15 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Arthur R. Miller [15]Arthur Ronald Miller [1]
  1.  29
    Arthur R. Miller (1989). Foresight, Intention and Responsibility. Southern Journal of Philosophy 27 (1):71-85.
    As the title indicates, This paper represents an examination of the relationships obtaining among the concepts of foresight, Intention, And responsibility. It begins with a critical analysis of the legal and quasi-Moral principle of the resumption of intentionality (i.E., An agent is presumed to have intended the "foreseeable" consequences of her intentional actions). It is shown that, While legally indispensable, It will simply not withstand philosophical scrutiny for purposes of ascribing moral responsibility. I proceed eventually to an evaluation of a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  8
    Arthur R. Miller (1980). Describing Unwitting Behavior. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (1):67 - 72.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  8
    Arthur R. Miller (1996). Bentham on Justifying the Principle of Utility. Southwest Philosophy Review 12 (2):133-139.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  16
    Arthur R. Miller (1980). Wanting, Intending, and Knowing What One is Doing. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (3):334-343.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  18
    Arthur R. Miller (2003). Civil Rights and Hate Crimes Legislation: Two Important Asymmetries. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (3):437–443.
  6.  11
    Arthur R. Miller (1981). Ii. Intentions and Conditions of Satisfaction. Inquiry 24 (1):115 – 121.
    This paper discusses a problem arising from the way in which John Searle marks the distinction between intentional and unintentional action (Inquiry, Vol. 22, pp. 253?80), namely, that of adequately distinguishing those events which we regard as unintentional actions on the part of an agent from those other events occasioned by or brought about as a result of his action which we (correctly) do not countenance as actions of any sort ? unintentional or otherwise. Searle's attempt to distinguish them in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  5
    Arthur R. Miller (1984). In Defense of a Logic of Imperatives. Metaphilosophy 15 (1):55–58.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8.  7
    Arthur R. Miller (1985). A Reply to Davis. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45 (3):457-458.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  9
    Arthur R. Miller (1975). The Locutionary-Illocutionary Distinction. Philosophy 50 (191):101 - 103.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  8
    Arthur R. Miller (1985). Moral Essentialism and Logical Possibility. Metaphilosophy 16 (2-3):146-149.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    Arthur R. Miller (2003). Dependent Rational Beings. International Studies in Philosophy 35 (4):349-351.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  10
    Arthur R. Miller (1982). Intention and Practical Reasoning. Mind 91 (361):106-108.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  5
    Arthur R. Miller (1974). Correct Vs. 'Merely True' Act‐Descriptions. Inquiry 17 (1-4):457-460.
    This paper is a critical analysis of David Rayfield's attempt to distinguish true from correct descriptions of human actions (Inquiry, Vol. 13 [1970], Nos. 1?2). It is argued that the analysis fails to do the job required of it for two reasons. First, the analysis of true descriptions is circular insofar as it turns on the notion of an ?unbound action?. Secondly, and independent of the charge of circularity, it is shown that the basis upon which Rayfield draws the true?correct (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  2
    Arthur R. Miller (1987). Acts and Consequences: Squeezing the Accordion. Metaphilosophy 18 (3-4):200-207.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Arthur R. Miller (1980). A Rejoinder. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (1/2):232-233.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography