6 found
Order:
  1.  2
    William W. Grings, Anne M. Schell & Cheryl A. Carey (1973). Verbal Control of an Autonomic Response in a Cue Reversal Situation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):215.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  2.  3
    Anne M. Schell & Michael E. Dawson (1995). Responses Conditioned to Fear-Relevant Stimuli Survive Extinction of the Expectancy of the UCS. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):312.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  21
    Michael E. Dawson & Anne M. Schell (2009). Is Propositional Learning Necessary for Human Autonomic Classical Conditioning? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (2):205-206.
    Additional support is presented for the necessity of awareness of the CS-US relation in human autonomic conditioning. However, possible limitations and exceptions regarding this general rule are discussed. Limitations include the lack of relationship between conditioned response (CR) strength and degree of awareness, and an important exception may be the finding of conditioning with backwardly masked CSs of a biologically prepared nature.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  1
    William W. Grings & Anne M. Schell (1969). UCR Diminution in Trace and Delay Conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2p1):246.
  5. William W. Grings, Cheryl A. Carey & Anne M. Schell (1974). Comparison of Two Methods for Producing Response Inhibition in Electrodermal Conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):658.
  6. William W. Grings & Anne M. Schell (1971). Effects of Trace Versus Delay Conditioning, Interstimulus Interval Variability, and Instructions on UCR Diminution. Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (1):136.