consensus; it is an eternal problem of philosophy. Certainly, since the flourishing of work on the subject two decades ago, it has become clear that some disputes between realists (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Anjan Chatterjee (2007). Cosmetic Neurology and Cosmetic Surgery: Parallels, Predictions, and Challenges. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16 (2):129-137.score: 3.0
  40. Anjan Chatterjee & Oshin Vartanian (forthcoming). Neuroaesthetics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Anjan Chakravatty (2007). Six Degrees of Speculation : Metaphysics in Empirical Contexts. In Bradley John Monton (ed.), Images of Empiricism: Essays on Science and Stances, with a Reply From Bas C. Van Fraassen. Oxford University Press.score: 3.0
    Metaphysical inquiry often exemplifies characteristics that do not meet with approval in the estimations of empiricists. Most distasteful to them, it seems, is a perceived distance between many of the speculations of metaphysics − about things such as causation, laws of nature, and unobservable stuff more generally − and the sorts of investigations they take to constitute proper empirical inquiry. Like any over-arching movement in the history of philosophy, empiricism has recognized different interlocutors at different times, but it appears that (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Anjan Chatterjee (2002). Pictures, Propositions, and Primitives in the Head. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (2):186-187.score: 3.0
    Data from neuropsychology do not support the idea that the primary visual cortex necessarily displays internal visual images. However, the choice of formats used in human cognition is not restricted to depictive or descriptive representations. Nestled between pictures and propositions, primitive spatial schemas with simple analog features extracted from pictorial scenes may play a subtle but wide role in cognition.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Anjan Chakravartty (2010). Explanation, Inference, Testimony, and Truth: Essays Dedicated to the Memory of Peter Lipton. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (4):335-336.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Anjan Chakravartty (2010). Perspectivism, Inconsistent Models, and Contrastive Explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (4):405-412.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Anjan Chakravartty (2003). The Dappled World. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 66 (1):244-247.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Cord Friebe (forthcoming). Don Ross, James Ladyman, and Harold Kincaid (Eds.): Scientific Metaphysics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science:1-5.score: 3.0
    Scientific Metaphysics is a collection of essays in which prominent philosophers of science explore how metaphysics looks like that is judged by scientific standards. Common to all chapters (authors) is the requirement that scientific results and methods should be applied to metaphysical puzzle solving and, hence, the skepticism about philosophical reasoning that is based on the analysis of common-sense concepts and appeals to (modal) intuitions and a priori knowledge. It is, however, controversial what exactly naturalistic metaphysics might be, since at (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Anjan Shukla (1969). A Note on Independence. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10 (4):410-411.score: 3.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Anjan Chakravartty (2013). Naturalized Metaphysics. In Don Ross, James Ladyman & Harold Kincaid (eds.), Scientific Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. 27.score: 3.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Anjan Shukla (1965). A Set of Axioms for the Propositional Calculus with Implication and Converse Non-Implication. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 6 (2):123-128.score: 3.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Anjan Shukla (1967). A Note on the Axiomatizations of Certain Modal Systems. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 8 (1-2):118-120.score: 3.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 76