Search results for 'Anne Finch Conway' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  84
    Anne Finch Conway (1996). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected (and unwanted) in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  2.  40
    Anne Finch, The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy God, Christ, and Creatures The Nature of Spirit and Matter.
    Copyright ©2010–2015 All rights reserved. Jonathan Bennett [Brackets] enclose editorial explanations. Small ·dots· enclose material that has been added, but can be read as though it were part of the original text. Occasional •bullets, and also indenting of passages that are not quotations, are meant as aids to grasping the structure of a sentence or a thought. Every four-point ellipsis . . . . indicates the omission of a brief passage that seems to present more difficulty than it is worth. (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Anne Conway (2002). O Bogu i Jego boskich przymiotach. Idea 14 (14).
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Marjorie Hope Nicolson (ed.) (1992). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. Clarendon Press.
    A scholarly edition of letters by Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and their friends. The edition presents an authoritative text, together with an introduction, commentary notes, and scholarly apparatus.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  9
    R. S. Conway (1910). The Unity of the Latin Subjunctive: A Quest I. Conway on Sonnenschein. The Classical Review 24 (07):215-216.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Christia Mercer (2012). Knowledge and Suffering in Early Modern Philosophy: G.W. Leibniz and Anne Conway. In Sabrina Ebbersmeyer (ed.), Emotional Minds. De Gruyter 179.
  7.  1
    David A. Conway (1974). Law, Liberty and Indecency: David A. Conway. Philosophy 49 (188):135-147.
    The distinction between private immorality and public indecency plays a significant and perhaps a crucial role in H. L. A. Hart's argument in Law, Liberty, and Morality . This distinction, and the uses to which he puts it, have, however, been largely overshadowed in the ‘debate’ between Professor Hart and Lord Devlin which has centred around such ‘great’ questions as whether a shared morality is necessary for a society. I shall argue that Hart's position, in so far as it is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. Henry Conway (1974). 15 Life, Death, and Antimatter Henry Conway. In John Warren White (ed.), Frontiers of Consciousness: The Meeting Ground Between Inner and Outer Reality. Julian Press 247.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  40
    Jane Duran (1989). Anne Viscountess Conway: A Seventeenth Century Rationalist. Hypatia 4 (1):64 - 79.
    The work of Spinoza, Descartes and Leibniz is cited in an attempt to develop, both expositorily and critically, the philosophy of Anne Viscountess Conway. Broadly, it is contended that Conway's metaphysics, epistemology and account of the passions not only bear intriguing comparison with the work of the other well-known rationalists, but supersede them in some ways, particularly insofar as the notions of substance and ontological hierarchy are concerned. Citing the commentary of Loptson and Carolyn Merchant, and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  35
    Marcy P. Lascano (2013). Anne Conway: Bodies in the Spiritual World. Philosophy Compass 8 (4):327-336.
    Anne Conway argues that all substances are spiritual. Yet, she also claims that all created substance has some type of body. Peter Loptson has argued that Conway didn’t carefully consider her view that all created beings have bodies for it seems God could have created only disembodied spirits. There are several reasons to think Loptson is right. First, Conway holds that God is all‐good and will do the best for his creation. She also holds that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Sarah Hutton (2004). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge University Press.
    Sarah Hutton sets Anne Conway in her historical and philosophical context in this intellectual biography of one of the very first English women philosophers. Hutton traces Conway's intellectual development in relation to friends and associates, and documents her interest in religion--which extended beyond Christian orthodoxy to Quakerism, Judaism and Islam. Her book offers insight into the personal life of a very private woman, and the richness of seventeenth-century intellectual culture.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  12
    Eileen O'Neill (2006). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):122-124.
    Eileen O'Neill - Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher - Journal of the History of Philosophy 44:1 Journal of the History of Philosophy 44.1 122-124 Sarah Hutton. Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. viii + 271. Cloth, $75.00. In 1690 a Latin translation of a philosophical treatise, originally written in English by Anne Conway , was published anonymously. The English manuscript did not survive, but in 1692 (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) (2009). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy is (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) (2011). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy is the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Allison P. Coudert & Taylor Corse (eds.) (1996). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.
    Anne Conway was an extraordinary figure in a remarkable age. Her mastery of the intricate doctrines of the Lurianic Kabbalah, her authorship of a treatise criticising the philosophy of Descartes, Hobbes, and Spinoza, and her scandalous conversion to the despised sect of Quakers indicate a strength of character and independence of mind wholly unexpected in a woman at the time. Translated for the first time into modern English, her Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy is the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  9
    Allison Coudert (1994). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. Journal of the History of Philosophy 32 (2):308-309.
  17.  2
    Michael Petry, Pauline Phemister, Andrew Pyle, G. Parkinson & Charles Webster (1994). Review of Bibliothecae Selectae da Cusano a Leopardi Edited by Eugenio Canone Leo S. Olscki Editore, Firenze. Pp. Xxxii + 631 + 15 Plates. 1993. ISBN 88-222-4104-5; Franco Burgersdijk : Neo-Aristotelianism in Leiden Ed. By E. P. Bos and H. A. Krop Studies in the History of Ideas in the Low Countries Amsterdam, Atlanta: Rodopi, 1993, Pp. 185. Hfl. 60,-. ISBN 90-5183-374-1; Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquillity: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought Margaret J. Osier, Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991, Pp. Xii + 304. Hb. 32.50. ISBN 0-521-40048-1; The Rise of Modern Philosophy. The Tension Between the New and Traditional Philosophies From Machiavelli to Leibniz Ed. By Tom Sorell Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993, Pp. X + 352. 40.00. ISBN 0-19-823953-X; The Conway Letters. The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends 1642-1684. Edited by Marjorie Hope Nicolson. Revised Edition with an Introduction and New Material. Edited by Sarah Hutton. Oxfo. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2 (2):161-199.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  3
    Chantel Lavoie (1999). The Progress of Another Error: Anne Finch's 'The Spleen'. Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 18:107.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    Katherine M. Quinsey (2007). Nature, Gender, and Genre in Anne Finch's Poetry: 'A Nocturnal Reverie'. Lumen: Selected Proceedings From the Canadian Society for Eighteenth-Century Studies 26:63.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Marjorie Hope Nicolson (ed.) (1992). The Conway Letters: The Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Revised edition by Sarah Hutton.The revised edition contains some important letters not included in the first edition, plus a new introduction.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Flora I. Mackinnon (1931). More's Enchiridion Ethicum; Cudworth's A Sermon, Preached Before the House of Commons, March 31, 1647; Donne's Biathanatos; Nicholson's Conway Letters, the Correspondence of Anne, Viscountess Conway, Henry More, and Their Friends, 1642-1684. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 28:466.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  68
    Carolyn Merchant (1979). The Vitalism of Anne Conway: Its Impact on Leibniz's Concept of the Monad. Journal of the History of Philosophy 17 (3):255-269.
  23.  39
    Jennifer McRobert (2000). Anne Conway's Vitalism and Her Critique of Descartes. International Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1):21-35.
  24.  12
    Steven Schroeder (2007). Anne Conway's Place: A Map of Leibniz. The Pluralist 2 (3):77 - 99.
  25.  31
    Peter Loptson (1995). Anne Conway, Henry More and Their World. Dialogue 34 (1):139.
  26. Justin Eh Smith (2006). Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 26 (1):41-44.
  27. Justin Smith (2006). Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 26:41-44.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28. Catherine Wilson (1983). Peter Loptson, Ed., Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 3 (6):292-296.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. S. Hutton (1995). Conway, Anne, Critic of More, Henry-Spirit and Matter. Archives de Philosophie 58 (3):371-384.
  30.  38
    Karen Detlefsen (2005). Review of Sarah Hutton, Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (7).
  31.  20
    Catherine Brown Tkacz (2006). Anne Conway. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):645-646.
  32.  24
    Jane Duran (2007). Women Philosophers of the Seventeenth Century, And: Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher (Review). Philosophy and Literature 31 (1):200-204.
  33.  15
    Patricia Sheridan (2006). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher. Dialogue 45 (4):810-813.
  34. Alan Gabbey (1977). Anne Conway Et Henry More: Lettres Sur Descartes (1650–1651). Archives de Philosophie 40 (3):379388.
  35.  23
    Robert Martensen (2008). A Philosopher and Her Headaches: The Tribulations of Anne Conway. Philosophical Forum 39 (3):315-326.
  36.  19
    Sarah Hutton, Lady Anne Conway. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  37.  2
    Carolyn Merchant (1985). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy by Anne Conway; Peter Loptson. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 76:275-276.
  38.  12
    E. J. Ashworth (1986). The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy Anne Conway Edited and with an Introduction by Peter Loptson International Archives of the History of Ideas, Vol. 101 The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1982. Pp. 252. [REVIEW] Dialogue 25 (04):821-.
  39.  6
    Patricia Sheridan (2006). Anne Conway: A Woman Philosopher Sarah Hutton New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004, Viii + 271 Pp., $75.00. [REVIEW] Dialogue 45 (4):810.
  40.  2
    R. S. Woolhouse (1983). Anne Conway: The Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy. Philosophical Books 24 (2):76-76.
  41. E. J. Ashworth (1986). Anne Conway, "the Principles of the Most Ancient and Modern Philosophy", Edited and with an Introduction by Peter Loptson. [REVIEW] Dialogue 25 (4):821.
  42. S. Hutton (1995). Anne Conway critique d'Henry More: l'esprit et la matière. Archives de Philosophie 58:371.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Sarah Hutton (2011). Philosophinnen oder Prinzessinnen? Anne Conway, Margarete Cavendish und die Neubewertung philosophierender Aristokratinnen des 17. Und 18. Jahrhunderts. [REVIEW] In Ruth Hagengruber (ed.), Von Diana Zu Minerva: Philosophierende Aristokratinnen des 17. Und 18. Jahrhunderts. Akademie Verlag 81-96.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Joanna Usakiewicz (2001). Anne Conway (1631-1679). Rys biografczny. Idea 13 (13).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Joanna Usakiewicz (2002). Anne Conway (1631-1679). Poglądy filozoficzne. Idea 14 (14).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Joanna Usakiewicz (2003). Bonum et (im)mutabilitas. Myśl filozoficzna Anne Conway. Idea 15 (15).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Moncure Daniel Conway (2003). Autobiography and Miscellaneous Writings.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  9
    Naomi Oreskes & Erik M. Conway (2010). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues From Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Press.
    The U.S. scientific community has long led the world in research on such areas as public health, environmental science, and issues affecting quality of life. These scientists have produced landmark studies on the dangers of DDT, tobacco smoke, acid rain, and global warming. But at the same time, a small yet potent subset of this community leads the world in vehement denial of these dangers. -/- Merchants of Doubt tells the story of how a loose-knit group of high-level scientists and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   47 citations  
  49.  30
    Daniel W. Conway (1996). Nietzsche and the Political. Routledge.
    Contrary to much recent opinion, Daniel Conway argues that Nietzsche's political thinking is fully consistent with his diagnosis of modernity as an exhausted and dying epoch. In addition, he clearly shows how Nietzsche does not recoil from political life in late modernity, but articulates an ethical and political teaching that relocates his notorious "perfectionism" to the political sphere.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  50.  19
    Daniel Conway (2008). Nietzsche's on the Genealogy of Morals: A Reader's Guide. Continuum.
    In Nietzsche's "On the Genealogy of Morals": A Reader's Guide, Daniel Conway explains the philosophical background against which the book was written, the wider context of Western morality in general and the key themes and topics inherent ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000