9 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Anthony Cunningham [7]Anthony P. Cunningham [2]
  1. Anthony Cunningham (2013). Modern Honor: A Philosophical Defense. Routledge.
    This book examines the notion of honor with an eye to dissecting its intellectual demise and with the aim of making a case for honor’s rehabilitation. Western intellectuals acknowledge honor’s influence, but they lament its authority. For Western democratic societies to embrace honor, it must be compatible with social ideals like liberty, equality, and fraternity. Cunningham details a conception of honor that can do justice to these ideals. This vision revolves around three elements—character (being), relationships (relating), and activities and accomplishment (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Wayne C. Booth, Dudley Barlow, Orson Scott Card, Anthony Cunningham, John Gardner, Marshall Gregory, John J. Han, Jack Harrell, Richard E. Hart, Barbara A. Heavilin, Marianne Jennings, Charles Johnson, Bernard Malamud, Toni Morrison, Georgia A. Newman, Joyce Carol Oates, Jay Parini, David Parker, James Phelan, Richard A. Posner, Mary R. Reichardt, Nina Rosenstand, Stephen L. Tanner, John Updike, John H. Wallace, Abraham B. Yehoshua & Bruce Young (2005). Ethics, Literature, and Theory: An Introductory Reader. Sheed & Ward.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Anthony Cunningham (2001). Self-Governance and Cooperation. Robert H. Myers. Mind 110 (439):799-802.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Anthony Cunningham (2000). Dignity and Vulnerability, Strength and Quality of Character. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (1):239-241.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Anthony Cunningham (1999). Kantian Ethics and Intimate Attachments. American Philosophical Quarterly 36 (4):279 - 294.
    This essay questions whether recent attempts to reconcile Kantian ethics and intimate attachments can be successful. Defenders have argued that Kantian commitments would leave enough room to pursue the sorts of intimate attachments that provide so much of the meaning and structures of most lives. However, close attention to the letter and spirit of Kant's ethics suggests that imperfect duties would demand far more of conscientious Kantians than defenders have acknowledged. The duties to prevent injustice and alleviate suffering should occupy (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Anthony Cunningham (1994). Moral Addicts. Dialogue 33 (02):223-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Anthony P. Cunningham (1994). Book Review. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 28 (4):581-583.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Anthony P. Cunningham (1992). The Moral Importance of Dirty Hands. Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (2):239-250.
    This understanding of dirty hands should dispell the air of paradox so often associated with it. Dirty hands is a genuine moral problem, but not a conceptual one. The temptation to see it as a conceptual one arises from a hasty acceptance of these assumptions:Moral criticism is appropriate if and only if we can always do what is right. If we cannot do X or avoid doing Y, we cannot be criticized for failing to do X or for doing Y.We (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Anthony Cunningham (1991). Liberalism, Egalité, Fraternité? Journal of Philosophical Research 16:125-144.
    This essay attempts to assess recent communitarian charges that liberalism cannot provide for genuine bonds of community or fraternity. Along with providing an analysis of fraternity, I argue that there is more common ground here than supposed by communitarians and l iberals alike. Communitarians often fail to see that liberal concerns for liberty and equality function as substantive constraints on the moral worth of fraternal bonds. On the other hand, insofar as liberals ignore fraternity, or see it as a purely (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation