Search results for 'Anne Finch Conway' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  84
    Anne Finch Conway (1996). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected (and unwanted) in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  2. Henry More, Anne Conway, James Flesher & William Morden (1669). Enchiridion Ethicum Præipua Moralis Philosophiærudimenta Complectens, Illustrata Utplurimum Veterum Monumentis, & Ad Probitatem Vitæperpetuò Accommodata. Excudebat J. Flesher, Venale Autem Habetur Apud Guilielmum Morden Bibliopolam Cantabrigiensem.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Henry More, Anne Conway, Joannes Paulius & William Graves (1695). Enchiridion Ethicum Præipua Moralis Philosophiærudimenta Complectens, Illustrata Ut Plurimum Veterum Monumentis, & Ad Probitatem Vitæperpetuò Accomodata. Apud Joannem Paullium. Prostant Venales Apud Guil. Graves Bibliop. Cantab.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  40
    Anne Finch, The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy God, Christ, and Creatures The Nature of Spirit and Matter.
    Copyright ©2010–2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . . . . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is worth. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Anne M. Walk & Christopher M. Conway (2016). Cross-Domain Statistical–Sequential Dependencies Are Difficult to Learn. Frontiers in Psychology 7.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Anne Conway (2002). O Bogu i Jego boskich przymiotach. Idea 14 (14).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Marjorie Hope Nicolson (ed.) (1992). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. Clarendon Press.
    A scholarly edition of letters by Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their friends. The edition presents an authoritative text, together with an introduction, commentary notes, and scholarly apparatus.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8. Christia Mercer (2012). Knowledge and Suffering in Early Modern Philosophy: G.W. Leibniz and Anne Conway. In Sabrina Ebbersmeyer (ed.), Emotional Minds. De Gruyter 179.
  9.  9
    R. S. Conway (1910). The Unity of the Latin Subjunctive: A Quest I. Conway on Sonnenschein. The Classical Review 24 (07):215-216.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  1
    David A. Conway (1974). Law, Liberty and Indecency: David A. Conway. Philosophy 49 (188):135-147.
    The distinction between private immorality and public indecency plays a significant and perhaps a crucial role in H. L. A. Hart's argument in Law, Liberty, and Morality . This distinction, and the uses to which he puts it, have, however, been largely overshadowed in the ‘debate’ between Professor Hart and Lord Devlin which has centred around such ‘great’ questions as whether a shared morality is necessary for a society. I shall argue that Hart's position, in so far as it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Henry Conway (1974). 15 Life, Death, and Antimatter Henry Conway. In John Warren White (ed.), Frontiers of Consciousness: The Meeting Ground Between Inner and Outer Reality. Julian Press 247.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  40
    Jane Duran (1989). Anne Viscountess Conway: A Seventeenth Century Rationalist. Hypatia 4 (1):64 - 79.
    The work of Spinoza, Descartes and Leibniz is cited in an attempt to develop, both expositorily and critically, the philosophy of Anne Viscountess Conway. Broadly, it is contended that Conway's metaphysics, epistemology and account of the passions not only bear intriguing comparison with the work of the other well-known rationalists, but supersede them in some ways, particularly insofar as the notions of substance and ontological hierarchy are concerned. Citing the commentary of Loptson and Carolyn Merchant, and alluding (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13.  36
    Marcy P. Lascano (2013). Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World. Philosophy Compass 8 (4):327-336.
    Anne Conway argues that all substances are spiritual. Yet, she also claims that all created substance has some type of body. Peter Loptson has argued that Conway didn’t carefully consider her view that all created beings have bodies for it seems God could have created only disembodied spirits. There are several reasons to think Loptson is right. First, Conway holds that God is all‐good and will do the best for his creation. She also holds that spirit (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Sarah Hutton (2004). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge University Press.
    Sarah Hutton sets Anne Conway in her historical and philosophical context in this intellectual biography of one of the very first English women philosophers. Hutton traces Conway's intellectual development in relation to friends and associates, and documents her interest in religion--which extended beyond Christian orthodoxy to Quakerism, Judaism and Islam. Her book offers insight into the personal life of a very private woman, and the richness of seventeenth-century intellectual culture.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  13
    Eileen O'Neill (2006). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):122-124.
    Eileen O'Neill - Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44:1 Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.1 122-124 Sarah Hutton. Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. viii + 271. Cloth, $75.00. In 1690 a Latin translation of a philosophical treatise, originally written in English by Anne Conway , was published anonymously. The English manuscript did not survive, but in 1692 the Latin version (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) (2009). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy is the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) (2011). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy is the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) (1996). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy is the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  9
    Allison Coudert (1994). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):308-309.
  20.  2
    Michael Petry, Pauline Phemister, Andrew Pyle, G. Parkinson & Charles Webster (1994). Review of Bibliothecae Selectae da Cusano a Leopardi Edited by Eugenio Canone Leo S. Olscki Editore, Firenze. Pp. Xxxii + 631 + 15 Plates. 1993. ISBN 88-222-4104-5; Franco Burgersdijk : Neo-Aristotelianism in Leiden Ed. By E. P. Bos and H. A. Krop Studies in the History of Ideas in the Low Countries Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, 1993, Pp. 185. Hfl. 60,-. ISBN 90-5183-374-1; Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought Margaret J. Osier, Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, Pp. Xii + 304. Hb. 32.50. ISBN 0-521-40048-1; The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension Between the New and Traditional Philosophies From Machiavelli to Leibniz Ed. By Tom Sorell Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, Pp. X + 352. 40.00. ISBN 0-19-823953-X; The Conway Letters. The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends 1642-1684. Edited by Marjorie Hope Nicolson. Revised Edition with an Introduction and New Material. Edited by Sarah Hutton. Oxfo. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2 (2):161-199.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  3
    Chantel Lavoie (1999). The Progress of Another Error: Anne Finch's 'The Spleen'. Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 18:107.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  2
    Katherine M. Quinsey (2007). Nature, Gender, and Genre in Anne Finch's Poetry: 'A Nocturnal Reverie'. Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 26:63.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. John Henry (1993). Marjorie Hope Nicolson , The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642–1684. Revised Edition with an Introduction and New Material Edited by Sarah Hutton. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992. Pp. Xxix + 592. ISBN 0-19-824876-8. £55.00. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 26 (3):357.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Marjorie Hope Nicolson (ed.) (1992). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Revised edition by Sarah Hutton.The revised edition contains some important letters not included in the first edition, plus a new introduction.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Flora I. MacKinnon, Henry More, Ralph Cudworth, John Donne, J. William Hebel & Marjorie Hope Nicholson (1931). Enchiridion Ethicum.A Sermon, Preached Before the House of Commons, March 31, 1647.Biathanatos.Conway Letters, The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 28 (17):466.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Flora I. Mackinnon (1931). More's Enchiridion Ethicum; Cudworth's A Sermon, Preached Before the House of Commons, March 31, 1647; Donne's Biathanatos; Nicholson's Conway Letters, the Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 28:466.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  69
    Carolyn Merchant (1979). The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of the Monad. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (3):255-269.
  28.  40
    Jennifer McRobert (2000). Anne Conway's Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):21-35.
  29.  31
    Peter Loptson (1995). Anne Conway, Henry More and Their World. Dialogue 34 (1):139.
  30. Catherine Wilson (1983). Peter Loptson, Ed., Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 3 (6):292-296.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. S. Hutton (1995). Conway, Anne, Critic of More, Henry-Spirit and Matter. Archives de Philosophie 58 (3):371-384.
  32.  41
    Karen Detlefsen (2005). Review of Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).
  33.  20
    Catherine Brown Tkacz (2006). Anne Conway. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):645-646.
  34.  24
    Jane Duran (2007). Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, And: Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (Review). Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):200-204.
  35.  16
    Patricia Sheridan (2006). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Dialogue 45 (4):810-813.
  36. Justin Eh Smith (2006). Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (1):41-44.
  37.  21
    Sarah Hutton, Lady Anne Conway. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  38.  23
    Robert Martensen (2008). A Philosopher and Her Headaches: The Tribulations of Anne Conway. Philosophical Forum 39 (3):315-326.
  39.  13
    E. J. Ashworth (1986). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy Anne Conway Edited and with an Introduction by Peter Loptson International Archives of the History of Ideas, Vol. 101 The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982. Pp. 252. [REVIEW] Dialogue 25 (04):821-.
  40. Justin Smith (2006). Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 26:41-44.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  2
    Carolyn Merchant (1985). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy by Anne Conway; Peter Loptson. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 76:275-276.
  42.  6
    Patricia Sheridan (2006). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher Sarah Hutton New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, Viii + 271 Pp., $75.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (4):810.
  43. Alan Gabbey (1977). Anne Conway Et Henry More: Lettres Sur Descartes (1650–1651). Archives de Philosophie 40 (3):379388.
  44.  2
    R. S. Woolhouse (1983). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Philosophical Books 24 (2):76-76.
  45. E. J. Ashworth (1986). Anne Conway, "the Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy", Edited and with an Introduction by Peter Loptson. [REVIEW] Dialogue 25 (4):821.
  46. S. Hutton (1995). Anne Conway critique d'Henry More: l'esprit et la matière. Archives de Philosophie 58:371.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Sarah Hutton (2011). Philosophinnen oder Prinzessinnen? Anne Conway, Margarete Cavendish und die Neubewertung philosophierender Aristokratinnen des 17. Und 18. Jahrhunderts. [REVIEW] In Ruth Hagengruber (ed.), Von Diana Zu Minerva: Philosophierende Aristokratinnen des 17. Und 18. Jahrhunderts. Akademie Verlag 81-96.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Joanna Usakiewicz (2001). Anne Conway (1631-1679). Rys biografczny. Idea 13 (13).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Joanna Usakiewicz (2002). Anne Conway (1631-1679). Poglądy filozoficzne. Idea 14 (14).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Joanna Usakiewicz (2003). Bonum et (im)mutabilitas. Myśl filozoficzna Anne Conway. Idea 15 (15).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000