Search results for 'Art and science Philosophy' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Roald Hoffmann (2012). Roald Hoffmann on the Philosophy, Art, and Science of Chemistry. Oxford University Press.score: 648.0
    Machine generated contents note: -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction, by Michael Weisberg and Jeffrey Kovac. -- 1 Trying to Understand, Making Bonds, by Roald Hoffmann -- Part 1: Chemical Reasoning and Explanation -- 2. Why Buy That Theory?, by Roald Hoffmann. -- 3. What Might Philosophy of Science Look Like If Chemists Built It?, by Roald Hoffmann -- 4. Unstable, by Roald Hoffmann -- 5. Nearly Circular Reasoning, by Roald Hoffmann -- 6. Ockham's Razor and Chemistry, by (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Steve Fuller (2012). The Art of Being Human: A Project for General Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 43 (1):113-123.score: 522.0
    Throughout the medieval and modern periods, in various sacred and secular guises, the unification of all forms of knowledge under the rubric of ‘science’ has been taken as the prerogative of humanity as a species. However, as our sense of species privilege has been called increasingly into question, so too has the very salience of ‘humanity’ and ‘science’ as general categories, let alone ones that might bear some essential relationship to each other. After showing how the ascendant Stanford (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Hīrālāla Jaina, Dharmacandra Jaina & R. K. Sharma (eds.) (2002). Jaina Philosophy, Art & Science in Indian Culture. Sharada Pub. House.score: 507.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sangeetha Menon (ed.) (2006). Consciousness, Experience, and Ways of Knowing: Perspectives From Science, Philosophy & the Arts. National Institute of Advances Studies.score: 459.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Prabas Jivan Chaudhury (1966). Reflections on Science, Philosophy and Art. Calcutta, Progressive Publishers.score: 453.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. A. Janik (1989). Psychoanalysis: Science, Literature or Art? In Style, Politics and the Future of Philosophy. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 114:190-196.score: 441.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Karel Boullart (1989). On the Essential Difference Between Science, Art and Philosophy, or Philosophy as the Literature of Necessity in Cognition and Literature. Communication and Cognition. Monographies 22 (3-4):285-301.score: 435.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Chukwunyere Kamalu (1990). Foundations of African Thought: A Worldview Grounded in the African Heritage of Religion, Philosophy, Science, and Art. Karnak House.score: 423.0
  9. George Boas (1937). The Ninth International Congress of Philosophy and the Second International Congress of Esthetics and of the Science of Art. Journal of Philosophy 34 (21):561-574.score: 414.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Catherine Chevalley (1996). Physics as an Art: The German Tradition and the Symbolic Turn in Philosophy, History of Art and Natural Science in the 1920s. In. In Alfred I. Tauber (ed.), The Elusive Synthesis: Aesthetics and Science. Kluwer. 227--249.score: 414.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Stephen Arnott (1999). In the Shadow of Chaos: Deleuze and Guattari on Philosophy, Science, and Art. Philosophy Today 43 (1):49-56.score: 414.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Robert Burch (1995). Babette E. Babich, Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science: Reflecting Science on the Ground of Art and Life Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 15 (5):304-306.score: 414.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Robert S. Lehman (2011). Between the Science of the Sensible and the Philosophy of Art. Angelaki 15 (2):171-185.score: 405.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Chalmers C. Clark (1998). The Art of Science: Quine and the Speculative Reach of Philosophy in Natural Science. Dialectica 52 (4):275–290.score: 405.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Babette E. Babich (1994). Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science: Reflecting Science on the Ground of Art and Life. State University of New York Press.score: 405.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ilaria Boeddu (2007). Art and Science: Which Relationship? Some Reflections About Nelson Goodman's Philosophy. Epistemologia 30 (1):101-121.score: 405.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Hans Gerald Hödl (1997). Babette E. Babich: Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science. Reflecting Science on the Ground of Art and Life. Nietzsche-Studien 26 (1).score: 405.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. K. D. D. Henderson (1969). Religion and Contemporary Western Culture (Readings From Ayer, Brunner, Bultmann, Christopher Dawson, Freud, Fromm, the Niebuhr Brothers, Sartre, Tillich and Others. With a Bibliography for Each of Seven Sections, Covering Religion in the Context of Culture, Modern Art, Modern Literature, Philosophy, Psychotherapy, Science and Sociology.) Edited by Edward Cell. (Abingdon Press. Nashville, N.Y.) 399 Pp. 7 Plates. $7.95. [REVIEW] Religious Studies 4 (2):303.score: 405.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Tadeusz Sierotowicz (1999). Kiedy filozofia nauki staje się filozofią [recenzja] Babette E. Babich, Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science. Reflecting Science on the Ground of Art and Life, 1994. Zagadnienia Filozoficzne W Nauce 24.score: 405.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Logan J. Fox (1972). Psychology as Philosophy, Science, and Art. Pacific Palisades, Calif.,Goodyear Pub. Co..score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Maria Grazia Gangale (2004). Philosophy, Science and Art in the Systematic Theology of Paul Tillich. Filosofia 55 (2-3):53-80.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. E. Garin (1988). Art and Natural-Science in the Renaissance, Ancient Philosophy in France, Festivals and Philosophy in the Renaissance. Rivista di Storia Della Filosofia 43 (1):121-129.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Joseph Head & S. L. Cranston (eds.) (1977/1994). Reincarnation: The Phoenix Fire Mystery: An East-West Dialogue on Death and Rebirth From the Worlds of Religion, Science, Psychology, Philosophy, Art, and Literature, and From Great Thinkers of the Past and Present. Theosophical University Press.score: 405.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. G. Hoedl (1997). B. Babich, Nietzsche's Philosophy of Science. Reflecting Science on the Ground of Art and Life. Nietzsche Studien 26:583-587.score: 405.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Robert S. Lehman (2010). Between the Science of the Sensible and the Philosophy of Art: Finitude in Alain Badiou's Inaesthetics. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities 15 (2):171-185.score: 405.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John Raymaker (2006). Empowering Philosophy and Science with the Art of Love: Lonergan and Deleuze in the Light of Buddhist-Christian Ethics. University Press of America.score: 405.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Anthony O'Hear (1988). The Element of Fire: Science, Art, and the Human World. Routledge.score: 390.0
    First published in 1988, the aim of this book can be stated in Nietzsche’s words: ‘To look at science from the perspective of the artist, but at art from that of life’. The title contests the notions that science alone can provide us with the most objective truth about the world, and that artistic endeavour can produce nothing more valuable than entertainment. O’Hear argues that art and the study of art are not indispensable aspects of human life, and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1993). Reconstructing Scientific Revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's Philosophy of Science. University of Chicago Press.score: 381.0
    Few philosophers of science have influenced as many readers as Thomas S. Kuhn. Yet no comprehensive study of his ideas has existed--until now. In this volume, Paul Hoyningen-Huene examines Kuhn's work over four decades, from the days before The Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the present, and puts Kuhn's philosophical development in a historical framework. Scholars from disciplines as diverse as political science and art history have offered widely differing interpretations of Kuhn's ideas, appropriating his notions of paradigm (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Karel Boullart, G. E. Lasker & Hiltrud Schinzel (eds.) (2008). Art and Science, Volume Vi: Proceedings of a Special Focus Symposium on Art and Science Held as Part of the 20th Anniversary International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, July 24-30, 2008, Baden-Baden, Germany. [REVIEW] International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics.score: 354.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jean-Claude Gens, Pierre Guenancia & Maryvonne Perrot (eds.) (2009). Au Risque de L'Existence: Le Mythe, la Science Et L'Art: Hommage à Maryvonne Perrot. Editions Universitaires de Dijon.score: 354.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Harry Redner (1994). A New Science of Representation: Towards an Integrated Theory of Representation in Science, Politics, and Art. Westview Press.score: 354.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter Clark & Katherine Hawley (eds.) (2003). Philosophy of Science Today. Oxford University Press.score: 345.0
    Philosophy of Science Today offers a state-of-the-art guide to this fast-developing area. An eminent international team of authors covers a wide range of topics at the intersection of philosophy and the sciences, including causation, realism, methodology, epistemology, and the philosophical foundations of physics, biology, and psychology.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Lorraine Daston (ed.) (2004). Things That Talk: Object Lessons From Art and Science. Mit Press [Distributor].score: 342.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Frederik le Roy (ed.) (2011). Tickle Your Catastrophe!: Imagining Catastrophe in Art, Architecture and Philosophy. Academia Press.score: 339.0
    A collection of essays that takes stock of the current impact of the image and imagination of the catastrophe in art, science and philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Israel Scheffler (1997). Symbolic Worlds: Art, Science, Language, Ritual. Cambridge University Press.score: 330.0
    Symbolism is a primary characteristic of the mind, deployed and displayed in every aspect of our thought and culture. In this important and broad-ranging book, Israel Scheffler explores the various ways in which the mind functions symbolically. This involves considering not only the world of science and the arts, but also such activities as religious ritual and child's play. The book offers an integrated treatment of ambiguity and metaphor, analyses of play and ritual, and an extended discussion of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Lutz Geldsetzer (1998). Symposium “Analytical Philosophy and Philosophy of Science Today”, 23.–24. Juli 1995 in Peking, VR China. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29 (1):123 - 127.score: 315.0
    Report on a symposium “Analytical Philosophy of Science today”, July 23–24, 1995, in Beijing. The symposium demonstrates the actual interest and familiarity of Chinese researchers with Western philosophy of science and especially with analytical philosophizing. Main topics were diagnoses of the actual state of the art, discussion and critique of some classics and classical analytical conceptions, application of analytical thinking on hermeneutical problems, and its possible social function.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ronald Bogue (2014). Review of Inna Semetsky, The Edusemiotics of Images: Essays on the Art–Science of Tarot. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 33 (5):563-569.score: 306.0
    For well over a decade Inna Semetsky has been at the forefront of an effort to introduce the thought of Gilles Deleuze into educational philosophy and theory. In her (2006) book, Deleuze, Education and Becoming, she set forth a sophisticated reading of Deleuze that drew enlightening parallels between his work and that of John Dewey and his Pragmatist predecessors. In Re-Symbolization of the Self (2011), she linked Deleuze to a very different tradition—that of Jungian psychology—and argued for the integration (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Kathleen Kuiper (ed.) (2010). The Ideas That Change the World: The Essential Guide to Modern Philosophy, Science, Math, and the Arts. Fall River Press/Britannica Educational Pub. In Association with Rosen Educational Services.score: 304.0
    The biological sciences -- Mathematics and the physical sciences -- The arts -- The social sciences, philosophy, and religion -- Politics and the law.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Don Ihde (2004). Has the Philosophy of Technology Arrived? A State‐of‐the‐Art Review. Philosophy of Science 71 (1):117-131.score: 303.0
    Using the occasion of the publication of a Blackwell anthology in the philosophy of technology, Philosophy of Technology: The Technological Condition (2003), as a key to the contemporary role of this subdiscipline, this article reviews the current state-of-this-art. Both philosophy of science and philosophy of technology are twentieth century inventions, but each has followed a somewhat different set of philosophical traditions and pursued sometimes divergent questions. Here the primary developments of recent philosophy of technology (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Soraya Nour & Olivier Remaud (eds.) (2010). War and Peace: The Role of Science and Art. Duncker & Humblot.score: 303.0
    Violence -- Poliltical philosophy -- Critical theory -- Science and arts in international relations -- Psyche -- Aesthetics -- Tolstoi's War and peace.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Marcello Pera & William R. Shea (eds.) (1991). Persuading Science: The Art of Scientific Rhetoric. Science History Publications, Usa.score: 300.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Babette Babich (2011). Towards a Critical Philosophy of Science: Continental Beginnings and Bugbears, Whigs, and Waterbears. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (4):343-391.score: 297.0
    Continental philosophy of science has developed alongside mainstream analytic philosophy of science. But where continental approaches are inclusive, analytic philosophies of science are not?excluding not merely Nietzsche?s philosophy of science but Gödel?s philosophy of physics. As a radicalization of Kant, Nietzsche?s critical philosophy of science puts science in question and Nietzsche?s critique of the methodological foundations of classical philology bears on science, particularly evolution as well as style (in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Axel Gelfert (2012). Art History, the Problem of Style, and Arnold Hauser's Contribution to the History and Sociology of Knowledge. Studies in East European Thought 64 (1-2):121-142.score: 294.0
    Much of Arnold Hauser’s work on the social history of art and the philosophy of art history is informed by a concern for the cognitive dimension of art. The present paper offers a reconstruction of this aspect of Hauser’s project and identifies areas of overlap with the sociology of knowledge—where the latter is to be understood as both a separate discipline and a going intellectual concern. Following a discussion of Hauser’s personal and intellectual background, as well as of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Arto Siitonen (2010). State of the Art A Commentary on Wenceslao J. Gonzalez'Contribution,“Trends and Problems in Philosophy of Social and Cultural Sciences: A European Perspective”. In. In F. Stadler, D. Dieks, W. Gonzales, S. Hartmann, T. Uebel & M. Weber (eds.), The Present Situation in the Philosophy of Science. Springer. 243--255.score: 291.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Peter Sloterdijk (2012). The Art of Philosophy: Wisdom as a Practice. Columbia University Press.score: 282.0
    Building on the work of Husserl, Heidegger, Nietzsche, Arendt, and other practitioners of the life of theory, Sloterdijk launches a posthumanist defense of philosophical inquiry and its everyday, therapeutic value.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Peter Garik & Yann Benétreau-Dupin (forthcoming). Report on a Boston University Conference December 7–8, 2012 on 'How Can the History and Philosophy of Science Contribute to Contemporary US Science Teaching?'. Science and Education.score: 276.0
    This is an editorial report on the outcomes of an international conference sponsored by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF) (REESE-1205273) to the School of Education at Boston University and the Center for Philosophy and History of Science at Boston University for a conference titled: How Can the History and Philosophy of Science Contribute to Contemporary US Science Teaching? The presentations of the conference speakers and the reports of the working groups are (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gordana Dodig-Crnkovic (2003). Shifting the Paradigm of Philosophy of Science: Philosophy of Information and a New Renaissance. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 13 (4):521-536.score: 271.7
    Computing is changing the traditional field of Philosophy of Science in a very profound way. First as a methodological tool, computing makes possible ``experimental Philosophy'' which is able to provide practical tests for different philosophical ideas. At the same time the ideal object of investigation of the Philosophy of Science is changing. For a long period of time the ideal science was Physics (e.g., Popper, Carnap, Kuhn, and Chalmers). Now the focus is shifting to (...)
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Thalia Fung (2006). Philosophy: A New Knowledge and an Alternative Political Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:23-27.score: 270.0
    Philosophy can enhance communication among new forms of knowledge, existing ones, and those that will arise in light of the heuristic possibilities of the revolutions in science, technology, and thought; it can turn to a reevaluation of all of the culture that humanity has produced for its own welfare and can prevent the loss of the differentiating essences of diverse social groups. In the conjugation of the forms of knowledge, I am interested in the relationship that has emerged (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. David Evans (2007). Aristotle on the Relation Between Art and Science. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 10:21-30.score: 270.0
    Aristotle assigns positive value to artistry and its skills, placing them below science but nearby. Fuller content for this view of art can be garnered from his technical treatises, especially the accounts of rhetoric and dialectic, where the subjectivity imported by the role of audiences is explored with subtlety. These ideas have influence on later philosophy of aesthetics and of technology, and they need to be pondered by those engaged in current debate in these areas.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Eleni Gemtou (2009). Analogies, Metaphors and Models in Art and Science. Philosophical Inquiry 31 (3-4):51-64.score: 267.0
    Analogy, as the connection of similar things, is present in all fields of human thought. Art uses verbal (in poetry, literature, art criticism) and optical analogies(in the visual arts), aiming at an emotional perception and interpretation of the world. Philosophy and the sciences also use largely analogical applications, as ameans to construct intuitionally understandable theories. In Law the analogical application of laws is an efficient way to regulate social conflicts. The risk,however, of cognitive distortions, by transferring inadequately explanatory models (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000