8 found
Sort by:
  1. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2013). Julia Peters (Ed.), Aristotelian Ethics in Contemporary Perspective, New York and London: Routledge, 2013, 238 Pp., GBP 80 (Hardback) ISBN 9780415623414. [REVIEW] Dialectica 67 (4):621-625.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2012). Further Definition (M.) Deslauriers Aristotle on Definition. (Philosophia Antiqua 109.) Pp. X + 229. Leiden and Boston: Brill, 2007. Cased, €105, US$144. ISBN: 978-90-04-15669-2. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (1):80-82.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2011). Aristotle De Interpretatione (S.) Husson (ed.) Interpréter le De Interpretatione. Pp. 224. Paris: Librarie Philosophique J. Vrin, 2009. Paper, €25. ISBN: 978-2-7116-2189-7. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 61 (1):68-70.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2011). Epistemological Problems in Aristotle's Concept of Definition. Ancient Philosophy 31 (1):127-143.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2010). Definition and Explanation in Plotinus: Some Problems. In David Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oup Oxford.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2010). Ennead VI. 7 [38] 2: An Outline of Some Problems. In David Charles (ed.), Definition in Greek Philosophy. Oxford University Press. 467.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2009). Plotinus on Dialectic. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (3):253-287.
    In this paper, Plotinus' treatise On Dialectic I.3 [20] is discussed. In the first part of the paper, I argue that for Plotinus the importance of dialectic stands in the method of division that enables one to grasp the ‘what it is’. I present and examine some passages which contain a description of dialectic and an account of its activity. I then look into the reasons why Plotinus affirms the superiority of dialectic, as he conceived it, over logic, as the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Annamaria Schiaparelli (2003). Aristotle on the Fallacies of Combination and Division in Sophistici Elenchi 4. History and Philosophy of Logic 24 (2):111-129.
    This paper discusses the fallacies of combination and division as they are presented by Aristotle in chapter 4 of his Sophistici Elenchi. Aristotle's examples are concise, their discussion is unclear, and it is difficult to distinguish the cases of combination from those of division. I analyse the Aristotelian examples and the interpretations offered so far. I show that these interpretations suffer from a major defect: they fail to identify a common characteristic whereby the Aristotelian examples can be classified as instances (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation