8 found
Sort by:
  1. Arno R. Lodder & John Zeleznikow (2005). Preface. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):189-192.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gerard A. W. Vreeswijk & Arno R. Lodder (2005). Gearbi: Towards an Online Arbitration Environment Based on the Design Principles Simplicity, Awareness, Orientation, and Timeliness. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):297-321.
    Arbitration is a preferred method for the resolution of international business disputes. As of yet, most publications on online arbitration deal with legal issues. In this paper, we present an Online arbitration environment that we believe facilitates the participants in a meaningful way. Our assumption is that an ODR service should be easy to use (convenient), and at the same time provide meaningful support. More specifically we have paid attention to four criteria that we believe are important, viz. simplicity, awareness, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Arno R. Lodder (2004). Book Review: Pamela N. Gray Artificial Legal Intelligence, Darmouth, Aldershot, England, 1997, (ISBN 1-85521-266-8). [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 12 (3):231-238.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Arno R. Lodder (2004). Law, Logic, Rhetoric: A Procedural Model of Legal Argumentation. In. In S. Rahman (ed.), Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science. Dordrecht, Kluwer. 569--588.
  5. Arno R. Lodder (2001). Christopher W. Tindale, Acts of Arguing, a Rhetorical Model of Argument. Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):73-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Arno R. Lodder (2000). Book Review of Gordon (1995). [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 8:255-264.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Arno R. Lodder (2000). Thomas F. Gordon, the Pleadings Game – an Artificial Intelligence Model of Procedural Justice. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):255-264.
  8. Jaap C. Hage, Ronald Leenes & Arno R. Lodder (1993). Hard Cases: A Procedural Approach. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (2):113-167.
    Much work on legal knowledge systems treats legal reasoning as arguments that lead from a description of the law and the facts of a case, to the legal conclusion for the case. The reasoning steps of the inference engine parallel the logical steps by means of which the legal conclusion is derived from the factual and legal premises. In short, the relation between the input and the output of a legal inference engine is a logical one. The truth of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation