7 found
Sort by:
  1. Arlene M. Davis (forthcoming). Exception From Informed Consent for Emergency Research: Drawing on Existing Skills and Experience. IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Michele M. Easter, Arlene M. Davis & Gail E. Henderson (forthcoming). Confidentiality: More Than a Linkage File and a Locked Drawer. IRB: Ethics & Human Research.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz, John M. Conley, Arlene M. Davis, Marcia Van Riper, Rebecca L. Walker & Eric T. Juengst (2015). Looking for Trouble: Preventive Genomic Sequencing in the General Population and the Role of Patient Choice. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (7):3-14.
    Advances in genomics have led to calls for developing population-based preventive genomic sequencing programs with the goal of identifying genetic health risks in adults without known risk factors. One critical issue for minimizing the harms and maximizing the benefits of PGS is determining the kind and degree of control individuals should have over the generation, use, and handling of their genomic information. In this article we examine whether PGS programs should offer individuals the opportunity to selectively opt out of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Rebecca L. Walker, Eric T. Juengst, Warren Whipple & Arlene M. Davis (2014). Genomic Research with the Newly Dead: A Crossroads for Ethics and Policy. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42 (2):220-231.
    Recent advances in next generation sequencing along with high hopes for genomic medicine have inspired interest in genomic research with the newly dead. However, applicable law does not adequately determine ethical or policy responses to such research. In this paper we propose that such research stands at a crossroads between other more established biomedical clinical and research practices. In addressing the ethical and policy issues raised by a particular research project within our institution comparatively with these other practices, we illustrate (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Arlene M. Davis, Michele Rivkin-Fish & Deborah J. Love (2012). Addressing “Difficult Patient” Dilemmas: Possible Alternatives to the Mediation Model. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (5):13-14.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 5, Page 13-14, May 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Gail E. Henderson, Arlene M. Davis & Nancy M. P. King (2004). Vulnerability to Influence: A Two-Way Street. American Journal of Bioethics 4 (3):50 – 52.
  7. Arlene M. Davis, Sara Chandros Hull, Christine Grady, Benjamin S. Wilfond & Gail E. Henderson (2002). The Invisible Hand in Clinical Research: The Study Coordinator's Critical Role in Human Subjects Protection. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 30 (3):411-419.