6 found
Sort by:
  1. Katarzyna Budzynska, Michal Araszkiewicz, Barbara Bogołȩbska, Piotr Cap, Tadeusz Ciecierski, Kamila Debowska-Kozlowska, Barbara Dunin-Kȩplicz, Marcin Dziubiński, Michał Federowicz, Anna Gomolińska, Andrzej Grabowski, Teresa Hołówka, Łukasz Jochemczyk, Magdalena Kacprzak, Paweł Kawalec, Maciej Kielar, Andrzej Kisielewicz, Marcin Koszowy, Robert Kublikowski, Piotr Kulicki, Anna Kuzio, Piotr Lewiński, Jakub Z. Lichański, Jacek Malinowski, Witold Marciszewski, Edward Nieznański, Janina Pietrzak, Jerzy Pogonowski, Tomasz A. Puczyłowski, Jolanta Rytel, Anna Sawicka, Marcin Selinger, Andrzej Skowron, Joanna Skulska, Marek Smolak, Małgorzata Sokół, Agnieszka Sowińska, Piotr Stalmaszczyk, Tomasz Stawecki, Jarosław Stepaniuk, Alina Strachocka, Wojciech Suchoń, Krzysztof Szymanek, Justyna Tomczyk, Robert Trypuz, Kazimierz Trzȩsicki, Mariusz Urbański, Ewa Wasilewska-Kamińska, Krzysztof A. Wieczorek, Maciej Witek, Urszula Wybraniec-Skardowska, Olena Yaskorska, Maria Załȩska, Konrad Zdanowski & Żure (2014). The Polish School of Argumentation: A Manifesto. Argumentation 28 (3):267-282.
    Building on our diverse research traditions in the study of reasoning, language and communication, the Polish School of Argumentation integrates various disciplines and institutions across Poland in which scholars are dedicated to understanding the phenomenon of the force of argument. Our primary goal is to craft a methodological programme and establish organisational infrastructure: this is the first key step in facilitating and fostering our research movement, which joins people with a common research focus, complementary skills and an enthusiasm to work (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Anna Gomolińska (2004). Derivability of Rules From Rule Complexes. Logic and Logical Philosophy 10:21.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Anna Gomolińska (2004). Parainconsistency of Credibility-Based Belief States. Logic and Logical Philosophy 9:183.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Anna Gomolinska & Justyna K. Myslinska (2000). A Note on Relationship Between the Consequence Operations Cn and Dcn. Bulletin of the Section of Logic 29 (1/2):63-67.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Anna Gomolińska (1998). On the Logic of Acceptance and Rejection. Studia Logica 60 (2):233-251.
    The logic of acceptance and rejection (AEL2) is a nonmonotonic formalism to represent states of knowledge of an introspective agent making decisions about available information. Though having much in common, AEL2 differs from Moore's autoepistemic logic (AEL) by the fact that the agent not only can accept or reject a given fact, but he/she also has the possibility not to make any decision in case he/she does not have enough knowledge.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Anna Gomolińska (1997). A Nonmonotonic Modal Formalization of the Logic of Acceptance and Rejection. Studia Logica 58 (1):113-127.
    The problems we deal with concern reasoning about incomplete knowledge. Knowledge is understood as ability of an ideal rational agent to make decisions about pieces of information. The formalisms we are particularly interested in are Moore's autoepistemic logic (AEL) and its variant, the logic of acceptance and rejection (AEL2). It is well-known that AEL may be seen as the nonmonotonic KD45 modal logic. The aim is to give an appropriate modal formalization for AEL2.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation