8 found
Sort by:
  1. Aysel Doğan (2011). On the Priority of the Right to the Good. Kant-Studien 102 (3):316-334.
    Rawls's view that the right is prior to the good has been criticized by various scholars from divergent points of view. Some contend that Rawls's teleological/deontological distinction based on the priority of the right is misleading while others claim that no plausible ethical theory can determine what is right prior to the good. There is no consensus on how to interpret the priority of right to the good; nor is there an agreement on the criteria of teleological/deontological distinction. In this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Aysel Doğan (2010). Cosmopolitan Principles of Distributive Justice. Prolegomena 9 (2):243-269.
    Cosmopolitans hold that our duties of distributive justice to others do not stop at borders. Darrel Moellendorf is among those who defend the view that principles of distributive justice are applicable beyond borders. He suggests as a principle of international justice the global difference principle, which allows inequalities in the distribution of wealth and resources only if they are to the greatest advantage of the least advantaged individuals. In this paper, I try to indicate that Moellendorf’s argument for the global (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Aysel Doğan (2010). Kozmopolitanska Načela Distributivne Pravednosti. Prolegomena 9 (2):243-269.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Aysel Dogan (2010). Liberalization in International Trade. Filosofia Unisinos 11 (2):130-140.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Aysel Dogan (2005). Confirmation of Scientific Hypotheses as Relations. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (2):243 - 259.
    In spite of several attempts to explicate the relationship between a scientific hypothesis and evidence, the issue still cries for a satisfactory solution. Logical approaches to confirmation, such as the hypothetico-deductive method and the positive instance account of confirmation, are problematic because of their neglect of the semantic dimension of hypothesis confirmation. Probabilistic accounts of confirmation are no better than logical approaches in this regard. An outstanding probabilistic account of confirmation, the Bayesian approach, for instance, is found to be defective (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Aysel Dogan (2005). Justification and Reliability. Epistemologia 28 (2):269-282.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Aysel Dogan (2004). Aristotle on Conceptual Awareness of Sensory Experiences. Philosophical Inquiry 26 (4):27-44.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Aysel Dogan (2004). The Law of Peoples and the Cosmopolitan Critique. Reason Papers 27:131-148.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation