Search results for 'Apologetics' (try it on Scholar)

344 found
Order:
  1.  33
    Maurice Blondel (1964). The Letter on Apologetics, and, History and Dogma. W.B. Eerdmans Pub. Co..
    'The Letter on Apologetics' is a key statement on the possibility and meaning of Christian philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  1
    Christoph Bultmann (2014). Grotius’s De Veritate Religionis Christianae in the Context of Eighteenth-Century Debates About Christian Apologetics and Religious Pluralism. Grotiana 35 (1):168-190.
    _ Source: _Volume 35, Issue 1, pp 168 - 190 While there is ample evidence for the popularity and influence up to the mid-eighteenth century of Grotius’s demonstration of the exclusive truth of the Christian religion, a fresh look at the reasons for the discontinuation of this line of apologetics can be attempted. In Germany in the late 1770s, G. E. Lessing claimed that all available arguments of Christian apologetics would ‘evaporate’ when analysed from a critical philosophical perspective. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Christina M. Gschwandtner (2013). Postmodern Apologetics?: Arguments for God in Contemporary Philosophy. Fordham University Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4. Peter Van Inwagen (1998). The Possibility of Resurrection and Other Essays in Christian Apologetics. Westview Press.
    Peter van Inwagen is a philosopher who became a Christian at the age of forty. His conversion was not a return to the religion of his childhood, but, on the contrary, consisted of the adoption of beliefs that had been held in explicit contempt by the Unitarian Sunday school teachers of his youth, the philosophers responsible for his professional training, and his colleagues in the philosophy department where he had been teaching for ten years at the time of his conversion.This (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Maurice Blondel, Alexander Dru & Illtyd Trethowan (1995). The Letter on Apologetics ; &, History and Dogma. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. James Mccosh (1871). Christianity and Positivism a Series of Lectures to the Times on Natural Theology and Apologetics. R. Carter and Brothers.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Maurice Blondel (1964). The Letter on Apologetics. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. C. Stephen Evans (2002). Pocket Dictionary of Apologetics & Philosophy of Religion.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Mark M. Hanna (1981). Crucial Questions in Apologetics. Baker Book House.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Michael Sudduth (2003). Reformed Epistemology and Christian Apologetics. Religious Studies 39 (3):299-321.
    It is a widely held viewpoint in Christian apologetics that in addition to defending Christian theism against objections (negative apologetics), apologists should also present arguments in support of the truth of theism and Christianity (positive apologetics). In contemporary philosophy of religion, the Reformed epistemology movement has often been criticized on the grounds that it falls considerably short of satisfying the positive side of this two-tiered approach to Christian apologetics. Reformed epistemology is said to constitute or entail (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  11
    João Figueiredo Nobre Cortese (2015). Infinity Between Mathematics and Apologetics: Pascal’s Notion of Infinite Distance. Synthese 192 (8):2379-2393.
    In this paper I will examine what Blaise Pascal means by “infinite distance”, both in his works on projective geometry and in the apologetics of the Pensées’s. I suggest that there is a difference of meaning in these two uses of “infinite distance”, and that the Pensées’s use of it also bears relations to the mathematical concept of heterogeneity. I also consider the relation between the finite and the infinite and the acceptance of paradoxical relations by Pascal.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  9
    John C. Cavadini (2013). Trinity and Apologetics In the Theology of St. Augustine. Modern Theology 29 (1):48-82.
    This article examines Trinitarian themes in St. Augustine's City of God and in his On the Trinity. It argues that the scope and intention of the latter work can be clarified to some extent by noticing the apologetic commitments entailed in the exposition of the doctrine of the Trinity in the former. It argues against the tendency of some recent scholarship to restrict the intelligibility of the On the Trinity to converted Christians, even as it also defends the irreducibility of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  7
    C. J. T. Talar (2009). Newman and the “New Apologetics”. Newman Studies Journal 6 (2):49-56.
    This essay explores how Newman’s thought influenced Maurice Blondel’s “new apologetics of action,” as well as the Modernist movement at the beginning of the twentieth century.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  5
    V. N. Akulinin & A. A. Ermichev (1988). Book Reviews: L. E. Shaposhnikov. Orthodoxy and Philosophical Idealism: The Untenability of the Philosophical Apologetics of Orthodoxy (Gor'kii: Volgo-Viatskoe Book Publishers, 1986, 144 Pp.). [REVIEW] Russian Studies in Philosophy 27 (1):89-92.
    The topicality and timeliness of the appearance of a book in which the philosophical apologetics of Orthodoxy is critically analyzed is beyond doubt. The increased popularity of Russian religious philosophers among contemporary Orthodox theologians, and the incorporation of some elements of their intellectual legacy into the arguments of our ideological adversaries in their attempts to enhance the prestige of religion, and of Orthodoxy in particular, make this topic a burning issue.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    Mark S. McLeod-Harrison (2014). Socrates and St. Paul: Can Christian Apologetics Be Public Philosophy? Essays in Philosophy 15 (1):117-137.
    Can popular Christian apologetics be public philosophy? This paper argues that it can be partly because the criteria for what counts as public philosophy are so vague but also partly because popular Christian apologetics parallels much that counts as public philosophy both in terms of its historical roots in Socrates but also how public philosophy is practiced now. In particular, there are parallels on the role of amateurs vs. professionals, the sorts of topics, the quality of the discussions, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  9
    Henry B. Veatch (1977). A Neglected Avenue in Contemporary Religious Apologetics. Religious Studies 13 (1):29 - 48.
    Apologetics’ is hardly a word to be used without apology in the present dispensation. And to speak of anything like a neglected avenue or opportunity in religious apologetics might almost seem as if one were speaking of an opportunity in just such an enterprise as no self-respecting philosopher would nowadays wish even to be associated with. For all of their avoidance of the term, however, the thing designated by the term is something with which not a few philosophers (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Gregory Bassham (ed.) (2015). C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con. Brill | Rodopi.
    In _C. S. Lewis’s Christian Apologetics: Pro and Con_, ten articulate defenders and critics of Lewis’s apologetics square off and debate the merits of Lewis’s central arguments for Christian belief.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. John G. Stackhouse (2007). Humble Apologetics: Defending the Faith Today. Ars Disputandi 7:1566-5399.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  51
    Glenn B. Siniscalchi (2012). Does Christianity Cause Violence?: The New Atheism and Negative Apologetics. Heythrop Journal 54 (5):n/a-n/a.
  20.  3
    Steve Fuller (2009). Philosophy Os Science in an Age of Neo-Darwinian Apologetics. Ludus Vitalis 17 (32):247-257.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21.  99
    Scott A. Shalkowski (1989). Atheological Apologetics. American Philosophical Quarterly 26 (1):1 - 17.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  26
    Peter Harrison (1999). Prophecy, Early Modern Apologetics, and Hume's Argument Against Miracles. Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (2):241 - 256.
    Hume’s "Of Miracles" concludes with the claim that prophecies, too, are miracles, and as such are susceptible to the same arguments which apply to miracles. However, both Hume and his commentators have overlooked the distinctive features of prophecy. Hume’s chief objection to miracles--that one is never justified in crediting second-hand testimony to miraculous events--does not necessarily apply to the argument from fulfilled prophecies as it was understood in the eighteenth century. Neither was prophecy necessarily thought to entail any breach of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23.  19
    John Coates (2009). Chesterton's New Style in Apologetics. Renascence 61 (4):235-251.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  1
    P. B. Wood (1980). Methodology and Apologetics: Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society. British Journal for the History of Science 13 (1):1-26.
    Central to Thomas Sprat's History of the Royal Society was the description and justification of the method adopted and advocated by the Fellows of the Society, for it was thought that it was their method which distinguished them from ancients, dogmatists, sceptics, and contemporary natural philosophers such as Descartes. The Fellows saw themselves as furthering primarily a novel method, rather than a system, of philosophy, and the History gave expression to this corporate self-perception. However, the History's description of their method (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  25.  40
    Glenn B. Siniscalchi (2011). Postmodernism and the Need for Rational Apologetics in a Post-Conciliar Church. Heythrop Journal 52 (5):751-771.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  8
    Gregory Wolfe (1992). The Role of Laughter in Christian Apologetics. The Chesterton Review 18 (3):429-430.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Tom Krettek (2016). Postmodern Apologetics? Arguments for God in Contemporary Philosophy. By Christina M. Gschwandtner. International Philosophical Quarterly 56 (1):122-124.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Richard Fox Young (1983). Resistant Hinduism: Sanskrit Sources on Anti-Christian Apologetics in Early Nineteenth-Century India. Philosophy East and West 33 (4):417-418.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  1
    V. N. Akulinin & A. A. Ermichev (1988). Book Reviews: L. E. Shaposhnikov. Orthodoxy and Philosophical Idealism: The Untenability of the Philosophical Apologetics of Orthodoxy. [REVIEW] Russian Studies in Philosophy 27 (1):89-92.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  12
    Gabriel Daly (1989). Apologetics in the Modernist Period. The Chesterton Review 15 (1/2):79-93.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  28
    Jiang Wu (2003). Buddhist Logic and Apologetics in 17th Century China: An Analysis of the Use of Buddhist Syllogisms in an Anti-Christian Polemic. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 2 (2):273-289.
    A glimpse of the new application of Buddhist logic in the seventeenth century leads us to reflect about our approach to logic in a given religious tradition: Should we isolate a logical system from the very context that has given rise to the genesis and development of such an intellectual apparatus? Methodologically, we do have the legitimate right to approach Buddhist logic from a purely logical point of view. However, when we study the actual use of Buddhist logic in the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  21
    William Collinge (1983). The Role of Christian Community Life in Augustine's Apologetics. Augustinian Studies 14:63-73.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  15
    Lewis Ayres (2012). “Where Does the Trinity Appear?” Augustine's Apologetics and “Philosophical” Readings of the De Trinitate. Augustinian Studies 43 (1-2):109-126.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  21
    Michael L. Czapkay Sudduth (1994). Bi-Level Evidentialism and Reformed Apologetics. Faith and Philosophy 11 (3):379-396.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  14
    Josep E. Corbí (2012). The Apologetics of Evil. The Case of Iago, by Richard Raatzsch. [REVIEW] Disputatio 4 (33).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  20
    Paul J. Griffiths (1988). An Apology for Apologetics. Faith and Philosophy 5 (4):399-420.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  17
    Charles M. Natoli (1983). The Role of the Wager in Pascal's Apologetics. New Scholasticism 57 (1):98-106.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    Keith Lemna (2016). Newman and Bouyer on Sacrifice and Apologetics. New Blackfriars 97 (1070):447-464.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  7
    E. A. R. (1967). The Letter on Apologetics. Review of Metaphysics 20 (3):536-536.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  13
    James Wetzel (1994). An Apology for Apologetics. Faith and Philosophy 11 (1):152-156.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Nicholas Wolterstorff (1986). The Migration of the Theistic Arguments: From Natural Theology to Evidentialist Apologetics. In William Wainwright & Robert Audi (eds.), Rationality, Religious Belief, and Moral Commitment. Cornell University Press 38--81.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42.  10
    Robert H. Ayers (1975). A Viable Theodicy for Christian Apologetics. Modern Schoolman 52 (4):391-403.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Erik Meganck (2015). Postmodern Apologetics?: Arguments for God in Contemporary Philosophy. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (1):87-88.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  3
    Peter Byrne (1992). Paul J. Griffiths. An Apology for Apologetics: A Study in the Logic of Interreligious Dialogue. Pp. Xii+113. Barry Miller. From Existence to God: A Contemporary Philosophical Argument. Pp.X+206. Richard J. Blackwell. Galileo, Bellarmine and the Bible. Pp. X + 291. $29.95 Hdbk.Terence W. Tilley. The Evils of Theodicy. Pp. Xii + 279.M. Jamie Ferreira. Transforming Vision: Imagination and Will in Kierkegaardian Faith. Pp. 168. £25.00 Hdbk.C. Robert Mesle. John Hick's Theodicy: A Process Humanist Critique. Pp. Xxxiii+141. £35.00 Hdbk. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 28 (2):283.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  16
    Jacques Fason (2004). Zen Apologetics: Reflections on Wright'sPhilosophical Meditations on Zen Buddhism. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):77-85.
  46.  16
    Kevin Mongrain (2011). The Eyes of Reason: Intelligent Design Apologetics as the New Preambula Fidei? Heythrop Journal 52 (2):191-210.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. William Dembski, Transcendence (Entry for New Dictionary of Christian Apologetics).
    The word transcendence comes from the Latin and means literally to climb across or go beyond. To transcend is thus to surpass or excel or move beyond the reach or grasp of something. Sometimes the term is used epistemologically, as when something is beyond the reach of human knowledge. But in reference to the Christian doctrine of God, divine transcendence is used ontologically, and refers to God being beyond anything that is other than God. In Christian theology what’s other than (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  13
    Paul J. Griffiths (2011). Introducing Apologetics. Faith and Philosophy 28 (3):359-365.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  9
    Alden Bass (2013). Critique and Apologetics: Jews, Christians and Pagans in Antiquity. Edited by David Brakke , Anders‐Christian Jacobsen , Jörg Ulrich . Pp. 327, Frankfurt, Peter Lang, 2009, $109.95. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 54 (3):445-446.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  4
    D. Z. Phillips (1977). Ethics, Apologetics and the Metaphysical Man. Sophia 16 (2):1-7.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 344