Search results for 'Avner de‐Shalit' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Anca Gheaus (2010). Review of Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit Disadvantage. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):148-50.score: 90.0
  2. Peter Vallentyne (2009). Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit, Disadvantage (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007), Pp. IX + 231. Utilitas 21 (4):532-535.score: 90.0
  3. Kristin Shrader-Frechette (2008). Review of Jonathan Wolff, Avner de-Shalit, Disadvantage. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (2).score: 90.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jonathan Seglow (2005). Daniel A. Bell and Avner de-Shalit (Eds.), Forms of Justice: Cri-Tical Perspectives on David Miller's Political Philosophy (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002), VIII + Pp. 400. [REVIEW] Utilitas 17 (3):355-357.score: 90.0
  5. Jonathan Wolff & Disadvantage, Avner de-Shalit.score: 90.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Claire Grant (2007). Daniel A. Bell and Avner de‐Shalit, Eds., Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller's Political Philosophy:Forms of Justice: Critical Perspectives on David Miller's Political Philosophy. Ethics 117 (4):742-747.score: 90.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kristin S. Shrader‐Frechette (2002). Avner De‐Shalit, The Environment: Between Theory and Practice:The Environment: Between Theory and Practice. Ethics 112 (2):364-366.score: 90.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Peter Marshall (1993). Thinking for Tomorrow: Reflections on Avner de-Shalit. Journal of Applied Philosophy 10 (1):105-113.score: 90.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. B. Brecher (forthcoming). Avner De-Shalit, Why Posterity Matters. Radical Philosophy.score: 90.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James Connelly (2005). Andrew Light and Avner de Shalit, Eds., Moral and Political Reasoning in Environmental Practice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 25 (4):274-276.score: 90.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. J. W. Sheppard (2002). Avner de-Shalit, The Environment: Between Theory and Practice. Ethics Place and Environment 5:169-170.score: 90.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Avner De-Shalit (1995). Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations. Routledge.score: 43.0
    The first comprehensive philosophical examination of our duties to future generations, Dr de-Shalit argues that they are a matter of justice, not charity or supererogation.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Claire Grant (2008). Review of Disadvantage, by Wolff, J. And de-Shalit, A. [REVIEW] Ethics 118 (2):370-375.score: 42.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Yonathan Reshef Avner de-Shalit (2009). Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and its Place in Egalitarian Thought – Andrew Mason. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):756-760.score: 30.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Richard J. Arneson, Disadvantage, Capability, Commensurability, and Policy.score: 30.0
    In their excellent book Disadvantage, Jonathan Wolff and Avner de-Shalit (hereafter: the Authors) state that their aim “is to provide practical guidance to policy makers by providing a version of egalitarian theory which can be applied to actual social policy.”1 This is a worthy project and their execution of it is full of insight. However, I doubt that they succeed in fulfilling their stated aim.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan Wolff (2009). Disadvantage, Risk and the Social Determinants of Health. Public Health Ethics 2 (3):214-223.score: 30.0
    The paper describes a project in which the thesis of the social determinants of health is used in order to help identify groups that will be among the least advantaged members of society, when disadvantage is understood in terms of lack of genuine opportunity for secure functioning. The analysis is derived from the author's work with Avner de-Shalit in Disadvantage (Oxford University Press, 2007).
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Joshua Preiss (2011). Disadvantage and an American Society of Equals. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 14 (1):41-58.score: 30.0
    In this article I review Jonathan Wolff and Avner de‐Shalit’s recent book Disadvantage (2007), highlighting its many contributions to egalitarian theory and practice. These contributions build to the authors’ central prescription: that policy‐makers work to create a society of equals by reducing the tendency for disadvantages to cluster around certain individuals or groups. From there, I discuss the idea of declustering disadvantage in an American context, and consider its implications for the politically salient ideal of equality of opportunity. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Kristin Shrader-Frechette (2011). Taking Action, Saving Lives: Our Duties to Protect Environmental and Public Health. OUP USA.score: 30.0
    In the United States alone, industrial and agricultural toxins account for about 60,000 avoidable cancer deaths annually. Pollution-related health costs to Americans are similarly staggering: $13 billion a year from asthma, $351 billion from cardiovascular disease, and $240 billion from occupational disease and injury. Most troubling, children, the poor, and minorities bear the brunt of these health tragedies. Why, asks Kristin Shrader-Frechette, has the government failed to protect us, and what can we do about it? In this book, at once (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Avner de-Shalit (1992). Community and the Rights of Future Generations: A Reply to Robert Elliot. Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (1):105-115.score: 29.0
  20. Avner de-Shalit (2004). Book Review: Kristin Shrader-Frechette. Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002. [REVIEW] Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):140-144.score: 29.0
  21. Avner de-Shalit (2004). Environmental Justice: Creating Equality, Reclaiming Democracy (Review). Ethics and the Environment 9 (1):140-144.score: 29.0
  22. Avner De-Shalit (1997). On Behalf of “the Participation of the People”: A Radical Theory of Democracy. [REVIEW] Res Publica 3 (1):61-80.score: 29.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Daniel Attas & Avner de-Shalit (2004). Workfare: The Subjection of Labour. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (3):309-320.score: 29.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Avner de-Shalit & Yonathan Reshef (2009). Levelling the Playing Field: The Idea of Equal Opportunity and its Place in Egalitarian Thought - Andrew Mason. Philosophical Quarterly 59 (237):756-760.score: 29.0
  25. Avner de-Shalit (2003). Philosophy Gone Urban: Reflections on Urban Restoration. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):6-27.score: 29.0
  26. Avner de Shalit (2011). Climate Change Refugees, Compensation, and Rectification. The Monist 94 (3):310-328.score: 29.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Avner de-Shalit (1995). Is Liberalism Environment-Friendly? Social Theory and Practice 21 (2):287-314.score: 29.0
  28. Avner de‐Shalit (2006). Thirty Years of Environmental Theory: From Value Theory and Meta‐Ethics to Political Theory. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 9 (1):85-105.score: 29.0
  29. Avner De-Shalit (1997). Environmentalism for Europe — One Model? Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (2):177–186.score: 29.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Avner de-Shalit (2000). Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Environmental Ethics 22 (4):435-438.score: 29.0
  31. Avner de–Shalit (2003). Philosophy Gone Urban: Reflections on Urban Restoration. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):6–27.score: 29.0
  32. Avner de-Shalit (1998). What is This Thing Called "the Environment"? The Philosophers' Magazine (3):28-29.score: 29.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Dan Avnon & Avner de-Shalit (1998). Particularly with Regard to its Empirical Scope. The Inclusion of the Arguably Quite Minor Case Study of the Brent Spar Affair and the Devotion of Two of the Four Essays to the Subject of the United Nations Are Both Puzzling Editorial Decisions. I Have a Few Other Reservations About This Volume. First of All, the Collec. [REVIEW] In Stephen Everson (ed.), Ethics. Cambridge University Press. 108--661.score: 29.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Miriam Cohen Christofidis, Roger Crisp, Avner de-Shalit, Simon Duffy, Ronald Dworkin, Alon Harel, John Harris, W. D. Hart, Dan Hausman & Richard Hull (2009). Jonathan Wolff. In Kimberley Brownlee & Adam Cureton (eds.), Disability and Disadvantage. Oxford University Press.score: 29.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Avner de-Shalit (2002). John Meyer, Political Nature Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (4):291-293.score: 29.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Avner de-Shalit (2006). Nationalism. In Andrew Dobson & Robyn Eckersley (eds.), Political Theory and the Ecological Challenge. Cambridge University Press.score: 29.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Avner de-Shalit & Jonathan Wolff (2011). Of Responsibility1. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press. 216.score: 29.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Avner de-Shalit (2006). Power to the People: Teaching Political Philosophy in Skeptical Times. Lexington Books.score: 29.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Avner de-Shalit (1996). Ruralism or Environmentalism? Environmental Values 5 (1):47 - 58.score: 29.0
    Recent works on the historical sources of the environmental movement neglect environmental philosophy. They therefore fail to distinguish between two different currents of thought: ruralism – the romantic glorification of rural life; and environmentalism – a philosophy which is based on scientific information, anti-speciesism and respect for all organisms. These works, therefore, mistakenly identify 'political ecology' with right-wing ideologies.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Avner de-Shalit & Jonathan Wolff (2011). The Apparent Asymmetry of Responsibility. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oup Oxford.score: 29.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Avner de-Shalit (1994). Urban Preservation and the Judgment of Solomon. Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (1):3-13.score: 29.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Avner de-Shalit (1998). What is This Thing Called. The Philosophers' Magazine 3:28-29.score: 29.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. J. Wolff & A. de-Shalit (2007). Disadvantage. OUP Oxford.score: 28.0
    What does it mean to be disadvantaged? Is it possible to compare different disadvantages? What should governments do to move their societies in the direction of equality, where equality is to be understood both in distributional and social terms? Linking rigorous analytical philosophical theory with broad empirical studies, including interviews conducted for the purpose of this book, Wolff and de-Shalit show how taking theory and practice together is essential if the theory is to be rich enough to be applied to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Vanderson de Sousa Silva (2013). Teologia da oração eucarística II: Da anáfora de hipólito de Roma à oração eucarística II. Revista de Teologia (Reveleteo). Issn 2177-952x 7 (11):35-59.score: 24.0
    Este trabalho monográfico busca pesquisar a teologia da Oração Eucarística II, em seus aspectos teológicos e históricos. Para tanto, buscou-se estudar a Anáfora Eucarística de Hipólito de Roma em sua obra – Traditio Apostolica, este é um texto patrístico do século III, onde se encontram alguns aspectos da Liturgia em Roma. Investigando o texto anafórico hipolitano constata-se que a Comissão responsável pela confecção das novas Preces Eucarísticas retoma o texto anafórico de Hipólito de Roma. Nosso artigo busca possibilitar o conhecimento (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Juan Cano de Pablo (2007). La aplicación física de la geometía astral como confirmación de la teoría Kantiana del conocimiento. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 40 (1):161-183.score: 24.0
    La aparición de las geometrías no euclidianas o astrales parecían contradecir la filosofía de la matemática de Kant. Éste había contemplado la posibilidad de una geometría suprema, pero la desechó por que no se relacionaba sintéticamente con la experiencia. Sin embargo, a principios del siglo XX Albert Einstein desarrollo la Teoría de la relatividad e hizo de ella una teoría de la gravitación. Esta teoría, conocida como Teoría de la relatividad general, confiere al Universo una estructura no euclídea. En este (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Lisardo San Bruno de la Cruz (2006). La crítica de Putnam a la noción de "referencia" en Fodor. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 39 (2):93-109.score: 24.0
    El presente artículo expone la crítica de Putnam sobre la noción de "referencia" en Fodor. Tal noción supone analizar el uso de condicionales contrafácticos y el uso de relaciones de dependencia asimétrica que realiza Fodor en Psico-semántica. De acuerdo con la concepción de Putnam, lo que se propone Fodor es naturalizar el discurso semántico-intencional; esto es, de lo que se trata es de ofrecer una reducción de la relación de referencia que no recurra a términos semántico-intencionales. Putnam concluye que no (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Luis Mariano De la Maza (2012). La interpretación antropológica de la Fenomenología del Espíritu. Aportes y problemas. Revista de Filosofía 68:79-101.score: 24.0
    Este artículo se refiere a una línea de interpretación de la Fenomenología del Espíritu de Hegel que tiene en Alexandre Kojève a su exponente más conocido e influyente. En ella se privilegian los aspectos antropológico-existenciales e histórico-políticos por sobre los aspectos lógico-sistemáticos de la obra. La exposición se divide en dos partes. La primera está dedicada a la lectura de Hegel realizada por Kojève en su célebre curso dictado entre 1933-1939 en la École Practique des Hautes Études de París, y (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Yolanda Ruano de la Fuente (1987). Para una teoría crítica de la sociedad en E. Fromm. Logos: Anales Del Seminario de Metafísica 22:107-140.score: 24.0
    Este artículo de homenaje a la Profesora Yolanda Ruano se divide en dos partes. En la primera discuto las críticas que ella realizara a mi libro sobre la diosa Fortuna en las que avanzaba su propio análisis de las complejas relaciones entre razón y fortuna en el pensamiento occidental. En la segunda parte, desde el punto de vista del “giro icónico” en humanidades y ciencias sociales, analizo el caso concreto del auge y desaparición de la diosa Fortuna en la iconografía (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Juan Cano de Pablo (2008). Algebra de la experiencia (o de cómo puede ser entendido lo no directamente intuible como parte integrante de la experiencia posible) y su aplicación a la Teoría de la relatividad. Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 25:457-482.score: 24.0
    El problema fundamental para que la Teoría de la relatividad pueda ser acorde con la filosofía de Kant es el de la utilización de una geometría no euclídea. Que sus principios sean interpretados como juicios sintéticos a priori es, a nuestro entender, un problema secundario. Si queremos que los principios de una ciencia de la naturaleza sean universales y necesarios sin recurrir a dogmatismos, no queda otra posibilidad que entenderlos trascendentalmente. Como se observa en el principio de relatividad, Einstein también (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Julio de la Vega-Hazas Ramírez (2009). La ética civil como factor de cohesión en la sociedad pluralista. Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 26:195-205.score: 24.0
    La llamada "moral civil" tiene tres características principales: es una "ética de mínimos", es plenamente racional, y se establece por consenso. Sin embargo, la ética no se mide por el número de preceptos, y los sistemas éticos no pueden ser clasificados por un criterio de cantidad. Más aun, es un punto de partida falso considerarla como un pensamiento racional uniforme frente a una pluralidad de creencias religiosas. Y si el consenso es sólo el resultado de una votación, puede fácilmente convertirse (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000