12 found
Sort by:
  1. Artur Rojszczak (2006). From the Act of Judging to the Sentence: The Truth-Bearer and the Objectivisation of Truth. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 89 (1):401-419.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Artur Rojszczak (2006). Husserl, and Reinach to Twardowski, Àukasiewicz, CzeĪowski and Ajdukiewicz);• in the Criticism of Psychologism in Post-Brentanian Philosophy (Husserl, Twardowski, Àukasiewicz, KotarbiĔski);• in the Philosophy of Language (Brentano, Marty, Twardowski. In J. Jadacki & J. Pasniczek (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School: The New Generation. Reidel. 6--401.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jan Wole'nski & Artur Rojszczak (2005). From the Act of Judging to the Sentence: The Problem of Truth Bearers From Bolzano to Tarski. Springer.
  4. Artur Rojszczak, Jacek Cachro & Gabriel Kurczewski (eds.) (2003). Philosophical Dimensions of the Unity of Science. Kluwer Academic Publisher.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Artur Rojszczak & Barry Smith (2003). Theories of Judgment. In Thomas Baldwin (ed.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870-1945. Cambridge University Press.
    The dominant theory of judgment in 1870 was one or other variety of combination theory: the act of judgment is an act of combining concepts or ideas in the mind of the judging subject. In the decades to follow a succession of alternative theories arose to address defects in the combination theory, starting with Bolzano’s theory of propositions in themselves, Brentano’s theory of judgment as affirmation or denial of existence, theories distinguishing judgment act from judgment content advanced by Brentano’s students (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Artur Rojszczak & Barry Smith (2003). Truthmakers, Truthbearers and the Objectivity of Truth. In Jaako Hintikka (ed.), Philosophy and Logic: In Search of the Polish Tradition. Kluwer.
    The aim of this paper is to show that the account of objective truth taken for granted by logicians at least since the publication in 1933 of Tarski’s “The Concept of Truth in Formalized Languages” arose out of a tradition of philosophical thinking initiated by Bolzano and Brentano. The paper shows more specifically that certain investigations of states of affairs and other objectual correlates of judging acts, investigations carried out by Austrian and Polish philosophers around the turn of the century, (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Artur Rojszczak (2002). Philosophical Background and Philosophical Content of the Semantic Definition of Truth. Erkenntnis 56 (1):29 - 62.
    The aim of this paper is to show that it is the explicativecharacter of Tarski's semantic definition of truth given in his study of 1933 that allows forconsideration of a philosophical background of this definition in the proper sense. Given the explicativecharacter of this definition it is argued that the philosophical tradition that should be taken intoaccount with regard to this philosophical background is the tradition of the Lvov-Warsaw Schoolin its connections with the School of Brentano. As an example of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Artur Rojszczak (1998). Dlaczego za nośniki prawdy uważa się obiekty fizyczne? Filozofia Nauki 1.
    The question stated in the title of the article splits into two other questions. One is historical: why did Alfred Tarski choose physical objects as truth-bearers in his famous article „On the notion of truth in languages of deductive sciences”? The second is philosophical: are there general reasons for choosing physical objects to play the role of truth-bearers? In the article the thesis put forward by H. Field and J. McDowell, that it is physicalism of Vienna Circle which had led (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Artur Rojszczak (1998). Truth-Bearers From Twardowski to Tarski. In. In Katarzyna Kijania-Placek & Jan Woleński (eds.), The Lvov-Warsaw School and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 73--84.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Artur Rojszczak (1997). Od sądów do zdań. Nosnik prawdy a obiektywizacja wiedzy. Filozofia Nauki 2.
    In the article a historical and systematical presentation of pros and cons of different theories of truth-bearers is contained. Different definitions of truth-bearers are presented. In author's opinion, in the Brentanian tradition metaphysical rather than epistemological arguments for the objectivity of truth are typical.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Artur Rojszczak (1994). Prawda i oczywistość w filozofii Franciszka Brentany. Principia.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Artur Rojszczak (1990). O pewnej krytyce teorii deskrypcji. Principia 2.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation