35 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Anne Bezuidenhout [31]Anne L. Bezuidenhout [4]
  1. Anne Bezuidenhout, Context Shifting.
    Tenses as operators on content: ‘PAST’ and ‘FUT’ are circumstance shifters, similar What I hope to do in this talk: to ‘ ’ and ‘◊’, except that they shift the time of the circumstance, as opposed to the My intention is not to prove Kaplan wrong. Even if Kaplan’s remarks about context shifting operators in English turn out to be strictly correct, there is clearly a lot of world of the circumstance.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Anne Bezuidenhout, Centering Theory and the Processing of Parentheticals.
    Centering Theory (CT) as articulated by Grosz et al. (1995) is a theory intended to model some of the factors that influence local coherence in a discourse. The idea is that at any one time there are a number of entities that are at the center of attention. Each utterance n that makes up a discourse potentially has two sorts of discourse ‘centers’, an ordered set of forward-looking centers, Cf(uttn), that provide potential links to upcoming utterances, and a single backward-looking (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Anne Bezuidenhout, Entry Title: Semantics/Pragmatics Boundary.
    The Gricean distinction between saying and implicating suggests a clear division of labour between semantics and pragmatics. The standard view that a semantic theory delivers truth-conditions for every well-formed sentence of a language has been grafted onto a Gricean view of the semantics-pragmatics divide. Consequently, many believe that truth-conditions can be specified in a way that is essentially free from pragmatic considerations. This view has been challenged, by those who argue for pragmatic intrusion into truth-conditional content. Others have argued in (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Anne Bezuidenhout, Of South Carolina.
    Malapropisms and slips of tongue represent ways in which expression meaning can come apart from speaker meaning. Another way is when a speaker engages in some form of implicit communication, conveying a meaning other than the meaning of the words or sentences she utters. Such implicit meaning can be intended either in addition to or instead of the explicit meaning. Some regard utterance meaning as a species of speaker meaning; others regard it as a distinct level of meaning. According to (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Anne Bezuidenhout, The Coherence of Contextualism: A Reply to Cappelen & Lepore.
    Cappelen and Lepore (2005) begin their critique of contextualism with an anecdote about an exercise they do with their undergraduate students (who I take it are meant to be naïve subjects whose linguistic intuitions have not been contaminated by mistaken philosophical theories). The test is to ask students to categorize types of expressions. Students quickly get the hang of the idea that referring expressions (like indexicals and pronouns) belong to a single category. They’re then asked whether they think that common (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Anne Bezuidenhout, VP-Ellipsis and the Case for Representationalism in Semantics.
    The debate between representationalists and anti-representationalists as I construe it in this chapter is a debate about whether truth-conditions are or should be assigned directly to natural language sentences (NLSs) – the anti-representationalist view – or whether they are or should be assigned instead to mental representations (MRs) that are related in some appropriate way to these NLSs. On the representationalist view, these MRs are related to NLSs in virtue of the fact that the MRs are the output of an (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Anne Bezuidenhout (forthcoming). Demonstrative Modes of Presentation. Communication and Cognition.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Anne Bezuidenhout (2010). —4—Anne Bezuidenhout Contextualism and Information Structure: Towards a Science of Pragmatics. In Erich Rast & Luiz Carlos Baptista (eds.), Meaning and Context. Peter Lang. 2--79.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anne Bezuidenhout (2009). Contextualism and the Role of Contextual Frames. Manuscrito 32 (1).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Anne Bezuidenhout (2008). Minimal Semantics - by Emma Borg. Philosophical Books 49 (1):59-63.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Anne Bezuidenhout (2006). The Coherence of Contextualism. Mind and Language 21 (1):1–10.
    Cappelen and Lepore (2005) begin their critique of contextualism with an anecdote about an exercise they do with their undergraduate students (who I take it are meant to be naïve subjects whose linguistic intuitions have not been contaminated by mistaken philosophical theories). The test is to ask students to categorize types of expressions. Students quickly get the hang of the idea that referring expressions (like indexicals and pronouns) belong to a single category. They’re then asked whether they think that common (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Anne L. Bezuidenhout (2006). Language as Internal. In Barry C. Smith (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. 127--139.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Anne Bezuidenhout, Steven Gross, Francois Recanati, Zoltan Gendler Szabo, Charles Travis, Herman Cappelen & Ernest Lepore (2006). Multiple Review of Insensitive Semantics. Authors' Reply. Mind and Language 21 (1):1-73.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anne Bezuidenhout (2005). Indexicals and Perspectivals. Facta Philosophica 7 (1):3-18.
    (1) Jenny is coming to visit me tonight. (2) I’m going to visit Jenny tonight. In these examples, it is where I am (my home, let us suppose) that is the center of the coming and going. This may suggest that the perspective point is always the perspective of the speaker, and that comings are always towards the speaker and that goings are away from the location of the speaker. But this isn’t necessarily so. For example, suppose that a colleague (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Anne Bezuidenhout (2004). Procedural Meaning and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. In Claudia Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Csli. 101--131.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Anne Bezuidenhout & Marga Reimer (eds.) (2004). Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
    In 1905, Bertrand Russell published 'On Denoting' in which he proposed and defended a quantificational account of definite descriptions. Forty-five years later, in 'On Referring', Peter Strawson claimed that Russell was mistaken: definite descriptions do not function as quantifiers but (paradigmatically) as referring expressions. Ever since, scores of theorists have attempted to adjudicate this debate. Others have gone beyond the question of the proper analysis of definite descriptions, focusing instead on the complex relations between definites, indefinites, and pronouns. These relations (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.) (2004). Descriptions and Beyond. Oxford University Press.
    In 1905, Bertrand Russell published 'On Denoting' in which he proposed and defended a quantificational account of definite descriptions. Forty-five years later, in 'On Referring', Peter Strawson claimed that Russell was mistaken: definite descriptions do not function as quantifiers but (paradigmatically) as referring expressions. Ever since, scores of theorists have attempted to adjudicate this debate. Others have gone beyond the question of the proper analysis of definite descriptions, focusing instead on the complex relations between definites, indefinites, and pronouns. These relations (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Kent Bach & Anne Bezuidenhout (2002). Distinguishing Semantics and Pragmatics. In Joseph K. Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth - Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. 284--310.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Anne Bezuidenhout (2002). Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Noûs 36 (s16):105 - 134.
    Introduction The mainstream view in philosophy of language is that sentence meaning determines truth-conditions. A corollary is that the truth or falsity of an utterance depends only on what words mean and how the world is arranged. Although several prominent philosophers (Searle, Travis, Recanati, Moravcsik) have challenged this view, it has proven hard to dislodge. The alternative view holds that meaning underdetermines truth-conditions. What is expressed by the utterance of a sentence in a context goes beyond what is encoded in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Anne Bezuidenhout (2002). Generalized Conversational Implicatures and Default Pragmatic Inferences. In Joseph K. Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth - Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press. 257--283.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anne Bezuidenhout (2002). Philosophical Perspectives 16.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Anne Bezuidenhout (2001). Metaphor and What is Said: A Defense of a Direct Expression View of Metaphor. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 25 (1):156–186.
    According to one widely held view of metaphor, metaphors are cases in which the speaker (literally) says one thing but means something else instead. I wish to challenge this idea. I will argue that when one utters a sentence in some context intending it to be understood metaphorically, one directly expresses a proposition, which can potentially be evaluated as either true or false. This proposition is what is said by the utterance of the sentence in that context. We don’t convey (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Anne Bezuidenhout (1998). Is Verbal Communication a Purely Preservative Process? Philosophical Review 107 (2):261-288.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Anne Bezuidenhout & Mary Sue Sroda (1998). Children's Use of Contextual Cues to Resolve Referential Ambiguity: An Application of Relevance Theory. Pragmatics and Cognition 6 (1):265-299.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Anne Bezuidenhout (1997). „How Context-Dependent Are Attitude Ascriptions?‟ In: D. Jutronic. In Dunja Jutronic (ed.), The Maribor Papers in Naturalized Semantics. Maribor.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Anne L. Bezuidenhout (1997). The Communication of de Re Thoughts. Noûs 31 (2):197-225.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Anne Bezuidenhout (1996). Pragmatics and Singular Reference. Mind and Language 11 (2):133-159.
  28. Anne Bezuidenhout (1996). The Truth-Conditional Relevance of De Re Modes of Presentation: A Reply to Grimberg. Mind and Language 11 (4):427-432.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Anne Bezuidenhout (1996). Cohen, L. Jonathan. An Essay on Belief and Acceptance. Review of Metaphysics 50 (2):392-395.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Anne Bezuidenhout (1996). Contemporary Materialism. Teaching Philosophy 19 (4):421-424.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Anne Bezuidenhout (1996). Modern Philosophy of Mind. Teaching Philosophy 19 (2):209-212.
  32. Anne Bezuidenhout (1996). Resisting the Step Toward Naturalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):743-770.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Anne L. Bezuidenhout (1993). Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Anne L. Bezuidenhout (1993). The Impossibility of Punctate Mental Representations. In Holism: A Consumer Update. Amsterdam: Rodopi. 197-212.
    In Holism: A Shopper's Guide Fodor and LePore contend that there could be punctate minds; minds capable of being in only a single type of representational state. The Kantian idea that the construction of perceptual representations requires the synthesizing activity of the mind is invoked to argue against the possibility of punctate minds. Fodor's commitment to an inferential theory of perception is shown to share crucial assumptions with the Kantian view and hence to lead to the same conclusion. The argument (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation